and to anyone else who thinks Pilchesky is your friend. This is all about him. If you have been paying attention you saw him threaten your jobs and your personal privacy simply because he wanted to apply pressure to Bill Courtright. Now you can see him throwing the police to the wolves. He is all about himself and his agenda. He has spoken to this issue in many of his alias. The one below is an example. This is him speaking under an alias. I recommend you people start realizing ...'If you feed the crocodile, he will eat you last' ....didn't work in world war 2 and it won't work now. He will run over you as soon as you are more valuable to him as a tool than as a source of information.
You'll never be able to convince me that the staff at the tax office had no knowledge of what was going on there. McDowell didn't move that money around by himself, did he?
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Monday 15th of June 2009 10:40:22 PM
He actually has a personal reason for throwing the Tax Office to the wolves ... remember people Joanne owes back taxes on thier home ... so is this intimidation at it's best ... is this his way of putting on the pressure so that the tax records for his home somehow disappear??? I wonder ...
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
As has been said here before, Pilchesky used to be able to physically intimidate people, but now with old age that's no longer possible. What's a bully to do? Well that's the beauty of the Internet for you: even the most shriveled up old body (Pilchesky) or angry nebbish (Anti) can be a tough guy on-line.
The best way to "win" these games? Don't play them.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Tuesday 16th of June 2009 06:44:37 AM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I honestly thought that the FBI had conducted an investigation of the Single Tax Office and came to the conclusion that although they were incompetent that that did not mean that they should go to jail ... and Now Janet is leading the way for Andy Jarbola to investigate something that has already been investigated? Am I right or wrong about this one. And they Got Judy to make the motion last night ... Fay used the upcoming election to get Judy to make the motion ... I'm not saying that I think an investigation is wrong but hasn't one already been done by the FBI???? Or am I thinking of something else?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
...was used at the end of the FBI investigation of the Single Tax Office. I think that says a lot.
What do I think?
As usual, Janet Evans is posturing. She's the Scranton equivalent of Nikita Khrushchev pounding her shoe.
If the FBI could not find enough information to charge tax office employees with committing a crime(s), then I highly doubt Andy Jarbola will either.
The attempt here, I think, is to somehow embarrass Ken McDowell and Andy Jarbola, as DD encouraged rumors have it that they are somehow political (if not personal) friends.
The above noted, everything that I've seen, heard and read tells me that Ken McDowell is grossly incompetent. Based on what we know now...things like accounts being pooled (contrary to procedural requirements)...he shouldn't hold any office that involves any fiscal responsibility. Hell, I wouldn't trust him to be the Treasurer of a Little League team. My personal opinion? He should resign from his current office and get a job collecting carts at WalMart (where there is less room to interpret procedures: "collect the carts").
Bottom line? More Scranton politics as usual, spearheaded by the queen of Scranton politics as usual, Janet Evans. She knows that Jarbola probably can't come up with anything to charge McDowell, but she just wants to put the screws to him anyway as it will showcase her as being "for the people" (more correctly the person...namely Janet Evans). This is the perfect issue for her, as it will probably never be resolved, therefore it provides her with an almost unlimited ability to posture to her "Doomer base".
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Wednesday 17th of June 2009 06:38:32 AM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I wonder just how she would feel if someone investigated her for insurance fraud ... hell just how does a teacher hurt their back doing their job? I am wondering ... especially when you consider she is now taking care of her mother who she more likely than not must lift and move ... yet she collects workman's comp for a back injury that she says she got at work ... insurance fraud is a felony ... we see it on TV all of the time that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is cracking down on it. Maybe ... just maybe an investigation on Janut should be done concerning the possibility of insurance fraud.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.