Ag ... you were so right ... look at this ... crazy train for sure!

Joe Pilchesky



Posts: 4921
Date: May 28 9:58 AM, 2009

a bitter pill wrote:

---

There needs to be a meeting of the minds.

Which minds? The minds that are diseased with ego and very limited emotional intelligence are those of Bill Courtright and Gary Dibileo. These two circle-jerkers clearly did not have enough toys as children. If either Courtright or DiBileo were female, Chris Doherty would concede to the world of advanced intuition, sophisticated manipulation and political vision. The problem here is that they're men. M - E - N.  Malignant Ego Neurosis To put it in simple terms, two dumb fvcks. They created a sandbox called musical council chairs some years ago and believe it belongs to them. Like I said, two dumb fvcks. And, they just might get away with undermining the opportunity to get this supermajority in place, after all, it's all about Billy and Gary. Right??  That's what matters here. Not the people. Not stopping Doherty and the Times, but Billy and Gary.

Here's Courtight, a quiet dumb fvck sitting councilman who watches, legislation by legislation, the city sink into corrupt-laden debt unequalled by any city of this size on the Eastern coast. For 6 years now, he's set the record for casting 'safe' no votes that meant nothing. The word "no" was the limit of his representation of the people who have been paying him $300 a week to let Sherry watch him jerk off under the desk. And we all thought Sherry was looking at her blackberry. My apologies to Sherry.

Here's DiBileo, gets steamrolled in 05 and retires to the lower shelf of political anitquity in the basement of Scranton politics. We don't hear a peep from him for four years. He emerges in 09, shrugs off the dust, clears the cobwebs and assumes the position of savior armed with a political pocket knife and handing his political puppet strings to Chris Cullen. That's how fvcked up this city is. That's the best we can do?  Clearly, it is.

All of them claim to be running against Doherty's politics.

These M - E - N don't run against Doherty. They run with him. Get it right. They play right into his hands. Janet Evans runs against Doherty. Chris Doherty fears her because she's a "her". A woman. Not a dumb fvck. Evans teaches political correctness by her emotional control, her ability to absorb whatever Doherty can dish out and rising to her feet no matter what size bus the Times runs her over with. All of which, by the way, she's done with a wink and a smile. But for a muzzle on her political liability known as Dave Evans, no one would know what she was thinking until it was far too late.  

If so, they should put their heads together and plan the next move. It's about toppling this regime, first and foremost. If they come together for the cause, they are all heroes.

Heroes are of an unselfish nature. That's what topples regimes. Even if they despise one another, they join forces to get the toppling done. They put aside personal agendas, political pride and destructive division. Courtright is NOT man enough to do that. DiBileo? Perhaps. With a nudge. Evans? Reeks with it.

---

 

If I were Janet I would be afraid ... he's stalker material and he's right in her neighborhood ... David watch yourself ... this guy is unstable. Lifetime movies are made about guys like him.

The time is coming when even the Evans camp is going to view Joe as too much of a liability and cut him loose. 

In my opinion, I think that is what the Dibileo camp did when Atty Cullen (major player in Murphy/Dibileo camp) failed to represent Edith in her legal battles. 

I've read that thread Sun and I'm pretty disgusted for several reasons:

1. SPD - Members of the SPD that post at DD really need to examine their conscience...why participate at a site where the moderator basically opens the door to calling the police involved de facto murderers?  Look, I wasn't there, Anti wasn't there, Pilchesky wasn't there...but several police officers were, so I say give them the benefit of the doubt.  We trust the SPD with our lives, so I think we should also trust that they did the right thing...until someone in authority conducts an investigation and proves otherwise.  They have earned the right of assumed innocence.
   
2. Anti - Anti is a racist pig.  Many of us suspect that "Anti" is actually some bloated white, middle-class, nebbish self-loather who has turned himself into a self-styled legend...on an Internet Message board.  That says a lot about the guy.
3. Taking Advantage - Clearly the deceased individual in question had some mental health issues, so dragging this issue around in the sewer that is DD is at best in bad taste.  Remember though that this is the same place were one of Pilchesky's alter-egos ("Twisted Brother"...complete with mock-ebonics parody speak) accused Chris Doherty of causing a suicide.  Anyone with any knowledge of mental health issues can tell you that suicides are not "caused" by someone else...the things that lead someone to taking their own life are far more complex than "he did it".  The fact is that Pilchesky is once again taking advantage of a horrible situation to inflate his own ego and generate DD site traffic.  Call me old-fashioned, but that's just plain wrong.
   

