Glenn is posting right along in the same post without a single comment with that pussy across the hall while he is attempting to slam Doherty with accusations of infidelity. (We are all still waiting for the pictures he claimed to have the last time he he did this...remember the love child in Harrisburg?)
Doherty must be really doing well as Joey-boy is now providing portraits of the gal Doherty is supposed to be seeing. Naturally there is not a shred of evidence to support his assertions. However, given that it is Doherty he is talking smack about no other substantiation is needed, except the accusation itself, but when it comes to discussing Missy Jan nothing short of a 100 page confession by the Sainted Missy Jan would be sufficient to allow any smack talk about her period.....
Case in point...A week ago several posts were deleted and the poster banned for merely mentioning that Missy Jan had gotten her job at the school district under less than perfect conditions and that for years a rumor about her and a certain school district individual has been circulating. Everyone has heard those rumors so it was no shock.
As usual Glenn is a class act posting right along with the slime and the dirtballs..... WAY TO GO GLENN!! (Isn't this the second time he deleted himself from the doomers only to come crawling back?)
You feel uninvolved huh??!! You ought to feel dirty hanging your hat next to those dirtballs....Hey Glenn, funny how we never see any comments on Edith's current ...shall we say financial troubles? Care to get "involved" with that?? I mean after all don't you find it ironic that of the the two primary people screaming corruption about Doherty only those two have actually been arrested, and of them both one has one foot in the jail cell and the other on a banana peel?
don't think so huh??? I am not hanging out with either camp...you?? You do have your name associated with these two dirtballs so guess what brother??....Tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who YOU are..... Nice try... but you can not distance yourself from them now. You are right up their butts. Besides my question was what thought about them not whether you were responsible for them ..You showed what you think about Doherty when you classified his actions as "questionable" So I ask you again do you have the balls to share your thoughts on those two slime-balls or not?
Honestly Glenn, it does seem that you have two standards of conduct:
One for Joe Pilchesky, where just about anything can be posted, unchallenged, as long as it's the "right ox to gore" I suppose...
One for the people who post here...where just about everything is challenged...
It's pretty blatant actually. Point an accusatory finger at Marie S. and get chastised, but all manner of lie and innuendo can be spewed by Joe and Joanne and it's all just "political activism".
Really Glenn, do I need to provide "The List" to you? You know, this is the list that includes such gems as:
1. Chris Doherty caused the deaths of two children in a fire. 2. Stacy Brown is a "******". 3. Judy Gatelli had someone kept in county jail 4. ______ has had a homosexual affair with _______. 5. Chris Doherty is having an affair with _______. 6. Chris Doherty is having an affair with _______. 7. [etc.] 8. [etc.]
Show me the Glenn Cashuric "moral outrage" at those DD postings. I dare you. I double dare you. Oh, you sent Joe "private messages" about some of those things, right? Yeah, and I sent private messages to Tiger Woods, warning him about all those golfing groupies too.
No, I suspect that those things don't rate batting an eye, did they Glenn? Seriously, do you just rationalize this kind of stuff as being some bizarre form of collateral damage/cost of doing business?
Let me make it so clear that even one of the DD posters can understand: You sir are a hypocrite.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Sunday 25th of April 2010 08:00:26 PM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
You're right though Glenn, we have been 'round this before. The bottom line is still the same though: you give Joe & Joanne Pilchesky a pass regardless of what they do.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
We've been around this maypole a dozen times. Calling Marie Schumacher names doesn't help anything.
GC
You're absolutely correct Glen. However if all you were looking to do is drum up real estate business, some law practice clients and/or discuss politics (as you claim) you could have started your own site for that purpose and kept the discussions centered around these topics without resorting to all the other BS. I find you're skirting and denial of your belief/ethics system to be on par with someone posting on a Klan site looking for a good beef jerkey receipe. I truely believe you're posting with the kids down the hall to get back at those who you feel wouldn't support you or "boned" you in your election bid. Grow up and get over it and move on. If not then deal with the consequences, Don't claim you don't smell like cow poop after you've been in the cow field playing with wack jobs when you come back to the city. Glen, trust me - time to reset, move on to someplace where you'd be appreciated.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
Nice try, but not quite. There will never a perfect site. Even this place gets its share of unpleasant behavior. As for "getting back" at the party, I merely need to sit back and watch as this senate race causes it to turn on itself and disintegrate.
While I won't compare this site with the crazies across the hall who make baseless and absurd accusations to anyone pro-Doherty, I find it ironic that the site with a motto, "True freedom of speech", removed a post by the FDS Preacher yesterday.
As I recall, it urged Glenn to join any anti- Southern poverty law center website, to show he was not racist. The current post is radically different.
Either David Blaine stopped by, or we have some editing going on here, too.
The moderators have the ability to edit posts ... they usually only edit their own posts ... so I will have to check into it and see ... you can put in a request to have a post of yours edited also ... it's pretty easy ... just PM a moderator or myself and they will make the changes for you ... but moderators can edit their posts should they choose to do so.
Did you notice who edited the post you mention?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
1. Glenn, you just proved that FDSP was correct by once again skirting the real issue at hand. Congratulations...you never fail to fail.
2. Balko, I didn't know there was a post removed by FDSP. If there was, it wasn't me who removed it. Hell, I love the Preacher's postings...including his "owning" of Glenn yesterday.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Nice duck again Glenn....do you think there will be any time you will actually answer the question?
Balko I only saw 2 posts from FDSP yesterday and they are both still up. One here and one in the Marie Shumacker thread. Can you help us out by telling us what thread the post which is missing was posted in? I know I didn't delete any posts. We always mention why (on the rare occasion we delete) we take a post down. It doesn't happen very often. I can't remember the last time it did it has been so long.
While I won't compare this site with the crazies across the hall who make baseless and absurd accusations to anyone pro-Doherty, I find it ironic that the site with a motto, "True freedom of speech", removed a post by the FDS Preacher yesterday.
As I recall, it urged Glenn to join any anti- Southern poverty law center website, to show he was not racist. The current post is radically different.
Either David Blaine stopped by, or we have some editing going on here, too.
Balko,
The posting you are referring to is still up in the Marie Schumacher thread. Perhaps you had a flash sideways timeline episode (I know too much LOST) and saw a more detailed posting which included links to some of the sites. Thanks for watching my back though, we're all good to go.
Glen - it's Man's primal instinct to want to belong and be accepted, just make a choice that doesn't require you to give up a part of your dignity/humanity to do so. Peace Out.
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
Apologies all around. The post I thought was removed actually is in the Marie Schumacher thread. FDS Preacher was correct, and my lack of alertness may have been due to my lack of consciousness. (If you check the 4 AM time of my post, you'll understand my inferrence)
I have to resolve to read only and not post during battles with insomnia.
Just to put this in perspective, this is what Glenn says we are the equivalent of...
(from Joe Pilchesky, dated December 4, 2007; red hi-lite by me)
RE: Fanny says Unions deceive public I like the caption, "Nealon: Unions deceive public". Now she's going to be a Nealon after she put the name Fanucci into the books as the most inept, incompetent and unscrupulousmoron to hold a council seat. Or, was this a Brown brainfest? Why do I get the feeling that Dave Gervasi just might make an appearance at tonight's council meeting, among other union officials who should make Fanucci, I'm sorry, Neeeaaaalon, walk the plank. I'd like to see her show us all how the recovery plan is still in effect and what part of it has not been inplemented. They like using the "implemented" word. What stopped the mayor from impleminting it? He shut the unions down. Isn't that what the recovery plan sought to do? Curb spending? But, then he gave the entire store away on non-union raises and phony job creations.
You know what I'd like to do, put Doherty, Gatelli, Fanucci, George and Bill Lynett and gay Mellow in a time machine and send them back to the 17th century where, for their corrupt deeds,they'd probably all be dragged out to public square and hung by their necks until they were dead. Andleft there as a reminder to all successors. Shame it's 2007 and we're confinedto suffering with these lowlifes like this.And tossshameless Stacy Brown in there, to be dropped off in Mississippi in the 30s as a reminder of whatthe people of his color have risen fromjust for him to embarrass them daily. Even Black people will tell you, within their own community there are respectable, honestblack people and then, there are the n-i-g-g-e-r-s, the dishonest, unethical scum, like Brown. We have the same line drawn in the sand in the White community, do we not? Stacy Brown is a black n-i-g-g-e-r. Doherty, Gatelli, Fanucci, Bill and George Lynett and gay Mellow are white n-i-g-g-e-r-s. There, I said it. Couldn't keep it in any longer.Sue me.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Friday 30th of April 2010 06:47:53 AM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Well Glenn this time I think you have really taken the cake..just when I didn't think you could 'settle" any lower or be any more of a suck-up you go and prove me wrong.
Joey-boy has done some pretty despicable things but this is right up there at the top of the list of dirtball antics.
...of course we can always count on Glenn to ride in on his white horse and not stand for this (or the racial comments, or the stalking comments) kind of behavior...now read with caution because Glenn really takes Joey-boy to the woodshed over this...
RE: (Child porn arrest) I've recieved a phone call to confirm that the person arrested is not the prominent lawyer.
Printer Friendly
Kind of difficult to get all of those feathers back in the pillow now, isn't it?
GC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I know I know strong stuff but wait there is more!!
This is Joey patting himself on the back via another alter ego
GC, you are nothing short of a riot. My gut is killing me.
To be fair to Joe, he's had that pillow on the shelf for a long time and did nothing with it until now. Even with that, he soft played it in a clever and wily way but still soft played it.
and this is Glenn's HUGE rebuttal....Glenn you really are a beast!! (OH way to be a total tool by responding to the jerkoff when he is talking about himself.
GC, you are nothing short of a riot. My gut is killing me.
It shouldn't. The accusation was a serious one. Even a "hint" at child pornography can ruin someone's entire life. It is almost impossible to squeeze that toothpaste back into the tube.
To be fair to Joe, he's had that pillow on the shelf for a long time and did nothing with it until now. Even with that, he soft played it in a clever and wily way but still soft played it.
I am always fair to Joe. The pillow should have stayed on the shelf a bit longer. The person in question got caught with child pornography on their computer was caught with heterosexual type of porn.
Oh, is that a mitigating factor now?
GC
WOW! You really out did yourself Glenn. I am very impressed. You sure gave him a piece of your mind.
I wonder if the person in Joey-boy's wind blowing posts was yourself.. how would you react then huh?? This man's reputation could have been destroyed by that post and you still suck up to the slime....wow you are something! But at least you are always 'fair" to Joey-boy....very noble!!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Wednesday 7th of July 2010 11:27:21 PM
I just need to say this, Glenn do you not see the problem with Joe putting up anything and everything that he hears ... rumors ... you don't see that as being a problem? I do ... like IHave said ... what if it were you he were saying it about .... I know the reaction you gave me when I asked you if you had a drink the night you were giving the play by play of what Kenny McDowell did right down to what he was wearing ... you didn't like it at all and you told me that I should not insinuate that you were drinking and driving ... you went a little nuts on me and I never once said you were drinking and driving ... I aske if you had been drinking because I thought that surely would have explained your strange behavior .... never once did I suggest that you were drinking and driving .... I hope that lawyer sues Joe .... as you said once that suggestion is made it's awful hard to recover from it. I say sue him because his freedom of speech does not give him the right to defame someone elses character ... it could ruin the man! Hopefully it didn't but it could have.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
And Glenn just so you know there are no perfect people ... nobody here at PD thinks that they are perfect ... I am more flawed than you could ever imagine ... however the difference is that we have morals and values ... and we want proof before we post or allow posts of a nature that would ruin the reputation of anyone ... including Joe Pilchesky ... Joe and the kids across the hall (yourself included) ask for no such proof! It's not perfection Glenn it's being a decent human being!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Have there ever been submitted by Father Pilarz actual economic impact figures to support what he claims in terms of improvements to Scranton's economy?
Maybe Janet can go over to the office and try blackmailing the priest into handing over the economic impact figures. I mean, hey, it's a shot across the bow...
Some of Glenn's "Greatest Hits" from that thread...
Seemed like a form of blackmail to me. Do this or else.
and if doesn't happen soon and she keeps listening to bobble-headed sycophants, her whole enterprise is going to implode.
Yes, the University of Scranton now has it on record that the supermajority will resort to questionable means...publicly...to get its way.
You are assuming the supermajority has a vision for Scranton beyond coddling the unions. It does not.
They said "give us more money or else".
There is no legislation. The supermajority really doesn't do much of that.
One-time fixes for the sake of political theater. The mayor's ass will finally be fixed, so everybody gets a good short-term laugh, and the financial house of cards will finally come crashing down around the supermajority's neck.
...I have busted Glenn's chops repeatedly over the years for a variety of reasons, but in all fairness, he hit a homerun in this thread.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Thursday 15th of July 2010 06:54:33 PM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I agree also ... those are some pretty good lines he put out there ... now is he still posting there or did old Joey Boy give him the boot for writing that?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.