Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!
Permalink  
 


I just finished reading more of his nonsense about anti McGoff posters he's printing. I'm still waiting for the news paper to arrive before the election.

I know Joe has a learning disability, but will someone please tell him that it's election day! All of the posters and newspapers in the world won't do him any good now.

PS. I hope Daron's court case against Dan Hubbard pays their moving expenses. Serendipity baby!

__________________

Make Jack pack!



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!
Permalink  
 


I think we will all be watching the results unfold. Personally I will be thrilled at the DD wailing and mashing of teeth when...

...McGoff is back on council
...Harhut is retained (...wait, what did Joey say about him?????)
...O'Brien is a county commissioner
...Minicozzi is on the school board*

All of which proves that the only 'movement' Pilchesky is capable of creating is the kind usually found in a toilet (which is coincidentally where some of his followers can be found).

[* Post script (5pm/Wednesday)...looks like Minicozzi isn't going to make it...I wonder if Joey-Boy get the 'credit' for that one?]


-- Edited by Agamemnon at 16:59, 2007-11-07

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 87
Date:
RE: Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!
Permalink  
 


Obviously, he has a problemand the overwhelming majority of Scrantonians don't share his view. Only those very few who blindly follow his path of hate-filled, misguided and sociopathic musings are as bad as he. If this were not the case, wouldn't he have succeeded in getting the candidates he wanted elected? Would not also Mayor Chris Doherty be in prison? All we ever asked of he and his minions was proof of their wild accusations of thievery, corruption and other felonious activities. A shred and we promised, it would be splashed above the fold on the front page. They have nothing. Never did and probably never will. He's further daunted by the fact that we reported the arrest of his wife. We reported exactly from a law enforcement afadavit and complaint and from court documents. We're wrong, in his warped head, of course. Just like the union members who came to council bashing the story of the city's arbitration victory. Short memory they have. When they won last year, we ran it bold, above the fold on page A1. But, I noticed none of the union people who matter and who really have influence spoke out; those are the ones you root for. The claim they don't read the paper ("the rag"), yet they quote the paper continuously and we see some of them in the building paying their bills. It's a drug, I guess. You don't want to let people know you do it, but you do. We print lies, they say. There isn't a newspaper in the world (including the Gray Lady) that could stay in business a week if they printed lies every single day the way they claim we do. We protect the mayor. It seems Doherty does a pretty good job of that himself. How? He doesn't break the law! If he has or does, well, he's doing a great job of hiding it because We're looking. The FBI, the state attorney general and other law enforcement have anonymous tip lines set up for corruption reporting. The last time we checked, they hadn't even received an anonymous tip about corruption in Scranton! So, wait, even the over-the-top PUKEchecksy's and followers haven't even felt the need to at least call it or mail it in anonymously? Wow!!! Look, anger has never solved a problem. The guynamed Joe, it seems is onlyone of the root causes ofall that is wrong in NEPA.



__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!
Permalink  
 


Wow ... now if we look at the posts over across the hall they tell a far different story ... they are always claiming that the FBI is conducting an investigation ... that the Attorney General has been contacted ... and that Doherty is being investigated ... now I never did believe that ... but those dolts across the hall believe every word this guy says.

I think that the "Rag" had to report the story on Pilchesky's wife ... it's news ... it also reported Walter and Helen Pestinikas when they were charged with ... although not quite the same ... but similar crime. I do believe it also reported on Mike Egan years ago when he was charged with estate fraud ... so now if the "Rag" didn't report this ... then that would have been wrong.

The Pilcheskys have made themselves public figures ... it was a choice that they made ... we did not ask for them to come out of the wood work and make our beautiful city the laughing stock of the state of PA ... I certainly never asked that my tax dollars be wasted by these people ... and yes it is my opinion that they do waste my tax dollars ... maybe even more than the administration does ... with the frivilous lawsuits that they continuously file.

