Glenn Cashuric wrote:

---

I bet none of you saw this choice coming in February.  I know I didn't.  Do you (a) give your favorite councilwoman a chance to put up or shut up or (b) elect a 19-year-old college dropout who is incapable of discussing any issues and refuses to answer questions about his campaign financing?

GC

---

Here is a little blast from your past Glenn!

 

1.  Damn, I am impressed with your memory Lus.  I forget what I've written most of the time, let alone what others have written.

2.  To the question at hand, I've said in the past that young Mr Miller is too young and too inexperienced to qualify for a position of city council.  That noted, it's tempting to vote for him as opposed Janet Evans and her two lackies. An Evans majority will means nothing but self-promotion for Janet Evans, period.  I doubt it will last long, as two years of accomplishing ZILCH with her majority will mean that she will lose it the next time enough konsil seats are up for re-election.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

I still admire any young person for running.  However, the Doug Miller I met last year was actually discussing issues and raising funds for handicap-accessible playgrounds.  He wasn't accusing candidates of gang activity and speaking in generalities which serve only to ass-goose the mayor.

The Doug Miller of then had a chance for my contribution.  The Doug Miller of now does not.  If anything, I'm really disappointed.

I deny nothing else and remain a steadfast supporter of the Democratic slate.  But I appreciate the conversation and still respect the opinions offered here.

GC

I made it easy for you Glenn the topic is now a stick topic ... happy reading ... my views have not changed. Oh and we hate to be the ones to say We told you so ... but didn't we tell you he was too young for this ... that he wouldn't be able to handle it ... ahhhh ... I think we did ... oh well you knew better didn't you!

I have discovered a lot of things about the young man that make me question his ability to serve.  I would like to know (a) how his first year of college went and (b) if he has gotten his driver's license.

Yes, you told me so.  Admitted.

GC

I personally don't care how young Mr Miller did in college and whether or not he has a driver's license.  Neither will change his age or the fact that he's probably never paid any substantial city taxes. 

Anyway, what's the REAL beef with him Glenn?  ENOUGH ALREADY with the circular, circumspect comments about how he has somehow "changed".  He is not even 20 years old, so he will be doing a lot of changing.

Lastly, the timing of your comments is interesting.  Is IHave right, and you are just shilling for Evans?  Is this in response to the fact that young Mr Miller might actually be getting some traction?


-- Edited by Agamemnon on Sunday 18th of October 2009 07:42:15 PM

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

"The mayor is backing Doug.  Doug denies it, but it is so."

Incorrect.  Young Mr Miller commented on Steve Corbett's Friday evening show that he was being supported by the Mayor.  I heard it with my own two ears.


-- Edited by Agamemnon on Sunday 18th of October 2009 08:00:13 PM

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Your ears were correct.  I meant financially.  That money is coming from somewhere, and it isn't from Dougie's piggy bank.

GC

1.  Meaning if they want to know what Corbett thinks, they should call him and ask. 

2.  I think he's a "Dougie".

3.  Credibility is a two-way street.  I don't think there's any here either.

Well, back to shilling.  I mean, it works for the Doherty folks, doesn't it?  Maybe I can lose two million dollars or get a fat taxpayer-funded redevelopment contract.

GC

For the record, I STRONGLY object to the 'Janet Evans' being used in reference to the word 'threesome'.  That's just plain disgusting.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

I won't argue those points and for the record I am not voting for Doug Miller.  He is a child.  I am simply pointing out Glenn's flip/flopping,  his clear lack of judgement (being kind here) by his close association with the slimeballs across the hall and last but not least his shilling for the Evans camp.

Let me see if I have this right...

1. Starting a new thread on this site is an offensive if there happens to be a thread that could have been dug up from page 9 or 10 and revived after a couple of years of lying dormant.*

2. You are a flip flopper if you decide after a year that a candidate for which you had some high hopes simply doesn't pan out because he has no platform and is too immature to be a viable choice for voters.

3. You are a shill if you support a candidate that you believe is the better choice of the few who are running for council.**

4. If you post at DD, you are the devil.***

Dang.  For a site based on the stalking of Joe Pilchesky, you people sure are picky!



*Damn, Glenn! You are just being lazy for not using the search option. You need to step up your game.
**Especially if that candidate has the support of Pilchesky.
***I have to admit that there is a faint odor of brimstone that lingers around Glenn's posts on occasion. 

Let me see if I have this right...

1. Starting a new thread on this site is an offensive if there happens to be a thread that could have been dug up from page 9 or 10 and revived after a couple of years of lying dormant.*

Don’t be ridiculous starting a new thread is in no way offensive.  Lus merely pointed out the Glenn had a much different opinion than he previously held.  If that were the only thing that has changed I wouldn’t have a problem, however; I am strongly suspicious as to why he changed his opinion…..Is it Doug Miller’s age? Glenn knew how old Doug would be at the time of swearing in to the office when he supported him, apparently his age isn’t a factor.  Is it Doug Miller’s platform? He had as thin a platform then (meaning no platform) as he does now; apparently it’s not his lack of a platform.  Is it that Doug Miller is naïve and lacks any real or meaningful life experiences? Apparently not, since presumably he is less naïve (however marginal that improvement maybe in a little more than 12 months) and has at least 12 more months of life experiences now than he did in September of 2008.  So what then what changed Glenn’s mind? Is it possible that the change came right around the time that Glenn was “introducing Missy Jan” to her adoring groupies at her fundraiser and the Evans camp started calling Glenn with advance viewings of their campaign commercials? Now let’s assume my guesses are accurate… is that in and of itself a problem? No!  Glenn can support anyone he wants, I am just calling on him to be honest about his support. Glenn stopped supporting Doug when Glen got sucked into the Evans camp plain and simple.

2. You are a flip flopper if you decide after a year that a candidate for which you had some high hopes simply doesn't pan out because he has no platform and is too immature to be a viable choice for voters.   

No not at all.

You are however a flip flopper if as I stated above Doug didn’t have any of those things a year ago when Glen was saying to give him a chance.
You are a flip-flopper if as I demonstrated with the Corbett post (non-issue then 4 hours later an issue that Corbett needs to clarify) you change your mind with no apparent reason.  

You are a flip flopper if you post two directly opposing opinions on the same issue without any reason for your change of mind.
3. You are a shill if you support a candidate that you believe is the better choice of the few who are running for council.** 

No that would be the simple definition of a supporter. You are shill when you pretend to be otherwise.
4. If you post at DD, you are the devil.***

No not the devil but you are a DD groupie (and a fool) if you post there as if the website has anything other than a handful of bitter, mean-spirited, racist, sexist, homophobic, ignorant posters, under the influence of a soon to be incarcerated estate bilker, and an old bald bully with nothing left in the equipment so he has to run what is the equivalent of a high school slam book. Anyone with a shred of decency or dignity or an ounce of self respect couldn’t post there regularly without their stomach turning over. Glenn having not only changed his position on Doug (which as I said is fine) but having to resort to degrading him (i.e. the subtle name change <Dougie>) smells so much like the usual tactics of the Evans team that I am more than convinced of the connection.  You are either with them or a’gin them as the old saying goes.  So once Glen rescinded his support that would not be good enough for them, Glenn will now have to join in on the degrading of the person. Nice! 
Dang.  For a site based on the stalking of Joe Pilchesky, you people sure are picky!
Stalking? Ok you may need to look up that word.  I for one am thankful that the only time I have laid eyes on the guy was quite by accident about 2 years ago and that was quite enough for me

 

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Wednesday 21st of October 2009 10:38:19 AM

NO you still miss my point.  I have no problem with him having that opinion I am just saying >>>since when and why>>>

I have always held the opinion that Sammy is a dufus and since he drew the first blood with his racist/ethnic comments I have no problem with him being degraded. He brought it on himself.  What exactly did Doug Miller do that was so henious he has to be pulled apart?

This board is all about stalking DD.  Copying and pasting posts made at DD is most likely a terms of use violation.  I know it is on other message board systems.  Intellectual property, or something like that.

Stalking a message board? I am not sure that is even physically possible but whatever.  I highly doubt that to copy and paste already posted remarks is even addressed in TOS. However I have to say if it is and the racist/ethnic/sexist/homophobic aren't a violation of the TOS I am certainly in the Twilight Zone. The use of the word Intellectual in the same sentece as DD might make some people's head just explode. I am one of them.......good god!

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Wednesday 21st of October 2009 01:36:27 PM