Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:
RE: Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


Art,

I can do that. However, there is talk of transfering Sloan to the school dsitrict. That's not a big deal since the same taxpayers will still own it. The part where the court says JP has standing is on the top of the first page.

And to Stacy Brown, in the words of Joe Buck from the Bud Light ads;

DUDE!

__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


Now I don't know for sure ... but I have read the article that John says Stacy Brown wrote ... here is the thing John ... I do not see Stacy's name on that little blurb ... so are we making an assumption and just laying the blame of this report on Stacy?

Take a look at this article in it's entireity ... and tell me where is Stacy's name on this ... (sorry for pasting entire piece here).

John we could be wrong to say that Stacy wrote this ... have you ever thought of that? ..... DUDE.........

Maybe this is the reason Stacy stands behind what he reported ...just a thought!


City man loses bid to block course sale

SCRANTON Commonwealth Court on Wednesday dismissed the arguments of a government critic who sought to block the 2003 sale of the Scranton Municipal Golf Course.

City resident Joseph Pilchesky filed a suit challenging the sale, but the court decided he lacked standing. Commonwealth Court reiterated that decision Wednesday after Mr. Pilchesky appealed.

David Laudeman, managing member of Heckman and Laudeman LLC, of Orwigsburg, offered $3.475 million at a public auction in 2003 at the courses Jefferson Township clubhouse, outbidding the Jefferson Township supervisors and Green Tees Management, of Dunmore.

Judge hears Whittier school zoning appeal

SCRANTON
The Scranton School District went before Lackawanna County Judge Thomas Munley on Wednesday to appeal a decision by the Scranton Zoning Board.

Since the Zoning Board rejected variances for the Whittier Elementary School project in October, the districts design team has reworked plans and now only needs a variance for an additional half-story of building height. Neighbors, who voiced concern for the first plan, said at a meeting last week that they were in favor of the new plans.

Judge Munley gave Zoning Board solicitor Daniel L. Penetar Jr. seven days to submit a brief, and a ruling is expected shortly after the brief is received.

DEP seeks source of Avoca drain fumes

AVOCA
The state Department of Environmental Protection is still trying to determine the source of a solvent-like odor in a storm drain at Russell and Grove streets.

Whatever caused the smell apparently originated in the parking lot of the nearby Petro Truck Stop, since the odor was detectable in drains there as well, DEP spokesman Mark Carmon said Wednesday. He said a truck parked in the lot may have leaked the still unknown substance.

What it might have been or when it occurred, we are going to continue to investigate, Mr. Carmon said.

DEP dispatched an emergency crew to the site after authorities received complaints Tuesday afternoon. DEP water quality personnel have taken over the investigation.

Scott Township home burglarized Tuesday

SCOTT TOWNSHIP
Camera equipment, electronics, jewelry and other items were stolen from 213 Christy Lane on Tuesday morning, police said.

The perpetrators entered the home through the basement and stole a camera, video camera, a laptop computer and jewelry, according to township police.

Anyone with information is asked to contact police at 254-7447.

Police, fire respond to two-car city crash

SCRANTON
One woman was injured in a two-car crash late Wednesday in the 300 block of Birch Street.

Barbara Ratliff 51, of Scranton, had to be extricated from her white Dodge Neon shortly after 10 p.m.

Police said Ms. Ratliff swerved into the westbound lane of Birch Street and crashed into a black Hyundai Elantra driven by Geriann Venesky, 43, of Scranton.

Ms. Ratliff was taken to Community Medical Center. There was no further information on her condition.

Mrs. Venesky was not injured, police said.




-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 08:00, 2008-01-20

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


See John, we can disagree and at the end of the day no one gets banned. It's a miracle! ...No, actually it's just the lack of a dictator running the board.




__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:
Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


Lus,

If he didn't write it then why bother to stand by it. Or why not just inform us that he did not write it. But, anyway I seem to recall seeing his name on the prtinted version. The point is if we are going to point out deceit, then let's be consistant. The message in this case is more important then the messenger (IMO). If Stacy is going to continue standing by this article with proof positive that the part about JP not having standing is false, then...............DUDE.......

AG, That's cool! Thanks!

__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


I understand what it is you are saying John ... but I must point out that on the internet ... Stacy is given credit for the articles that he has written ... I found many examples of this ... more than I can paste up here ... that is one reason that I was thinking that there is a possibility that he did not write that little blurb concerning the lawsuit over the Golf Course.

And I do have to agree with Art on this one that IMO the golf course is not a park ... since it has a specific purpose and therefore cannot be enjoyed by all ... and the fact that it is not located in Scranton ... this tells me that it was never intended to be a Park for all of the citizens of the city of Scranton ... but for Golf loving citizens ... now that's just my thoughts on this I'm not saying that I am right or wrong ... it is just an opinion ... that the Golf Course never was to be considered a public park ... I for one never understood why Scranton would own a Golf Course located in Lake Ariel ... but like I said that is just my opinion.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


Definition of Public parks:

A park is an area of open space provided for recreational use, usually owned and maintained by a local government. Parks commonly resemble savannas or open woodlands, the types of landscape that human beings find most relaxing. Grass is typically kept short to discourage insect pests and to allow for the enjoyment of picnics and sporting activities. Trees are chosen for their beauty and to provide shade.

Park uses are often divided into two categories: active and passive recreation. Active recreation is that which require intensive development and often involves cooperative or team activity, including playgrounds and ball fields. Passive recreation is that which emphasizes the open-space aspect of a park and which involves a low level of development, including picnic areas and trails.


__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


Not one instance of a Golf Course being considered a Public Park ... although I guess a golfball is a ball ... so is that what they mean by ball fields ... and sporting activities? Who knows!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:
Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


Lus, I think they call what you're thinking rationalizing, but that's just my opinion.

Golf is recreation. So, a golf course should be considered recreational use, both passive and active. The grass is kept short, and there are a lot of trees. Lot's of open space (thank God, I need it). Trails, cart paths should be considered trails right? It was owned and maintained by our local goverment. And humans beings play there, to relax.

The original drawings and plans for the golf course included a picinic area for people to come and enjoy. I'm not sure what happened, but that was part of the original plan. As to why they chose Mt Cobb? Avaiable propery? Not sure. There was an article printed when the course was being, uhumm sold, that told the history of the course. It was an interesting read. I'll try and locate it.

__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Add another one to Joe's 'loss column"
Permalink  
 


I would appreciate that John ... thank you!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard