Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Post Info TOPIC: Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Joe Pilchesky

born_loser_l.jpg

Posts: 1408
Date: Aug 22 5:12 PM, 2007
Views: 62

Quote | Reply
McDowell survives local court, as expected - stays on ballot

An appeal will be filed first thing in the morning, as expected. Supreme Court here we come. The Opinion and Order completely ignored my wifes contention that the Administrative Code forbids McDowell from running. I can't imagine why.

OPINION AND ORDER


__________________

Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Paul, my unofficial tally is as folllows:

1 Win (Against Cordaro)
1 Settlement (Against Jarbola, PSP, et all)
31 Losses

If you are doing the math, that equates to serial-plaintiff Pilchesky winning or settling about 6.4% of his cases, loosing about 93.5%.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Proving that he is the ULTIMATE LOSER!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Art Gordon


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

He's quite good at losing. Let's give credit where credit is due.

__________________

Make Jack pack!
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Serial-plaintiff Joe Pilchesky's odds of winning or reaching a settlement in another case are, based on his current track record, roughly 6 in 100. Now is that really all that good? Well...

...you have a far better chance of dying from cancer than he does of winning another case (those odds are 1 in 7)
...he DOES have a better chance of winning again than the average American does of dying from a suicide attempt (those odds are 1 in 119)
...but sadly, you are more likely to die in a car are accident (those odds are 1 in 84).

Don't fret though, it's still far more likely that Pilchesky will win another case than the average American will die via lightening strike (those odds are 1 in 79,746).

Source: Odds of dying are from the National safety council, www.ncs.org



__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Now hold on just a minute here folks. Although he was the man behind the scenes, she was the front man and therefore the blame should be laid on her and not him, right?

At least that's how he'll see it.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Art Gordon


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Great point. She has a perfect record in court now. Joe should be proud. Bonus: Joe got to start a thread about how the judge was mean to her.

__________________

Make Jack pack!
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Boo hoooooo ... the judge was mean to her ...



__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Ohhh, Paul, the picture of THAT Janet Evans is gonna get you into truuu-bullll...

Miss Clairol doesn't like brunettes
and from dave's own postings, neither does he.

But the Gold Medals???
Would our own Janet have won them in suck-ocity???

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

I actually got a PM complaining about the councilwoman avatar. "Anything but that" I believe were the exact words. THIS Janet Evans is temporary, until I find something else.

You gotta admit, though, <------ is nicer to look at.

-- Edited by Paul at 09:39, 2007-08-24

__________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Oh yes, as my eyes were bleeding from the last one. LOL LOL

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

Paul, I saw that picture of this cute little Janet with her gold medals on my quest to find a pic of Miss Clairol.

The one I was trying to find was apicture they ran in The Times while she was politicing for State Rep. She was shaking hands on election day. It showed her with her shoulders all haunched over (completely removing her neck from sight) with that smarmy, lipless grin and the pouffed-out, punch-bowl sized hairdo. The Times only ran it once and I couldn't track it down, dammit. Now THAT one was the picture to advertise. However, Ag's avatar gives me a chuckle too.

(edited for typos and grammaticalerrors because I don't want to be accused of being Granma)


-- Edited by His Girl Thursday at 09:32, 2007-08-27

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Permalink  
 

As reported in the Scranton Times this morning, serial-plaintiff Pilchesky fails yet again with a lawsuit...this time in a bid to have Mr McGoff removed from the ballot for City Council. So by my unofficial count, that makes him:

1 Win (against Cordaro)
1 Settlement (against the Pennsylvania State Police)
32 Losses

I guess he figured he had a roll going there with the Cordaro victory. Ooops, guess not.

-- Edited by Agamemnon at 08:43, 2007-08-28

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> Pilchesky Loses. Again. I lost count...how many is this now?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard