There is no doubt in my mind that this is someone using Joe Pilchesky and Ray Lyman's name ... but lets be as polite as we can ... and in case it is Mr. Pilchesky I want him to feel comfortable posting here as long as he stays within the boundaries of our Rules of Conduct.
By this I mean we will tolerate no threats, nothing that is not backed with proof ... we shall not have any "Calling for information On" threads ... and no Avatars that are not appropriate for this site. Any Avatars or posts that go against our Rules well the Moderators have permission to edit. Just be sure that you send me a copy of any of the Deleted Pilchesky Posts. As this site has rules and we stick to them .... we do not operate in the same style as the DD site.
If it is Mr. Pilchesky I am happy to have him as a member as there are many questions that the Pilchesky Deceit members have for him.
Lets welcome him members ... and ask him all of the questions that you have been wanting ask.
Lus Site Administrator
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 11:29, 2007-03-31
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
It has been quite a while since I have posted in this particular thread ... but this one qualifies for the Hypocrite of the day ... so here we go! Take a look at this!
City Council Watcher Posts: 46 Date: Fri Apr 13 7:41 PM, 2007 Views: 153
RE: Hold the pepperoni on Piccolino I've never seen Piccolino at council other than this past year when he was trying to speak about his eminent domain issue. Doesn't mean he isn't a good guy, but I think someone who is interested in public service is usually seen around town involved in more things. Some of the other ones don't work for me either, Popil, McGoff, Bolus.
First off I would like to ask this poster ... when was Janet Evans first appearance at a Council meeting ... Oh that's right ... when she was sworn in ... Most do not attend Council Meetings before they become a councilman/woman ... and then they don't attend after leaving office ... Bob Bolus (and I'm no fan of his) does attend ... and Mr. Piccolino ... does attend ... let me just say this ... most people do not attend until they have a problem ... Even Les Spindler has a problem ... that's why he goes ... for god sake he's always got a problem.
You city Council Watcher are the recipient of they Hypocrite of the Day award ....
-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 15:34, 2007-04-14
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Maybe that's what they want???? God knows they haven't had much success when they push for a candidate to win ... so maybe just maybe they have figured this out ... who knows.
Now I'm the one talking of conspiracy ... I'm getting parinoid just like them ... well maybe not just like them ... but pairnoid non the less.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I was surprised to see this at the end of one of the old man's more tame posts today
::: Stay focused and keep composed. That's what dignity looks like. Stay confident and proud, that's what pride looks like. Stay strong in numbers and spirit, that's what success looks like. And lastly, stay vigilant against oppression and the attempted suppression of your civil rights. That's what an American looks like. :::
I had to re-read it to make sure I read it at DD - and I am oh-so sure theold man's next post had to have said something about someone's sexual preference, drug inducement, alcohol abuse or pornographic tendencies. Just as I am sure his prior post pi$$ed on the leg of Parker, Doherty, Sietzinger or Hayes.
He knows his bacon is real close to the fire so he attempting to wrap himself in a shield of baseball, Gramdma's apple pie, and the Flag. Afterall this whole thing was about being a "good" American right? Not about being a mean vindictive troll right?? Come on... you guys remember don't ya?? It's Joey... the guy we all know to be the just the best American alive!! YAAAAAAAAAAA!!
RE: City Union's candidate debate - or was it a roasting? This 18444 character has a lot to say but offers no substance. I find it sad that sheep and kool ade drinkers such as 18444 have so little to offer that they post outrageous statements but provide not proof. In typical, I cannot think for myself, style, these sheep demand that we provide proof that what they say is a lie. Well, no more taking the bait for me. You make a statement of that ilk then I think you should be ready to prove it either by reputation here or with fact. If you cannot do that YOU ARE PROVING YOUR ARE A LIAR! I know most other posters agree because I am sure they are as tired as I of idiots making asses of themselves.
RE: City Union's candidate debate - or was it a roasting? This post is addressed to KACHMAN18444. Sir might I ask that you, since you made the statement as if it were fact, list all the policeofficers and firefighters and what their connections are. I do mean all of them the whole 150 firefighters and 140 policeofficers. Since you put your post out there as fact, I am calling you on it. We don't want to hear Jeff Gilroy because he is some shirttail relative of the mayor. We want ALL 290 connections. If you cannot provide that then you, my good man, have proven yourself to be a liar.
*****We have a double award today......it goes to both of these posters, now all of a sudden they want someone to show proof of what they are stating....How about that, but they can post any lie and not show any proof.....
I think the news on Joey in todays paper (under the political heading) qualifies for todays hypocrite of the day (actually more like "of the year") According to the report Joey registered to vote in 1999 (where the heck was he before that?) and has voted 5 times since 1999. Since there are two voting opportunities per year and since there have been 7 voting years to date since 1999, that means Joey has voted 5/14. that puts him at 35% voting record.
Wow, he sure isquite the political activist, greatest american alive, better than Clarence Darrow, Lawyer,Doctor, Judge,Jury, and the list goes on....
How embarrassing!! I guess despite his many many many perfected skills, finding his voting booth was just too difficult for him. Pathetic!
I have your poster gets the award today ... now imagine that ... Curley Joe is always telling everyone that it is so important to vote and that the way to make a difference is through the vote ... and who turns out to be someone who does not even try because he's tooooo busy waxing the Vette ... or he can't pull himself away from the keyboard ... Curley Joe you make me sick ... and the posters over there why the hell do they listen to anything you say ... you do not live by your own words ... typical ... that's what you are ... a typical loudmouth ... a typical bully ... you my friend are just typical ... nothing special at all!
Thanks for that information IHave ... I have not read the paper yet today!
Lus
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
RE: Is Fanucci's advisor trying to sabotage her, or is doing it to herself? She is a product of a few ingredients. She is the product of what money can buy. Hubby coughed up the bucks to get her elected so he could make a clean split. (who could blame him?) She it the product of a apathetic electorate. Many people don't bother to vote and many others vote without really knowing for they or what they are voting.
Anyone with half a brain only had to speak to her when she was running to realize that she is a moron. Heard a few words of one of her campaign speechs and got the he!! out of dodge. Her claim to fame was because some grand relative of hers could make spagetti sauce. Sweet lovin' Mary are you serious? And she beat out people like Chris Phillips, no wonder we are in trouble~
Now I would say that the DD rats are the Blind rats because they are blind to the ways of Curley Joe ... Come on 3BlindRats ... you are not even serious ... because surely you all claim to know what kind of man Curley Joe is ... so then you all knew that he is a non voter for the majority of the time ... so I guess this particular post qualifies you for out award ... but hell you have to share it with your mentor ... but you should be honored to be sharing it ... you all love him so much and hang on his every word .... and jut to quote you "No wonder we are in trouble~"
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
RE: If Connors supports Gatelli then so do I TB, free speech can be shown by putting signs on one's lawn. Here's an article from Bradford, PA, where private citizens were criticizing the mayor by putting signs in their front yards without a permit, and they were cited for violating the sign ordinance. After they sued the town, the ordinance was changed to allow signs like that for 60 days without a permit.
My point is, in order to change the way the government is run in this town, we have to not vote in candidates who have the strong smell of 'connectedness' about them. At this stage of the game, there are very, very few who run for office who are not politically, or captialistically connected to city politics and government. Joe Gatelli is too close to those connections for me to feel comfortable electing him to a position that can influence the awarding of contracts, raising of taxes, policy of the school, and hiring teachers and staff. It's not a far reach to see the conflict of interest between him being on the school board and his daughter looking for a job in the school district. A temporary job that she already received at NEIU, was given to her although there were others higher on the list. Also, any policy he votes for or against directly influences his wife, Judy Gatelli, who is a nurse in the school district.
-- Edited by Joanne Pilchesky at 18:07, 2007-05-05
WOW, is all I can say about this.....Now correct me if I'm wrong, but it was ok for Janet Evans to be on the school board, while she was also on the teacher eligibility list in Scranton, but not Mr. Gatelli because his daughter is looking for a job, and from what I hear she does not even want to work in Scranton. Secondly, any policy he votes on will directly influence his wife......hello pot this is kettle...if that is her reasoning for not giving Joe Gatelli a vote, then she sould also not vote for Chris Phillips because his wife is a teacher in the district....oh abd by the way his child attends Catholic School and Paul O'malley's daughter in law is also a teacher in the district.....I don't feel the need to continue becausze as you can see everyONE is connected in one way or another.....One last note.....maybe Joanne doesn't really even vote, just like her husband.....
Paul O'Malley's son works there also ... but ... what's that got to do with anything because as I stated once before ... you won't be able to find a person who does not have some sort of realative ... because in the city of Scranton the SSD is the largest public employer ... could be the largest employer right now ... check it out ... so chances are it will be hard to find someone who doesn't have friends and relatives working there ...
How about we go on their experience ...
and Ducky you are right about Janet!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I was not trying to step on toes again, but there reasoning is for not voting for someone is so flawed it is ridiculous, I was just tryng to state that they are hypocrites and anything little miss Jan does is ok, they did not give her a hard time, but they are all over Gatelli, that was the only point I was trying to make, and if we are going to go on experience *which by the way is how I will vote, I would definitely want somene who has worked is the district, they know it best....sorry if I offended anyone
Ducky I absolutely understand the point you were trying to make ... and I agree with you that it is wrong ... I don't believe that we have any of the Directors ... well maybe one or two out of 9 that have no relatives working for the District ... so I agree with you that their reasoning is ridiculous ... and Jan well her son is a teacher for the district as well so why she slams Judy on a regular basis for her daughter geting a temporary position with the NEIU is beyond me ... by the way Jan's boy is an appointed teacher.
I think that educators are more likely to make better directors ... because they know what they need in the classroom ... they know what it's going to take to educate the children ... and well Mr. O'Malley he will know what it's going to take to fix and maintain buildings ...
You didn't offend me ... I was just trying to make a point.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
i keep getting angry that most of the council "speakers" don't have jobs. marie schumacher doesn't really live here. she talks city business like she's been here all her life. what sort of job does that ozzy character have? ray? do these people contribute to the community in any way? do they volunteer their time at st. francis? at st joe's? do they want to volunteer for city clean up? i doubt it.
As to your question, we are still trying to figure out if Lee Morgan actually lives in Scranton...let alone what he (or some of the others) do for a living, although we do know that Fay 'Foam@the Mouth' Franus does work for the water company.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Yes indeed welcome Vince.Yes Fay does work for the water company. Its funny though as she seems to be able to call the Sue Henry show, which is on between 9-11:45am. Hummmmmmmmmmm she's not making calls on comapny time is she?? WowI bet she would faom every so much more at the mouth if one of the people she doesn't like did that at work. Well as her mentor, little miss Jan, does the same thing. I guess she thinks its ok!! I wonder if her boss would feel the same way?
Fay was at the meeting last week with a Cane, so maybe she got hurt at work and is taking a little time off, I also see her logged on at various times during the day.
Apparently this rule only applies to posters that they like.... if they don't like you anyone can try and "out" you.These posts have been up awhile and no reprimandor "edit".........way to be a hypocrite Joannie!!
RE: Gatelli Countersues the Pilchesky's... Antisystemicmovements wrote: Dukie,what explains the fact that they skipped Harcore? I am sure I could find a few other examplesPlease be mindful of admin policy that forbids identifying posters, either directly or indirectly, by name or by association. I know that some posters have aligned themselves with city employement here, or at least claimed to, but that's unverifiable information. The less 'they' know the better. The gauntlet has been dropped. They want a war. We're going to give them one they'll never forget courtesy of Judy Gatelli.
RE: Sam??? WHAT THE? "So get your facts straight you 2 lying racist pieces of pro-doherty trash (crazy otto & notscare)"
I think he meant council crazies & notscaredwoman
Council crazies or shouldI say Les what has happened to you? All of a sudden your backing Judas and Dumbass, whats the matter Jimmy not writing anything for you anymore.... Your just a Doooobeee in training at this point I think. You were there and you are going after Sam instead of "sold out" Newcomb who really is responsible for this. I guess it was your first meeting since you think that the officer has to listen to Judy, not to mention the fact that he was wet behind the ears and had no idea how to handle himself to begin with.
RE: Sam??? WHAT THE? Les you there???? Council Crazies its funny how you joined this site to dig up info on Hubbard during the election but never before, huh...... Your posts basically started and revolve the Hubbard write-in, looking out for your buddy Novembrino huh. Les I think that your a plant in the meetings and a plant to get info for the dooobbees, what were you promised new curbs? Whats Jimmy think? If you think that Sam is wrong here then you are blind to the bigger issues, Newcomb was planted there to cause a scene to play into Judas and the mayor and trying to stop the people from being heard, you go to the meetings and you honestly think that Sam was wrong, it has nothing to do with Judas baiting him and trying to get him to blow up and then Newcomb throws the final match on the fire to set Sam a blaze and justify what Judas has been trying to do with the speakers. Les just stay home if you do not have the stomach for this anymore and wait for your curbs ok buddy.
Issues the City would like us to forget about Prior to this post, I only posted budget items. "LEGION OF DOOM" A NAME GIVEN TO COUNCIL SPEAKERS BY THE LOCAL TABLOID EDITORIALISTS. JUST TO BE FUNNY IN A MOCKING WAY, SOME OF THE SPEAKERS WEAR T-SHIRTS WITH "LEGION OF DOOM" ON THEM. NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. IN FACT, STACY BROWN, THE TIMES REPORTER HAS ONE"LOWEST OF LOW", "LESS THAN DESIRABLE", "NOT WRAPPED TOO TIGHT", "FELONS", "MENTALLY CHALANGED", "FREAKS", "LIARS", "PATHETIC", "LOW LIFES", "ANKLE BITERS", "CLOWNS", "CRAZIES" "HALLOWEENERS", "INANE", "MALCONTENTS", "HIJACKERS", "SMALL MINDEDNESS" " FEEBLE MINDED THUGS", "INTIMIDATORS", "LUDACRUS", "LEGION OF DUMB". HIGH CITY ELECTED OFFICIALS, A LAWYER, NEWSPAPER EDITORIALISTS AND CARTOONIST HAVE CALLED COUNCIL SPEAKERS THOSE NAMES, THIS, IN MY OPINION TO DISCOURAGE THE SPEAKERS FROM COMING TO COUNCIL TO SPEAK ON ISSUES CONCERNING THEM. EDUCATED PROFESSIONAL PERSONS RESORTING TO NAME CALLING. WHAT A TRAVESTY WHEN PROFESSIONAL PERSONS RESORT TO CALLING NAMES, LIKE CHILDREN. PRICELESS.
Oh Nelson I can understand your outrage after all no one would every resort to name calling over in that cesspool you post at, swim in, and call home. It's priceless alright and also qualifies you for "Hypocrite of the Day" award. Congrats!! Hey Nelson stick to the budget numbers you normally post, you won't sound like such a jerk like you do in this post!
Wow Dingo (dave) you have the nerve to accuse Daily Double of being racist? What makes you think only white males own property? Wow Wow I can't even comment further I am in shock with this *******'s comment, beyond saying you win today's Hypocrite of the Day award.
Dingo8MyDoobee Posts: 31 Date: Sat Jun 9 10:56 AM, 2007 Views: 23
RE: ABOLISH JUNIOR COUNCIL Daily Double wrote: I still think only property owners should vote and have a voice in how tax money is spent - that's what Thomas Jefferson believed, and that's good enough for me! I'm a Jeffersonian! so, i guess you're alright with only men and whites being able to vote.okay - just so i know where you stand. can't have it both ways.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 11:36, 2007-06-09
Give them hell IHave ... I agree 100% ... and I think your last two posts say it all!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Got love this! I have to conclude after reading the thread that someone jumped on Dave Evans and Joey removed the post. Last time I checked anyone even remotely related to a public figure was fair game for this pack of rabid savages including their minor children and grandchildren, not, however, the dumbo and her, shall we say, slightly short of a full deck husband. Way to be a hypocrite Joey!! Do you actually think people don't pick up on this stuff? News flash for ya baldy.. they do!!
What's more you can think again about the fact that he is not running for office and therefor not open to scrutiny,if someone runs for office you can bet your bottom dollar that their spouse will be scrutinized as well. Scrutinized not savagely attacked, by the way, there is a difference.
RE: A question for Joe about Janet Evans Make a left at the next intersection. Dave Evans is not running for office, nor is he holding any political job. If you want to discuss how he handles any part of anyone's political campaign, knock yourself out. How he handles himself extrinsic to that arena, yet intrinsic to personal relations, is inappropriate for discussion here. This is not a coffee shop. Thank you.
...Judy Gatelli's daughter and granddaughter are fodder for discussion and rumor mongering at DD, but David Evans is NOT??
This is just as good as the infamous Pilchesky "why free speech does not apply at DD" posting.
TO THOSE FROM DD THAT READ THIS BOARD (and we know you do): If you can't see the hypcrisy in Pilchesky's post, then I am sorry, you really are a bunch of retards.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
It's a DD Double Standard ... if they like you ... well then your family is not open for discussio ... if they do not like you then your family is fair game we have seen this over and over ... I would list all that have had their families personally attacked but the list would take forever ... Janet's family seems to be the only ones that are not open for discussion.
Janet can miss as many meetings as she wants/needs to ... Judy misses and well all hell breaks loose ... she should give back her salary ... but Janet more than likely in the DD world deserves a raise ...
And Ag we knew how long ago that free speech is not free speech at DD ... we disagreed with them so our free speech was taken away ... but when we pull our heads out of the sand (can you hear me laughing) we can all post again ... they couldn't pay me to post on that site ... and I would never change my beliefs in order to regain posting rights ... Janet Evans Sucks ... and DD Blows!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.