Quote from Joe on his site about janet Evans as mayor:
Gary is not near man enough for the job. End of story. Evans is too much woman for the job. Her call, but in my view, she belongs in a much higher level of government, elected or appointed. Having her as mayor would be like hiring Trump to run your Bingo. She'd be great for the city, but I don't know how great it would be for her. She'd have the city back on its feet by mid-term, and then what? Wow, that's quite a departure from the "doomed generations of Scranton children paying for Dobee mistakes" that we heard so much about. It's screwed beyond repair, but Janet could fix it in two years. Sadly though, she won't. She's too good to stay in the city and has a higher calling.
"She'd be great for the city, but I don't know how great it would be for her."
Is she doing...whatever it is she's doing....for us, or for HER?
Joe, Janet, Mary Ann, etc...Please stop shoving the "She's the only one who acts for the people" horsesht down our throats until you can come up with a simple, consistent answer to that.
Well right now they are thinking that she is the solution ... and what exactly does she think will happen to her good standing at DD when she doesn't perform well in the first month in office ... they will slam her just like they slam Doherty ... she is not for the people ... Janet is for Janet ... otherwise she would answer emails sent to her ... Paul can attest to the fact that she does not give a rat's ass about the problems of most people ... Did she answer your email Paul ... no she didn't ... and then she came up with some lame excuse as to why she did not answer ... yeah she's for the people ... the people of DD ... and the people who wear the LO(a)D tee shirts ... but for the rest of us ... well she could care less.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I don't think Ms Evans is even "for" the DD/LoD crew...they happen to be a convenient bunch, easily excited, prone to hero worship, and ready to follow with no questions asked. Instant mob...just add water. In that respect, Ms Evans and serial-plaintiff Joe Pilchesky are very much alike, as I think he doesn't give a rat's a$$ about "the people" either; if he did he'd actually do something constructive for the city instead of simply stroking is already engorged ego via countless unsuccessful lawsuits.
Now if you take a step back and try to look at Ms Evans leadership qualities objectively, I think you'd see someone who isn't qualified to run a small business office, let alone a city. As we've asked here many times, just what has she done? Oh, she proposed a POLITICAL BUDGET (designed solely to harm Chris Doherty) once as Finance Chairman. If Mayor Doherty's budget was flawed in one extreme, then the Evans budget was flawed in the other.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Perhaps Joe described her actual intent better than anyone:
In my humble opinion, it would be a major sacrifice in her life on behalf of the people. If she thinks the people in this city are worth what she has to bring to the table, I wish her well in a population with an undeveloped appreciation for either strong ethical convictions or the capacity to process what leadership really is. You know, loyalty and fidelity can be painful. It's not written anywhere that sacrifices will be honored at the door. Strength is perfected at times of weakness, but neither strength or weakness comes equipped with 20/20 vision.
So, you see, she'd be great, but has to decide if we (the people) are worth it. Or to put it my way, she'd have to decide between continuing her charade of "working hard for the people of Scranton" or admit she was always full of BS and seek another office. Wait, she did that and lost to Frank Shimkus.
If she is "for" you can anyone tell me why she denies knowing you or Joey?
You and Joey (the biggest butt kisser of the bunch) spend enormous amount of time following her every move, applauding her every word, bowing before her altar day and night but at the first opportunity Janet denied knowing you. Are you really that stupid? She doesn't want to be associated with you!! She uses you for her purpose and then denies knowing you. Wake up!!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 10:55, 2007-07-31
She will not associate her council persona with their website - for good reason - she would be run out of town on a freaking RAIL.
However, she'll let her hair down across the hall, and have at it with the rest of the dd whackjobs just because she can and does have oh so much to say. Sure, we all have our speculations about her nom de plume, and correctly so. But just like everything else across the hall -- is there proof? Nope, just speculation and she will keep it that way for as long as possible. But when it actually does come out that she does, in fact, post across the hall - the $hit will hit the political fan over some of the things she has said.
If it looks like dog$hit and smells like dog$hit and squished between your toes like dog$hit, then it must be dog$hit, RIGHT?
The name in itself is the giveaway. Then you just have to read the crap on the screen. No matter what she says, It's got to be her. She tries to white-trash it up once in a while to make us think she's from up Granma's way but c'mon ... she has dropped a few hints over time, too.
If it were not Janet - she would come right out and say so -- and then she would be spouting and shouting and have her very own lawsuit in the making, naming anyone she might have heard make even the slightest insinuation.
Again if it were not Janet - the other person (who obviously by the posts has psychotic tendencies and a personality disorder) would be ranting and raving "It's ME, not HER".
Yeah - it's HER ! And she loooves to be called Queen.
::::::The name in itself is the giveaway. Then you just have to read the crap on the screen. No matter what she says, It's got to be her. She tries to white-trash it up once in a while to make us think she's from up Granma's way but c'mon ... she has dropped a few hints over time, too.:::::
Hey Girl ... I am from up Granmas way ... wat are ya tryn te say!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I could never vote for Janet because people like fay and Pilchesky will be at her side telling her what to do . Everybody keeps saying janet had her own budget and council did not consider hers she claims there would not have been a tax increase. What they don't tell you is she wanted to cut non union positions back to 2001 salaries you do not move a city forward by taking money from some one else to make ends meet.You stop the over spending and create revenue for the city like make the non profits pay their fair share because lord knows they don't if the university takes any more property off the tax roles we might as well turn the whole city over to them.
Well if Joe says the city isn't "that bad" then what the h*ll is he always bitch*n about? He has to have his nose in everything. Just someone with too much time on his hands. Him and her both. They should take up a hobby- quilting, knitting etc..... Tha is what amazes me about those DD'ers--- "foam at the mouth" wanted a dog park- cried for months about it- she finally got one and guess what- a couple weeks later she was up at the blessed podium crying that she doesn't think a dog park should cost that much.. NEVER HAPPY...
Too bad Janet doesn't realize that eventually they will find fault in something she does or doesn't do and then she's "fair game".
Fay Franus is walking negativity. No wonder she works for a utility...next to the cable company that's the perfect place for her.
I will never forgive or forget her opposition to the new high school. Typical nasty human being...she was fine with our children attending the oldest operating high school in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Why? Because she didn't have kids going there. Funny, but I never did see the rash of elderly that were to be made homeless once the new high school was opened (according to Fay).
Lastly, I can't stand her "...you're not for the people" lines. When last I checked, Fay 'Foam @ the Mouth' Franus holds no elective office, therefore she is not in a position to speak for anyone but her own miserable herself. She needs to change that line to "...you're not for this person".
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 20:31, 2007-09-01
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
