Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Post Info TOPIC: There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Permalink  
 

Funny, but I thought only Congress and had the power to amend the Internal Revenue Code (you know...the "thing" that defines what is considered to be tax exempt).  Silly me.  According to "Political Sex" the Mayor of Scranton Pennsylvania apparently has that power.  Now who would have thought that? 




Political sex

avatar_7564.gif

Posts: 120
Date: Apr 13 8:58 PM, 2009

It's safe to say the if Doherty is dumped Dibileo might implement some kind of plan to get the U of S on the tax rolls. Or, if we get the Evans/Rogan/Joyce team elected, we might be looking at some new legislation that will get the U in the game of paying their way. Da U is looking more and more like a welfare institution with all these land grabs with no tax liability.


-- Edited by Agamemnon on Monday 13th of April 2009 09:36:03 PM

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Permalink  
 

Maybe she is going to do that 'arms crossed across chest and blink thing"






__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Permalink  
 

LOL... Barbara "Tomko" Eden.  That still makes me laugh.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
tooltime


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Date:
RE: There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Permalink  
 

Here's a simple question for those of you smarter than I. When any non-profit is taking a property off the tax rolls, is it possible to charge a (for loss of a better word) lost tax fee of say 5 years worth of taxes?

__________________
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Permalink  
 

Unknown for sure but I do know they have wide protection against taxes in general so my guess would be no.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Permalink  
 

tooltime wrote:

Here's a simple question for those of you smarter than I. When any non-profit is taking a property off the tax rolls, is it possible to charge a (for loss of a better word) lost tax fee of say 5 years worth of taxes?


I'm not smarter than anyone, (in fact when it comes to certain things I'm down right dense...hell I can't even tell what color socks to wear most days) but I'm going to say that the answer to your question tooltime is no.  A non-profit means that the organization in question complies with IRC section 501(c)(3), meaning that it engages in certain activities...religious, educational, charitable, etc.  I'm not aware of any exemption that says "income isn't taxed except...".

This was the whole point of my original posting...namely that the definition of a non-profit is determined at a federal level.  I don't think there is anything generally speaking that a city government can do about that designation.  About the only thing that even comes close to that is the notion of parsing the activities of an organization and in effect saying "well that part of ____________ isn't engaging in religious, educational, charitable, etc activities and as a result, that portion of the institution is no longer considered to be a 501(c)(3) organization".  Even then I think it's a bit of a stretch and I suspect that a non-profit could probably mount a legal challenge to that kind of determination.


-- Edited by Agamemnon on Tuesday 14th of April 2009 05:25:19 PM

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> There's No Need to Fear: DiBileo/Evans et all Will Re-Write the Internal Revenue Code
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard