Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Pilchesky for Mayor
Post Info TOPIC: Pilchesky for Mayor
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

The Phillips for Mayor thread at DD just reeks of pathetic desperation.

Here's a novel thought: Start a "DRAFT PILCHESKY" campaign. Forget the whole "wife as potential estate-bilker" thing; ignore the whole drunk-beating episode...Joe is the Man. If Scranton is truly that desperate, maybe we need a truly desperate candidate.

What do you say Cashuric? I say you should start that thread. You'll be a hero, I promise.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Glenn Cashuric


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

He's not the mayor type, although you have to admit, it would be entertaining...right up until the day somebody pulls a Harvey Milk on him.

GC

__________________
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

"He's not the mayor type"

Lawyer to Human Translation = Bitching is more fun than doing

Artfully done Glenn, artfully done.

Truth be told, Pilchesky has far thinner skin than Chris Doherty; you need only look at his banning from DD anyone who dares challenge the Dogma as proof. Compare that to Doherty, who barely knows that Joe Pilchesky is alive, despite 'ole Joe's many attempts at notoriety.

By the way, are you insinuating that Joe Pilchesky is gay (the Harvey Milk reference)? If so, please expand on your suspicions. I always thought that Pilchesky sometimes goes overboard on the homophobic references, which certainly raises suspicions in my mind.


__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Glenn Cashuric


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

I was referring to Harvey Milk's other end. The one with the gun.

I always said that Chris Doherty's greatest strength was his ability to act as though there was a bell jar over City Hall. Unfortunately, Judy and Sherry failed to heed the mayor's warning and stumbled right into the trap.

GC

__________________
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

Glenn Cashuric wrote:

I was referring to Harvey Milk's other end. The one with the gun.

Say what you will....I have always thought he spent wayyyyyy to much time thinking (fantisizing) about the men in politics and their private parts. It sure sounds to me like Joey-boy is quite attracted to them.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

"I was referring to Harvey Milk's other end. The one with the gun."


Now there are dozens...maybe hundreds...of examples where politicans have assassinated, but maybe two or three that I can think of (including Harvey Milk) that had a gay connection. I don't know Glenn...I think you're subconsciously trying to tell us something.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

Only threw this here as there wasn't anywhere else to put it.

Gee I know based on his past behavior Joey-jerkoff is great believer in full financial disclosure, so I sure hope he claimed the money he received. Also did I read this right?? Is he claiming he kills? Oh and $hit for brains?? Wolves hunt in packs as$hole!!


Joe Pilchesky

leonidas.jpg

Posts: 3784
Date: Nov 30 11:34 PM, 2008

Traditional apathy wrote:

He also said he's allowed some people close to a lawsuit to help with fees but only after knowing their motives.

Only after they've gained my complete trust.

He's a lone wolf and he likes to hunt alone.

A wolf that hunts alone is a successful wolf. Stalking prey like the judicial system, our local and state government and the media takes a lot of energy and thinking that needs focus. It also takes a lot of time and cunning to induce an opponent into reactions that can be beneficial, let's say, in a year or two. Hunting in a pack means you have to spend more time counting heads and keeping everyone accountable for their actions. Doesn't work. Hunting alone has its benefits, like killing when I just feel like it, politically speaking. There's also the issue of being the only one who knows where I am and what I'm doing. And another thing, when I make a kill alone, I don't have to share it. I like that part, the prick that I am.




-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 23:26, 2008-12-07

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 07:29, 2008-12-08

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

Now this is just a thought ... Pilchesky may be the right man for the office ... now before you think I have lost my mind let me explain .... He is constantly talking of broke promises by elected officials .... well he made a promise and broke it and one of his posters poses this question to him:

lackaco
Posts: 7
Date: Dec 15 8:30 PM, 2008

Mr.Pilchelsky,

Do you remeber promising us that you would show yourself this year at council meeting. Did i miss it? The year is now over...oh well maybe next year.



So if broken promises are qualifications then Pilchesky is the man! How long do you think this particular poster will be around considering he calls Pilchesky on this?

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

There's going to be a Governership for the great state of Illinois opening up soon. Send him there - he'll fit RIGHT in.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

I would go for that idea ... can we send the kids across the hall with him ... or would that be tooooooooo much to expect from the citizens of IL .... LOL

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

Well a response ........of sorts anyway. How lame is this excuse. Yikes !!

Joe Pilchesky

leonidas.jpg

Posts: 3838
Date: Dec 16 7:32 PM, 2008

lackaco wrote:

Mr.Pilchelsky,

Do you remeber promising us that you would show yourself this year at council meeting. Did i miss it? The year is now over...oh well maybe next year.



Sure do. I ranted on for two months through November and December that beginning the first week of January I would go to the podium and confront President Gatelli on her repeated violations of constitutional rights of speakers and filling the agenda with Doherty fat, among other things. I very specifically stated what I was going to say to President Gatelli and more specifically how often I'd say it until she resigned as president. I knew I could embarrass her to no end in direct confrontation on live TV. She knew it, too. Unfortunately, my plans were shattered when there was no President Gatelli to confront. She gave it up. Wonder why?

So?? She is still there, Mr. no-balls...What is the matter.. you scared?? What a tool!! Oh and what about going every week for 6 weeks to serve council court papers starting right after they returned from summer break?? What happened there?? You afraid of the stairs leading into city hall ? Maybe you could ask for a ramp.......hehahahhehahahhaaa
You no-balls jerkoff!!


-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 21:12, 2008-12-16

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 21:14, 2008-12-16

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

That's not what he said ... he said that he was going to go for 6 weeks and serve her with lawsuits at each of the 6 meetings ... I know that we have those posts somewhere ... I just have to find them.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

Joe Pilchesky

avatar.img?ID=166895

Posts: 3955
Date: Jan 3 10:58 PM, 2009
Judge "Crony Blowjob" O'Brien strikes again - Professional hitmen couldn't do it any better

Date: Aug. 14, 2007 filed lawsuit against mayor over illegal poolhouse.
Date: Sept. 20, 2007 filed lawsuit against mayor over banners and billboards.

Doherty's lawyer, Atty. Tom Helbig, filed preliminary objections against both actions claiming I had no standing. By this time, I had already defeated the standing objection issue twice in appellate court over the Complex and Golf Course. We filed our briefs on both of the matters and a hearing was set for Nov. 14, 2007 before Judge O'Brien, a senior judge doing visiting judgework. This is thesame disgrace to the robe who handled Gatelli's lawsuit.Just awful.

A week before the hearing date, something came up that caused Helbig and myself to agree to continue the hearing. I sent a letter to the Court Administrator verifying that both counselconsented to continuing the hearing. Well, the judge decided, without telling anyone, at lest not me, that he'll just make a decision without a hearing by reading the briefs. And so he did. And, on Nov. 21, 2007 he decided I didn't have standing and dismissed both cases.

That doesn't bother me. I fully expected that from him. What bothers me is that as a matter of law every litigant has a right to oral argument. It's a rule. Both Helbig and I demanded oral argument. It cannot be denied. What bothers me more is that after O'Brien issued his order and opinion in the case, I was never served witha copy of either. Therefore, no appeal was filed to his crony, blowjob order and opinion.

So, how did I finally find out? Well, afterwe decided to continue the hearing, and not hearing from the court on a new hearing date, I decided in January to withdraw the complaint so I could refile and add the contractor who built the pool(sh!t)houseand the Dept. of Health as defendants. First, though, I contacted Fiorini and asked if the city intended to make proper renovations to the poolhouse, to which he responded in the affirmative. So, I held off to see what would happen in 08. Nothing happened. So, I filed the new lawsuit on Nov. 20, 2008 again seeking to have the existing sh!thouse demolished and have the correct sized on built.

Once again, Helbig filed objections and it was his objections that alerted me to the fact that the oldlawsuit had already been disposed of on the briefs. Completely unknown to me, I might add. Now, it's a dogged process to undo what damage that old cronyblowjob of a judge did.It was completely illegal.

You can't make this sh!t up.

translation.......Blah blah blah.... damn...... I lost AGAIN!! hahahahahah



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

Read the final sentence of the order:

"Costs are assessed against Plaintiff"


Also, Pilchesky refers to himself as "counsel"...maybe it's not illegal for a non-lawyer to refer to himself as being a lawyer, but it certainly tells you that he fancies himself to be equivalent to a lawyer. Nope, no ego issues there.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

Now I have been thinking ... we have been asking and asking the question of exactly how much the Pilchesky lawsuits have cost the taxpayers over the last 4 years ... I think that they will now with the RTK laws have to tell us how much it's cost the city taxpayers ... I think it's something that everyone has a right to know.

I wonder how much it has cost ...and I wonder if his loyal followers will still worship the ground he walks on if that cost is bigger than they think.



__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

I think that would make an excellent RTK request. We should ponder how to do this...

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Glenn Cashuric


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Pilchesky for Mayor
Permalink  
 

The city (and county, for that matter) should make it a lot easier for the public to obtain information. Anything not legally required to remain confidential should be placed online in .pdf format for all to peruse.

RTK letters should be unnecessary with an honest and open government.

GC

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Pilchesky for Mayor
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard