Far be it from me to accuse anyone of anything. So I will simply state my thoughts on this and others can decide for themself what is really going on here.
For months Joey wasall over Cordaro, however, latelyI have seen (and others have mentioned) achange occuring over the last several weeks. It seems he is ok with Cordaro now. I wonder why? What would change for Joey? Hummmmmmmmmm inquiring minds want to know!
( I could care less who he endorses I simply find it strange that before their encounter in court he was dead set against Cordaro and now........?? Why?)
PEOPLE PEOPLE can we focus for a few days??? The objective the next8 days has to be working hard to make sure the Doherty candidates do not get elected. To that end can we not worry about non-issues until after election day? One more time the Doherty/Times carry on the corruption slate...
RE: PEOPLE PEOPLE can we focus for a few days??? That's a good list to copy and post anywhere you can. The main target there is McGoff. He's the big money man, although they're all bad for the people. There's a week left, that's plenty of time to talk, and keep talking. The Times endorsements are an endorsement for more nepotism and cronyism. Vote against the Lynetts and spread the word to family and friends to do the same.
Could it be reverse psychology??? Every time Joey tells the people to vote in a particular way ... or for a specific candidate ... well they don't do it ... so now if he tells them to vote against Washo and O'Brien ... hell maybe he will get a winner ... who knows that could be what he is doing.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I wonder what Joe's kids think about all this crap he is doing.
Please - no replies, because dragging kids into this quagmire is not what we do here, but this seed might be worth planting in the minds of the people who read this site.
(If the moderators feel I have overstepped, please feel free to edit or delete.)
You haven't said anything about his children ... you are only wonder what effect is being made on them ... I don't think that's saying anything about them ... you in my opinion are expressing concern for them ... maybe I'm wrong ... who knows it's been known to happen.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I agree with Lus, in my opinion MyGirl is on safe ground. There is a world of difference between asking a generic question about "kids" no names, no specific issue, just a general question. "How do you think they are doing?" followed by a request for no answer/information and the evil attacks the goons have engaged in across the hall. At least that's the way I see it anyway.