How dumb are those people at DD? They are all over the so-called posts from Mr. Piccolino.
Duhhhhhhhhhh goons how the hell do you know Mr. Piccolino wrote any of those posts?? Huh?? Tell me!! I will go as far as saying he may indeed have posted "something" but what? Joey as already admitted to editing, removing and replacing altogether a post with his own, and then flat out just taking over the poster's account and writing for him. So **** for brains goons which posts are Mr. Piccolino and which are Joey's? As far as that goes which posts are really anyone other than Joey posting under perhaps dozens if not more names? The few of you who are posting under your own "alter egos" are you certain your account is secure? Have you ever gone back and checked to make sure your posts remained the way you wrote them originally? You might want to check! You entire board has been compromised. Never again is there any certainty thatany post doesn't come straight from the jackass's mouth or keyboard I should say! Nice going Joey you jackass!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 08:05, 2007-09-25
I agree IHave. Pilchesky has always controlled the content and topics of his board with creative editing, but hijacking DD identities is probably a recent phenomenon.
He's such an idiot though. For professing to be so well prepared all the time, he didn't do his homework so well when he wrote the ficticious replies for Piccolino did he?
He went after the current cty commish's without realizing Piccolino had/has a big ole sign for them on the side of his building.
Have you noticed Blonde Ambition reared her head last night?
5150 I think that he has been doing that for far longer than you think as you can go through his archives and see that he has bee editing his posters for a very long time ... now one has to wonder did he just edit for typos or did he totally re write the entire post to make it fit in better with the hate theme of DD.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Groupthink - Groupthink, a term coined by social psychologist Irving Janis (1972), occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment. Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups. A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background, when the group is insulated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making. I'll bet we all could come up with examples where mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgement have failed at DD.
Mental Efficiency - Nelson's claim that he gets all the news he needs from DD. Granma's inability to string sentences together with both subjects and verbs. Patilla's inability to write in anything other than soundbites. Pilchesky's own claim that he edits postings for "clarity".
Reality Testing - Honestly, anyone here ever hear of SPECTRE (damn, I meant the ICN) before reading DD? I was reading DD for two months before I figured out what it meant, and I do consider myself to be a fairly knowledgeable person.
Moral Judgement - Chris Doherty having affairs? Councilmembers 'kneeling'? Blaming a suicide on an elected official? Using the granddaughter of a councilmember as a political bomb? Going through the garbage of a councilmember? Wishing AIDS on people? Tell me, where is the moral judgement in all of that?
Now I'm not opposed to a site where people can be critical of elected officials. We have been critical of them here, although that's not what at least I consider to be the mission of this board. But what Pilchesky does at DD is stifle independent thought. That's sad, because any real information sharing and healthy discussion at DD are automatically discounted because Pilchesky allows and encourages things like that lunatic Anti wishing AIDS on people.
Now someone like Bo/Shari would have you believe that it's possible to separate out the 'good' that DD does from the 'bad'. Yes, I suppose that's possible, but using that same logic I can tell you that it's also possible to extract nitrogen from human urine. Anyone boil their own pee lately rather than going down to the store to buy a bag of fertilizer?
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:16, 2007-09-27
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Very informative and well thought out post Ag ... as always I learn something from you just about daily ... thank you!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
