Paul, you gotta give Mr P a break here...this is probably the closest he's ever come to winning, so its definately cause for celebration in DD land. Usually at this time he's at the stage of asking for 'dirt' on Judge ___________ (insert name of judge here...any judge will do).

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

I'm with Paul on this one - no breaks for the chosen one.

Maybe if he starts walking on water (unfrozen please) and turning water in to wine I'll give him some props. Come to think of it, if he turns water in to wine no one will be able to drink it. Didn't he say all of the bars will go out of business because of the smoking ban?

Denied.

Schadenfreude is beautiful, wouldn't you agree, old man?  I guess you wouldn't know; you've never experienced it as nothing you've done has been sucessful yet.  Trust me, it's nice.  As long as your ego controls your actions, we'll have it in spades over on this side of the fence.  If you weren't such an arrogant useless prick, we might actually have a shred of sympathy for you.  Instead, watching the nail get hammered once again has been delightful. 

You're a Cub fan, aren't you?

EDIT:  Did anyone else notice that after the old man posted, "BAR Members" posted almost immediately afterwards, blowing sunshine, using the same metaphors and similies that the old man does?  Joe, do you even bother trying anymore?  This is one of your more obvious socks (registered yesterday, posting today, shamelessly kissing your shrivled ass, "we can't announce ourselves, as you can imagine" *cough*horse*****cough*).  Put forth some effort next time, please.  You're getting lazy in repeated defeat.

-- Edited by Paul at 11:38, 2007-01-03

Thanks, Art.  I have more.

Another gem from one of the low-post count-kissasses in the linked thread:

"Lynetts Berlin Wall" posted: "...It sounds so selfish, but so many others can't do what you are capable of doing."   (emphasis mine.)

What he's capable of doing?  What has he done, exactly?  Surely you can't be implying that not everyone is capable of losing almost 20 lawsuits in three years.  Anyone off the street is capable of losing 20 lawsuits in such a short period of time. 

Well, maybe you have a point, after all.  Most of us would have realized our suits were frivolous and pointless after four, maybe five beatings.  Not the old man, though.  He's acting with his own ego in mind, not the city's or people's best interest, as he claims. 

It's been said that it's unfair to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.  That must be what he means when he says the judges are unfair. 

Lynett's post also reminds me of a line from a movie.  "They said you aren't fit to sleep with pigs.  But I defended you.  I said you were." Jack Moniker (Robin Williams), Club Paradise.