Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Anti Challenge #1
Post Info TOPIC: Anti Challenge #1
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

So do I

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

LOL Damn its just not as much funwhen you only use one screen name like we do over here. LOL LOL

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

IHavehadenoughofhaters wrote:

Hummmmmmm I think Glen called me irritable. LOL



Irritable is too tricky to spell; can I just keep calling you 'IHave'?



__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

Ok but it won't be the same you know :))

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

I, for one, can't wait until Attorney Conscience pops in to enlighten us all with his take. yawn

-- Edited by Paul at 07:44, 2008-05-01

__________________

LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

I have already been enlightened ... I know anti is a racist pig ... yep I'm calling him a name ... if he can call me an inbred I can call him a racist pig ... pretty enlightening huh?

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

Wait a minute...so Anti can call Scranton's Irish "in-bred" and that shouldn't be challenged, but calling Anti a "racist pig" for making the in-bred comment in the first place is somehow engaging in name-calling/hating?

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

That's my take on Glenn's little lecture .... that's what I got out of him telling us that we are just like the kids across the hall ... I'm not trying to be "snarky" (I love that word) here but I really don't like being called inbred ... I am highly offended by that ... and therefore I have come to my own conclusion that Antisystemicmovements (DD Poster) is in fact a RACIST PIG! The proof can be found scattered about across the hall ..

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

Jeez - the $hit always hits the fan the day I'm on siesta.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Glenn Cashuric


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

What is infantile or "stooping down to another level" about pointing out that someone may or may not be racist? The statements are there to be analyzed, and you came to a reasonable conclusion based on the facts as you see them.

I sincerely hope that no one was able to gather such facts as someone having no testicles by obtaining first-hand information. That kind of analysis is simply unpleasant to imagine.

GC

__________________
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

Humph now who is being snarky?? :)

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

racist? facts? testicles?

Maybe it's just because it's Friday afternoon, but I'm having a tough time assimilating your last post Glenn. Maybe I should just have Lus tell me what to think (oops, sorry, wrong message board & wrong administrator).



__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

I have enough trouble coming up with my own damn ideas .... I hope you don't expect me to start thinking for all of you ....

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

Glenn I think and I'm guessing that I am understanding what IHave means .... she has come to the conclusion that Pappa Pilchesky is ball-less due to the fact that he makes statements like

"I'm going to go to the next 6 meetings and serve Judy with lawsuits at the public meeting for all of the city to see ... (channel 61)"

And then the bald ball-less wonder that he is proves once again that he is all talk as he does not make the appearance at the podium ... hence we (most and not only IHave) have come to the conclusion that he is ball-less ... not in the literal sense ... but without the courage to follow through with what he says he will do ... therefore (figuratively speaking) he is without balls ...

At least that's my take on what she is trying to convey in her posts!

Am I being Snarky???? (love that word)

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

Glenn Cashuric wrote:

What is infantile or "stooping down to another level" about pointing out that someone may or may not be racist? The statements are there to be analyzed, and you came to a reasonable conclusion based on the facts as you see them. (Anti wishes aids on all Irish and that's ok .... Anti calls the Irish "Inbreds" and that's ok .... Anti in your book should just be left to his "EVIL" thoughts and be allowed to post whatever the hell he wants with no respnse????? is that what you are trying to tell me with this response to my post? I am being "infantile" and "stooping down to his level because I pointed out what a racist pig he is?... I have as much right to my opinion as he does his ... I should feel ashamed of myself if I did not say anything ... when does my freedom of speech kick in? I'm not going to apologize to you for my feelings .... and I am not going to ever sit by and not point out a racist when I see one as I am also highly offended by Pappa Pilchesky's use of the "N" word.)
I sincerely hope that no one was able to gather such facts as someone having no testicles by obtaining first-hand information. That kind of analysis is simply unpleasant to imagine.

GC


My response in red ... I will continue to "Stoop to another level" and I am damn proud that I am stooping!





__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Glenn Cashuric


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

My point was that it was NOT infantile to call him out for his racist comments. You took offense and called him a racist pig. I had no beef with that. What made you think otherwise?

GC

__________________
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Anti Challenge #1
Permalink  
 

I'm sorry
Custom SmileySorry guess I had a long hard day and lost my comprehension skills ... I whole heartedly apologize to you I missunderstood what it was you wrote!







sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb096&pp=ZNxdm824LEUS

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Anti Challenge #1
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard