Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Post Info TOPIC: FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

Ever notice that we get the label as "drinking the DO cool aide" AND yet we do criticize Doherty BUT no one at DD is ever allowed to seriously criticize the Serial Plaintiff at DD? That discounts, of course, the many "anti-Joe" posters that we strongly suspect are actually a Pilchesky in disguise.

You are right Lus, it comes down to sheer stupidity.


-- Edited by Agamemnon at 20:36, 2007-10-08

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
FormerDrunken Southern Preacher


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 319
Date:
RE: FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

Does my heart good
Posts: 5
Date: Oct 8 9:21 AM, 2007
Views: 6

Quote | Reply
RE: Does any of this really matter???

This place can make one vote = two. Every vote taken off McGoff, for example, and given to Rogan, becomes a two vote spread. It depends on what's going on. When the crap hit the fan with Bob McTiernan, this place lit up. Look at the excitement caused with Piccolino. Within 48 hours the topic on his little charade here ran up to 23,000 views. What's nice about DD is that it's open 24/7.


Hey dolts at JOeyLand don't get your panties in a bunch or your egos bruised, but ya really think 10,000 folks viewed that post late at night on a Saturday and then another 10,800 on a late Monday evening? JOey's sheep can be so easily manipilated.

One other thing that cliche "drink the kool aid" is so over used, what do y'all think, that you're Bill O'Rielly? BTW, dolts ever check out why that phrase came to be - "Google" Jim Jones - JonesTown. Don't be too shocked if you see parallels between Jim Jones & Joey and JonesTown & yourselves.

We'll keep y'all in our prayercircle that one day y'all see the light.

__________________

You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

We have been trying to point out that to them for just about a year now Preacher ... it's just not sinking in ... we all get it and have gotten it from the beginning but they just don't see it ... they have a sick blind devotion to him ... no matter what he says ... or does ... they will follow.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

This all gets back to what Pilchesky and his message board are, at the core:

The Followers
First, we have a bunch of fools who, with rare exception (such as Jimbu), have been blinded into loosing the most basic elements of decency, all for sake of belonging. Yes, in this group we have people who, because they want so much to belong, can no longer see the difference between valid criticism vs. racism, dissent vs. hate-mongering. Questioning Janet Evans is evil, but wishing death on Chris Doherty is ok. In this group we have the likes of Edith Pilchesky (the ultimate follower) and Granma.

The Apologists
Second, and even worse than the first group, we have the apologists. Bo Peep is in this group. These are people who probably are offended (on some basic level) by, for example, AntiSemiticMovement's racist rants, but still don't say a word because they like the seeming damage that the board does to the people they don't like. Oh, and it's mostly about money for this group. Chris Doherty's crime? He raised taxes, and for the apologist, that's enough reason to turn a blind eye to things like death wishes. These people follow in the grand tradition of Italian apologists who would point to Mussolini and say "Hey, he made the trains run on time".

The Nuts
This group is for people like AntiSemiticMovements. Sam Patilla is both a follower and a nut. These are people who manufacture their own reality, full of heros (Karl Marx and Joe Pilchesky), villians (the evil ICN) and oppressed masses, as if they lived in some modern version of a Dickens novel.

The Self-Styled Leader
Lastly, we have the self-styled leader, serial-plaintiff Pilchesky. He is so adept at running this little charade that, among other things, he can crow about free speech on one hand and then issue a multi-paragraph disclaimer about why it doesn't apply to him on the other. The leader bends reality to suit his whims, such as turning a 1-1-32 (or so) record in the courtroom into a series of victories. Jim Jones and Joseph Goebbels would be proud.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Art Gordon


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

Very well done Ag. Well stated. Right on.

__________________

Make Jack pack!
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

many of them are of the mindset that "If I say it often enough it'll become the truth"

(even if it's only in their own minds)

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

excellent post Agam excellent!

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
FormerDrunken Southern Preacher


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 319
Date:
RE: FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

Excellant post Ag. It clearly outlines the dolts at DD.

__________________

You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Permalink  
 

Great post Ag .... and perfect analysis of what the posters of DD are ...

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> FINALLY!!! Joe defines his version of Freedom of Speech
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard