How about this, my wife and I had volunteered to be Hillary workers ata voting place in S. Abington, but we got a phone call telling us there were already plenty of Hillary workers and they didn't us. But..........BUT, when we went to vote there we no Hillary workers to be seen. Sooooooooooo, we took a little ride to several voting places and found that all of the Hillary helpers had been pulled. Soooooooooo, I made some phone call to friends of mine all over the 113thdistrict to find out there were hardly any signs of Hillary workers anywhere.
That's not hard to figure out, a vote for Hillary was a Dem vote, wasn't it. Maybe even across the board. I wonder if Hillary knows about this little prank to help keep Murphy's numbers down. (A vote for Obama was a DEM vote, too. Your point?)
Or maybe I should have put this in the conspiracy theory thread?
I find that to be one of the dumbest posts ... #1 they would not turn down workers ... they would find something for them to do!
I can't even imagine this post being even close to the truth!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Posts: 2167 Date: May 29 12:08 AM, 2008 Views: 661
Should've kept his graft honest. Oh wait, that's right. Chuckie had to resort to dishonest graft because the ICN have all the honest graft under lock and key.
__________________ DARE to keep ICNers off GRAFT.
I think that Anti uses this word yet has really no idea what the hell he is talking about when he writes it. This statement is just stupid.
In some parts of the world, for example in the United Kingdom, graft means hard work (as a noun) or to work hard (as a verb). Thus in British dialect, a grafter is someone who works hard. This is the more commonly understood meaning in the UK, and is mutually exclusive with the American concept. The modern UK slang term for political corruption is sleaze The origins of this word are still unproven, but a likely source is the act of digging, considered a low or menial type of work. In American slang of the mid-1800s, graft was used to mean work. By the late 1800s, the meaning drifted to refer to illegal work. The root word is graaf, the imperative form of Dutch word for digging.
Now ... he has in the past used this word as the modern UK slang for political corruption ... but I am now wondering ... just how the hell do the Irish have the GRAFT under lock and key ... you can't lock up hard work it's an act ... not an object .... and political corruption again ... an act not an object.
Now maybe we can say if he is using the term as it was meant from the early 1800's ... then possibly the shovels used to dig ditches are locked up ... but again we can not keep "work" legal or illegal under lock and key!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Having complete control means that shopping for health care is done poorly and that can cost the taxpayers plenty, as it has already. We should sue to protect our best interests. I'd like to get an injunction to stop the execution of this contract, or at least stop that part about the health care committee. The people's best interestsare represented in it, so the standing is there, in my humble opinion.
He needs to just admit that he's nothing more than an attention whore who gets his rocks off by pretending to be Perry Mason. Standing? By Pilchesky's logic, any taxpayer could sue the city over anything.
Here's a novel thought: this contract is between the CITY ADMINISTRATION and the CLERICAL UNION. When last I checked, the Internet Bully isn't a member of either. Pilchesky is just crying that they actually struck a deal with the city, thus precluding an extended potential bashing of the Mayor.
I think it's in the people's best interest that the city not have to be engaged in incredibly silly litigation simply because an old man wants to extend a baseless grudge with the Mayor in perpetuity.
What a self-centered ego-maniac.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:42, 2008-05-30
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I was going to vote for Hillary then a little voice in my head told me not to vote...just go home. I saw a guy with what looked like some sort of radio emitting device. He had earplugs connected to a little white thing that was obviously sending signals to his brain. I'll bet that f**ker was behind the voice in my head AND the Hillary conspiracy. Only Joe can get to the bottom of this. God speed Frau Pilchesky.
PS: Please roll videotape when you begin asking anyone in any agency questions about the Hillary/Murphy conspiracy phone calls. Ever since Ray Lyman stopped speaking at consil there's nothing good to watch on the Internets.
I could not imagine going without a contract/raise for so longand then vast majority approve a contract only to have it get hung up in court b/c a jacka$$ who has no bussiness with either side decides he wants to AGAIN make a spectacle out of the legal system. Joe P is friggen idiot!
Today's dumb post comes courtesy of DD poster 'dukie', who writes (and for the record I did not copy & paste the other parts of his posting)...
"...I'm not defending Roseann, by any means, I think it's time for her to retire. She's always quoting the Home Rule Charter, when it suits her..but obviously, she doesn't have it memorized. She could have done some light reading over the past 25 years: Too bad she ran unopposed for so many years. We DOn't have one single candidate to run against her, ever?"
A few thoughts come to mind after reading this:
What part of the posting from 'dukie' sounds like it's defending Ms Novembrino?
No one has the Home Rule Charter memorized...not even the Mighty Janet Evans; it's a tad bit longer than, say, Lincoln's Gettysburg Address.
Yeah, too bad Ms Novembrino did run unopposed all those years. Why didn't Joe or Edith run for the position?
As for candidates to run against her, DD/LoD doesn't exactly have a "stellar" record with the candidates they field. As I recall, Lee Morgan (for example) didn't get a Brownie Troop worth of votes when he ran for konsil. And didn't Danny-Boy Hubbard get something like two votes from Controller (him and his Mom)?
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
That's right Danny did run a write in campaign against Mrs. Novembrino didn't he ... I forgot all about that ... so why are the kids across the hall say she has never been opposed for the controller's seat ... What our little Danny doen't count (wow Danny I thought they were your friends).
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Given that he only collected 67 write ins, it really wasn't much of an opposition, was it? I can understand how the minions feel that she ran unopposed.
Pilchesky was in Harrisburg all morning today in lengthy discussions with the authorities down there. My source tells me that the names he dropped were Shimkus, McDowell, Novembrino and Doherty. The front counter of the Ethics Commission has ears all its own. My source tells me that Shimkus is headed for some heavy whitewater over lying on his affidavit. Rose is headed for the same over failure to disclose and Doherty has some issue with a 500K loan he took out and didn't claim along with some problems with campaign contributions. Fire in the hole.
If he was testifying somewhere, do they introduce him as "Mr Crackpot" or "Mr Serial Plaintiff"? Also, can I submit a few of Joe's postings to whatever group he was speaking to, you know, as background information? I'm thinking...
...the posting where he claims that Mayor Doherty caused a suicide ...the posting where he calls Stacy Brown the "N" word ...the posting where claims that free speech applies everywhere except his board ...etc. you get the picture
Yeah, Joe's a real credible source for information. Right up there with the Weekly World News & Art Bell.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Yikes...this poster might give Granma a run for the most illiterate poster.
So tell me Bill500mag have you ever heard of punctuation...run on sentences...rambling???!! The point "too this story" is ....STAY IN SCHOOL... learn something... like basic English. In addition knowing how to write...spell.... use "too" and "to" correctly in a sentence might be nice, that is, if you intend to continue to post. ;)
BILL500MAG Posts:8 Date: Jun 14 2:24 AM, 2008 Views: 41
Post InfoTOPIC: WhenWill It Stop?
The Fake Police Precence Is Really Sickening that I've Seen Lately Makes Me Sick,Police Looking For Some Poor Smuck who might have had one two many and lock the poor Barsterd up and ruin his life is unethical as far as I'm concerned.....My main concern is "Phycian Heal Thyself'....Look for evidance of your own Lackies,clean your own corrupt political house that runs you.......and then come after the average citizen not connected to the "MACHINE.".......One exsample last week is Sue k. the poor woman was dying a few days ago whan her husband Frank k. desperarely begged the Scranton Police for help with his dying wife.Frank K. being a Vietnam Vet. and Federal Witness in a Hijacking Case this week with the feds. was paid no respect at all by several of Scranton's finast.....This past Sunday I was a personnel witness to a scranton cop just disrepecting us unconnected to the corruption scumbags and refused to give us his badge number or name ,he left his wife to "DIE".The next day while the F.B.I picked up the husband monday morning to be a federal witness, the man asked his next door neighbours to look in on his wife.....They called me hysterical in tears that the woman was near death.I told them too call an ambulance immediately and not the Scranton Police....The ambulance personnel said "Thank God You Called When You Did This Woman Would Have Died Within Hours".......The Point too this story is that "Absolute Corruption" "Corrupts Absolutely"......the Scranton Police Officer knew that his actions would not be reported by the Times Tribune and he had double protection by his hire ups.....By The Times Tribune in acting in such a racketerring and corrupt way is responsible for making peoples life's miserable and "Yes" even murder.....Me and my friends have plenty of true and informative articles that were sent to the Times Tribune that they refused to print,because it stepped on their cronies toes.WHAT A DISGRACE OF A PAPER!!!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 12:40, 2008-06-14
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 12:40, 2008-06-14
DD poster "BILL500MAG" was police bashing right? It's kind of hard to tell, as his writing is PAINFULLY hard to follow.
Not to bother though, I am CERTAIN that poster NELSON will immediately get on DD and defend the honor of his brothers in blue by responding to that posting. Afterall, Nelson is an FOP officer, so he should be the first condem any DD posting that bashes the police, right? [Sorry, I just accidentally threw up my breakfast, as I was laughing myself silly..."Nelson defending the police on DD"...what a hoot!].
Oh well, Pilchesky never claimed that his site attracted the "best and the brightest" of the area; in fact, I think said it attracted "bottom-feeders".
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
He does not want the best and brightest ... he would not be able to manipulate the way they think if they knew how to actually think!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I think the line must be crossed when a poster like DET Shockley pm's another poster with unwelcome comments.
I would have to wonder how Shockley approaches the Times when an article publishes statements that they don't have to prove? Must be he/she just accepts them, because it's in a newspaper - as opposed to his suggestion that the statements posted here are unproven.
I was not aware that articles publish statements ... but then again I only read articles I never talk to them ... but if I do I will be quite careful of what the hell I say to the article ... Damn it I wouldn't want to be misquoted by an article!
TOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FUNNY! I think I'm in a rather silly mood today after reading all of Sammy's posts! I just can't get the ocotman image out of my mind!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
This post is incredibly dumb...funny, but I don't recall that section in the Gospels where it says that Jesus told his disciples to ask for "papers" before helping someone in need.
Posts: 184 Date: Jul 27 6:04 PM, 2008 Views: 4 The only thing Adrian did was bring illegals to this area. Yes she helps people but many times the wrong people. Before she beds or feeds one person she should ask for their Green Cards or papers of citizenship. Many of these people she helps have possibly murdered or robbed or burglarized our community and maybe elswhere. They the illegals send the word out "COME TO LACKAWANNA COUNTY FREE FOOD FREE HOUSING, SEE SISTER ADRIAN YOUR BENEFACTOR ON YOUR ARRIVAL CALL HER IMMEDIATELY"
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.