Had to grab this before "politically speaking" is liberally added. Key points in red (by me).
***********
If I decide to stay beyond Jan. 1, 2012 I will have a different agenda. For example, You, the people, generally speaking, will become a direct target. The unions will also become a target because they don't belong so politically situated. The Evans camp will become a target beause that camp, for as much potential as it has, has a screw loose and its name is Dave Evans. That motherfvcker has to be somehow silenced.I don't know if a bullet to the head would do it because there can only be concrete between those two ears. Janet deserves far more respect from someone so close to her, and it pains me to write this, but it's time to put the big girl panties on and shove something down Dave's throat that'll silence him. It's that or suffer the future. Efforts to silence him have been in vain. He's a selfish, insecure, immature, self-centered idiot with no concern or consideration for the thousands of supportive people who put Janet where she is. She's never going to be the mayor of this city with Dave's tongue clearing to way to the political cemetery. I'd personally choke the life out of the bastard myself if I didn't know him to be a great grandfather.
Wow ... I knew he wasn't going away ... and the pretty much tells it ... so does this mean the Joe is now a Doherty supporter?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Nahhh, I just think it means he's nuts. Kind of ironic in that he is threatening David Evans. By the way I did grad a screen capture of the original post, pre-the inevitable editing by Pilchesky.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Nothing to defend. It wasn't "politically speaking" or anything of the sort. It was as close to an online threat as one can get without actually explaining how and where one is going to do the "silencing". Joe knows my view on how one can only go so far in disguising a terroristic threat.
Of course, Dutch's bravado doesn't help, either...especially since his wife's political career is rapidly heading for a flush.
Of course, Dutch's bravado doesn't help, either...especially since his wife's political career is rapidly heading for a flush.
GC
Yes I agree I think the target of the threat is always somehow responsible for the threat! WOW Glenn!! I think you better reevaluate whether hanging around with a crazy is having a negative effect on you.Oh and we are still waiting for your defense of your “friend” banging other babes while married!!Did you notice this post mysteriously disappeared?Think it was asking all the “wrong” questions?Maybe it is getting too hot in the kitchen <errr…bedroom> ?
Well I have said my piece and been ridiculed for my feelings and opinions, but that is ok. However I really feel bad for Mrs. Pilchesky and I am sorry to see how very little support there seems to be for her and her feelings from this group, who she has helped out so much over the years. I am asking each of you to ask yourself the following question Have I read any posts from Mrs. Pilchesky that says this situation is ok with her?? She sure has had plenty of opportunity to comment on this issue if she felt so inclined. Doesnt anyone but me find that curious?
I understand how anxious you occasionally can be to jump to a conclusion, but the "you know where to find me" response does nothing to help the situation. My position was crystal clear. I think it crossed the line.
and the part where he has started banging random females as opposed to his wife and the occasional bowl of wheaties........your position on that is....???
Copied from the first post to this thread: "If I decide to stay beyond Jan. 1, 2012 I will have a different agenda. For example, You, the people, generally speaking, will become a direct target. "
As I posted on another thread, I think joe was given the ultimatum -- you've crossed a line this time and you either shut the site down, or spend some time in the pokey alongside the missus.
So, he shuts the site down that he is currently operating, revamps the name to something like "Hello Scranton, I'm Ba-aaack!", and "you the people" will be targets because you didn't shovel the snow in front of your house in a timely manner ... and the politicos will take a little breather.
I really don't think he is going anywhere either ... I say he shuts it down for a day or two waits for the kids across the hall to beg him to come back ... it feeds his ego and then he makes the big announcement that he is cominig back by popular demand ... he needs them to beg him.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Lol. Pilchesky, gets worked up very easy, its not hard to hit a nerve on him. After beating him in a pissing contest about a month ago, I recently had a passing with him. Prior to the pissing match he was so fake nice trying to push my buttons, because he had to try to discredit me for his new model as a I was a witness in a legal proceeding. I was as equally friendly, smiley and fake, wich he was not expecting, it was very evidable what his intentions were, as he failed to get under my skin. After an online pissing contest that I made a lot of eye browse raise to many people, I ran into him at another court proceeding w his new superstar model that looked like she hadnt slept in a month, kind of like the photo someone posted of her on here. Any way I approached Joe the same way he approached me very kind and nice, and asked him how he was doing ( like I really gave two ****s)Only this time he gave me a dirty look and turned his back on me. It was such an awesome feeling knowing I beat him at his own game.