Sherry Fanucci offered up that little tidbit at the council meeting yesterday. Quite gleefully, might I add.

So, what exactly is the reasoning behind the name "LusOnlyVoice"? It's been nagging at me. I'm not even sure how to pronounce it.

GC

Glenn Cashuric wrote:

---

Sherry Fanucci offered up that little tidbit at the council meeting yesterday. Quite gleefully, might I add.

So, what exactly is the reasoning behind the name "LusOnlyVoice"? It's been nagging at me. I'm not even sure how to pronounce it.

GC

---

Don't let my screen name keep you up at night ... if that's the thing that is nagging at you ... do you know how lucky you are?

You know what nags at me ... Joe Pilchesky ... and the kids across the hall ... the fact that they blame all of their problems on the Doherty Administration ... the fact that they blame the Doherty Administration as being the sole downfall of the City of Scranton ... the fact that they can't see the good things because they are wildly blinded by the bad ... the fact Joe and the kids across the hall blame Chris Doherty for a suicide ... the fact that Joe Pilchesky is capable of beating a sleeping drunk with a tire iron and is quite proud that he did so ... the fact that Joe cost the city so much ... but makes a clear choice to not pay his taxes ... the fact that Joe needs to pose as so many different posters to make his website more popular than it really is ...

But what really nags at me is the fact that there are starving children in the world ... that there is so much hate in this world ... the fact that our babies are off fighting wars ... and that's just to name a few things! The worry that the cancer I once had will return ... now that one really nags at me.

There are so many more important things in the world so don't get hung up on a screen name ....

Oh and Lus is for my favorite Aunt ... Lucianne ... we always called her Lus ... she passed away 5 years ago now ... she was my very last living Aunt ... so I thought I would honor her by using her name for something that she would believe in ... hope that helps you to sleep at night Glenn.

-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 20:10, 2009-02-18

So let me see...folks don't pay traffic tickets and that bothers Glenn...fair enough...it bothers me too. I've had two parking tickets and paid both promptly. Know what else I pay promptly? My property and garbage taxes.The man (Pilchesky) has bragged about his 'vette...his bike...vacations...spending over $30,000 on lawsuits...but yet he isn't paying taxes? Pathetic.

Glenn...nice try at changing the subject. I don't blame you for not wanting to piss Pilchesky off...afterall he allows you to post on his site. However if you're upset about people not paying parking tickets, you must really be pissed off about people not paying their taxes....especially when they clearly have the means to do so.

What say you, Glenn Cashuric, about the possibility that Pilchesky is a tax dead-beat??

-- Edited by Agamemnon at 21:56, 2009-02-18

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Glenn does not live in Scranton so why would he be upset that Joe didn't take some of that money that they bilked from Mr. Conrad to pay taxes ... at least you could have done something more useful with that money Joe ... no instead you wasted it on court costs ... for your little hobby of costing the taxpayers (and no I'm not talking about the Pilchesky's) of the City of Scranton money ... raising those property taxes ... you know the ones that tax evading Joe Pilchesky does not pay. But I would bet money that he owe the county a small fortune also ... hmmmmmm ... have to check into that one! RTK

Ahhhhhhh ... ok I was trying to figure out what Ducky was talking about! Pilchesky acts like he knows everything ... and yet he knows nothing ... hell I bet he didn't know he owed $8,000 in back taxes ... yeah that's right ... he didn't realize that it's been 6 years since he has paid taxes.

Edith got one hell of a deal when she got Joey. "I offer you Edith my solemn vow to help bilk your dying father, not pay the local taxes on the house I put in your name as well as the garbage tax, in sickness and in health, in good times and bad, and till you are found guilty"

Hey Joey ... here is a way for you to live without paying property taxes .... as I'm sure it won't be long before the Sheriff is knocking at your door!



Park it at WalMart ... you can get extra savings there ... I hear they let you plug into electicty for free ... water may be a problem ... but hey Maybe Sammy Patilla will let you fill up from his Garden Hose ... God knows he worships the ground you walk on!


This option would save you a lot of trouble! And then again ... maybe Sam and Phyllis will take you and Joanne in ... afterall he did offer to take in that woman from St. Ann's St. So maybe ... that would be great as then you wouldn't have to pay anything and you could devote yourself to your legal career ... and wasting more of the taxpayers (not your own)money.

No it wasn't was it ... in life one is given opportunit to make choices ... some of us choose to go down the honest path in life ... and then some of us choose to pay for frivilous lawsuits instead of paying our taxes/garbage fees. Then some of us make a choice to honor our parents and others make the choice to reconcile a broken relationship with their dying father to gain controll of his money ..

Sounds like Joe and Joanne were a match made in hell ... perfect in every way for each other. Not an honest bone in either of them.

Well it appears, Joe and Edith haven't filed their Federal Income Tax from 1999-2007. And what does somelike Joe do when the IRS comes knocking? Well of course he sues them.

JOSEPH PILCHESKY AND JOANNE RICCI PILCHESKY, PETITIONERS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SIDNEY BURNSIDE, REVENUE OFFICER, AND RUTH LITTMAN, GROUP MANAGER, RESPONDENTS.

September 29, 2008


Background

On April 14, 2008, Petitioners initiated this action with the filing of a Petition to Quash Third Party Summonses (Doc. 1) issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Petitioners are proceeding pro se.

On July 23, 2007, Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. 5) and supporting brief (Doc. 6). Therein, Respondents argue that third-parties Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Community Bank, N.A. & First Liberty Bank Trust are not found within this judicial district and, accordingly, that this Court is without the subject matter jurisdiction to quash the summonses issued to these two (2) third-parties.

Also on July 23, 2007, Respondents filed a Motion to Enforce IRS summons (Doc. 7). In this motion, the Respondents argue that Petitioners have failed to allege the grounds require to quash the summonses issued to four (4) third parties, including NBT Bank, N.A., Wachovia Bank, N.A., Community Bank, N.A. & First Liberty Bank Trust, and Citizens & Northern Bank. Along with the motion, Respondents submitted the Declaration of Sidney Burnside (Burnside Decl., Doc. 7, Ex. 1.) which details the nature and history of the IRS investigation into Petitioners tax liabilities from 1999 through 2007.

Petitioners filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Briefs (Doc. 9) in reply to Respondents' motions on August 15, 2008. The Court denied Petitioners' Motion in an Order signed August 27, 2008. As Petitioners failed to timely file briefs in reply to Respondents' motions and were unable to obtain an extension of time, Petitioners' and Respondents' motions are currently ripe for disposition.


In this case, the IRS has submitted a declaration from Revenue Officer Sidney Burnside stating that: (i) he is examining the Petitioners' tax liability for the years 1999 through 2007 because the Petitioners have not filed tax returns for those years, (ii) the summonses issued in this matter are relevant to the IRS investigation as the information sought is needed to determine the correct amount of Petitioners' tax liability for these years, (iii) the information sought is not currently in the possession of the IRS, and (iv) the IRS followed all administrative steps provided by the Internal Revenue Code when issuing the summonses. (Burnside Decl., Doc. 7, Ex. 2.) This declaration satisfies the required burden for a prima facie case as established in Powell.

Officer Burnside further represents to the Court that the pending investigation has not been referred to the Department of Justice and the IRS has made no recommendation to the DOJ for either a grand jury investigation or any criminal proceeding against Petitioners for the years under investigation. Officer Burnside further states that the IRS is not delaying such a recommendation to the DOJ and the DOJ has made no request pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 6103(h)(3)(B) for the disclosure of any return or return information relating to Petitioners. (Burnside Decl. 18.) Accordingly, the IRS is not attempting to circumvent constitutional limitation on the collection of information during a pending criminal prosecution.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, the Court will (i) deny Petitioners Joanne Ricci Pilchesky and Joseph Pilchesky's Petition to Quash Third Party Summons (Doc. 1), (ii) deny Respondents' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 5), and (iii) grant Respondents' Motion for Summary Enforcement of Summons (Doc. 7).


http://pa.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CMPA%5C2008%5C20080929_0001141.MPA.htm/qx

do you think they claimed and paid taxes on the money they "found" when the poor old guy was in Edith's "care"? lol lol

Put this posting from Foam'n Fay the "Truly Ironic" file...



aquamg
Posts: 441
Date: Feb 24 3:07 PM, 2009
ken smith on radio

---

Ken Smith will be on Steve Corbettt at 4:05 Pm today about his unpaid property taxes--if you'd like to call in, the number is 883-0098




Hey Fay...next time Pilchesky calls into the Sue Henry Show maybe you can call in and ask about HIS tax paying status.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

I do believe that if the refuse fee goes unpaid that the city is not required to haul your refuse away ... you will have to hire a private hauler ... so in the wind will be the stench of Joe's rotting garbage ... because if you don't pay the private hauler ... hell they don't take your garbage!

Well I reposted Sherri's comments below I am sure she wants to stand by them. :))

Glenn???  What say you?

sharilewis Senior Member Posts: 428 Date: Fri Feb 20 1:19 PM, 2009

RE: So...What Is Everybody's View On The Parking Ticket Situation? If that is true about his taxes, that would trash his credibility on that subject. You can't throw stones...well you know the rest. I'd be shocked if he let that happen considering the the backlash he'd get. We'll see I guess.

Ok ... this just kind of cracked me up ... read it and you will see why ...

Joe Pilchesky Posts: 4293 Date: Feb 25 11:52 PM, 2009

What State Rep. Murphy is trying to accomplish here is passing a state law with some teeth to it that would make it impossible for the county commissioners, or any other taxing body, to arbitrarily raise our taxes in excessive amounts without the voters agreeing to it.  If a tax was needed above 5% or so, it would go on the ballot, where it belongs. It's called a referendum. The people decide. You know, the ones who pay the bills around here.(Joe would that mean that you don't get a say?? As you don't pay your taxes that means you don't pay the bills) It's a great effort by Rep. Murphy to put people like Doherty on a leash. Here's a copy of the proposal mailed to all of the communities in Lackawanna County wherein the legislation is fully explained.  Every local taxing body got a copy. Attached to it was a Motion that any of the taxing bodies could sign and return as a sign of support of the new law. Gatelli and Fanucci, along with McGoff, voted against this legislation.  Why? It will protect us from further taxation like the 48% tax hike Cordaro hit us with and the 25% tax hike Doherty just hit us with.  (No Joe it is designed to protect those of us who actually do pay our taxes not people like you who do not pay taxes.  I have to wonder if you would be in favor of this if it protected those who do pay and levied stiff fines on people like you who do not pay ... what would you think about it then?) In fact, the mayor has stayed silent on the issue, electing not to show any support for the legislation. My source has informed me that Doherty placed calls thoughout the community looking for support against this important law.  (Ok ... so now you have just contradicted yourself ... The Mayor has either stayed silent or he has been placing calls ... make up your mind ... you can't tell me one thing and have me believe another ... I'm not one of your sheep!) Gatelli asked her friends in the Taylor/Old Forge area not to support it.  Strange that a public official would vote against protection we need.  Then again, look at Gatelli's voting record on borrowing and taxes. (How about we look at your record Joe ... Joe bitches about taxes he has no intention of paying ... Hey buddy can you say Sheriffs Sale????  I think he should be knocking on your door any time now!!!  Hey just go and pay your taxes will ya!)

Joe I do not understand why you spend so much time bitiching about taxes when you have no intention of paying them ... any of them.  Yet you utilize the services ... you kill the city and county with lawsuits costing the TAXPAYERS (of which you are not one) Thousands of dollars ... raising those taxes you have no intention of paying ... YEAH YOUR A GREAT COMMUNITY ACTIVIST!  NOT!!!!!!