Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: More Springer-esque Proof


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


[Background chat...Jerry! Jerry! transitioning to Joey! Joey!]

abbey
Posts: 49
Date: Dec 11 8:11 PM, 2007
Views: 1468

Sherri the BITCH

For God's sake, shut it. She's not only a bitch, but a stupid bitch. Go ahead, sweetheart, sue me.I'm begging you. I can't believe Janet can sit that close to her and not slap the sh*t out of her.


Now do I think that Sherry Nealon Fanucci is the brightest member of council? No, I do not. But hey, who said that brains were the only thing that mattered in life? Just ask Dave Evans.

Anyway, my take on Ms Nealon Fanucci is that she genuinely believes in what the Mayor is doing, and that's her prerogative (and yes, that word is spelled right). I'd suggest though that maybe City Council isn't the right place for her, mainly because she just gives the rapid anti-Doherty people just too much ammunition, playing into their rants. She should take a cue from Mr McGoff...just let it roll off.

Back to the topic title...the post by 'Abbey' is yet another classic example of the almost worst of DD. Pray tell just what does calling Ms Nealon Fanucci the 'B' word have to do with exposing corruption? How is government opened up by using the 'B' word? How does calling her the 'B' word get the word out that there are problems in how Scranton is governed? Nope, zero, zilch, nada...just more stupid-a$$ed name calling, most likely by a bitter city hall employee who actually should be thankful that they don't have to make it in the private sector.

Oh and Abbey, if you really want to be sued dear, it may make sense to include your actual name in the post. Just a thought. Take a cue from your svengali.



__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


::: I can't believe Janet can sit that close to her and not slap the sh*t out of her. :::

The funny thing is, I've asked Sherri a number of times how she can sit next to Janet and listen to her drone on and on and on, and not reach over and smack her in the back of the head.

How can ANYone use so many words to say so little. Janet's droning has got to stop. The next time they refurbish council chambers, they should put in trap doors for each chair and at the podium. I'll keep the control panel at my house, thankyouverymuch ...

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


Aga,

Sherri Fanucci is not the "brightest member of council"? I nominate you for the "understatement of the year" award.

Get your speech, thanking the academy, ready! And the winner is......

__________________


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


sharilewis wrote:

Aga,

Sherri Fanucci is not the "brightest member of council"? I nominate you for the "understatement of the year" award.

Get your speech, thanking the academy, ready! And the winner is......




Shari my friend, you are missing the point by picking out four words out of many.

Is, in your personal estimation, Sherry Nealon Fanucci a 'B****'?


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


Calling someone a bitch has broad overtones. It also depends on the meaning of the word bitch by the user. I choose not to call anyone that name for it's negative personal overtones. I do not know the woman to make that interpretation. My interpretation of Sherri Fanucci is based on my observance of the council meetings, statements she makes and how she votes and how she explains why she votes that way, lends me to believe words I would use to describe her are more in line with Pawn, puppet, fool, stooge, tool or patsy. Rubberstamp also comes to mind. Those words I'm comfortable with. Bitch? No.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


::: ... It also depends on the meaning of the word bitch by the user. I choose not to ... for it's negative personal overtones. ... :::

a bitch is a bitch is a bitch (just like pilcheski, etal use 'other' words)
no color - no gender - no religion

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


Personally I hate that word, which is why I wrote the post. In my book, it's right up there with the 'C' word.

Good post Shari...now put that up in the 'B' word thread at DD and I'll buy you an large hot chocolate at Starbucks smile.gif.


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


More trash at this link...why do I even mention this? Because for all the claims of a "political movement" at DD, there are probably three postings of this sort, postings that exist soley to provide some maximum level of pesonal pain on another human being. Again, what is the crime that this human being is guilty of?

Yes (as Shari said), Dr Goebells would be proud...but proud of what? Proud of the fact that Joe Pilchesky has created an environment where it's perfectly okay to Demonize someone to the point where others can justify any and every action against them. I think Art said it best once (and if I am mis-quoting you Art, please forgive)...all of this will not end well...someone will eventually read the stuff at DD and honestly believe that it justifies some act of physical violence.


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
SWB


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 12
Date:
RE: More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


Agamemnon wrote:

Personally I hate that word, which is why I wrote the post. In my book, it's right up there with the 'C' word.


Carbondale? (Shudders!) bleh



__________________
This message has been approved by yet another voice banished for intellectually intimidating the intimidator.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: More Springer-esque Proof
Permalink  
 


LOL LOL LOL

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard