Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Post Info TOPIC: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Looks like the Pilchesky spin machine is in effect...

Grassy Knoll

270749.jpg

Posts: 1
Date: Aug 13 10:08 PM, 2007
Views: 386

Quote | Reply
Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

Caught wind of this earlier last week. I read a letter Dave posted to another message board that he wrote and provided proof that he wrote from Janet's email address- her city council e-mail address.

Is it just me, or should he not even be reading those potentially sensative e-mails, let alone deciding which ones to mark as spam.

I know we usually cast aspertions in other directions here, but tgis one stinks to high heaven.

Joe, any chance on getting you to come to the plate for us? This is off the charts slimy. Help is needed.

ridgeman101
Posts: 2
Date: Aug 13 10:44 PM, 2007
Views: 27

Quote | Reply
Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

could you let me know were its at ? post a link or address.

I got 2-1 odds that the thread doesn't make it to midnight.

5-1 that Dave Evans is Grassy Knoll, and that he's trying to get the firestorm out of the way before the next council meeting.

__________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Well well well things are getting interesting aren't they?

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Joe Pilchesky

SpinCycle.jpg

Posts: 1370
Date: Aug 14 12:17 AM, 2007
Views: 12

Quote | Reply
RE: Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

And what, pray tell, is it that you need me to come to the plate for? Help is needed for what? Apparently you have read an email, so I can't help you with that. You know who sent it. I can't help you with that. You know what email address it came from. I can't help you with that, either. If he's marking them spam, I can't help you with that, either. I could personally care less what he's doing with anyone's email address. It's not my turn to watch Dave Evans or any other adult. Nor, is it their turn to watch me. I think as adults, that's a given. What's off the charts for you? A husband using a wife's email address? He probably doesn't have his own. Most couples have only one.

You have this situation. An adult male married to an adult female, allegedly using her e-mail address. My wife uses mine all the time. She can't get to it unless I am allowing her to do so. She also often reads emails sent to me because I seldom have time to check them myself. I have nothing to hide, so it's not an issue. Trust me, there is absolutely no expectation of privacy when sending anything via email. Private messaging on forums such as this is a different story.

Janet Evans is a councilwoman, not the head of national security. What in God's name could be sensitive, if there is any chance that anything would be sensitive? Last time I cheked, husbands and wives slept together. For me, that would mean they share all aspects of their lives. The only thing I can figure out here is that now you have Janet Evans' email address. Welcome to the club, so does 30,000 other Scrantonians. She advertises it on the City Council Web site. So, send her an email. Send Dave an email, or send me an email at jpilchesky@earthlink.net.


(edited for typo)

That man sure loves the spin cycle, huh? Holy downplay, Batman!

__________________

Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

And naturally, the request for the link has been deleted...

All those suprised, raise your hands:

reserve_center_2.jpg

__________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Well Paul you were half right. He didn't as of yet take down the post but boy oh boy is he spinning it!

Joe Pilchesky

joepilchesky.gif

Posts: 1370
Date: Aug 14 12:17 AM, 2007
Views: 7

Quote | Reply
RE: Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

And what, pray tell, is it that you need me to come to the plate for? Help is needed for what? Apparently you have read an email, so I can't help you with that. You know who sent it. I can't help you with that. You know what email address it came from. I can't help you with that, either. If he's marking them spam, I can't help you with that, either. I could personally care less what he's doing with anyone's email address. It's not my turn to watch Dave Evans or any other adult. Nor, is it their turn to watch me. I think as adults, that's a given. What's off the charts for you? A husband using a wife's email address? He probably doesn't have his own. In his the e-mail he sent he say he does it's an epix one (so he claims)Most couples have only one. Most couple's actually do their own but I digress this isn't "most couples" this is an elected goverment official who is having their official e-mail seemingly controlled by a non-elected non-goverment citizen. I again repeat my challange can anyone imagine what would be being said by Joey and the other goons if it had been Joe Gatelli interfering or using Judy Gatelli's e-mail?

You have this situation. An adult male married to an adult female, allegedly using her e-mail address. My wife uses mine all the time.Well good for you two!! I would imagine the public doesn't expect privacy between you two, they do however expect it from Janet as she is privy to sensitive and private information such as job applications which have people SS# on it, possibly medical information and other like information. Personal files are private by law and you know it! I sort of remember there was quite an uproar about personal records being disposed of improperly because someone other than who is allowed to see them might have seen them. Same theory applies here. Nice try Joey but not even close. She can't get to it unless I am allowing her to do so. Exactly.. which leads me to ask does Dave has Janet's full permission to read, edit, and reject city business e-mails or he is doing this on the sly? Which is it Janet dear? She also often reads emails sent to me because I seldom have time to check them myself. I have nothing to hide, so it's not an issue. Trust me, there is absolutely no expectation of privacy when sending anything via email. That is not correct and you know it Mr. Darrow!! I receive many documents via my e-mail and there is every expectation that they will remain private. In fact they all carry a a privacy warning on them. Private messaging on forums such as this is a different story. Really? How so?

Janet Evans is a councilwoman, not the head of national security. Neither am I but if I allowed my spouse to read, edit,respond or worse delete business mail or sensitive internal documents from my company I wouldn't be emplyed long, I would wager. I might even be facing some legal action. What in God's name could be sensitive, if there is any chance that anything would be sensitive? I assume you are not retarded so I will guess that you are just trying to BS everyone with that question. If you really are that dumb read above and stop at least acting like a total A-hole. Please.. I understand you are protecting your little friend but could come up with something a little better than that stupid question? Last time I cheked, husbands and wives slept together. For me, that would mean they share all aspects of their lives. They better not be sharing sensitive information as that would be a violation of a employee's right to privacy and you know that also! The only thing I can figure out here is that now you have Janet Evans' email address. Welcome to the club, so does 30,000 other Scrantonians. She advertises it on the City Council Web site. Ya you think so? Check again.. little Missy Jan's e-mail link is the only one that is not activiated. hummm I wonder why? Maybe it's too much work for Daveyboy to monitor two e-mails? So, send her an email. Send Dave an email, As far as I can tell that would be the same thing. The problem is who will answer? Or worse will it get deleted before our 'esteemed" council member ever saw it? Who can say at this point? or send me an email at jpilchesky@earthlink.net.


(edited for typo)


-- Edited by Joe Pilchesky at 00:20, 2007-08-14


-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 01:19, 2007-08-14

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

A QUESTION FOR ALL THE PEOPLE FROM DD THAT READ THIS SITE

If Joe Pilchesky cares about "Free Speech", why then did he delete the request for a link to the Dave Evans email?

I'm not breaking stones here, just asking a simple, straight forward question.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

::: ... I can't help you with that... :::
seems to be the general consensus of that post.

I guess it was Joe's shoulder she boo-hoo'ed on, after all.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Joe Pilcheskywrote:
What's off the charts for you? A husband using a wife's email address? He probably doesn't have his own. Most couples have only one.
bull-texas-longhorn-plastic-f812.jpg
Verizon e-mail accounts are free. There are any number of free e-mail providers as well. G-Mail, Yahoo, MSN, etc.

To claim that most families have one is a half truth at best, a bald faced (HA!!) lie at worst. Most FAMILIES have one. EVANSFAMILY(a)email(dot)com could be it. But for there not to be individual sub accounts for Janet, Dave, the son, and whoever else resides in the household is a ridiculous contention. Especially in 2007. Fifteen or twenty years ago, you may have been on to something. Not now.

"He probably doesn't have his own" If he has a job, he has his own. If he has a computer, he has his own. The dog probably is the only one in that house without an e-mail address, and even he probably has one too.

I have numerous e-mail addresses. My wife has at least 3. My kid had one at age 4. Dave has his own address.

Furthermore, 30,000 people have Janets address because she uses it to conduct city council business. What city council business does Dave conduct that requires him tohave access to her e-mail?

Keep spinning things like that and you're gonna rupture your ACL.


-- Edited by Paul at 10:24, 2007-08-14

-- Edited by Paul at 10:26, 2007-08-14

__________________

His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

I keep waiting for that bull to raise his tail and leave a little something to finish the rest of that story

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

At the time of this post, there are 2229 views to the post across the hall about dave's letter - and the only post which has been allowed to remain in reply to the original, and it's Joe's.

Must be damned spankin' nice to be the purveyor of free speech in his little world.


__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

He kissed his sister in the lawsuit. A tie makes him an expert on free speech, I guess.

I wonder how many other people kissed his sister.

Tied, I mean. It beats a loss, I suppose.

__________________

Art Gordon


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Just in case it yets yanked.


Grassy Knoll

270749.jpg

Posts: 2
Date: Aug 14 4:37 PM, 2007
 Views: 1
Quote | Reply
Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

I thought this was the site to go to if their was suspected corruption ro wrongdoing by elected officials. guess I was wrong about that.

This is simple stuff - the kind of thing you don't need to be a lawyer to understand.

Janet Evans lists her Verizon email address as her official means of contact for people who want to write to her in her capacity as an elected council person.

Despite the freewheeling choices you've made with who you let use your email account, you're not an elected official. Take the blinders off.

Anyone of the 30,000 people who know and use that email address expect their correspondence to be confidential. I doubt that any of the 30,000 people you mention expect her husband to be reading or editing or deleting or marking as spam any emails that they send. We elected her, not him.

Sorry you can't or won't see the problem with that. Could you be so kind as to allow this thread to remain so others may know that the mail they send councilwoman Evans is read by other people than her. It's only fair that citizens are aware that they are speaking to her and her husband. There are things many people would not want to share with him.

__________________

Make Jack pack!
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

I'm thinking that post will be yanked shortly. Serial-plaintiff Pilchesky does not take kindly to people exercising Free Speech in HIS corner of the internet.

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

The spin machine is in overdrive.

Joe Pilchesky

joepilchesky.gif

Posts: 1376
Date: Aug 14 5:06 PM, 2007
Views: 8

Quote | Reply
RE: Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

What gave you the impression that I was going to take the thread down.Maybe because you have done it before including the post in this very thread were a person was asking for a link to be able to view the e-mail?She's an elected public official, right? As I mentioned above, it's not my turn to watch other grown adults. Really?Why do spend so much time watching other public officials and not Jan? They are adults also aren't they? But they arenot 'special' like her are they Joey? I shared my thoughts on it. Fair enough? I get 50 - 75 emails a day, sometimes twice that if there's something controversial going on. I couldn't read all of them if I wanted to. Private Messages through this board are for my eyes only. My wife does the reading of emails and she'll bring my attention to something she thinks is critical for me to know. She answers most of them for me. Some I want to answer in a way that only I can respond because some of them are threatening and nasty, or some need some technical inclusion. No doubt, Janet Evans gets the same thing, and probably a lot more than I get. I agree that if I believed I was sending an email to Mayor Doherty only, I wouldn't want his wife to read it. But, at the same time, I think the chances are that he would share it with her anyway. If, as you allege, Mr. Evans is improperly handling email, and you've offered no proof, They tried to offer proof but you took down the post asking for the link to the copy of the e-mail so do you want the prove or don't you?Of course as you read this website as you have e-mailed our admin Lus onsome website content you didn't care for, you have seen the proof yourself already haven't you? I see you are throwing around the BS again. I always thought you were strange but wow are you a BS thrower as well. contact the councilwoman and alert her to your feelings. How? Daveyboy monitors her e-mail does he also monitor her written mail too? Who can say? So what should they have to do, track her down in person, as her mail is longer secure is it? I'm sure she'd be interested in your concerns. I am quite sure she already knows this poster's concerns :) Of course I am sure she doesn't read, post on your site or know you for that matter. Ya right!


__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Nice try "judge" but that look at this again shall we?

The Judge
Posts: 63
Date: Aug 14 6:33 PM, 2007
Views: 9

Quote | Reply
RE: Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

I don't read any proof here that Mr. Evans is doing any of the things suggested. The possibility of any official or their representative doing anything is available. The what ifs are endless. Fortunately for both sides, what if doesn't hold water when holding someone accountable for a certain alleged action. Proof... if that isn't priceless coming from a group who starts most sentences out "i heard.." "someone whispered to me.." "I was at the diner and overheard..." However if you want proof simply ask Lus or Art to forward a copy of the e-mails read them yourself.

The law holds that emails provided by an official website domain are under scrutiny of that official entity. However, any personal content of the email has not been held to be available for public scrutiny. If an email is sent from that domain regarding official business, that email can be used in a court of law to document communications. Personal emails cannot. (political activities are subject to other laws) Personal responsiblity holds that a citizen wanting to communicate with their public official at least have the opportunity with a responable amount of privicy be able to do so. Doesn't Janet know that?

It appears as though Ms. Evans is not using the scrantonpa.gov email domain, and as such citizens are thereby forewarned that their communications are not protected nor available to the public. Where exactly does it say that? I saw no such disclaimer where is it? Mr. Pilchesky makes a very good point in that other officials have their secretaries review emails, and in that regard, those secretaries can take it upon themselves to delete emails prior to the official reading it or even knowing about it. It would be up to the official to take appropriate action if that were discovered, not the individual nor the government. Hello?? this isn't her secretary ( a person hired to do the job you just described and who would have a responsiblity to maintain the privacy of such communications) it's her nosey husband... big difference. If however the secretary did do something inapproprite it most certainly would fall to the public official to take responsiblity for it and it would also look bad for the administration of said government. Just like when Mr. Doherty's staff don't do as you think they should you hold Mr. Doherty and his administration responsible. As to the individual they too would, I am sure, take some kind of action if it affected them negatively If your issue is sensitive, or confidential, face to face communications is the best choice. I am sure it is, however, as all you goons screamed to the high heavens when the cameras came out of council chambers...."What about the people who are shut ins?" Surely you don't expect those poor sick individuals to hobble down to Janet's house becasue they can't trust that her nosey husband isn't interfering in their mail to her, do you? Even with restricted delivery certified mail, anyone could actually open the letter, and should the intended receiver suffer adverse consquences because of that, the receiver would still have an appropriate defense stating that they never received it. That's one reason why lawsuits are inititated with personal service by the sheriff.
How about she just has her husband back off and mind his own business? Seems easier to me.
Whoever allegedly posted that alleged communication between the alleged 'parties' without permission, could be subject to defamation claims, since the alleged malicious content is being attached to Ms. Evans either directly or indirectly and apparently is being used to malign her reputation as a public official. Well if you take the time to read the "alleged e-mail" you will see that Daveyboy says quite clearly to post it for all to see. That kind of shuts down your thought doesn't it? And as to miligning her reputation I would say Daveyboy had a bigger hand in that than anyone else dear, wouldn't you?


-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 19:10, 2007-08-14

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

I look forward to IHave's dissection of serial-plaintiff Pilchesky's final word on the Dave Evans e-mail thread, although I do have to make two observations:

1. Contrary to what Pilchesky may think, many of this sheep already do come here and have already seen it. Even if they lack the spine to say write in at DD, I am absolutely certain that more than a few (well, that's a relative term, as we know that many of the DD posters are actually Pilchesky himself) of the troops probably do think what Mr Evans did stinks to high hell.

2. Gotta love Granma's "YEAH, WHAT JOE SAID" note in the thread. Once again Granma proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the weak-minded are easily led.



__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

how long do you think it would last if we posted it over there??

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Right off the top of the bucket they are talking lawsuits -- who said anything about a lawsuit over here? I don't feel the intent here is to bring any sort of suit against the woman, but simply to make everyone see that she and her family are not what she politely and respectfully pretends to present to the public.. The husband is the one who admittedly reads all her email -- the husband is the one who admittedly sent the emails to our members - the husband is the one who gave explicit permission to make them public -- the husband is the one who IS NOT a 'confidential' secretary to any councilperson -- the husband is the one who brought this scrutiny on himself.

Ok, so the husband is a jackass, no big deal. She knew this before she married him but married him anyway. This guy must have really big feet - anyway, ...

Everyone has 20/20 hindsight - but this guy has just screwed the pooch and this stunt will put her political career on the skids. I seriously think we should have these two letters made public come election time.

-- Edited by His Girl Thursday at 08:46, 2007-08-15

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
His Girl Thursday


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

paraphrased - Pilcheski
::: ... Evans is extremely protective of his wife. If he's disqualifying emails for inappropriate content, he's doing what he's supposed to be doing. If my wife was a councilwoman, she'd never have her feeling subjected to hostile and degrading emails. I'd make sure of it. The job is tough enough without being bombarded with personal attacks.... :::
Now folks, what's wrong with this paragraph, specifically the hilighted portion?

He's across the hall spinning the webtoward the fact that we have created the incriminating e-mail and poor, little, besotten, puppy-dog-in-love dave evans is just protecting his little sugar-n-spice, cupcake wife when he checks her e-mail.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !
tim


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 149
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

he rounded up the troops on this one to squash it. God forbid anyone treat Janet with the same disrespect they treat Judy bob and sherri daily. Hypocrissy is nothing new for them, they are mindless drones.

That thread over there should prove to anyone with half a mid who is readding it what their bottom line really is., Stackthe council with votes pro their agenda, get a moyor they like inand then become the very machine they complain about now.

__________________
Paul


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Joe squashed nothing. He just solidified the notion that he has a double standard in regards to all things Janet.

He's simply made a bigger ass out of himself. And I never thought that was possible.

__________________

IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Whoo hoo lets do the twist!! The spin machine still spinning!!


Joe Pilchesky



Posts: 1378
Date: Aug 15 12:34 AM, 2007
Views: 257

Quote | Reply
RE: Is it true that David Evans is reading and editing Janet's email?

There will be no links posted here to a message board that is absent any responsible administration or credible content, to say nothing of a site where the poster's IP addresses are handed out like candy upon request. By that I presume you mean an administrator who allows freedom of speech and the right to discuss whatever the posters feel needs to be discussed? As opposed to yourself who only allows discussion on the persons you have deemed unworthy of your "special protection"? The lawsuits I just won (tied) over the PSP and DA was all about refusing to surrender IP addresses and violating our constitutional rights. We protect the posters IP addresses here, at all costs. See Pilchesky vs. PSP/DA. Settled. Please if you are served with a subpoena I predict you will give them up in a heartbeat. As to the winning thing I propose the following: since you insist on calling it a win, when in fact you settled, then I say the DA won as well as he settled with you. So NEWS FLASH!! THE D A WINS LAWSUIT WITH JOEY WHOO HOO
As an Administrator of a message board that enjoys and benefits from substantial local traffic and loyalty to my posters to protect them, let me give you some advice. Things that come to you via email may have been tampered with numerous times before you got it. I could get an email from anyone, copy it, edit it, paste it, resend it to another person and create havoc like you've never seen before. They can't be verified. I don't care if the guy puts his fingerprints on it. Fact that his phone number is on it means nothing. Thousands of people have my personal cell number. I've sent thousands of emails out. They can be copied onto Notepad, edited as desired, pasted back into the body of the email and forwarded to another thousand people. Here's what I think, you're being set up, like those pervs who are set up by cops pretending to be 14 year olds. WOW are you calling Grassy Knoll a pedophile? Its funny you have that in your mind a lot. I remember you making a similar analogy in another post about a different person and you got called on it by a poster as I recall. Humm thats interesting but I digress, if you want proof, the posters have said they will send it to you. What more do you want? Perhaps this might be a good idea, the next time you are up little missy Jans for dinner why not take a good look at her computer? You are a computer genius right? (As well as a doctor, lawyer, and did I see you mention a seminar trainer in the future? Whoo Hoo Joey in info commercials just were a charlatan should be I think!) You could recall deleted e-mails, no doubt, being the computer genius that you are, find out for yourself what the truth is.. Clarence! You're not posting that stuff here. Period. You know how I'd know for sure that Dave Evans said anything to anyone? By hearing him say it. You plan on implementing that criterion to anyone else or just those "special people"? That's it in this business. A year ago I called Sue Henry to ask to be a guest on WILK. She confronted me with a letter she claimed I'd sent to her that was threatening and nasty, except I didn't send it. It took a day or so for me to prove it was not me. Right up until that time, she believed I was the author of the letter. She held that against me without ever meeting me. We get along famously now, but someone had tried to sabotage me long before I got there, and it worked until she heard from me personally. Uh huh!I believe that story I do I swear!
In closing, what Dave Evans says is said as a private person. He's not an elected official. EXACTLY While it may be interesting, it's as inappropriate for the purpose of this board as what Joe Gatelli, Donna Doherty or Diane Mellow may have to say in private matters. Who cares if Joe Gatelli and Donna Doherty are reading emails? You would, big time, if you found out they were doing it and you know it! Evans is extremely protective of his wife. If he's disqualifying emails for inappropriate content, he's doing what he's supposed to be doing. Please Joey get the story straight and stop BS'ing people. I am going to try and explain this to you for the 100th time, try to pay attention will you, you rock head! Daveboy sent the first letter to Lus not the other way around. It was Lus's response that was bumped out of Jans mail according to the content of the second letter Daveboy sent Lus. Further Art then sent a request for further information about this situation and Daveyboy sent a third letter repeating that it would be bumped as well. Maybe my presumption in an earlier post was incorrect.. are you retarded? Just asking, as you dont seem to be able to follow a line of events, or are you trying to BS again? If my wife was a councilwoman, she'd never have her feeling subjected to hostile and degrading emails. I'd make sure of it. The job is tough enough without being bombarded with personal attacks. Huh?? Well if this isn't priceless coming from you and your rabid pack wolfs! Funny I don't remember there being a problem with this kind of behavior until you and your gang of goons arrived on the scene. Besides its free speech right? Fay says she can say anything she wants and you agree right? However once again, rock head, the only personal attacks in the letters came from Daveyboy's side of the content, so bitch at him! If I found out Dave Evans wasn't protecting her, I'd have no use for him and I'd feel sorry for Janet. I already feel sorry for her I can't imagine being so demeaned by my spouse. I wonder, as I asked before, why he feels the need to control her e-mail. Does he feel she is too stupid or untrustworthy to handle her professional duties? As to needing to protect her, are you kidding? Have you seen those two stand side by side? I doubt he's the one doing the protection. Yikes!
Grassy, you're done. You had your chance to legitimize your claims and you failed to do it. That's because you can't. A lot to do over nothing. Wow that was a shock never saw that coming,.. nooooo! Come on everyone you know you never expected this poster to get the boot right? Geez this Joey always has you guessing heyna or no?Go back to your board and fillet your goldfish. We fillet sharks here. No, its more like you grow sharks there. I guess they don't bite you or little missy Jan out of professional courtesy.



-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 11:41, 2007-08-15

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 11:58, 2007-08-15

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
IHavehadenoughofhaters


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Any requests for a the actual email yet Art or Lus? I know those crusaders for the truth wouldn't want to pass up an opportunity to get to the truth of this matter right? LOL LOL

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))
Agamemnon


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

Of course they would not pass that up IHave...we all know that Joe Pilchesky champions the right to free speech*.

(*) Legal Disclaimer:
As long as Joseph Pilchesky agrees with the speech in question. Free speech does not apply to postings about Janet Evans, David Evans or any other Evans. Free speech does apply to postings critical of Judy Gatelli and her weight, especially if said postings also make fun of her haircut. Critical postins about Bill Courtright are allowed on alternate Tuesdays and Fridays in October, March and June, unless otherwise decided by Joseph Pilchesky. Warning, free speech does not entitle one to question the actions, motivations or writings of Joseph Pilchesky, his wife Edith Pilchesky or any other member of the extended Pilchesky family. Free speech does include the right to spread unfounded rumors about Christopher Doherty, Sherri Nealon-Fanucci, Judy Gatelli, Robert McGoff, Sara Hailstone, anyone with the last name Brazil (except former wrestler 'BoBo Brazil') any sitting judge, members of the DPW union, the children and grandchildren of previously mentioned individuals, dead relatives of previously mentioned individuals, and mythical organizations such as the ICN, PCN, IPN and the Illuminatti. All decisions about what constitutes the nature of free speech at DohertyDeciet are made soley based upon the judement of Joseph Pilchesky. Free speech does not entitle posters at DohertyDeceit to make comments that reasonable people would consider racist, unless those postings are written by Joseph Pilchesky, Edith Pilchesky, AntisemiticMovements, Cyberly'n or select other posters of DohertyDeceit and are about Jews, Catholics, Whites, African American journalists, Jesuits and of course the Irish. Joseph Pilchesky reserves the right to ban any poster at DohertyDeceit at any time for disagreeing with Joseph Pilchesky regarding any issue that Joseph Pilchesky deems to be important. Joseph Pilchesky also reserves the right to ban posters for expressing viewpoints counter to accepted DohertyDeceit norms. Note: if you think this disclaimer is solely intended to be just funny, you are missing half the point...it is both funny and sadly true.


-- Edited by Agamemnon at 16:57, 2007-08-18

__________________ 
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Art Gordon


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
RE: My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

IHavehadenoughofhaters wrote:

Any requests for a the actual email yet Art or Lus? I know those crusaders for the truth wouldn't want to pass up an opportunity to get to the truth of this matter right? LOL LOL



Zilch. Nada. Nil.



__________________

Make Jack pack!
LusOnlyVoice


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Permalink  
 

None at this time!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
PilcheskyDeceit True Freedom of Speech -> True Freedom of Speech ... Pilchesky denies Freedom of Speech -> My letter to Dave Evans and his response
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard