Since "NADB" will probably not be cutting & pasting any Edith related articles at DD (assuming that there are any...while we may be interested in this, the people in Erie may not be nearly as much), maybe as a service we should here.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 06:06, 2008-07-03
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Update: Looks like she's asked for and was granted a continuance, she said she needs more time. Prosecutor in the case is Michael Alan Sprow, judge is named Freed. Letters were sent out Tuesday via first class mail. Still, latest info doesn't clarify if the date has been moved from the 14th. We'll see. I should have further update next week.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Isn't that something ... she is so very critical of others ... meanwhile I guess she feels that she has really done nothing wrong ... she probably thinks that it's ok to do what she did because after all it was her very own sick/dying father that she ripped off ... so she probably thought she was entitled ... she must have thought that it was ok because it was her father.
What really kills me about the whole story is that they would have everyone believe that Joanne, Joe and Mr. Conrad were a close family ... and that DD began to honor him ... because the city turned them down for a permit to build a handicap accessible ramp so he could get in and out of the house easier ... now how many of you were under the impression that he lived with them from this bull$hit story they spun? I know I thought that he lived there ... for the longest time I thought that this was a close family ... here we come to find out that they had been estranged ... and didn't even speak for how many years .... she didn't give a second thought to any of her siblings ... and what they may have been entitled to ...
And she has the nerve to post about misappropriation of funds ... ripping off taxpayers ... and just doing the right thing ... Well Joanne you would not know what the right thing was if it bit you right on the ass ...
I hope that they take you to court soon ... I hope they nail your a$$ to the wall ... I hope the give you 3 hots and a cot ... I hope you look good in orange ... and I hope Joey doesn't find someone else while you are away ... because for what you have done ... you deserve to spend eternity with Joey!
I'm sorry for my rant and I hate that she makes me feel so judgmental ... I have not led a perfect life ... but God ... I would never ... do what she did.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
UPDATE: Trial moved to September 8 at 9:30 a.m. Court Administration Room 204 in Erie before Judge Peter Freed. I'm told (have not verified), however, PUKEboy trying to work out plea deal with terms they're willing to accept is probation and reimbursement of the funds she (allegedly) stole.
As a side note, it's kind of ironic that we get this information from Stacy via postings...posting which probably wouldn't be happening had Joe not dropped the N-word bomb on Stacy in the first place. It just goes to show that karma is a bitch.
Anyway, copping a plea would be par for the DD course, as you had Sammy & Danny doing the old "I'm sorry your honor" two-step already.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I would not give her a deal ... period! She doesn't deserve a deal ... she deserves to go to jail .... PERIOD!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I'd say that this post from 'heretherebedragons' fits nicely into this thread...
heretherebedragons Posts: 39 Date: Jul 14 8:43 PM, 2008 Views: 112 A survey was done. Humor
Didn't want to cut into other threads. However,
AP: Scranton 9 Jul 2009
In a recent survey,politiciansfromPennsylvania have proved to be the most likely to have had sex in the shower!The survey, carried out forleading toiletries firm 'Brut',found that a huge 86% ofScrantonpoliticianssaid that they have enjoyed sex in the shower.
The other 14% said they hadn't been to prison .... yet
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Either a long trial begins where Joe tries to explain why Edith didn't in fact bilk the estate of her deceased father, OR they cop a plea. Personally I hope that there is a trial...one where lots of details can be exposed for all to see and read.
Now it could be argued that the whole notion of pointing this out is wrong, as Edith is "innocent until proven guilty". Ordinarily I would agree, but not in this case. You see in Joe and Edith Pilchesky, you have two people who, for years, have been branding people "guilty before proven guilty" on their website. Yes, they have engaged in their own special brand of "justice" for years, facts be damned, and all for the glorification of one man's ego.
Turnabout is a bitch, is it not?
What is it that they say about people living in glass houses throwing stones?
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:23, 2008-09-08
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
As expected, the PUKEboy and his beast are trying to cut a plea deal. Today's start date is on hold and a conference before Judge John Garhart is scheduled for Thursday. If talks break down there is a new tentative trial date set for Nov. 10. I'll keep you posted very faithfully!!!!!!!
Here's what happened in Erie Criminal Court with the PUKEboy's wife.
She requested the court order the prosecutor to hand over to her what you call a bill of particulars. This is a written statement by the prosecutor specifying, as required by this section, items of factual information which are not recited in the indictment and which pertain to the offense charged and including the substance of each defendant's conduct encompassed by the charge which the prosecutor intends to prove at trial on his direct case, and whether the prosecutor intends to prove that the defendant acted as principal or accomplice or both, and items of factual information which are not recited in a special forfeiture information or prosecutor's forfeiture information containing one or more forfeiture counts and which pertain to the substance of each defendant's conduct giving rise to the forfeiture claim, the approximate value of property for which forfeiture is sought, the nature and extent of the defendant's interest in such property, and the extent of the defendant's gain from the offense charged.
Her request was denied by Judge John Garhart and the trial date is set Nov. 10 in court room B Room 208 in Erie COurt of Common Pleas before Judge Peter Freed.
Sounds like somebody's finally going to pay the piper!!!!!
Yikes! I certainly understand that this is hardly the most important news of the day given the hi-jinks on wall street..... but can we expect anything to be in the paper anytime soon? :))))
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 20:13, 2008-09-18
Sounds like Pilchesky is trying every stall and delay trick in the book...you think he's worried? These are precisely the kinds of tactics he would criticize others for employing.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Very interesting ... I can't wait for this ball to get rolling ... Nov 10th ... and what do we think he will pull out of that magic hat of his to stall it on Nov 10th????
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Funny, but no mention of this at DD. Gee, I wonder why? Good thing they can come here for the latest Edith "news" (Hey Nelson, I thought you got all your "news" from DD?). Now why do you think that's the case? Whenever anything happened to the families of anyone guilty of not being liked by Joe, it's all over DD...regardless of the person's age.
Think now DD trolls: why is it that Joe has no problem with everone else's legal troubles sprayed all over his site, but when it comes to him, it's the "cone of silence"?
Hypocrisy? You bet!
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Looks like Edith's been granted another delay. The judge has issued a continuance to March 9, however, he did stipulate that this would be the very last delay. PUKEboy working over time trying to get a plea deal judge says get one or be prepared for trial! Maybe he's trying also to get his favorite reporter to cover it!
Well Stacy ... this seems to be the never ending case ... hell if it were me I would want to get this done and over with ... I wouldn't want to be sitting around waiting to see where I would be taking up residence.
I hope that it goes to trial ... I don't think a plea deal should be offered ... some offenses do not deserve to be plead down and in my opinion this is one of them. But that's just how I feel.
I hope that you are the reporter covering this ... I know that's not your thing anymore ... but hell after everything that he said about you ... I would hope that you would make an exception and cover this story. But again that's just the feelings I have.
Thank you for keeping us updated on this!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
a. Bullet to the brain; b. Bullet to the brain; c. Bullet to the brain; or d. In the alternative: Find a way to jail me. Be creative. Forget about throwing the key away. Weld the door shut.
If they can't shut me up, and jailing me doesn't mean I can't communicate with the outside world or stop filing lawsuits, for that matter, they go down. I'd pick "bullet to the brain" if I was in their shoes. A big bullet. At close range.
And, soon, because I'm currently working on financing the freedom to investigate and file lawsuits full timeand with that comes the demise of corruption as we know it. It takes money to fight money. I've dabbled thus far. The time is here to pull the trigger ona full timeinvestment now that Ihave a good handle on what this is all about and who the players are. It took nearly four years just to identify the players.
The last thing they need is for me to be well financedbut that's where I'm headed now that I've acquired success in the courtroom, and I know I can continue to be successful fighting government misconduct. It's a full time effort that needs full time attention, perhaps even a small staff.
I recommenda.45 cal.and don't insult me by doing it from behind
Well I don't think that they would waste a bullet ... and although he may have "dabbled thus far" ... he has not been a real success in he courtroom antics.
::::::The last thing they need is for me to be well financed but that's where I'm headed now that I've acquired success in the courtroom, and I know I can continue to be successful fighting government misconduct. It's a full time effort that needs full time attention, perhaps even a small staff. :::::::::
I would like to know where the success in the courtroom has been???? Oh he has won a few ... but how many has he lost ... and does he or does he not ... if he plans to go forward with a career in law need a degree??? And how the hell would you like to be on his staff ... wow.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.