Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Do you concur??
tim


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 149
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


After reading the thread about Ken Mcdowell's testimony I noticed soething a bit odd.

I noticed in a pretty regualr pattern, not very commoon for DD a bucn og rare posters who are hardly ever there to share a comment all comment very derogatry comments in a row. They also made sure to keep on relaying certain messages. In order to hurt the character of the man for anyone reading. There was one dissenter then a quick rebuttle. It was just to convienient for this thred to blow up like this with all unregualr posters all hashing the same sentiments .

I want to say this is Pilchski posting under all his names in roder to make it look like 10 other citizens are so disgusted with this ken guy that they need to call him scum, make allegations he has numerous children out from differnt young women and he is a drunk.

JOe is really trying to ruin this guy not just job wise but his reputation as well. I am beginning to wonder when the empire will strike back. I know joe is a knat on a dinosaur but even still. I am looking forward to when he goes an inch to far and he gets cuffed and thrown in jail.

__________________


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


Yes, we agree that there is a very real possibility that Joe has posted under numerous different accounts in order to give the illusion of a large congregation, advance an illogical (and usually incorrect) position, play devil advocate with himself, but mostly he does it for masturbation purposes. Generally speaking, the lower the post count, the more likely the chances for an "Oh, Joe, you're our hero, thank you for standing up for what is right" bullsh!t post.

It's clear that he has a following, but it in no way reflects the majority of the folks in the city. Hell, it doesn't even reflect the minority of the city. Joe leads the "superminority", if you will. All fifteen of them.

This site has become less of a "Let's discredit Joe Pilchesky" excercise (he's doing that just fine by himself with every one of his lawsuits and posts) and more of a point and laugh at him forum. Nothing he does is really shocking anymore. And it's unfortunate. If he were to actually uncover some disturbing truth, or actually have a beneficial solution for the greater good, unlikely as it may be, he's cried wolf so many times and alienated so many people that no one with any sense could possibly ever believe him again.

__________________



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


Oh I believe that he's got 100+ people living in that fat head of his ... when things start to slow down with the posters over across the hall ... in comes a brand new poster to whip them up into a frenzy ... it's definetly a pattern that has been going on for at least 9 months that I know of ... that's when I really began watching what they did over there ...

if you go back into the archives of the board you will see where Granma as just one example ... has outed more than one poster alternate identity ... the one thing we can say here is that maybe we don't give up our real names ... but we also don't post under multiple names ... I have 2 user names ... however I only use one.

Here we delete members who have not been actively reading or posting... only after they are sent an email to tell them of the deletion of the account ... we here are looking for accurate numbers and not just to have members out the ass who never read or post. If that were the case I would approve every member who ever signed up.

Yes I concur that Joe Pilchesky posts under multiple user names ... and here is just a thought ... could that be the reason he won't give up the IP addresses ... as it could possibly show that this is the truth ... I don't think he's really doing it to protect his members ... remember by his own admission ... He's not a nice guy!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

tim


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 149
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


When I read that post it just stood out to me. Too many posters flowing off each others thoughts. When you read this board you can tell the 5 or 7 posters here think for themselves and have very different approaches to writing. That thread lacked those qualities.

Also, the post where somebody tells about joe beating guys up. JOe wrote that. There was a definite overtone in that post. He talks about joe beating guys up but makes joe seem like the type where if you look at him wrong he will whoop your ass. BS and a big BS at that. I know a lot of guys like joe. Always talking about how tough they are/where.

__________________
tim


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 149
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


Also, rather than create a new thread I will ask another question in this one. I do not know squat on the personal life of Ken Mcdowell. Nor Do i want to. However they are going nuts over there posting some awful things. they just mentioned his wife and daughters name. That to me is a low blow and should be erased.

Is he really a drunk, womanizer no shopw ect ect. If you can refute it please do otherwise I will conclude that you are in the same boat as me and do not know. I think it is extremly disrespectful to the FAMILY of a man or woman when personal attacts are made. I am sure Kn does not care what they say about him on the site, but now they are talking about his kid. When does this insanity stop.

What do these goons want the outcome to be. Fay running the DPW. Janut as mayor, Joe as Nelson as controller. The Judge as solicitor. News from the shed as Chief of Police. Gimme a break. There isi a city like that. It is called LA LA Land. Please go there!!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
RE: Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


tim wrote:

Is he (McDowell) really a drunk...


It's no secret that the dude's favorite beer is Coors Light. (Why is Coors Light like having sex in a canoe? Because both are f*cking close to water.)


But not only is he drinking a Coors Light or two when he goes out, but he drinks 'em over ice. If he's getting bombed off of a couple watered down Coors Lights (4.2% alcohol by volume), then Pilchesky isn't his greatest concern, if it ever was. If he's getting drunk ona few Light rocks, then he'sgot the liver function of a newborn and really should have it checked out by a medical professional.

Short answer, no, McDowell is not a "drunk" in the sense that they'd like you to think he is. I do believe, however, that Pilchesky and his crew are a bunch of sanctimonious teetotalers.

I will not judge his qualifications as a parent based on uninformed rumors posted by a bunch of ignorant assclowns on a third rate messageboard.




-- Edited by Paul at 17:13, 2007-07-16

__________________



Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


I could care less how drunk he is.

If he's a drunk it will all come out in the wash. It always does.

His problem, not ours. My problem when he plows into me with his car, drunk on Coor's Light. Then I'm his worst nightmare.

Pilchesky is not on his radar. The bald prick hasn't influenced an election yet - including the last one Ken won with Joe campaigning for Charlie.

This is a non-issue. The guy wins or loses regardless of booze and Pilchesky.

__________________

Make Jack pack!



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


I don't really care if he is a drunk ... I don't think that he is ... has he gotten drunk ... yep he has ... is he always in a state of drunkeness ... NO HE IS NOT ...

His family life is not our concern ... and it should not be the focus of the concerns of the goons across the hall either ... I would like to know which one of them leads a perfect life ... because judging the behavior in this thread alone ... well I think they all will have to answer some questions when they get to those pearly gates.

I do not ... and never have liked it when they attack the families of politicians ... I think that we have all made that quite clear in our postings form the past and present ... it's easy to pick on children and I guess that's why those gutless wonders across the hall do it. It's easy to make up $hit and post it to a "Third Rate Message Board" (as Paul calls it) ... but have no proof to back up your statements ... the hard part would be to dig up the truth. But these people are all about rumor and innuendo ... they don't want the truth ... and so here we are ... speaking out against what it is they stand for ... if they didn't attack the personal lives of politicians we would not exist here at PD. So when it comes right down to it ... the collective posters over there have created this place.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


I didn't take the whole post ... just the first paragraph of it ... if you want to read the whole crazy rant by Anti ... then here you go ... Connect the dots: Sherry's vote for Daron on CPC


Tim I thought that you would appreciate this paragraph!

Antisystemicmovements
Posts: 1174
Date: Mon Jul 16 6:16 PM, 2007
Views: 229

Connect the dots: Sherry's vote for Daron on CPC

LOL what are you speechless about? The inbreeding? You shouldn't be surprised. Perhaps I was wrong again: not 5 years, not two years, but less than two years it would take for AIDS to be contracted by everyone in the ICN if god for bid one of them contracted it. (BTW, does anyone know if McDowell is AIDS free? That womanizing man-whore had to have contracted something by now.)



How disguting #1 and #2 how much further into the pits of hell do you think this guy will fall?

You can safely bet they will fall further and further until there is no hope of ever redeeming themselves.

-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 12:19, 2007-07-17

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


When I was skulking around across the hall a while back, I happened to notice that there are approxiately 30+ pages of user names which have not been used. Created, I am sure to boost the numbers and in my opinion, extremely excessive. Not only have they not been used but they have not been accessed to even view the board. There are a few names which have been approved one minute and have shown a lengthy "way-to-go-Joe" post the next minute. It's all a little too coincidental if you ask me.



__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Do you concur??
Permalink  
 


... and I have seen Kenny tip a few - but not to the extent they claim

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard