Glen.....you think Brian is a problem.... - PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech

IHavehadenoughofhaters

Guru

Status: Offline

Posts: 3414

Date: Sat Jul 4 11:10 AM, 2009

Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....

Permalink

.......... with his harmless, marginally juvenile, silly humor but having your name attached to the website and the web admin who prints this kind of sick stuff and is running a vious ruin-anyone-I-don't-like campaign, financed with money only God knows where it comes from (Edith care to chime in here). is ok with you?? You may want to reconsider your priorities.

Joe Pilchesky

Posts: 5135
Date: Jul 3 8:55 AM, 2009

IN THE WIND: Lackawanna County judge received from feds a "target letter".

It could be any one of them. Who knows which judge may have compromised himself over the years? Opportunities come their way daily. However, Harhut has been at the center of a controversy where he appointed a Scranton attorney, Larry Moran, to the arbitration of Atty. Jimmy Tierney, former solicitor for the Election Bureau, and his wife. From those arbitrations Tierney and his wife picked up about 3.2 million. Harhut is the godfather to one of Tierney's children. Moran Jr., was Tierney's campaign manager. I believe there's some marriage relation between Tierney and Moran, also. Senator Mellow, Judge Harhut's longtime gay lover, is the godfather of another child, while DA Andy Jarbola is also a godfather of yet another. That's quite a Thanksgiving dinner they have going there. Tierney clearly suffers little or no outward diminished capacity or function. The nature of his injury was reportedly related to his right arm, but that seemed to be working just fine as he shook a lot of hands running for judge. I know an elderly couple who got diddly after being rear-ended by a tractor-trailer. Moran was an arbitrator along with Jim Doherty and Tierney was for the company. The elderly couple was represented by Atty. Tim Lenehan. Just in the wind, but it sure is windy out here. Coming to a theater near you: Arbitrationgate

Cartman

Posts: 33
Date: Jul 3 1:21 PM, 2009

I am thinking the FEDS are probably looking at all the judges, look at the type of judges we elect here in lackawanna co.

1. Trish Corbett; Didn't she do a little stay at a drug rehab herself? I have been told she has by more than one person, and is she related to gay Ray Hayes?

2. Mike Barrasse; I am not really even sure where to start with Barrasse he has a lot of baggage, alcohol monitors is just one example.

3. Vito Geroulo; I know nothing about so if anyone could fill me in, please do.

4. Tom Munley; Just take a look at his finance report, it says a real lot.

5. Carmen Minora; Amil Minora's brother.

6. Bob Mazzoni; I have trouble keeping track of Mazzonis it seems like a lot of the are sucking of the taxpayer's tit.

7. Carlon O'Malley; The guy really should of retired about 20 years ago.

8. Terry Nealon; How many judge Nealons are there for Christ sakes, isn't there a federal judge Nealon?

9. Chester Harhut; I truly believe he is the gay lover of Sen Mellow. I was told a few years ago Mellow's wife knew all about it and told many about Harhut and Mellow participating in gay sexual acts.

The FEDS could be looking at any one of these nine judges or all.

I would bet all nine, considering all nine are probably friendly with each other outside of the black robe and all nine have baggage.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

rare form

Newbie

Status: Offline

Posts: 30

Date: Sat Jul 4 12:07 PM, 2009

RE: Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....	Permalink

How is this Glenn's problem? He doesn't get involved in the trash talk at either this board or that board, so why make him responsible for the behavior of others? From what I can see, Glenn's priority is to address the issues and avoid the crap. I don't see him legitimizing the gossip on DD or encouraging lunatic rants. Maybe I'm missing something. Does he finance Joe's activities? The real question is... what's your problem with Glenn? I think you pick on him because he uses his real name. He gives you a target for your Joe-induced frustrations. Am I right? __________________

Agamemnon

DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline

Posts: 3768

Date: Sat Jul 4 7:07 PM, 2009

Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....	Permalink

IHave can speak for herself, but I'll add my two cents here. It's always cause for pause when someone who otherwise seems like a good, decent person stands in the midst of what I'll simplistically call evil and says nothing. A lot of this goes back to the "Stacy Brown is a n____r" post by Pilchesky, where the perception (and as I recall reality) is that Glenn said nothing. To use the often-quoted quote... "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" Now from time to time Glenn has spoken up at DD, and I don't think anyone expects him to be the official DD "Truth Squad", but a lack of a strong response to the whole Stacy Brown episode (and a few others) has left a bad taste in some mouths. The fact that he's willing to apply a standard to this "Brian" guy that he does not apply with any consistency to the crew at DD only amplifies the negative perception. To bring the point back home, the strong negative reaction lies in part because I think many of us think of Glenn as being a decent guy. I'll also comment on the whole posting anonymously thing. I actually write quite a bit on-line, and this is the only place where I use a pseudonym (what's more, many of the posters here...including Glenn BTW...know my "real" name). Why? Well maybe IHave's reasons are similar (or maybe different), but for me it's because I don't want to be a party of some nuisance lawsuit by Pilchesky, I don't want Les Spindler going through my garbage and I don't want some idiot like McGoof making up lies about my spouse OR children. Yes, posting under one's own name is always preferable, but given the severity of lunacy at DD, posting anonymously is a better idea. Glenn, on the other hand, enjoys some measure of respect and protection from Pilchesky, as I think he lends an air of (undue) credibility to the site. As a result, he has the luxury of posting under his own name. -- Edited by Agamemnon on Saturday 4th of July 2009 07:10:18 PM __________________ Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Glenn Cashuric

Member

Status: Offline

Posts: 505

Date: Sat Jul 4 8:36 PM, 2009

RE: Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....	Permalink

As I have stated many times before, I have openly condemned any nasty comments related to race, sexual orientation, or gender. I thought the Stacy Brown slam was indefensible, and I said so publicly and privately. I really can't offer anything further. That said, my guess on the Bob Mellow thing is that Pilchesky is trying to bait the senator into a libel lawsuit. Since the senator's political sense is as acute as the mayor's, he will not bite. By the way, if one really does some analysis, "Brian" can only be one of a handful of people. Very few individuals (a) watch the council meeting, (b) know who the players are in such depth, and (c) show little or no aptitude for spelling and grammar. My instincts say it's Doug Miller (or someone in his circle), but I won't know for a few weeks. I have two other suspects. GC __________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters

Guru

Status: Offline

Posts: 3414

Date: Sun Jul 5 9:03 AM, 2009

Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....	Permalink

rare form wrote: How is this Glenn's problem? He doesn't get involved in the trash talk at either this board or that board, so why make him responsible for the behavior of others? *Qui tacet consentit* Rare Form are you familiar with the above phrase? I believe it will be very enlighting for you to look it up, in the meantime I am quite sure Glen does..and he understands exactly what my point is about DD. From what I can see, Glenn's priority is to address the issues and avoid the crap. I don't see him legitimizing the gossip on DD or encouraging lunatic rants. Maybe I'm missing something. Does he finance Joe's activities? If I were to be a member of a KKK chapter or an anti-Semitic group but did not participate in the activities other than to socialize at the meetings would you think I was legitimizing their activities just by my presence? I would say yes. Glen does indeed legitimize the activities across the hall by posting. If what goes on across the hall (or here for that matter) is offensive then to continue to post without being the vocal critic is no better than turning a blind eye to the activity in my opinion. Apparently Glen felt that way at one time because when the n-bomb was droped Glen declared he was done posting due to how offended he was……..his self-imposed banning was not very long lived. The real question is... what's your problem with Glenn? I think you pick on him because he uses his real name. He gives you a target for your Joe-induced frustrations. Am I right? You are in the right church but the wrong pew. I do not dislike (or pick on ) Glen for using his real name. I try to make him see that because he uses his eal name the mud over there sticks to him. Unlike the rest of the posters who do not identify themselves, Glen becomes personally identifiable as “that” guy who posts at DD. Glenn Cashuric wrote: As I have stated many times before, I have openly condemned any nasty comments related to race, sexual orientation, or gender. I thought the Stacy Brown slam was indefensible, and I said so publicly and privately. I really can't offer anything further. You said you were done with posting over that remark ….guess not! I wonder why I do not see any “righteous outrage” over the gay/jew/children/sexual slams that occur daily? That said, my guess on the Bob Mellow thing is that Pilchesky is trying to bait the senator into a libel lawsuit. Since the senator's political sense is as acute as the mayor's, he will not bite. I did not ask you what Joey-boy motives are as I could care less. Why that slime-pig does what he does is hardly relevant. You don’t get to do a wrong thing because you think you have a “good reason. I said it was sick and that you are indirectly supporting the continuance of that kind of behavior by participating without protest. I wonder how you would feel if the people involved in the various vicious slams were your friends or family perhaps your wife…mother…sister or maybe your brother…son…father?? Do you think this whole topic would take on a different look for you? By the way, if one really does some analysis, "Brian" can only be one of a handful of people. Very few individuals (a) watch the council meeting, (b) know who the players are in such depth, and (c) show little or no aptitude for spelling and grammar. Who Brian is or is not is also irrelevant to me. I simply can not believe that you would point out the “nasty’ (your word not mine) aspect of Brian’s report while totally overlooking the most vicious of gossip across the hall. My instincts say it's Doug Miller (or someone in his circle), but I won't know for a few weeks. I have two other suspects. GC -- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Sunday 5th of July 2009 09:37:44 AM __________________ Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

rare form

Newbie

Status: Offline

Posts: 30

Date: Sun Jul 5 9:42 AM, 2009

RE: Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....	Permalink

IHavehadenoughofhaters wrote: rare form wrote: How is this Glenn's problem? He doesn't get involved in the trash talk at either this board or that board, so why make him responsible for the behavior of others? *Qui tacet consentit* Rare Form are you familiar with the above phrase? I believe it will be very enlighting for you to look it up, in the meantime I am quite sure Glen does..and he understands exactly what my point is about DD. He hasn't kept quiet. So From what I can see, Glenn's priority is to address the issues and avoid the crap. I don't see him legitimizing the gossip on DD or encouraging lunatic rants. Maybe I'm missing something. Does he finance Joe's activities? If I were to be a member of a KKK chapter or an anti-Semitic group but did not participate in the activities other than to socialize at the meetings would you think I was legitimizing their activities just by my presence? I would say yes. Glen does indeed legitimize the activities across the hall by posting. If what goes on across the hall (or here for that matter) is offensive to anyone to continue to post without being the vocal critic is no better than turning a blind eye to the activity in my opinion. Apparently Glen felt that way at one time because when the n-bomb was drooped Glen declared he was done posting due to how offended he was……..his self-imposed banning was not very long lived. Comparing posting a legitimate political opinion at DD to attending a KKK meeting is ridiculous. And Glenn has been a critic, but he can't be expected to police the place. There is no way a person with a life and a job can possible be expected to read every thread and point out every racist, sexists, and stupid thing posted by anonymous people on the internet. The real question is... what's your problem with Glenn? I think you pick on him because he uses his real name. He gives you a target for your Joe-induced frustrations. Am I right? You are in the right church but the wrong pew. I do not dislike (or pick on ) Glen for using his real name. I try to make him see that because he uses his right name the mud over there sticks to him. Unlike the rest of the posters who do not identify themselves, Glen becomes personally identifiable as “that” guy who posts at DD. I read DD on a daily basis. The thing that stands out to me about Glenn is that he's intelligent, articulate, and doesn't get involved in the name calling or gossip. I don't see the mud sticking to him, but that's just my opinion. I have a solution for Glenn. He needs a signature line disclaimer when he posts at DD, and here, for that matter. This would probably work: As I have stated many times before, I have openly condemned any nasty comments related to race, sexual orientation, or gender. I thought the Stacy Brown slam was indefensible, and I said so publicly and privately. I really can't offer anything further. __________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters

Guru

Status: Offline

Posts: 3414

Date: Sun Jul 5 10:44 AM, 2009

RE: Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....

Permalink

I completely respect your opinion Rare but I am not certain you understood the point of my post to Glenn

I was reponding to Glenn's comments about Brian's post-council meeting observations. I was merely remarking that Glenn was seemly "offended" by Brians silly observations but seems to have adjusted nicely to the filty, racist, sexist, daily comments by Joey-boy and his slimeball thief of a wife.

"Comparing posting a legitimate political opinion at DD to attending a KKK meeting is ridiculous."

I would agree if I was in fact refering to legitimate political comments of which there are few......I was specifically refering to comments like the posts below...they racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-semtic enough for you? Hanging out at DD is exactly like attending a KKK meeting without having to drive anywhere.

Joe Pilchesky

Posts: 4317
Date: Mar 1 3:43 PM, 2009

There's no mystery to writing politics or city issues, although reporters for the Times are prone to making it a mystery in terms of accurate and honest reporting.

Here, we have his work and experience history, which indicates that he's been unemployed since 07 when he wrote for Poynter Inst. in Petersburg, Fla.

From the University of Buffalo's newspaper in 05-06 to a very short stint with The Buffalo News in 06 to another very short stint at Poynter in 07, Burton hasn't logged much Beat Reporter writing. MIA in 08, except for the recent hiring here.

Leave it to the Times-Tribune to put an easily influenced greenhorn on the City Beat, but we were happy with anything other than Stacy Brown. Brown? Burton? What's the difference? This kid might just be like that monkey avatar, just pissing all over himself. Jewish, too, which explains even more as to why he's not going to tackle any tough issues.

Maybe it's no coincidence that the word 'buffalo' dominates his resume`.

PresidentMcGoof

Posts: 146
Date: Mar 2 12:30 PM, 2009

We all know the old saying 3 strikes and your out!!!
Well I think Burton just got his 3rd strike.

Burton's 3 strikes::::::
1st He is a Jew
2nd He is Gay
3rd He is on Pilchesky $hit list

Joe Pilchesky

Posts: 4884
Date: May 23 11:05 PM, 2009

Tom Yerke has once again gone on the attack against women. He's viciously verbally attacked certain women involved in politics or who have been critical of the corruption and thefts. The cowardly lowlife won't go face to face with certain men, but he loves attacking defenseless women. Yerke needs some special attention, and I am personally going to see that he gets it. With the Scranton election wrapped up, I have free time.

For that reason, I am sanctioning the open attack upon any and all women in the life of Tom Yerke from his mother to any other adult female, with partiular emphasis on his own wife and two daughters. I understand he was screwing the painter, and there's strong rumor that Secretary Kate Tierney blows him from time to time to keep those 4-day weekends coming, no pun intended.

I am of the understanding that at least one of his daughers lives at home on welfare having a child with no father in sight, who spends her day on a cell phone paid for by Covington speaking with a Covington employee on yet another Covington cell phone.

Have at it. Keep it truthful. Your well worded opinions are welcomed.

