Status: Online Posts: 1382 Date: Jan 22 10:14 AM, 2011
Printer Friendly
I don't know if he used the word "death", but it most certainly is a threat. With the rash of tragedies that were forecast on the internet by the assailant, it would be irresponsible to disregard this message. Wake up dude.
Hardcore seems to think the story in today's paper indicates a serious message being sent ( I don't disagree).....well then how about the other serious messages that have been sent on the DD website that he is part of????
Like these for instance? (I know I know it looks like it is two different posters but we know better don't we??)
Can anyone please drown Brown at Nay Aug? Maybe he can be drowned in his own articles, they're certainly deep enough with bull****. This park's article is today's paper is such a bunch of bunk it made me physically ill. Hasn't that ******* Brown been to the park, or any of the parks lately? What's with this stroking of Doherty again. Three stroking articles in a row, two from Brown and one from Borys. Prep for the mayor's convention coming here next week or what? Who knows, but that no good Stacy Brown should write a truthful article about the real condition of the park. He didn't mention the dilapidated greenhouse, the totally illegal poolhouse, the joke of a zoo, the washed out Davis Trail, the horrible condition of the grounds inside the pool area, the collapsed amphitheater and the list can go on and on. C'mon Brown, get your head out of Doherty's ass and write something truthful. You're making all of us sick out here.
For Christ's sake, if Doherty ran down four people in a drunken stupor, and got out of his car and helped an old lady across the street, the headline would be: "Mayor helps old lady across the street".
RE: Sunday fishwrap article on Joe Legal strategies have often adopted the application of divide and conquer. They certainly can't team up if they're not on the same team at the same time, can they? The potential defendants haven't isolated themselves as yet. That'll come in time. Gatelli? Today a defendant, tomorrow a witness. Who knows? We're in every-man-for-himself territory. Her answers may feed others to the wolf, and maybe not. This much is certain, they have to file preliminary objections. I'll take it from there. Then, they will soon have to file an answer. That's when the players will all know where they stand. I can hear Gatelli now, "If my husband loses they'll all hang." (Gatelli in front by 370 votes) It's collateral damage, but what can you do? Doherty gave her the playing cards, now she's going to demand a stack of chips. Why not? I would, wouldn't you? However, if he's not in the top five in the D and R results, he's screwed because not long after the primary, these answers will be due and the hangman will know which necks get the custom-fitted noose.
I guess it's ok with everyone across the hall as long as it's one of their own making the threats ... but no free speech for anyone else ... not that I agree with what that facebook poster did ... because I don't ... but there is that DD double standard once again!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I simply grabbed those as they were most accessible. The event of which Hardcore speaks was in today's paper....I was merely pointing out he seemed to have no problem with the concept of threats when they originated on DD.