Oh I think you are right that they are posting under all of these names ... I say that we compile a list of all of the different names that they (Joe and Joanne) are posting under ... what say you all ... this could be great fun ... and it won't really be all that hard.

And how about this Shadow guy ... you know they always say that the Shadow sent them another great cartoon or pic ... so now if the Shadow can create these on the computer ... why the hell isn't he capable of uploading them to the site himself ... he send them to Joanne and she posts them ... I think Joe is the Shadow ... or Joanne ... anyway it's just my opinion.

I don't really care ... anyone can post under multiple names ... even here ... but why ... it's so much work to try and remember which one of your personas said what ... and I personnaly would be so confused ... I would rather not do it.

Now the Kids across the hall think he actually has all of these posters ... they don't see it when he carries on a conversation with himself ...

And now totally off topic ... I was thinking about a certain DD poster today and would like to shout out a "Happy Holiday's" to Mrs. Moran ... better know as Granma ... I miss her posting!

this one sure has an appropriate screen name if you ask me.


666



Posts: 10
Date: Dec 5 7:56 AM, 2008

What shall I correct? You've presented your evidence well.

"aaaotr" is an actual individual not involved with the Legion of Doom or Doherty Deceit. The person is educated, works behind the scenes for good government, and generally seems to be well-balanced and thoughtful.

GC

Is Bill back? (qestion mark mine)



Posts: 32
Date: Dec 4 4:59 PM, 2008


I say ask Joey-jerkoff as he seems to have yet another in a long list of "alias" so he would know!!

I would move it IHave ... but I already have it ... found that one this morning. Thank you!

Chris Phillips for mayor ... now did you hear that on the streets or is it just somthing you read in a thread at DD?

That would certainly prove iteresting ... I do however have a problem with people running for one office and then serving a year when they begin the process of running for the next office taking away the focus of the office that they already have.

But that is just my opinion.

For me it would be Chris Doherty for Mayor ... I can't say who for council as I do not know enough about Tom Charles to rule him out ... I need more information on these candidates... what happened to young Dough Miller who already had a fundraiser for beoming a candidate for city council?

Tax Collector ... I would vote for Bill Courtright ...

-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 09:27, 2008-12-15

1. Chris Phillips will have served two years in January 2010.

2. Ken Smith, barring a monster of a scandal (highly unlikely), will die in that legislative seat several decades from now. Dunmore residents born this year may not know any other state rep until they turn 40. Does Chris even live in the 112th?

That would certainly prove interesting ... I do however have a problem with people running for one office and then serving a year when they begin the process of running for the next office taking away the focus of the office that they already have.

3. Let's see if you still feel that way in 2010.

4. I forgot about Doug Miller. Ironic. Looks like Mr. Miller is falling off the radar quickly.

GC

Yes your are right, i forgot that School Board takes office in December and not January. Still i dont see why he would run for Mayor in 2009. Phillips will not be able to raise the money necessary to win a mayoral campaign against a well funded incumbent.

From what i hear Bolus is running Millers campaign. Bob Bolus cant even run a hot dog stand nevermind a political campaign for a underqualified candidate. Miller should save his money for 2011 or 2013.

I never clain to be an expert, but i dont think that having a convicted felon run your first political campaign is a smart move.

Miller, like almost all first time candidates will likely loose. Even G W.B and B. Obama lost their first political campaigns. He may get a seat on council someday, but it wont be in 2009.

NewsAlert,

We ... none of us here are experts ... and as IHave has stated we have definite opinions ... and I think that we went throught how we feel about this and why we feel as we do in another thread ... please refer back to that.

I once told you that I feel young Mr. Miller will one day be a sitting member of council ... however I do not feel that he will be sitting in that seat this time around. He much to young in my opinion ....and a seat on the Jr. Council does not qualify him to now graduate to a seat on Council.

I will not be throwing my vote to Mr. Rogan either ... again for the same reasons ... his age ... and lack of life experience. How about if these two fine civic minded young men concentrate on school work ... which will be tough enough without adding the pressure of a political career.

As for the others ... I will not be voting Piccilino ... and I do not know enough about Charles to form an opinion yet ... I thought that Fanucci was not running ...

There is no need to get snotty with people because they do not support your candidate ... if you want to gain our votes for Mr. Miller sell him to us ... tell us his intentions ... it seems as though you are very close to this young man.

And might I add ... I don't think that Mr. Bolus pushing him into something that he is not yet ready for is a good thing.

This is simply my opinion ... and no I am no expert ... I wish Mr. Miller all the best!

Lus

I dont think Miller will lose because of his age, I think he will lose for two main reasons 1) It is his first time running for office and 2) Because it is his first time running it will be difficult for him to raise money.

I have no problem with voting for a young candidate if they are more mature than their age would suggest. I will most likely vote for Rogan dispite his age because he handles himself well and understands the issues. Rogan also seems willing to work with both sides unlike some of the more mature candidates.

Ok ... here is where Ag and I differ ... he does not like the bus driver sitting on the school board ... I however do ... I like having the bus driver who earns a regular salary ... who does a regular job ... who raised his children ... and sent them through the Scranton Public School System ... he knows more what it is like to be me ... than say the lawyers sitting on the School Board do ..

Now that is two differing opinions ... Ag is entitled to his ... and I mine ... we can still get along ... now this is something that wouldn't happen across the hall!

Ag if I were Pilchesky ,.. I would have banned you for not sharing my opinon ... LOL

If that's the case Ag ... then we have a lot of unqualfied people sitting on the board ... not just the bus driver. Think about it!

Others:

Brazill
Hartman
McGuigan
Jeffers

And that's just to name a few ... and I would also put Gilbride in that group as he is a worker's comp lawyer for the O'Malley/Langan firm ... so what qualifies him?

I'm not being defensive ... I'm just asking a question.