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Antisystemicmovements



Status: Online
Posts: 3685
Date: May 31 2:20 PM, 2009

Let anti break it down for you:

The woman is black. She is not fully human, thus there needs to be no explanation. End of story.

The SPD is right; the two women in the last 4 or 5 five years are dead wrong.

__________________
All Joe ever wanted was a ramp for his disabled father in law.........

Perfect example on how DD is way over limits of being legit. I love it when I see these!!

agamemnon, I believe you now! This guy is garbage, plain and simple.

Sorry Lus for starting this topic under this heading. If you look at the current posts on DD in this topic, you can clearly see the posters there are at each others throats over it. Maybe now people will wake up and see that this shi##y site is not what it is. The true colors have shown.

This one is unbelievably simple...so simple that even the average DD poster could get it, if they just stop for a moment and think.

...The police risk their lives to protect us for modest pay
...A mentally ill individual was tragically shot by the police
...An investigation has been launched

The End. 

If it turns out that the officers did not follow procedure or acted inappropriately, then that will come out in due time.  Until then, give the guys who risk their lives for us the benefit of the doubt.  They deserve that much.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

I guess Joe Pilchesky is ancient ... if this woman is considered and old lady... She was 52 years old ... Joe is 60 what???? Anyway ... my heart goes out to all involved.

Side note...I was just reading this thread at DD and what a shock, some DD posters have started to figure out that the site is full of anonymous idiots making accusations without any facts!  Now who would have thought that?  I think it is "John Galt" who has also come up with the "revelation" that DD posters selectively believe the Scranton Times.  By selectively I mean...

...when it says something they agree with it is credible
...when it reports anything negative about Pilchesky, Evans, (or positive about Doherty) it is not

...amazing, simply amazing.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Sorry to be yelling there, but you WILL NOT see a single post from "Nelson" in that thread.  He is too afraid to open his mouth, lest he end up contradicting himself about how DD is the "only real source for news" in Scranton.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

I really believe hardcore has had enough of that site. Hardocre if you see this, Brother I am standing behind you 110%. I was banned there for voicing my "free speech right." I believe that dumba$$ Pilchesky does keep you around for his simple amusement.

Hang in there, People are seeing the true colors of the felons website.

Speculation on why the officers were there for an hour is pointless at this moment, and it will all come out in the PSP investigation anyway.  The DD "Truth Squad" is just looking for someone new to demonize, as...

...Doherty won
...They've already dragged every single relative (including daugthers) of this Yerke dude through the mud
...apparently Pilchesky has suspended his jihad against Bill Courtright

...this is nothing more than water-cooler gossip of the worst kind because we are talking about one person's life and the professional lives of four police officers.


-- Edited by Agamemnon on Tuesday 2nd of June 2009 06:27:38 AM

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Spin do they teach you this couch pillow unamring tactic for knife attackers?  Or how to use a couch pillow as a shield?

Joe Pilchesky


No matter what is said at the end of the day, no one, and I mean no one, is going to sell the idea that four cops could not have subdued this woman, NO ONE. They were in her home. They each had access to a variety of means to end it, i.e., surround her until one gets a chance to grab her arm, throw couch cushions at her or use one to protect yourself




So Joe can subdue a woman who has a knife using a pillow, so then WHY in THE HEcKY SHeCKy (saw sam made his first post in over a month) did you use a tire iron to beat a sleeping drunk???

Many many years ago my grandfather was a police officer ... he was a Lt. with the SPD. That was way back in the 30' 40's and 50's ... he was not yet retired when he passed away in 1960.

Anyway that has nothing to do with anything ... I wanted to comment on Puzzler's post ... how the hell does Pilchesky know that they could even get near that couch ...

There are so many people who post about what happened and the only ones who know are the ones who are there ... they can't comment due to the ongoing investigation. I for one have complete trust that the PSP will investigate this properly and come to a conclusion as to if the proper steps were taken and if deadly force was indeed needed. Until that time, and until the facts of this case come out and proves that there was some sort of wrong doing ... I can only assume that our officers acted in a professional manner.

Let's wait for the completion of the investigation people.