Who would want to willingly take the wheel of the Titanic after she had already hit the iceberg? The inevitable sinking is quickly approaching on the horizon.
Now Daniel ... you claim it is due to us being the titanic ... financially speaking of course ... but it has absolutely nothing to do with the way that all politicians are slammed on Doherty Deceit and the City Data Forum ... that's got absolutely nothing to do with ...
Let me ask you this Daniel ... who in their right mind would want to subject their family to the $hit that is spread on DD and now the city data forum??? I can't think of anyone ...so I do think that you should consider that it is the fault of people liky yourself that keep good viable candidates from considering a run for office ...
One day you all love Giovanni Piccilino ... the next you are trying to destroy his reputation and a well established family run business ... DD has resorted to posting private papers (divorce papers etc.) of candidates and sitting city officials ... that should have never happened ... you all make up any crap you want ... then are surprised when sitting on the business end of a lawsuit .... Hell look at the vile names ... and things that you just plain made up about Judy Gatelli .... do you really think that any sane person would want to jump into this after seeing that ... no you will however have the people who have gone through this already step up because they already know and have more than likely survived it ...
Sorry for rambling!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Danny-Boy is a funny guy, someone with a reach that clearly exceeds his grasp.
Remember the letter to editor Danny?
Retracts claims
Editor: The purpose of this letter is to rescind the multiple accusations and negative remarks I have made at Scranton City Council meetings regarding Daron Northeast. The statements I made were misleading, malicious and without merit.
Among the false allegations I made toward Daron Northeast were:
I stated that Daron was not in compliance and that it exploited loopholes to get the company up and running. Daron Northeast followed the proper guidelines to start its manufacturing operations in the city of Scranton and did nothing to exploit the city or the zoning officials. Daron submitted all the proper applications and received all the appropriate approvals to begin its operations in 2003.
I also stated that Daron Northeast violated local zoning ordinances 30-some times. I had and still have no basis for that accusation. To my knowledge, there is not one existing zoning ordinance being violated by Daron Northeast at this time.
I have accused the city administration of protecting Daron Northeast and lining its pockets as a result of that. I have no basis for that accusation whatsoever. Daron Northeast has followed all the proper channels and guidelines in establishing its business within the city limits.
My statements accusing Daron Northeast of causing long-term lung damage as a result of Darons operations and operating illegally polluting the environment and killing residents were made recklessly and without any merit. I have no reason to believe that these statements have any truth whatsoever.
For these reasons, I am hereby retracting the above statements that I have made about Daron Northeast.
DANIEL HUBBARD
SCRANTON (Scranton Times, June 20, 2008)
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I just find it amazing that they say that nobody wants to run because of the financial burden Doherty has placed on the city ... when that's not the reason at all ... nobody wants to subject their families to the lies that will be spread about them ... nobody wants to subject themselves or family members to being stalked ... Now Doherty ... he is used to it ... his family is used to it ... they seem to be able to weather that storm called DD.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Welcome to the place where you can get facts and statistics along with documents to support or refute an statement. (Ok is is just me or do the rest of you find the humor in that particular statement????? Why is it they never show these supporting facts and documents to anyone ... )The majority of people did not vote for Doherty the second time. I believe it was within 1500 votes both ways.
It wasn't really your spelling error, believe me those types of mistakes are all over this board. What you did get ripped for is making that statement about Fanucci.(What happened to this posters right to free speech ... after all I thought all at DD were the Champions of one's right to free speech ... once again .... you prove that the only people who can experience free speech at DD are those who agree with all of you goons!)We honor you as a veteran and thank you for your service. But that doesn't mean that your statements cannot be discredited.
If it makes you feel better you can support your statement about Fanucci with quotes from council minutes, copies of legislation she's signed, tapes of council meetings and listings of her votes. I suggest you don't waste your time. (Funny thing is that you all go through life saying whatever the FVCK you want about whomever the FVCK you want ... and no proof is needed ... but this poster simply states that Fanucci represents the people of Scranton and you slam him/her. Well maybe your few posters don't represent an entire city ... many don't even live in Scranton and many are the dysfunctional personalities of Pilchesky and Edith .. so just how many actual members that live in Scranton are there at DD????? Get the FVCK over yourselves!)
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Taylor I am going to assume that you are talking about Dan Hubbard???
I don't think there is any "dirt" on him ... who is he ... he is Dan Hubbard President of the Lower Greenridge Neighborhood Association ... I don't know what he does and come to think of it ... not to be snotty here ... I don't care what he does ... and he hates Mayor Doherty because he has been asking for flood relief and believes that it is the Mayor's fault that he has not gotten any ... No real dirt there ... and I think ... he has a legit gripe ... I would want the warning siren if I were him ... I would want the levy finished if I were him ... it's just the way he goes about it that I disagree with ... and the fact that he hates me for my personal views ... they are the only things that I can see wrong with Mr. Hubbard ... he could be more respectful to others in this life.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Wasn't the "inevitable sinking" of Scranton supposed to happen years ago? While I agree that the Mayor is managing the finances of Scranton like someone who lives off credit cards manages their personal budget, I'll challenge anyone to name a city anywhere in the northeast that isn't challenged from a fiscal perspective.
Danny Hubbard is the embodiment of the term "guttersnipe". Questioning the management of the city? Well just what the hell does Danny manage, the household grocery list? Questioning the Mayor's management practices? Note to Danny...managing your kids is different than managing actual adult employees. That's not to say that all of us can't have opinions...even pointed ones. However Hubbard adds this element of vitriol that seems odd coming from someone who, as far as we know, has no professional career (we are not even sure if he works outside the home) and who has been forced to make public apologies for mouthing off.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 08:00, 2008-12-19
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.