I'm sure the name calling on that site could match yours word for word, probably worse, my point was at least there is some action being taken there to right some wrongs, I don't see that.That's what an activist does, takes action. I am disappointed in your forum, there is simply no substance and no point in further wasting my time. Go on, fart all you want....LOL
1. But I thought you said there was no name calling on DD, only facts? Now you're saying there is name calling, and that it may actually be worse than ours. Make up your mind, please.
2. Filing a lawsuit is not "taking action" when the lawsuits are so baseless that they repeatedly get dismissed.
3. No point in wasting your time, yet I'll bet $10 you'll post at least three more times before 5:00 PM...
Ok ... so you work in Scranton Jean ... do you live here also ... just wondering?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Then she'll have lost the bet. If we're too pointless for Twisted Sister / Jean Yale, then we would be too pointless for Quiet Riot / Slacks Harvard too...
it must be her turn to post quickly here ... you know we had Shari and she left now we have this twisted one!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Let's not forget that Milo and 'whats-his-name-didn't-actually-live-in-Scranton'. Personally I can't wait for it to be AntisemiticMovements turn here. I want him to tell us how to spot an Imported Jew (as they all look alike to me).
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Maybe he can also help us to learn to identify all members of the ICN! That would be great wouldn't it?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Well when she makes the statement that she works here I can assume that she does not live here ... and what I'm really thinking is this ... What does the hired public officials have to do with you dear? Especially if you only work here ... I'm still wondering ....
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I take it back when I said you people are like high schoolers, it's more like kindergarten. I would not know the poster from DD if I fell over them. I was simply trying to make a point that you people are all talk (drivel), and no action. From an observers point of view, Joe P. must strike a nerve in you or you would not give him this kind of attention, you would simply ignore him. Like I a going to do to you, after Ifart and take a bath........
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot" FIRST OF ALL I HAVE NO AFFILIATION TO ANYONE IN POLITICS IN SCRANTON, I AM NOT RELATED TOANYONE ON THIS SITE OR THE DD WEBSITE. I DO WORK IN SCRANTON AND HAVE BEEN INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT WHAT REALLY GOES ON WITH OUR HIRED OFFICIALS. I HAVE BEEN READINGTHE POSTS AT THE DD WEBSITE FOR ABOUT THE PAST SIX MONTHS AND HAVE GONE THRU MOST OF THE POSTS AT THIS SITE. I MUST SAY, THE DIFFERENCE IS NIGHT AND DAY. THE DD SITE ALWAYS HAS INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT ACTION IS BEING AGAINST CORRUPTION AND ALL YOU SEE HERE IS "HIGH SCHOOL " NAME CALLING,MOSTLY ABOUT JOE P. AND THE DD WEBSITE. WHAT ACTION HAS ANYONE TAKEN HERE TO HELPMAKE THINGS BETTER FOR THE TAXPAYERS OF SCRANTON? DRONE ON,I'M GOING BACK TO DOHERTYDECEIT.
By stating that "THE DD SITE ALWAYS HAS INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT ACTION IS BEING AGAINST CORRUPTION", you implied that they were above name calling. Where would they find the time, what with all the well documented facts they're posting.
Of course, you also said "DRONE ON, I'M GOING BACK TO DOHERTYDECEIT" and then later on you said "I am disappointed in your forum, there is simply no substance and no point in further wasting my time."
And yet, HERE YOU STILL ARE!!!!!!!!
You can't even keep your own word for twenty minutes. Whatever, enjoy your weekend romp though our site this weekend. We'll clean up when you leave.
OH geeeeeeeeeeeezzz another one! I get busy for a couple of days and look what happens. OK who left the door open?? Huh?? Who?
Oh and twisted?? Please give me one example of something Joey has done that has changed anything in Scranton for the better. Oh and while your at it how about one example of one thing Miss Jan has sponsered and passed at City Council that has changed anything in Scranton for the better. :) Since they both do sooooooooooooo much one example shouldn't be hard. I will even help you....errrr lets see.....<muttering> Joey needed Doherty gone to help Scranton ......... wooops not that one....failed on the that one big time. Oh Oh oh the park ..there's one... the park... oooooooo never mind no ...not that one. Oh well I can't think of one but maybe a super joebee like yourself can come up with something??
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 11:13, 2007-07-21
Super Jobie ... now I wouldn't call Twisted that ...
Oh and I was the one who forgot to close the door .............. again ........... I'm sorry! I will try and remember to close it when I leave next time.
Question to twisted sister ... second request actually ... you make the statement:
:::::::::::::FIRST OF ALL I HAVE NO AFFILIATION TO ANYONE IN POLITICS IN SCRANTON, I AM NOT RELATED TOANYONE ON THIS SITE OR THE DD WEBSITE. I DO WORK IN SCRANTON AND HAVE BEEN INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT WHAT REALLY GOES ON WITH OUR HIRED OFFICIALS.::::::::
So now I will ask again ... I can assume that you do not live here ... and what I'm really thinking is this ... What do the hired public officials have to do with you dear? How do they directly impact you seeing as though you do not live here ... you work here ... I'm still wondering .... I'm still waiting ... see you hit and run our site and never answer questions ... Did Daddy Pilchesky send you? It's your turn at bat is it .... can you tell me who is coming over next ... please oh please tell me it's Fay "Foam at the Mouth" Franus ... I would find that terribly interesting ... or maybe Miss Jan herself ... can't wait!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Oh and Paul I was thinking ... maybe we should hire someone ... a cleaning staff to clean up after these jokers ... just a thought!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
RE: Judy violating our first ammendment rights There will be absolutely no sympathy or respect for Gatelli, Fanucci or McGoff. I'm going to tee off on all three of them over the next several months. Enough is enough. They're corrupt, disloyal, betraying dogs who have a date with the truth. She tries that out-of-order crap with me and she will definitely find herself in the federal courthouse in a heartbeat. Who does that no good, deceitful, two-faced, fat-assed, crony liar think she is? She's never been embarrassed and humiliated the way she's going to be when I step to that podium, and my wife just might follow me up there. Out with the truth with these political scum, all three of them. She will be made an example of so the future crony candidates for council will see what they will be in for when they betray the people. I'll have a few one-on-one discussions with McGoff, too. There's another useless crony dog who needs a good public thrashing on his voting record.
Hell cometh to council, and I'm going to be the delivery boy.
I just thought that this was the best place for this post ...
Now isn't this what you would call planning on being disruptive at a meeting ... I think it is ... but that's just my opinion ...
Isn't this why Sam Patilla is in trouble ... just a little food for thought Joey ... you must want to go through what Patilla is going through.
Not that I care ... I think it would be pretty funnyto see you hauled out in cuffs and taken downtown and booked ... but that's just me! I don't think your going to speak anyway ... I believe you have posted intentions to speak before on your board ... and well I know that I made sure I watched ... and nothing ... you are more comfortable at your keyboard than you are at the podium.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
NOOOOOOO - according to the dipsticks across the hall, Sam Patilla is in trouble simply because he is black. According to them, none of the crackers got any citations.
Poor Sam. Always the scapegoat - maybe if he opened his mind before he opened his mouth - maybe if he stopped beating his wife ... oh, sorry, did I say that out loud?
:::patting pockets ::: now where did I put that disclaimer?
Now Phoenix why would they need to do that?? Doesn't DD get hundreds of thousands of hits every hour? LOL LOL Isn't there thousands of posters registered? Why would they need anything more than "that" exposure to fill up several petions?? Only 89 signatures huh? Maybe you dunces better start walking up to the truth about your so called "revolution" LOL LOL You don't have enough people to fill up one of our local Church's Hall never mind have a revolution. LOL LOL LOL 89 signatures and we probably count for at least 15 of those LOL LOL
RE: Times Leader ONLINE petition? Joanne has the link under Important Links with a sticky. Ozzie should get some of his people out to the neighborhoods and get some signatures, or do some flyer type of advertising.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 01:11, 2007-08-01
::: ... You don't have enough people to fill up one of our local Church's Hall never mind have a revolution. ... ::: I've got a broom closet for the lot of them (and might even have a little extra room left over for a broom or two).
::: I would love it if Les Spindler came to by door asking me to sign just such a petition. Can you imagine. ::: Ag, you've just made me all warm and fuzzy thinking about Les Spindler at my door. I would hope he would call before he comes so I can spruce myself up a little. I'd make him turn around so I could gaze at his fierce arse while I signed that thang.
RE: Commonwealth Court vs. McDowell today Please don't let Quigley give you a warm and fuzzy feeling. I looked at some of his rulings and they leave me cold, very very cold. He does not appear to be the kind of guy who can make an independent decision. He either wants the parties to get together to 'work it out' [What, avoid litigation? Why Attorney Cashuric just the other days said that the job of an attorney is to discourage litigation, therefore I would think it reasonable and admirable for a judge to want to do the same] or he looks for an 'IDENTICAL' case to make his ruling [I believe that the concept is called 'precedent'.] Failing to get that 'identical' ruling, he falters. [That's code for "How dare that trained legal mind not make decisions that agree with my extensive experience as themom! The audacity of someone, just becasue they went to Law School, severed time as a practicing attorney, because a judge, blah, blah, blah! Why that's just as bad as those Theoretical Physicists claiming to know more about Comsic String Theory than I!"] Don't be fooled by this guy, check his record! [That's code for "I spent a few minutes looking at this guys record, saw a few things I didn't like and therefore this guy sucks". With that kind of stellar analysis, it's probably pretty safe to say that everyone can be judged at sucking at everything.] Sorry, I don't mean to pi## on your hopes, but I don't want to be lulled into believeing that right is right and right wins all the time, or even most of the time. Love the fight you are doing and you are right, but don't let being right make you think that the ruling will be fair. Unfortunately, life is far from fair!
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Twisted sister, you sadi DD list facts, I am sorry to see you play "follow the leader'' Why is it a fact? Because an a s s said it? Go on DD and SAY one thing Joey doesn't like, you'll be warned, say something else and you're banned. If you think that is a good discussion then go back across the street with the othersheep. Go ask JOEY Why he hasn't shown up at a meeting a spoke in two years? WHY cause he is nothing more than a cyber bully, and no one over there has the balls to ask him why. If you like to be lied to and you think that following an a s s is good, please go do it. IF YOU HAVE TRUE QUESTIONS TO DEBATE ASK THEM, OTHERWISE GO FLOOW THE REST OF THE SHHEP. SUCKS TO BE A FOLLOWER DOESN'T IT, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE LEADER IS WEAK.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 08:48, 2007-09-15
Sorry twisted sister before you start I appoligize for the fast fingers. Again I challange you to put Joey on the carpet and ask why he has so much to say on the web but never at the podium. Other wise you are a useless follower.
Can I ask that we not call anyone inbred ... I don't like that ... it's a request ... lets hold ourselves to a higher standard here at PD ... Please????
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I can't rightly sit here and claim to be offended when Anti calls Irish inbreds ... so I ask that we please try to hold to the same standards that we would like to see the DD'ers hold to ... not that the do or ever will ... but we can have more class here ... can't we?
I prefer the word idiots ... Thank you Doomers!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.