It seems as though the city could have used all the money not collected due to political favoritism and/or outstanding fines floating around. What, in your opinion, is the proper solution for this?
In no way am I excusing anybody, but I can see one ticket getting bounced. I cannot see fifteen or twenty, and there is no way any elected official (even Mrs. Evans) should have outstanding fines floating around.
Deplorable. Every time I get nailed for parking (sometimes I intentionally do it to avoid long walks in bad weather), I pay the ten bucks.
I think even one is wrong. either getting tickets fixed is right or it is wrong ...period! Fixing one as opposed to a hundred and one shouldn't be the point. The point for me is they are using their position to get an advantage. OH Sherri?? you paying attention?? Janey-baby seems to know how to milk the system a bit herself haynaaaaaaaa??
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 16:28, 2009-02-17
Now if it were me, I wouldn't or couldn't get ONE ticket fixed, let alone many tickets. So to Glenn's point, it's wrong, period. The wrong starts with the first ticket fixed. Janet Evans is more "connected" than I am...and certainly Attorney Minora is many times more connected.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Wrong back at ya. I said "bounced", not "fixed". There are deals cut at the district judge's office on parking tickets (and others) all the time. But the indulgences should be applied equally and without prejudice.
A few years back Jimmy Klee was involved in a major ticket fixing scheme, nothing happened even after it was proven as true. So don't think anything will change,, if your connected you can get them fixed, been going on for years and years.
__________________
Just when you thought it was safe to open your mind......
Glen you will have to excuse me if I don't get the "lingo" . In my world things are a bit more simple than that .....bounced.... fixed what is the difference? If you have a ticket pay it...period. That way there is no need for "lingo".
Taylor I agree, it has been going on for years but I don't like it anyway. You are probably correct though, it won't end any time soon. It certainly won't end because i want it too, that is for sure
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 08:56, 2009-02-18
"bounced" or "fixed", neither has been an option ever presented to me. I must not be among the political elite.
Taylor's right...this is almost viewed as a perk of sorts, one that extends beyond one faction (Doherty vs Evans) or the other withing the municipal government.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:33, 2009-02-18
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Dear Jacka$$ IHAVE. Please PM me that info, for I can not open it for some reason. I assure you that Saintly Jan pays tickets. If one got away it was probably me. By the way Council members have a Lic plate for offical business as does the mayor for tickets. We pay them anyway. Send me that info. If you don't,, just goes to show you are a hate filledA$$.
Dear Jacka$$ IHAVE. Please PM me that info, for I can not open it for some reason. I assure you that Saintly Jan pays tickets. If one got away it was probably me. By the way Council members have a Lic plate for offical business as does the mayor for tickets. We pay them anyway. Send me that info. If you don't,, just goes to show you are a hate filledA$$.
You call me a jackass and you don't know how to open a link?? Yikes!!
If the link won't open for you honey just highlight it (right click and drag to highlight) then hit copy. Afterwards open a new window and paste the address into the web line.
If that is too hard for you I really can't help you any further, but what I can do is copy the body of the document and paste it below. I can't help if it looks goofy as it is not formatted to be displayed in this way, but if you are too dumb to know how to open a link I guess you can't be too critical can you??
Oh despite your many attempts to engage me in a private conversation by way of PM's the answer remains .....forget it!! I have nothing to hide.If you need to say something to me say it here and I will happily respond here. I have no desire to get any "closer" than that to you dear!!
Magisterial District Judge 45-1-06Docket Number: TR-0000934-01Traffic Citation DocketCOMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
EVANS, JANET
Page 1 of 1DOCKETIssue Date: 11/26/2001
File Date: 11/07/2001
Case Disp: Dismissed
Disp Date: 12/13/2001
Requested: $0.00
Judgment: $0.00
Case Status: Adjudicated
CASE INFORMATIONJudge Assigned: KENNEDY, JAMES P
OTN:
Arresting Agency: SCRANTON CITY, POLICE DEPT
Arresting Officer:
Complaint/Incident # F0433779-3
County: LACKAWANNA
Township: SCRANTON CITY
DEFENDANT INFORMATIONName: EVANS, JANET
Date Of Birth:
Address:
Sex:
Race:
SCRANTON, PA 18509
CHARGES# Charge Grade Description Disposition
1 FOC 114 PERMIT PARKING ONLY Dismissed (Lower Court)
CALENDARSchedule Date Event Type Status
12/13/2001 02:30 PM Summary Trial DIS
CASE ACCOUNTINGTotal Due: $0.00
Total Paid: $0.00
Total Adj: $0.00
Balance: $0.00
SUMMONSSummons Date Summons Action
11/29/2001 SUMMONS ACCEPTED
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
1200 Printed: 02/18/2009 1:36 pm
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 13:40, 2009-02-18
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 13:44, 2009-02-18
Way ahead of you. We had no parking permit in the window of carand had to prove we paid for the permit. We pay our tickets Skank. You could have had a laugh because the DOB says Janet is 101 yrs young As far as opening a file is concerned! Hey what can I say. I give the retarded a bad name. OR maybe I can't open them because of all the vile virus filledthings that are sent to Janet from the haters like you. Matter of fact. Ill bet if your not the skank I think you are, your one of the wussy's that email me to kick my a$$ and don't ever show up. See ya, David
LOL well well well if this isn't the Dave we all know and love lol lol lol.
I would love to take credit for being "the skank that e-mails you" but alas it would be a lie. I actually have a life unlike yourself who lives vicariously through your wife.Therefore wasting time e-mailing you isn'ton my daily agenda.... sorry!
Now as for the viruses you think "those people" are sending your wife (not too paranoid are ya? You wearing the tinfoil yet?) ever think about investing in a good virus protection program??
I use Mcafee it is quite good actually. Here is the link to their website. www.McAfee.com Assuming you can actually open it you may find this a helpful program to have on your computer for when the aliens try to beam you aboard the mothership.
Also I highly recommend staying off porn sites I have heard they can load your computer up with all kinds of nasty bugs......just a suggestion.
"Skank"? You're WAY THE HELL out of line on that one.
Now you could whine that we pick on your "Saintly Janet"...and we do, for her actions in public service...but even then it doesn't degrade the level you just sunk things to. Show the posting on this board where we've referred to your "Saintly Janet" as a "Skank" or "Whore". If you can...any one of us will edit out the posting immediately.
As far as emailing you to "kick your a$$"...well that's not any of our styles, and honestly I thought you would have figured that out already. In fact, if I were you, I'd be looking to your buddies at DD...they seem to have far less distaste for you than we do. Hell, I was beginning to like you...well until the "skank" comment that is.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Please refrain from such name calling ... everyone ... I would like to keep this place a civilized as possible ... lets have debate without the name calling please.
I do know that often times we all have a bad day ... or a bad moment in our day and it is not always easy to be nice ... but in the end we should be more considerate of each other's feelings.
I like all of the posters here and don't want anyone name calling each other. OK ... thank you very much!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Does not pay his parking fines ... yet criticizes others for the very same transgressions and publishes it on his hate site ... and he does not pay his taxes ... and yet criticizes others for the very same transgressions and publishes it on his hate site. And he does not pay his Garbage fees ... but I bet he expects prompt removal of his garbage ... and he is one of the strongest critics of everything they DPW does ... hell he expects them to run into burning buildings ... but he does not pay the garbage fee .... GEE ......... HMMMMM .... I'm not suprised that he doe not pay his parking fines .... are you?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Is Pilchesky being courted by the City's Administration ... is he taking favors for lightening up on the City???? I have noticed that he suddenly cares about North Pocono and Covington more than he does about Scranton ... he is getting quite boring in his old age ... I at least used to get a slight thrill responding to his posts about Scranton and well lately I have to say I don't even have much of an interest in even going there to check it out ... well until today that is.
But I have to wonder about Joey ... is he going over to the side of the Administration? Fixed tickets ... not paying taxes for 6 years and yet ... no Sheriffs sale on his property ... Why ... is it pay to play politics for Joey? hmmmmm one wonders don't you think?
Glenn, Shari ... what do we all think about Joey being implicated in the Parking Ticket Corruption that seems to be running rampent in the City of Scranton?????
I know it's ok for Joe right?????
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Lus, if he was part of the scandal, I would think it's terrible. Not defending anyone, but his dockets are non parking tickets, but complaints or citations. All were plead not guilty and dismissed. I would be pretty certain Pilchesky would not get favored treatment, especially by a magistrate. Something else resolved those citations and I couldn't believe he cut a political deal to get them tossed. I would question what precipitated the citations. That I give you.
Most of the dockets posted over there are mostly parking tickets. What I do find hard to believe is the number of connected people with dozens of tickets were dismissed or withdrawn. I'm sure they couldn't be right each and every time. There's a little too much evidence to not make me believe something fishy is going on.
Everyone should be treated equally, regardless of their income, connections, or non-connections. That's apparently not reality, but the way it should be.
Fair enough Shari, although I find the notion that there are so many compliants & citations to be funny at best, scary at worst. Gee let me think now...how many complaints/citations has "Agamemnon" been issued over the years????
[crickets chirping]
Oh, none. I must not be a "community activist" then.
Anyway, now what's your take on the prospect that Pilchesky hasn't paid property/garbage taxes????
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 20:12, 2009-02-19
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
hummmmmmm maybe it is just me but it seems like it got awful quiet about the ticket thing........you think it was when the doomers realized that if you throw out a net you might drag anything or anybody back in????
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 09:45, 2009-02-20
I'm sure that they didn't think that they would net their very own leader .... good work IHave ...
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
It seems as though the city could have used all the money not collected due to political favoritism and/or outstanding fines floating around. What, in your opinion, is the proper solution for this?
GC
Yikes I just realized I was so annoyed with the subject I never actually answered Glen's question.
What is the proper solution for this?
1. All outstanding summons/tickets ect must be paid immediatly (10 days ) if not a warrent for your arrest will be issued. 2.A late fee/penatly of $30.00 per issuance. 3. All outstanding issuances published in the paper.
If that is true about his taxes, that would trash his credibility on that subject. You can't throw stones...well you know the rest. I'd be shocked if he let that happen considering the the backlash he'd get. We'll see I guess.
Oh Shari it's true ... 6 years ... over $8,000 ... and don't forget the garbage fee ... and now IHave has dug up the citations ... come on ... all one can do in this case is say ... that's right ...................................... HELLO POT! THIS IS KETTLE!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Oh and Glenn tells me Sherry Fanucci brought it up at a council meeting ... well my dear you know Joe better than I do and I know him well enough to know if Sherry brought it up at a public televised council meeting and it were not true ... he would be shouting it from the rooftops and off to the courthouse to file yet another pesky lawsuit!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
...Yes, I did notice the subject has been verboten over at DD....
But I thought that at DohertyDeceit there were "No Cuffs On Free Speech"?? Score another victory for Pilchesky Hypocrisy.
As for whether or not the accusation is correct, from what I've heard, it's very credible. Trash his credibility? Well let's put it this way: there's not much there to trash.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.