Joe Pilchesky wrote:

There's strong rumor that Secretary Kate Tierney blows him from time to time to keep those 4-day weekends coming

Joe Pilchesky

Posts: 1389
Date: Aug 17 1:44 AM, 2007
Views: 32

Quote | Reply

RE: Beatdown of Stacy Brown/TT on spins, lies and concealing the truth

I get a little flak from some posters who don't feel it's appropriate that Stacy Brown is referred to as Uncle Tom. They say it sounds a little racist. I agree, it may sound racist, but the shoes of slavery fit. Stacy Brown's crony-fitted articles are the work of a man under the thumb of Plantation-like owners of the old South. He walks, talks and writes like a man captured by slavery. He doesn't walk, talk or write like a free man, regardless his skin color. Worse than that, he betrays each and every resident and taxpayer in the county and city with his 'water carrying' loyalty to the true cancer in our community, the Lynetts. If it looks like a man in slavery, and it talks like a man in slavery, and it writes like a man in slavery, then slavery is what it is. He could be called much worse, but until he begins to act like a free, dignifed, self-respecting and honorable man to the people who are now currently suffering from his lowly loyalty to the Plantation owner, the name Uncle Tom fits him like a glove. How that man can look at himself in the mirror and not see the dispicable and ugly servant of corruptoin that he is, is beyond me.I saw him at the Evans' party and the sight of him was truely sickening. Who invited him? That was a party for free men and women, not slaves shaclked by the loss of morality and conscience. ( Is he saying blacks are not allowed around Miss Jan? Is she ok with this "new rule"? Are the DD goons going to go along with this hideous racist attack?)

Stacy, I know you read this site. Do not, under any circumstances, ever contact me again for any interviews for any reason. I don't care what it's for. It's an insult to hear your voice, and more of an insult to read your factless, untruthful reporting. The shoe will be on the other foot soon enough. You're as much a part of the corruption in this city as the Lynetts and Doherty. I've had my fill of your betrayal and dishonesty to the people you lie to and deceive practically every day. You think it's journalism using words to play with the minds of good, hard working people in order to protect the thief in the mayor's office? The likes of you and Cole are having a good time playing games with the lives of good people. Just remember that you lowlifes have taught me that the only Golden Rule is that there are NO RULES. And, remember that you're dealing with a man more corrupt than that sissy Chris Doherty. We're bumping things up a notch or two, Unlce Tom. Soon, instead of doing the writing, you'll be doing the reading. Tell that to that boy-lover John Cole. (again is he intimating someone is a pediphile?)

Psssssst

Posts: 8
Date: Sun Jun 10 9:10 AM, 2007
Views: 5

Quote | Reply

RE: CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR PROMOTION ENGINEER BRAZIL....

Jeff has taken and passed a few state level exams that will qualify him to sign permits, but it won't qualify him to review prints or do on-site inspections. It was a man of his unqualified status that was on board when a 13 story building collapsed in Toledo about three years ago. Another Doherty crony with no experience at this position, but neither does any of his cabinet members, so why are we surprised. Stacy Brown, the crony black blowjob from the Times, knows that side of it but has never printed one word about it. Isn't there a cotton field somewhere calling his name? That sounds cruel, but read this man's articles, they are a cancer directly aimed at hurting each and every one of us. That black snake in the grass should be dragged down to the river and dunked until he can remember that this is

AMERICA. AND HIS BLACK ASS IS INSULTING IT. HE'S A SNEAKY, NO GOOD, TWO-FACED WALKING PIECE OF S-H-I-T. PERIOD.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

Agamemnon

DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline

Posts: 3768

Date: Tue Jul 7 7:03 AM, 2009

RE: Glen.....you think Brian is a problem....	Permalink

I think it's hard to deny your point IHave. Could there be legitimate opinions and discourse at DD? Sure, and there is legitimate news in supermarket tabloids every once in a while as well, but that does not make them the functional equivalent of the New York Times. In the end, DD is really two things...and only two things: An Ego Booster for Joe Pilchesky...where a tired old man who can no longer physically intimidate people instead tries to use the Internet for that same purpose. Too bad he has failed miserably to accomplish the one thing he started out to do: intimidate Chris Doherty. Hell, I don't think Doherty even acknowledges that DD exists. A Gossip Site...where bitter public employees and assorted others can put into text the spew they normally reserve for the water-cooler. Like most gossip, much of what is spewed at DD is simply wrong. __________________ Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.