I find it very hard to believe that this started over not being allowed to build a handicapped ramp ... and even more so now because this man resided in a nursing home ... so what was the reason for this ramp ... who was this ramp for ... it apparently was not for Mr. Conrad ... as he did not reside with the Pilchesky's ... There is much more driving these two people than that ramp ... but I guess we will never know the real reason because these are the people who are constantly lying to people ... so much so that they would not know the truth from the lies anymore ... and that is sad.

I know what you mean about asking for proof ... simply overhearing a conversation in a donut shop is not enough proof ... and that's what they base everything on ... something that someone heard or told them at the coffee shop ... but just because I say that they sky is pink and not blue does not make it a fact. I could sit here and say that the Mayor is a crook ... but if I have no proof ... why should a newspaper put their reputation on the line ... not only their reputation ... why would they open themselves up to a huge lawsuit for slander ... Proof is not alot to ask ... they should be happy to provide it ... but how dare you ask them for something that they do not have.

As far as the Unions ... I think that they need to find new people to lead them ... it is pretty evident that the current union leaders like to air their dirty laundry in the public view ... I don't understand that ... maybe if they found some level headed people who know how to handle things tactfully they may get further ... and then if they are getting no place then you go and air the dirty laundry but these people go right to the televised council meetings before taking the correct steps ... and that's wrong ...

I do believe that the SPD and the SFD are some of the finest people and they deserve a contract with a raise ... they put their lives on the line for us on a daily basis ... ok so there are a few bad officers on the SPD ... but where can you go that you don't have a few bad ones ... no place ... so lets not slam them all for the sins of a few ...

I agree with you also when you say that they must read the "Rag" as they quote it on a daily basis ... they claim that they read it online only because they don't want to give the money to the Lynetts ... well ... I imagine that each time the click ... they get money for that ... so they are still giving money ... maybe not from their own pockets ... but from the advertisers on the pages that they view ... Oh my God ... they are making more money from you fools ... you might just as well subscribe ... that way they only get .50 ...

Anyway I haven't ramled like this in a long time ... thank you for your informative post Stacy!




__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!
Permalink  
 


A few disjointed thoughts...

An overwhelming majority of Scrantonians don't even know who the hell Joe Pilcheksy is...and of those that do, more likely than not they know him as that "nutty bald guy that files all the lawsuits".

I've said for a while here that Pilchesky needs "big villains" in order for him to be a "big superhero". That's how you get...
...the Illuminati-esque ICN
...all-powerful Chris Doherty
...the evil Scranton Times conspiring to keep citizens down
By pumping up Doherty and the Times, he in turn makes his own struggle seem all that more important. As for the ICN, well that pumps Pilchesky up into almost Beowulf proportions. Newsflash: Doherty is just a small-city politician, the Scranton Times is a just a newspaper (and no more or less slanted than any other mainstream newspaper in this country) and the ICN doesn't exist outside of DD imaginations.

As for the need for the DD crew to constantly cite the Scranton Times, well that just comes with the territory. I love the claims of "I don't ever read it" while they simultaneously cite all the reasons why the Times has it all wrong...funny, but don't you actually have to read the paper first in order to determine that it has gotten a story wrong??*

Anyway, thanks for sharing your thoughts Stacy. I really enjoy it when you take a moment to post here. Also, keep up the good work...you know that you're doing a good job when nut-bags like Pilchesky and crew throw all sorts of insults at you.




(*) Ahhh...maybe it works like this: you know how someone who goes blind gets more acute hearing? Well maybe since former officer Stulgis injured her finger (and consequently felt compelled to retire on disability), she gained the ability to know what's in a newspaper without actually having to read it. Just a thought.

-- Edited by Agamemnon at 17:48, 2007-11-07

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!
Permalink  
 


I like how dd.com is talking Doherty, FBI, blah, blah, blah. How did Doherty affect this landslide? How did Joe? What is the FBI investigating? How would Joe or his crew know? When have they ever been right about FBI investigations?



__________________

Make Jack pack!



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Exit Polls: Pilchesky still a lying a-hole!
Permalink  
 


The DD'ers subscribe ... it's like a dirty little secrete that they have to keep from Joey ... what is it that they call the ... a Guilty Pleasure!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard