Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Re: Scranton Post


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
Re: Scranton Post
Permalink  
 


Ozzie's asking about the Scranton Post, an alleged newspaper supposedly starting in June. Sounds a bit miffed that this got higher off the ground than his movement to get the Times Leader to Lackawanna County.

Anyway, Oz-man, here's some points of interest for you.

1. The website has not been updated in over a month. Not a good sign.
2. The topic of the Post was undertaken on another message board in late March. Consensus there is that it's a joke, or an ego-stroke.
3. In any event, the spelling on the website is atrocious, as Glenn pointed out. Are these supposed to be professional journalists working for the "paper"?
4. I suppose that's to be expected when you solicit a staff by posting on Craigslist.

I for one can't wait for this to get off the ground. I promised the kids a hamster, and sure could use the shredded copies as bedding. I'll be sure to stock up in the six weeks that the tabloid exists.

__________________



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Re: Scranton Post
Permalink  
 


Personally I don't know what would be funnier:

...the TL coming to Scranton; this is the same newspaper that, in a feat of sheer brilliance, managed to endorse BOTH Don Sherwood and Rick Santorum. If Himmler came back from Hell TL Publisher Connor would probably endorse him for Congress.

...some new piece of crap tabloid coming to Scranton, complete with all the news that the Scranton Times will not print. Quick...grab the first edition and read about the UFO landing in Randsom Township!


The Times-Shamrock folks, to the extent they even pay attention to Pilchesky's meaningless meanderings, must really bust a gut over this stuff.



__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Re: Scranton Post
Permalink  
 


The initial poster (aaaotr) is not Ozzie Quinn, unless you are referring to another post or article.

GC


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Re: Scranton Post
Permalink  
 


You sure? We have some real good reasons to belive it is but we could be wrong of course. :))

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Re: Scranton Post
Permalink  
 


It is absolutely not Ozzie Quinn. Trust me. You would like this person if you met them in real life, and I don't mean that as a slam against Mr. Quinn. I merely state that you would approve.

GC


__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard