You know you've finally become SOMEbody when the get-a-c-l-u starts calling YOU. And they tell you to cut the $hit and quitcherbitchin

I can imagine the eyes of the ACLU lawyer(s) rolling as they read through some of the DD postings...especially Anti's rants on racism and the IBEW (damn, I meant ICN).

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Oh my God he finally won one!

Joe Pilchesky



Posts: 601
Date: Mon Mar 5 12:50 PM, 2007
Views: 114
Quote | Reply
Judge Mazzoni orders the Business Admin's Office to fess up check for $134,621.14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A check for that amount was written to the city of Scranton out of a UDAG account, which is an account used for economic development. I found it odd that Atty. Carl Greco had sued the city for the precise same amount for services rendered. He got an uncontested judgment for that amount. In a Right to Know letter, I asked the BA's office to explain in writing why that amount was first written to the city of Scranton, and then Atty. Greco obtained a judgment for that amount at the same time. That office refused to respond, so I sued them for the information under the Open Records Laws. Below is an Order issued by Judge Mazzoni that directs the BA's office to provide any documentation relating to the issue of the check.

You'll see only pages 1, 6 and 7. Pages 2, 3, 4 and 5 are just review of facts as the developed. You need Adobe Reader to access the file, if you don't have it, click on www.Adobe.com to get it first and then come back here to read the file.

http://www.dohertydeceit.com/Udagfundsorder2.28.07.pdf#page=1





Antisystemicmovements



Posts: 536
Date: Mon Mar 5 2:15 PM, 2007
Views: 50
Quote | Reply
RE: Judge Mazzoni orders the Business Admin's Office to fess up check for $134,621.14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Joe Pilchesky wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A check for that amount was written to the city of Scranton out of a UDAG account, which is an account used for economic development. I found it odd that Atty. Carl Greco had sued the city for the precise same amount for services rendered. He got an uncontested judgment for that amount. In a Right to Know letter, I asked the BA's office to explain in writing why that amount was first written to the city of Scranton, and then Atty. Greco obtained a judgment for that amount at the same time. That office refused to respond, so I sued them for the information under the Open Records Laws. Below is an Order issued by Judge Mazzoni that directs the BA's office to provide any documentation relating to the issue of the check.

You'll see only pages 1, 6 and 7. Pages 2, 3, 4 and 5 are just review of facts as the developed. You need Adobe Reader to access the file, if you don't have it, click on www.Adobe.com to get it first and then come back here to read the file.

http://www.dohertydeceit.com/Udagfundsorder2.28.07.pdf#page=1




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joe,

Great job on this victory. If they have nothing to hide they should have nothing to fear, right? This is the same argument they're using to install cameras in sections of the downtown. It's too bad they don't live by that philosophy.




__________________
The ICN love Notre Dame football, Syracuse Basket Ball, St. Patrick's Day, beer and, of course, their beloved children. However, they love their property value more.


There will be no living with this Bald Bastard now .... he actually won the right to get information ... I call that a Big GD victory ... Good Job Joe!

Haffa loser is better than no loser at all...