What happened to that long post about the Tarapchak case? That was interesting and we were all waiting to hear about that.
I have been accused of posting intentionally false information.
The post I put up earlier in this day was the accumulation of two things: First, there were many accurate facts as I know them, since I was very closely involved in certain aspects of the case as time passed. So, they were accurately stated. Secondly, I relied upon sources to recite what I believed was Judge Corbett's final decision in the case. Granted, I have been extremely prejudiced to the benefit of Dr. Stephanie Tarapchak. I have been nothing less than aggressively hard on Alex Tarapchak. One reason for that is that there are two things in the world I hate. One of them is a man who abuses women, particularly, the mother of his own kids. From the beginning it was my agenda to stop him and punish him. I believe I've assisted with the former, the latter contemplates resources.
For everyone's information, I have to rely on sources because I was named as a witness on the Alex Tarapchak side right from the beginning. He never called me as a witness, but he wanted me out of the courtroom permanently, so that's how he accomplished that. Good move on his part. Witnesses are not allowed to be in the courtroom, so I was frozen out of hearing things first hand and I had to rely on sources for whatever information I did get.
After I posted up the original comments on the case earlier in this day, I was contacted by both sides advising me that some of the information I had posted was not accurate. For example, I had posted that the final disposition of the case was that Judge Corbett ordered the parties to counseling and things would then start fresh. Apparently, that may not be the case.
Objections came forward that Judge Corbett additionally ordered either both parties, or just one party, to obtain more mental and emotional recovery that what I had posted. I initially posted that it was counseling.
I regret any error in reporting, and I cannot now rely on either side for full and accurate information. It's not that one side or the other gave me false information, but it's possible one side or the other didn't give me ALL the information that would have better represented what Judge Corbett ordered. After all, there was plenty to talk about. Then again, when a judge is talking in the courtroom, you don't really know what's going to end up in an order until it's written. Things can very easily be taken out of context. But, the point is, I wasn't in the courtroom when the judge spoke.
I am not in the possession of a court order or an opinion, or I'd have posted it up.
I will order the transcripts. I will also get a copy of Judge Corbett's final disposition in this matter. I'll post both when I get them and let them speak for themselves. Until then, it's my personal view that regardless of whatever the judge ordered as help for any of the parties involved, Alex Tarapchak's goal of destroying the mother of his children has been defeated. It was a good effort, that much I'll say.
__________________
"Justice doesn't have to be fair, equitable or honorable - it just has to be justice"
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Monday 26th of September 2011 09:35:16 PM
What gives? I thought Joe was this Internet tough-guy who always said "just go ahead and sue me!"?
What's more, if his "sources" were incorrect in this one, could it possibly be...just wondering...if maybe some of his "sources" on other topics are just as equally suspect?
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I have no idea why it posted that slimeball's post twice but it is fixed now.
Second
Agam you should be ashamed of yourself suggesting those bottom feeders are not reliable sources.....you don't by any chance actually read the paper or watch the news do you???.... You heathen!!!
Third
Joeyboy isn't being a pansy again is he??? He should be posting some homophobic comments soon to proof he still has it "down there" <winkwink>.....
Gee you mean JOey BOy, who posted away in that thread, like he was right there in the courtroom standing toe to toe and face to face with the dark side doing his exparte, Carpe diem and Quid pro quo lawyer stuff defending helpless Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman from the evil empire was really at Chick's spilling coffee on his good shirt and getting third hand info from one of the bottom feeders who was out in the hallway at the courthouse. Say it ain't so JOey BOy, say it ain't so.
What's next - the world's not FLAT!!!!
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
Looks like JOey BOy went from a Nose Slap to a Bitch Slap. Any mention of the court proceedings or info about Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman has been removed from the thread. About 5 pages of postings have vanished.
JOey BOy did have time to post one of his homoerotic fantasies – “ On another note, has anyone ever noticed how affectionate Alex Tarapchak and Atty. Joe Campolieto are to one another? There seems to be something more than an attorney/client relationship going on there. You'd have to be in the courtroom to see how they look at one another.” JOey Boy must have gotten this from one of the Bottom Feeders, because JOey BOy confessed earlier that he wasn’t in the court room, so it must be his fantasy…
The Bottom Feeders are questioning the removal of posts, so JOey BOy and his alter egos try to calm the fellow Jim Jones followers into thinking this is all part of JOey BOy’s master plan.
Mongoose
Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date: Oct 7 1:42 PM, 2011
Somebody pruned the tree. WTF?
Whistleblower
Status: Offline
Posts: 135
Date: Oct 7 1:54 PM, 2011
Court ordered in the Tarapchak case? That's my guess.
Igotoutyoucantoo
Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date: Oct 7 6:17 PM, 2011
Mongoose wrote:
Somebody pruned the tree. WTF?
Seriously, what's missing? 5 pages gone.
Joe Pilchesky
Status: Offline
Posts: 10238
Date: Oct 7 6:26 PM, 2011
Mongoose wrote:
Somebody pruned the tree. WTF?
I did the pruning. To be explained at a later date.
Nothing to do with the parties or the court, but deals with me directly.
The blind monkey
Status: Offline
Posts: 137
Date: Oct 8 8:50 AM, 2011
Joe Pilchesky wrote:
Mongoose wrote:
Somebody pruned the tree. WTF?
I did the pruning. To be explained at a later date.
Nothing to do with the parties or the court, but deals with me directly.
Ican't imagine what that could be. I've been around here a long time and never saw anything like this. Pruning is one thing, lopping off several branches is what happened here.
I am a dumb blonde
Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Date: Oct 8 9:54 AM, 2011
Deals with you directly how, Joe? It's pretty obvious that it's almost all of the Tarapchak vs. Tarapchak content that's been wiped off this thread. If it's not because the court ordered it then what was it?
Bought off would come to mind if it wasn't you.
By days end
Status: Offline
Posts: 182
Date: Oct 8 10:44 AM, 2011
Joe would never lop off so much content without a very, very good reason. He'll tell us when he's ready. I have my theory that I'll keep to myself, but I think he's in a tough spot.
And justice for all
Status: Offline
Posts: 234
Date: Oct 8 10:53 AM, 2011
By days end wrote:
Joe would never lop off so much content without a very, very good reason. He'll tell us when he's ready. I have my theory that I'll keep to myself, but I think he's in a tough spot.
I agree.
While there are laws that exist to punish government corruptionRICO ENHANCES THEIR PENALTIES.
Joe Pilchesky
Status: Offline
Posts: 10238
Date: Oct 8 1:01 PM, 2011
By days end wrote:
Joe would never lop off so much content without a very, very good reason. He'll tell us when he's ready. I have my theory that I'll keep to myself, but I think he's in a tough spot.
There are some things that outweigh free speech. I'm going to leave it at that.
Someday I'll explain, but now is not the time.
Time waits for no one
Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Date: Oct 8 1:40 PM, 2011
You don't have to, Joe. We're not stupid out here.
Winds of change
Status: Offline
Posts: 134
Date: Oct 8 5:46 PM, 2011
My daughter has Ross for a guardian. She called her four times before she finally got a return phone call. Ross was simply a bitch. My daughter called her because Ross has yet to send her copies of papers she was supposed to send her. That's happened lots of times. Ross said it was because of an unforeseen shortage of staff, but I thought she and Sue were the staff.
At the end of the conversation my daughter asked her why she has not resigned from her position considering the newspaper article and Ross just hung up on her.
Nice.
Sucker born every minute
Status: Offline
Posts: 82
Date: Oct 8 7:10 PM, 2011
Personally, I think we all have a right to know why there was all of a sudden a huge loss of postings here. We all got caught up in this business of abuse in Family Court and all of us followed this topic like its our favorite show on TV.
It's only fair that we know. What if it happens again? When will one of our posts be taken down for no good reason. I respect Joe greatly for what he does but he's made himself the leader of this cause so he has to be a good leader. Tell us what is going on.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
To the benfit of anyone concerned or curious: My coverage of the Tarapchak v. Tarapchak case in Family Court has terminated in the best interests of the children. There will be no further discussions. There will be no further postings on the case. There will be no transcripts posted. The case has taken a new direction, and one which, if handled appropriately and wisely, will result in the children's best interests served.
While I give great weight to the benefits of free speech and transparency, it is outweighed by the best interests of the children involved in this case. The free speech and transparency experienced here has contributed as much as it possibly could have to influence change. Some very improper court decisions were exposed here. Poor Guardianship was exposed here. A dirty judge was exposed here. Some dirty lawyers were exposed here. Further exposure of things past will not contibute any more in terms of influence.
The circumstances in place right now, especially with Judge Moyle gone, provide the opportunity for moving forward to the right closure. Judge Corbett now has this case. She has recently ruled to give the parties a fresh start. The slate is cleaned of all those contempt accusations, most of which were unsupported with facts. I will watch the case. If the Court handles it poorly, I will reinstate it on this site to expose it. Unless that happens, Tarapchak v. Tarapchak is history. I wish them all well. And I pray they move wisely and patiently.
__________________
"Justice doesn't have to be fair, equitable or honorable - it just has to be justice"
Whooooops the wife has left!! He is out of money (wow what a shocker given that he doesn't work).....sounds like he has had a lovers quarrel with the Clairol Queen.....he is hated by most everyone...... sounds like the only wheels that came off where his own....Joey-Boy should have read a bit more about karma while he was reading how to be a lawyer for dummies (pun intended) because KARMA IS A BITCH!.....And if Edith walked who exactly is posting under her screen name?
He bailed and he said he wouldn't. He asked us to follow and we did. He. Said he would lead and we believed him. All he is as of January 1 is another failed competitive venture who took on the establishment. A few battles won, but a war lost.
Very sad.
I'll stay. Here's the deal. You walk with me everywhere I go. You show up in court with me for every argument. You sit along side of me while I research every issue in preparing lawsuits and preparing to argue them here and in Harrisburg. You go with me to follow up on every tip and lead that comes my way. And you appear with me after bashing the judge's brains in under your own name. For starters. There's more, a lot more. Forget about your job, you won't have time to go to it. Forget about your friends and family, because you'll lose 90% of them when you refuse to take down a post about one of their friends, associates, employers or political favorites. Forget about vacations, you won't have time for one. Forget about a wife, she'll walk out on you after being arrested for something she didn't do because you're exposing a corrupt system. Forget about sleep, there's no time for that. Forget about your future, you won't have one.
Expose corruption for seven years as I have and look at the numbers on election day. Three of ten people voting. The people in this area are their own cancer. I cannot save them. I tried. I'm not walking away. They've pushed me away. They don't want to be saved. They're stupid, ignorant and lazy, lacking in dignity and self-esteem. My time and energy are far better invested elsewhere.
If my plans come to fruition I'll be back with the resources to finish what I started. I'll be gone one year, perhaps less. It's a matter of resources vs. resources. I've always known that, but the resource called free speech is simply insufficient to finish the job with the mentality of the people that live here. Get me five Liz Hubbards and I'll stay. Gladly! Otherwise, it'll take a huge bankroll to take on a political machine with a huge bankroll. Be happy I understand the theatrics of politics. The lesson was an expensive one. A Web site is not a big enough stage to go toe-to-toe with a local newspaper. Too many voters do not have computers. When I return, I'll show you theater that will do more than upset an election here and there.
OK?
__________________
"Justice doesn't have to be fair, equitable or honorable - it just has to be justice"
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
well he let her into his cold black heart...so why not the computer...and I remember Glenn posting that he wasn't sure it was Edith (well he said Joanne) posting under her screen name anymore. So I just threw that out there!
He's simply a coward. What's that you say about dying on your knees, Joe? You're not only dying while on your knees, you're also bent over taking it from that end, too. Enjoy.
When does Joann ship off to prison?
-- Edited by Paul on Thursday 20th of October 2011 09:47:04 AM
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I'll be the first one to jump on any bandwagon if it'll get me a laugh or make me chuckle, but it didn't hit me until just now after seeing her picture posted above that this is someone's MOTHER. I don't know this woman or her ex-husband from a cake of soap, but I have seen those eyes before.
It took me a minute or two to realize that I have looked into those eyes before when I spoke to her son. He is the spitting image of her. Whether I spoke to this boy on one of his 'good days' or a 'bad day' I don't know. All I remember is looking at this child and thinking that he looked like he sure could use a hug.
I do not work for the county, I do not work for any political figure, I have nothing to do with this child, his siblings or his parents. I am just a mom who happened to be in the company of this child a few months ago. His soulful eyes struck a chord with me, even though his name did not.
He and his siblings do not deserve what's being done to them.