Wrong is wrong. I firmly believe that the U of S and every single person involved in the theft of the Complex knew it was a theft right from the start, to include Councilmen Murphy, Gilhooly, McCormick and Hazzouri; Mayor Doherty, Council Solicitor Hickey, Senator Mellow, Father Pilarz, Carl Greco, Paul Walker, the U of S Board of Directors (which Lynett sits on), the SRA and Judge James Walsh, to name a few.

If my standing is denied by Judge Mazzoni, I will simply have no choice but to have a fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud and unjust enrichment lawsuit filed in order to bring all the ugly truths and facts out into the open in this matter. They are not only ugly, but they involve weatlthy businessmen, such as Louis DeNaples and several lofty Legislators and Senators. A fax exists that ties many of these people together, and I have a copy of it. It was a fax issued by Carl Greco. I've kept it under raps until now, but it will be an exhibit in the lawsuit. I had hoped these unethical people would do the honorable thing in the face of legal challenge, but they did not. Instead, they raised the bar. Intensified the challenge. So, it is done. This action will be filed before Christmas, maybe next week, so I'm not going to wait on Judge Mazzoni's decision to act on it, whatever he dicides. I'm a patient man, but not stupid. I believe the U of S will resell most of that land to those who own land around the Complex, if it has not already. The statutes on fraud is 6 years, so perhaps I'd be better off doing the same thing with the golf course.

I'LL SUE THEM ALL FOR FRAUD AND IN ADDITION, I'LL FILE A FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT FRAUD CRIMINAL COMPLAINT. Rising tides can lift any ship.

-- Edited by Joe Pilchesky at 00:06, 2006-12-07
 

Where does he get these fax's ... I really would like to know ... and again we have Joey P suing the world for anything he can think of ... if he is so for the taxpayer then why the hell does he keep spending tax dollars on lawsuits ... does he not think this contributes to the financial problems of this city ... 

posted by Granma 12-08-06

::: Janet is the only one that really cares. And is voted down. I am trying to see what way Bill is really going. ...   :::

Sure she is voted down - by her buddy.  She can't even get per partners in crime to stick by her side. That's how far out in left field SHE is.

This was added 1 minute after my trip but it should be considered a part of the above post ... here you go ... get a load of this Bullsh**.

Joe Pilchesky
Posts: 214
Date: Sat Dec 9 8:32 AM, 2006
Views: 4


Quote | ReplyRE: It took some muscle to get to Chumster

Today's trip reveals

Antisystemicmovements



Posts: 223
Date: Mon Dec 11 3:57 PM, 2006
Views: 26
Quote | ReplyRE: non-combative word from the other side....

---

TIM wrote:

---

Manny wrote:

---

First and foremost, there are many good Irish/Catholic people who live in Scranton who are not involved in any way with what is referred to as the ICN.

I do not fully understand this statement.  So according to you being Irish and "affiliated" to lawyers, doctors, priests, buisness owners ect...is not ok.  Because according to you all of the ICN people are the citizens that have worked hard and made something of themselves.  Trust me nothing is ever handed to you.  You work for it.  Any of the people you have problems with can attest to that. 

ICN is a biased and wrong thing to say.  Agree or disagree with me but that is how i feel.

---

The ICN didn't "work hard" to, as you say, "make something of themselves." They've inherited what they have. They Network their way to the top. They steal, plunder and cheat. To top it all off: they don't leave the area (not even for college) and they intermarry.

Want to earn my respect? Just admit that you're a scumbag ICNer and that your mommy and daddy got you your job. Just admit you have it easy and that you work to undermine other people. Just admit that you got the job because you're a good Irishmen (as opposed to a bad non-Irishmen). Just own up to it. Stop trying to explain away everything you have as if you really worked for it--- at the very least, you should let the people who actually did work for what they have feel satisfaction and pride.

The term ICN just about sums it up. This network is a system. That is to say, it has rules, boundaries and works relationally. There is relational rank and status within the system, of course.

__________________
The University of Scranton took the "Adopt a Park" campaign a little too seriously.    

*********************************************************

I am almost ashamed that I am Irish .... NOT!  I can't even believe the nerve of this particular guy ... WOW is all I can say ... if you are Irish and you have anything in this life ... like say a job ... you must be a part of the ICN network ... are you kidding me ... you know what I will admit that I am Irish ... I grew up poorer than poor ... of that I will never be ashamed ... My parents had nothing ... but taught me the value of hard work ... and I work hard for what I have and I work hard to maintain what I have ... there have been times in my life that I have worked 3 jobs at a time ... is that a privilege .... I'm just wondering ... you need to get over the fact that you are nothing more than an Irish wannabe ... that's your problem ... you wannabe Irish and well I am guessing that you are not Irish.

I just couldn't resist ... this is the new WTF moment of 2006.  This is a post from DD by the admin himself.

RE: McGowan baseball field is going to go great with.....

This is not Tim's first time visiting the board, is it Tim? You suffer somewhat from de inofficioso testsmento, but not from an egocentric point of view. Good debates predicated upon facts are always ad lucrandum vel perdendum, and the effort should always be ad jungendum auxilium to be authentic, don't you agree? Ad punctum temporis you chose to only ad prosequendam instead of ad rectum absent facts ad tunc et ibidem, and to the adnocumentum of others inconsiderate of adnihilare. Now, you run pro defectu exitus due to the pro defectu justitiae nature of your pro indefenso. We will consider your previous contributions restitutio in integrum absent social sans frais and with the consideration of sans impeachment de wast as a courtesty since you were clearly vis inermis. We wish many vulgo consepti upon you for wasting our time once again. When you return, if you do, consider the following: Certa debet esse intentio et narratio et certum fundamentum et certa res quae deducitur in judicium. Remember, we are not enchanted by the threat of another Clausula vel dispositio inutilis per presumptionem remotam vel causam ex post fact non fulcitur. Farewell.

... and then a half-assed explanation to the remedial masses

RE: McGowan baseball field is going to go great with.....

Since Tim likes Latin so much, I used it to tell him that he came with nothing, left with less, he was a pain in the ass while he was here, and if he comes back, bring something beyond his ususal sandbox-level foreplay.

Who the hell is he kidding?  PIG Latin, maybe...

Well guess what...the more towns that start charging insurance companies for responding to an accident, then you can bet the insurance companies will raise insurance rates.

If the city wants to make money with the police, then have them sit on the Scranton Expressway pulling over all the cars that do 80 mph in a 50 mph zone.  They'll make a mint in just a day, and it will hlp slow people down in this city already and make it safer to drive.

EastOGreenRidge
Posts: 7
Date: Thu Dec 14 1:44 PM, 2006
Views: 39
RE: Illegal Immigrants and Stats from the LA Times

I was at a restaurant on the Scr/Carbondale Highway last week.  I'm not stating an instance for racial profiling here, but please hear my case. Six individuals of Hispanic descent walked in.  Two males, approximately 20-25 yrs old,2 females same age description and two infants.  As the server came up to them, she asked for their drink order.  All of the adults ordered alcoholic beverages.  As the first one was asked for identification, he indicated that he had none, nor did the other patrons at that table. Moreover, they got quite angry with the server for not heeding their wishes, even after she explained the legal implications involved.  Now,considering they had to drive to that highway location, doesn't it sound odd that NONE OF THEM had any identification on their person, whatsoever?  As my significant other asked me if I overheard this conversation, I indicated that it did seem quite odd, as we both have ID on us whenever we travel outside of our homes.  Now it's just my opinion, but I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that they weren't legal.  How did they get the driver's licenses that they supposedly didn't have on them to drive to the restaurant?  HMMM?  I can understand ONE member of a party forgetting an ID, BUT ALL FOUR ADULTS?  Something's rotten in the State of Denmark here.  I don't wan't to hear how there's no illegal immigrant problem in Scranton anymore.  Doherty, stop pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining.

[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]

This is probably the only post at DD that did not make me rol my eyes.  I wish I could have seriously responded to this post there. 

Am I the only one concerned that four adults intended to drink alcoholic beverages and still get behind the wheel of a car along with two infants?  You know if they were sold one, they would have ordered more.

YES, boot their illegal asses out, but keep the children here so they can be taken care of in a proper manner.  I'll bet they were smoking around the kids too.  This might sound like I'm a big Pollyanna, but that really pisses me off. 

Speaking of "granma," her posts are painful to read.  My four year old can put together sentences and use the English language better than she can.

If someone is just not intelligent, I won't look down on them, but when "granma" decides to look down on others and even criticize their grammatical errors, especially Tim (remember him, the guy who went to "COLLEDGE"), I have to criticize someone like that.  Or how about how she criticizes Sherry Fanucci's grammar?  I have never heard Sherry talk, but the impression I get from people on that site is that her grammar is pretty bad, BUT I still think Granma has no right to critique others' grammar.

I think Granma needs to spend more time doing things for her grandkids or baking cookies, rather than wasting pretty much all of her time posting on DD.

I was reading "Talkback 16" and came across "Granma's" other half....."Granpa."  There has to be a relation, just look at the grammar:

By: granpa
Posted: Tuesday, 7:32 PM

smokers have rights to. if you dont want to got to a place that allows smoking fine. just like watching tv. you dont like it change the channell. go someplace that you like.

I wanted to get this copied over here before JoJo deleted it.  You'll not see much of this at DD.  It's lengthy, and a good read

From first-time DD poster - Joe Kizanu -

::: Hi.

I've been perusing this site for a while. Not with an interest in the content within, rather getting my fill of the most recent conspiracy theory / wacko rantings. A few of the things I've read recently have given me pause and forced me to join the community and put my two cents into this insane asylum passing as a message board.

So here's a list of things which have been culled from recent threads that I felt must be commented upon:

1) Joe Pilchesky is not an egotist.

This is patently false. Joe's all about getting glory and headlines for...well...not for the greater good. It's for Joe. Just reading how absorbed he is in himself leads one to that conclusion. Plus we all know, if he really gave a **** about any of the plethora of lawsuits he's filed he'd hire a lawyer and persue them. At least he'd have a shot at winning one. Or, even better, he wouldn't be wasting our money finding out what every first year law school student learned in Constitutional Law, i.e. taxpayer standing is almost never appropriate. Congrats on spending several thousand of our tax payer dollars to find that out, you f-ing nimrod.

2) Joe's becoming more popular with the public.

This is laughable. It's common knowledge that DiBileo lost because he failed to distance himself from fruitcakes like Joe. He went from a statistical tie to nearly losing by a two thirds majority. People think Joe's crazy and probably dangerous (due to his criminal background). Someone said that the Courthouse employees have respect for Joe. That, too, is laughable. The secretarial / administrative groups roll their eyes, and fight back a guffaw. The legal staff usually shake their head and mutter profanity. It's no wonder, you obviously have no idea what you're doing legally.

Let me ask you something Joe, what do you do when some noobish moron tries to come on a work site and tell YOU what your job is? Well, that's a lot like what you're doing to these legal professionals.

The pained look in the Judge's eyes isn't sympathy for you. I heard Munley winced when you started talking about "Sunshine Act" standing...in a petition for a Preliminary Injunction. Hint: It wasn't cause he had to rule against you and you were right.

3) There's a County-wide conspriacy to ensure / prevent "X", "Y", and "Z", Judge Mazzoni's recent decision proves it.

Just no. There's no such thing. Judge Mazzoni is still a great guy. You lost because you don't know what you're doing. No one put "the squeeze" or anything else on him. Frankly, I like Judge Mazzoni a lot. He's a good man, and I was extremely dissappointed by the fact that you and others on your site implied his decision was based on something other than the law.

Here's an original thought for you:

Maybe you, the completely untrained and novice legal scholar, were just plain f-ing wrong. Ever cross your mind, you dipsh-t? Instead you imply someone with Mazzoni's integrity abandoned the law? You're a f-k, you're not worthy to lick his shoe. Pathetic.

4) Joe is a serial plaintiff.

Yes. However, to my astonishment, someone stated this as though it was a GOOD thing. Bwhahahaha. I hope you keep doing it, because soon the GA will take action against this. Cites cannot be ground to a stop by some imp with malicious intent, soon you'll have to show that your case has merit before you're allowed to file. That'll be a sad day, but apparently it's necessary to stop yahoos like you from gumming up the works with tons of innane lawsuits.

5) Joe's going to find out what Dragonetti and Rule 11 mean soon.

Also true. Having read several of the posts here I've discovered several which tend to indicate that the filing of many of Joe's lawsuits are not only negligently done, but are also "vexatious, harrassing and obdurate". I saw one particularly eggregious one where he stated he could drag out one against Judy Gatelli for a long time. I made a copy of it, so when he institutes that case I'll forward it to opposing counsel. It'll be nice to have Joe paying the WHOLE bill for the lawsuits he files (and not just the filing fee). I hope the City's attorney's bill at a rate which will substantially wipe out his "savings" in a very short period of time.

I'd tell you to stop Joe, but watching you get continuously crushed like a bug is entertaining. I'd forego disturbing you at all, except I'd like you to stop wasting my money with your pointless jacka-sery.

Ta. :::

And after only a few minutes - here is a portion of the final paragraph of JoJo's reply

::: You have your head way up your ass, my friend. Your next post of that nature will be your last. We have no time to stroke the blissfully blessed here. ::

Should we expect anything else??

This was just such a silly question that I had to put it here ... this Guy or Gal makes a lot of sense ... what do you think?

Joe Kizanu
Posts: 2
Date: Wed Dec 20 8:00 PM, 2006
Views: 212


Quote | ReplyRE: THIS JUST IN: 61 MAY BE TOSSED ON JAN. 11

MagnumPI wrote:

---

1st Amendment Rights:

ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU,

ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU,

ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, ACLU

DID I MENTION THE ACLU.

---

wonder no more ... there would be Lee Morgan ... he has always attended ... even though it's rumored that he lives in Chinchilla ... go figure ... and Fay ... sorry to say Fay would still go ... because she also went before the cameras were there ... but that's about it ... the meetings would be over rather quickly.