Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........

LusOnlyVoice

Site Administrator

Status: Offline

Posts: 5099

Date: Tue May 12 9:10 PM, 2009

Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........

Permalink

Now all weekend long I have been lead to believe that there would be no meeting tonight ... that Virgina McGregor had order that there would be "No God Dammed Meeting Tuesday"

StorminCarmen

Posts: 292
Date: May 9 9:26 PM, 2009

VIRGINIA AT THE COUNTRY CLUB: There will be no G0D Damn Meeting Tuesday

That's right folks, Ginger called it while at a CC function today. She ordered Fanucci not to attend and called Gatelli to say the same. McGoff tried to fight back and she told him she would have him thrown off council. Let's see what the excuse will be when it gets cancelled this week. They cannot take the heat. Lame Duck Judy and Sherry will be nasty, nasty women for 3 - 7 months.

(edited for typos)

-- Edited by Joe Pilchesky on Sunday 10th of May 2009 01:00:49 AM

And this is Nelson Ancherani's new source ... these people make things up contantly and continuously ... and the truly sad thing is that they believe the lies that they tell.

I guess it just goes to show that Virgina McGregor is not the evil bitch she is made out to be ... and she does not have as much say about running the city government that the kids across the hall would lead us all to believe.

Oh and Carmen ... it seems as though Judy and Sherry are taking the heat very well ... I have that council meeting on right now ... you know that God Dammed council meeting that isn't going to happen!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

Glenn Cashuric

Member

Status: Offline

Posts: 505

Date: Tue May 12 9:30 PM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

They still should have attended the debate. Even tonight there were no good excuses given. GC __________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters

Guru

Status: Offline

Posts: 3414

Date: Tue May 12 10:06 PM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........

Permalink

Glenn Cashuric wrote:

They still should have attended the debate. Even tonight there were no good excuses given.

GC

fine they should have attended....now I am wondering did you by chance chastise Joey-boy for making those horrible comments about Sherri Fannucci?

see below for an example

Joe Pilchesky

Posts: 3334
Date: Sep 29 12:20 AM, 2008

RE: Fanucci out - Tom Charles in for council seat?

Don't know anything about her resigning, but I do know that she's had her fill. Not running for re-election, so Tom Charles will step up to the plate.

Dead true.

Also dead true, I personally have had my hands all over Sherry Fanucci's chest. Have pics to prove it. Quite solid, I might ad. Great knobs

I was just wondering since you seem hellbent on pointing out others mistakes. I just want to make sure you are consistant.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

Glenn Cashuric

Member

Status: Offline

Posts: 505

Date: Tue May 12 10:11 PM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

Racist comments? I will object. Off-color remark that even Ms. Fanucci found amusing? Nope. Stop being so defensive. Chris Doherty is going to win, and you will have your mayor for at least another couple of years. Also, offering my opinion that all candidates should attend a debate is not pointing out mistakes, even though that did happen to be a big one on their part. GC __________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters

Guru

Status: Offline

Posts: 3414

Date: Tue May 12 10:47 PM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

Not being defensive...just like to keep you honest :) __________________ Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

LusOnlyVoice

Site Administrator

Status: Offline

Posts: 5099

Date: Wed May 13 4:32 AM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

Well if the topic had anything to do with the debate ... I might give you that ... however the topic is ... the kids across the hall ... which you are one of ... said that there would be no meeting Tuesday Night ... because Virginia McGregor said there wouldn't be one ... and they clearly ... were WRONG .... do you Glenn ... have anything to say about that. And if you read IHaves post you would see that she did not say Joey made a racist comment ... not at all ... where did you get that out of her post????? So lets go back to her question for you ... did you by chance chastise Joey-boy for making those horrible comments about Sherri Fannucci? __________________ I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

Agamemnon

DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline

Posts: 3768

Date: Wed May 13 6:18 AM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

I think the ladies should have attended the debate, despite what I think were at least reasonable concerns over objectivity. By not going, they played into the hands of Pilchecky and his troop of quasi-retarded konsil stormtroopers & various assorted union thugs. Pilchesky and his allies Gary DiBileo and Janet Evans LOVE issues like this, as it takes the spotlight away from things like... ...Gary's inability to actually get a copy of the City Budget (despite it being public document) so as to offer details about his "plan" ...Gary's assinine chirping about ending poliltics as usual...all while he touts his "endorsed Democrat" status (funny, but isn't being endorsed a part of the whole "politics as usual" thing????) ...Janet Evans highly questionable hiring (and this is NOT a good environment for that sort of thing...cough FBI cough) ...Janet Evans abysmal record at getting anything done while on konsil...other than t a l k i n g r e a l l y s l o w l y The more the discussion is about Judy and Sherry, the less it is about Gary/Janet/young racist dude/other one. Finally, but now showing up, they turned the LWV detate into a free commercial for Janet/young racist dude/other one. Bad move. __________________ Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Glenn Cashuric

Member

Status: Offline

Posts: 505

Date: Wed May 13 8:40 AM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

I post on both message boards. I am "one of" neither. There is no "Stormin Carmen", by the way. It is someone else's second or third account. I'm not yet sure who it is. "Quasi-retarded" and "union thugs" is something I expect from "the kids across the hall", especially since Mrs. Schumacher or Mr. Ancherani are much more professional than shills like Mrs. Williams. GC __________________

Agamemnon

DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline

Posts: 3768

Date: Wed May 13 5:34 PM, 2009

Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

Ahhh, the moral prarie dog pokes his head up...my thoughts in [Dark Red]. I post on both message boards. [Yes, you do. You post on DD, I suspect, because you want that "crew" to not end up rooting through your garbage the next time you run for something...probably a smart move. Keep in the mind the old saying though..."if you lay with dogs, you eventually fleas". As for why you post here, well, I suspect that you don't want to alienate the 5 or 6 potential voters here either.] I am "one of" neither. [To post here there is no such "one or the other" requirement.] There is no "Stormin Carmen", by the way. It is someone else's second or third account. [Glenn, we've been saying that for a very, very long time, so you are a little late in the revelation department. In fact, there was a recent post that talked about how Carmen started off as a pro-Doherty "foil" for Pilchesky, but has now fully morphed into a typical quasi-regtarded DD toadie.] I'm not yet sure who it is. "Quasi-retarded" and "union thugs" is something I expect from "the kids across the hall", especially since Mrs. Schumacher or Mr. Ancherani are much more professional than shills like Mrs. Williams. [If a Les Spindler comes to the podium and speaks in a manner consistent with the actions of someone who is almost retarded, then I will use what I feel is the appropriate descriptive. As for that being similar to "the kids across the hall", well note that I've not called any of them anything approaching the "n-word". Remember that little episode Glenn? As I recall, there was no Glenn Cashuric "shaming" post in that entire thread. Funny, but you don't have a problem questioning my descriptive language, but Joe get's a pass (oh, I forgot, you messaged him privately about that sort of thing, right? Why how very...well, unproveable of you). As for "union thugs", well when you have a union officer using scare tactics to enrich his own wallet (via a new Mayor and a better contract)...which "officer" Nelson does...then I'll call that like I see that. He may in fact be much more personally charming than Joanne Williams, but personal charm in the face of public shame does little to change the fact that his actions at the konsil podium are reprehensible at best, examples of thuggery at worst.] GC -- Edited by Agamemnon on Wednesday 13th of May 2009 07:27:11 PM __________________ Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Glenn Cashuric

Member

Status: Offline

Posts: 505

Date: Wed May 13 7:26 PM, 2009

RE: Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

1. I like message boards. 2. My opposition to the use of racial slurs is well-documented and public. 3. Why should a union not want the best contract it can obtain? Someday soon I bet there will be common ground located on this issue, but I have concerns about a potential Mayor DiBileo just like you do. 4. Joe Pilchesky knows that he doesn't have to root around in my garbage. If anybody wants to know something about me, they need only ask. Anybody interested in politics would do well to follow the same rule. 5. You guys are getting very defensive lately. I can't imagine why. I realize it's going to be an extremely close election, but I still believe the mayor will win. GC __________________

Agamemnon

DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline

Posts: 3768

Date: Wed May 13 7:49 PM, 2009

Well once again the kids across the hall are WRONG ...........	Permalink

Ahhh, now this is getting fun... (By the way, I am using a different laptop without a real-time spell checker, so forgive the horrendeous spelling errors!) 1. I like message boards. [I suspect that Message Boards like you too Glenn.] 2. My opposition to the use of racial slurs is well-documented and public. [Except at DD, other than the occasional mild retort.] 3. Why should a union not want the best contract it can obtain? [They should, but you are going off topic here; the point is that "officer" Nelson is using scare tactics...which I personally consider to be a form of intimidation...i.e. thuggery...as leverage to achieve this end. Based on that, I think the use of the term "union thugs" is appropriate.] Someday soon I bet there will be common ground located on this issue, but I have concerns about a potential Mayor DiBileo just like you do. [Oh there will be common ground. The police and fire unions are simply running out of courts. What's more, if Doherty is re-elected, maybe he will finally see that he has already won and actually negotiate in good faith with this crew. As for Gary, well there is a reason why he is so beloved by the police and fire unions, and it has nothing to do with his skill at selling P&C or life insurance.] 4. Joe Pilchesky knows that he doesn't have to root around in my garbage. [You can be rather "high horsed" about it Glenn, but the fact of the matter is this: you are seen as a supporter of Pilchesky, so of course those gutteral tactics...such as midnight garbage can raids...will not be applied against you. As long as you continue to provide Pilchesky with some sense of legitimacy, it won't be your wife, your children, your grandchildren, etc. that will be fodder for some anonymous Internet goon posting at DD. In a sense then you have really helped yourself.] If anybody wants to know something about me, they need only ask. [Let me express your tactic here in a slightly different way Glenn...befriend the bullies, therefore they will treat you as a friend and not as a target. How does that sound??] Anybody interested in politics would do well to follow the same rule. 5. You guys are getting very defensive lately. [I suspect that might be true, but as the out-right lies come out about people some of us know...and those lies turn nastier and nastier...it is a natural reaction.] I can't imagine why. [You can't???? What planet are you on???? My wife's family has known the Gatelli's for almost 30 years. Some of the stuff written about her at DD goes well beyond mere political blustering Glenn. ] I realize it's going to be an extremely close election, but I still believe the mayor will win. [Would I like Doherty to win? Yes, but only because Gary DiBileo is a far, far worse choice. Given another candidate...one who could actually serve...I might vote differently. You are over-simplifying matters by implying that "you guys should be happy becuase your guy is probably going to win". Finally & speaking just for myself, my single biggest arguement with you is that you want to play in the sewers of DD, but you get offended when someone comments on your stench. Sure, on occasion you will post something here about how (for example) they get too homophobic at DD...and if you really feel like going wild you may even make a mild comment or two at DD. However when it comes to the core crap that is spewed there, your natural inclination is to stay out of it. Your choice, but don't think that you get a pass on it here.] GC -- Edited by Agamemnon on Wednesday 13th of May 2009 08:04:59 PM __________________ Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.