Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Had to grab this before "politically speaking" is liberally added.  Key points in red (by me).

***********

If I decide to stay beyond Jan. 1, 2012 I will have a different agenda.  For example, You, the people, generally speaking, will become a direct target.  The unions will also become a target because they don't belong so politically situated. The Evans camp will become a target beause that camp, for as much potential as it has, has a screw loose and its name is Dave Evans. That motherfvcker has to be somehow silenced. I don't know if a bullet to the head would do it because there can only be concrete between those two ears.  Janet deserves far more respect from someone so close to her, and it pains me to write this, but it's time to put the big girl panties on and shove something down Dave's throat that'll silence him. It's that or suffer the future. Efforts to silence him have been in vain. He's a selfish, insecure, immature, self-centered idiot with no concern or consideration for the thousands of supportive people who put Janet where she is. She's never going to be the mayor of this city with Dave's tongue clearing to way to the political cemetery. I'd personally choke the life out of the bastard myself if I didn't know him to be a great grandfather.

***********

 

You can link to the thread here.

David Evans may not be the most sane individual to reside in Scranton, but I'd give his sanity a notch above that of Joe Pilchesky.

Come on Glenn, come to Joe's defense.  Please.  Please.  Pretty please, with chocoalte sauce on top.  Defend the "community activist" now.  

 



-- Edited by Agamemnon on Saturday 29th of October 2011 04:43:09 PM

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Wow ... I knew he wasn't going away ... and the pretty much tells it ... so does this mean the Joe is now a Doherty supporter?


__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Nahhh, I just think it means he's nuts.  Kind of ironic in that he is threatening David Evans.  By the way I did grad a screen capture of the original post, pre-the inevitable editing by Pilchesky.

 



__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Nothing to defend.  It wasn't "politically speaking" or anything of the sort.  It was as close to an online threat as one can get without actually explaining how and where one is going to do the "silencing".  Joe knows my view on how one can only go so far in disguising a terroristic threat.

Of course, Dutch's bravado doesn't help, either...especially since his wife's political career is rapidly heading for a flush.

GC



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Glenn Cashuric wrote:

 

Of course, Dutch's bravado doesn't help, either...especially since his wife's political career is rapidly heading for a flush.

GC


Yes I agree I think the target of the threat is always somehow responsible for the threat! WOW Glenn!! I think you better reevaluate whether hanging around with a crazy is having a negative effect on you.  Oh and we are still waiting for your defense of your “friend” banging other babes while married!!  Did you notice this post mysteriously disappeared?  Think it was asking all the “wrong” questions?  Maybe it is getting too hot in the kitchen <errr…bedroom> ?

RE: (Kids 4 Kash, Lack. Cty) Officially announced: Feds convene Grand Jury to investigate Guardian Ad Litem Program, Ro


 

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date: Oct 28 9:15 PM, 2011
 
Printer Friendly

Well I have said my piece and been ridiculed for my feelings and opinions, but that is ok. However I really feel bad for Mrs. Pilchesky and I am sorry to see how very little support there seems to be for her and her feelings from this group, who she has helped out so much over the years. I am asking each of you to ask yourself the following question Have I read any posts from Mrs. Pilchesky that says this situation is ok with her?? She sure has had plenty of opportunity to comment on this issue if she felt so inclined. Doesnt anyone but me find that curious?



 



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


I understand how anxious you occasionally can be to jump to a conclusion, but the "you know where to find me" response does nothing to help the situation.  My position was crystal clear.  I think it crossed the line.

GC



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


and the part where he has started banging random females as opposed to his wife and the occasional bowl of wheaties........your position on that is....???



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


He's a selfish, insecure, immature, self-centered idiot with no concern or consideration for the thousands of supportive people...

Is he talking about Dave or himself?

 

P.S.  Janet wll never be Mayor of Scranton, period.  That's a fact.



-- Edited by Paul on Sunday 30th of October 2011 05:16:56 PM

__________________



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Copied from the first post to this thread:
"If I decide to stay beyond Jan. 1, 2012 I will have a different agenda. For example, You, the people, generally speaking, will become a direct target. "

As I posted on another thread, I think joe was given the ultimatum -- you've crossed a line this time and you either shut the site down, or spend some time in the pokey alongside the missus.

So, he shuts the site down that he is currently operating, revamps the name to something like "Hello Scranton, I'm Ba-aaack!", and "you the people" will be targets because you didn't shovel the snow in front of your house in a timely manner ... and the politicos will take a little breather.

he's not going anywhere , trust me

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


I really don't think he is going anywhere either ... I say he shuts it down for a day or two waits for the kids across the hall to beg him to come back ... it feeds his ego and then he makes the big announcement that he is cominig back by popular demand ... he needs them to beg him.


__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Although, knowing that Mr. davetomkoevans has an asskicking on his schedule gives me half a woody.



__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


lol brat! lol

 



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


"Mr. davetomkoevans"

 

LOL...that's funny.

 

Who would win in that fight?  My money is on David.  Why?

...he's nuts, and crazy people are better fighters (i.e. Mike Tyson)

...he's not eldery like Joe

...he actually has some motivation/something to fight for (Janet*)

 

Joe Pilchesky on the other hand...

...is, like, elderly

...in the absence of a tire iron, he has no proven fighting skills

...David will most likely not be sleeping or drunk 

...has no core motivation, other than his own ego

 

 

(*) Note that I'm not going to claim that she is actually worth fighting for



-- Edited by Agamemnon on Tuesday 1st of November 2011 05:46:31 PM

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 88
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


Lol. Pilchesky, gets worked up very easy, its not hard to hit a nerve on him. After beating him in a pissing contest about a month ago, I recently had a passing with him. Prior to the pissing match he was so fake nice trying to push my buttons, because he had to try to discredit me for his new model as a I was a witness in a legal proceeding. I was as equally friendly, smiley and fake, wich he was not expecting, it was very evidable what his intentions were, as he failed to get under my skin. After an online pissing contest that I made a lot of eye browse raise to many people, I ran into him at another court proceeding w his new superstar model that looked like she hadnt slept in a month, kind of like the photo someone posted of her on here. Any way I approached Joe the same way he approached me very kind and nice, and asked him how he was doing ( like I really gave two ****s)Only this time he gave me a dirty look and turned his back on me. It was such an awesome feeling knowing I beat him at his own game.


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Joe Pilchesky: Direct Threats to David Evans
Permalink  
 


NICE! ;)

 



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard