Believe it or not, Pilchesky does not meet the criteria for "public figure".

GC

Word on the street is Dr tarapchak needs supervised visits for her four year old, and she is not allowed have the child over night. I guess her ex husband has schuylkill county payed off too, give me a break!!!!! Joe p is just the man, he has done so much for her since he's been involved. Not

Ya and while you are explaining your logic....tell us how you feel about your good buddy across the hall tossing Edith out for the "new babe"!!

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Saturday 29th of October 2011 08:48:29 AM

 

 

Question for the room. Is testosterone a prescription medication? Attachments   View image __________________

Joanne Pilchesky Status: Offline Posts: 2151 Date: Nov 7 9:23 AM, 2011	This is a test wrote: Question for the room. Is testosterone a prescription medication?  What does this have to do with this discussion? __________________ Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty. - Thomas Jefferson
Like a rented mule Status: Offline Posts: 122 Date: Nov 7 9:30 AM, 2011	Is there a doctor in the house?

grammy wrote:

---

Joanne Pilchesky Status: Offline Posts: 2151 Date: Nov 7 9:23 AM, 2011	This is a test wrote: Question for the room. Is testosterone a prescription medication?  What does this have to do with this discussion? __________________ Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty. - Thomas Jefferson
Like a rented mule Status: Offline Posts: 122 Date: Nov 7 9:30 AM, 2011	Is there a doctor in the house?

---

I know a younger guy doctor tarapchak wrote testosterone for. He was in his mid twentys, he has the pharmaceutical records. What she did was draw her own blood and send it to the lab to make it look like a low level so she could be in the guidelines to prescribe him it. A you man' natural test levels should be anywhere from a 250- 1100 count. The lab results of the blood she turned in was 20, there is only one way it is physically possible that specimen could have been my friends. And that is if he had no testicles. Them levels are unheard of in a male of that age. And a simple physical and blood test is going to prove it. One might ask what her motive might have been to do this? She abuses her privileges as a doctor to get what she wants. I guess that's one of the reasons she has supervised visits only and no custody of her children, she clearly puts herself in positions were she puts drugs, booze, and men befor her own children. It would not Suprize me one bot if she has Joe on painkillers, testosterone and or viagra.

Edith strikes back...

 

Joanne Pilchesky (Guru)

2011-11-10 12:51:34

RE: (Kids 4 Kash, Lack. Cty) Dozens of Family Court staff have been served with a subpoena. Time for a protest.

Joe Pilchesky wrote: I've been contacted by a group of women who have an interest in having a sit down with the Honorable Judge Trish Corbett.  The common denominator among these women is their sexual/relationship history with XXXXXX relating to the now infamous XXXXX v. XXXXXX case that continues to toil in a lack of justice due to XXXX XXXXXXXXX's influence over the court. When is the day coming that Corbett overrules affluent influence and does the right thing here?  XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, who has repeatedly proven herself not to be a either drug addict or drunk, as often claimed by XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, and who has never once in her life abused any of her children, still cannot have unsupervised visitation, while XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, with documented proof of his abuses under Corbett's nose, has primary custody of them.  When are these kids, who know the truth, going to find themselves on a witness stand to make things right?  What's the problem here?  Why is XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX being so blatantly protected by Trich Corbett, and rewarded with primary custody on top of that?   Some of these women are related to XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, some by blood and some by marriage. At least one looks like she could be his daughter. The problem is they don't want to be in the same building as XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX because the mere sight of him would turn their stomachs, so they are seeking to get into the judge's ear somehow. They also fear retaliation, because one of XXXX traits is to threaten women.  I'm not sure a private metting with Corbett is possible under the court's strict rules. They'd likely have to submit themselves to testimony at a hearing petitioned by XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX. When is she going to start fighting fire with fire? When talking to these women, a lot of sexual terms coming rushing forward, like pervert, abuser and pedofile. One is a well known stripper. My advice to XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX is to come forward with a Petition for Modification and slam XXXX the Sexual Predator with his own sexual history, and hope each of these women will come forward. Or, just aubpoena them. At the end of the day, XXXX might find himself submitting some DNA.  Every child deserves to know who her father is. Joe, I'm upset and disappointed that you are posting stuff like this. Last I checked XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX is a grown adult and is fully capable of posting these statements on her own, if she so chooses to air her dirty laundry. She is a member of this message board and can post under her own name. This group of women should be referred to Melanie Naro, XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX's attorney, for Melanie to follow through on, not you. What has gone on between these two parents is none of your business to pubicly interfere with, other than to factually document how the court may have mishandled this case. You have put every poster who participated on this topic at risk for indentification. And, YOU HAVE HARMED ALL OF THE XXXXXXX CHILDREN BY POSTING SUCH ADULT RELATED CONTENT AS IT IMPUGNS THE REPUTATION OF BOTH XXXXXXXXX AND XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX.

-- Edited by Agamemnon on Thursday 10th of November 2011 05:36:27 PM

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

I am actually (gulp) proud of Edith.  Maybe this is the first honest thing she has done in years.  

The question is this:  is Joe going to give her the Internet boot (to go along with the marital boot)?

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

uhohhhhh Edith may have grown a set finally!!!

 

Joe Pilchesky Status: Offline Posts: 10425 Date: Nov 11 6:11 AM, 2011

Printer Friendly cannonball wrote: What happenned with the war of words with JOE and JOANNE??? Hours ago they were at each other backs. She pulled the posts, not me. She's unjustly imposing her admin authority, for now.

Hummmmmmmmmmmmmm either Edith has had a relapse orrrrrrrrrrrrrrr the "for now" comment was prophetic and Joeyboy has now wrestled control off of Edith thus she may not be in control of her own account at this point.....

Personally I think it is the latter choice!

 

Joanne Pilchesky Status: Offline Posts: 2154 Date: Nov 11 9:24 AM, 2011

Printer Friendly Joe Pilchesky wrote: cannonball wrote: What happenned with the war of words with JOE and JOANNE??? Hours ago they were at each other backs. She pulled the posts, not me. She's unjustly imposing her admin authority, for now. Joe is right. I took control over a situation I had no business in. Thank you all for your participation on the message board, it has empowered many people, both participants and readers. It is a place where I no longer belong. God speed.

After several hours of anguished and threatening conversations, control over the board was given up willingly. The time, the money, the effort and the loyalty was not appreciated or reciprocated and the disrespect of being publicly humiliated revealed his true feelings about his wife.

There may not be much to contribute on 'this side of the hall' as you like to put it, but being provided an opportunity to explain is appreciated.

It is not my business to sit in judgement ... I have opinions ... god knows I hav opinions ... I do believe that Edith has been led down a path that she probably never would have take had she not met Joe Pilchesky ... that is just an opinion ... and we all do deserve an opportunity at redemption. Welcome to PD ...

Ooooooo....Joe is such as "bad ass" (said in Stewie Griffin's voice).

-- Edited by Agamemnon on Saturday 12th of November 2011 07:09:34 AM

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

"...This was an attempt to give Joe a chance to do the right thing ..."

 

Admirable concept, but you DO realize that you are dealing with a guy who makes a habit of doing just the opposite, right?

Example: the time he blamed a suicide on the Mayor.  Then, just to put an exclamation point on doing "the wrong thing", he creates a fictional African American character ("Twisted Brother")...complete with insulting "ebonics-esque" language...to bolster his mock case.

Somehow I think "the right thing" isn't in his lexicon.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.