Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


I think this needs further investigation ... Hey Ag if you are reading maybe you would be able to help out on this particular subject. I know that you are in the know about how things work in the HR departments.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Here is what is said about the HIPAA laws and the Employer where privacy is concerned:

Privacy - HIPAA - Employer and Benefit Manager Services - CareFirts BlueCross BlueShield

HIPAA
hdrline.gif

Privacy Standards

HIPAA Overview | Impact on Employers | Transaction Standards | Privacy Standards |
Security Standards | Unique Identifiers | FAQs


On August 14, 2002 the Department of Health and Human Services released the final Privacy regulations. The Privacy regulations required all covered entities to comply with the regulations by April 14, 2003.

The Privacy regulations establish safeguards to protect an individual's health information by restricting the uses and disclosures of protected health information. In addition, individuals have more rights including the right to access and amend an individuals protected health information. Whether the information is spoken, electronically transmitted, or written on paper, an individuals health information is protected by this rule.

Individual Rights Individuals have the right to access, copy and request amendments to their own information from CareFirst. Individuals may also request an accounting of to whom their information has been provided for certain purposes not related to treatment, payment or health care operations. An example would be a release of information for a subpoena or to resolve a worker's compensation claim.



Now what this says to me ... and maybe I'm wrong is that unless Kenny gives his permission the County Commissioners are not allowed to disclose his information to the General Public. I might be wrong ... and if there is anyone out there that can clear this up for me I would greatly appreciate it.

If the Commissioners are unaware of what is going on with Kenny I think as I read this they would be able to get a subpoena to find out just what is going on ... however they still would not be able to disclose this information to the public.

I think that this would put them on the business end of a lawsuit with the offense being a violation of Mr. McDowells Civil Rights ....

Maybe if GC is out there he could enlighten us on this as he is a lawyer and would more than likely have a better understanding of this matter.



__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Kenny works (chuckle) for the county. I do not believe the commissioners are allowed to discuss his medical condition (snort) as they are in charge of the county and oversee its human resources.

So...anyone here still think this was gross negligence and not criminal? Seems as though Attorney Rinaldi is trying desperately to shift the focus anywhere else but on him and his boss/client/ward.

GC



Thank you for anwering my question Glenn ... that's exactly what I thought.

I know that we do not think that going to Rehab should be something that is held to be a "Private Medical Condition" but if you look at the American's With Disabilities Act ... Alcohol and Drug Abuse are covered as Disabilities. Reasonable accomodations must be made to any one employed with a disability and I do believe that Rehab is among the reasonable accomodations ... now you don't have to allow someone to go to Rehab on a regular basis ... but I do believe that offering Rehabe one time is required .... but again that's what I got from reading the ADA and I am not a lawyer ... just a curious person who likes to look things like this up ...

Anyway Glenn time will tell how this story unfolds ... and I think that it will not be a pretty picture in the end.



-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 05:16, 2008-05-21

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


I think it is grossly strange and may be criminal but I intend to wait for the charges (should any be filed) before I call him a criminal. I realize you have a stake in the matter as it probably feels more personal for you, so feel free to gloat if you need to indulge. We do occasionally and its fun. :))

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Named Most Valuable Poster 4/5/09

Status: Offline
Posts: 204
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


I think I will let the FBI determine if anything criminal has been done, instead of joining the lynch mob full of blind hatred who take great pleasure in hoping someone is in rehab along with spreading vulgar offensive rumors.



__________________


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


"So...anyone here still think this was gross negligence and not criminal? Seems as though Attorney Rinaldi is trying desperately to shift the focus anywhere else but on him and his boss/client/ward."


Can I cast a vote for 'Criminal Stupidity'?

As for Attorney Rinaldi, he's just being a good lawyer, which we all know runs the gamut from defending the poor pro bono to making up outlandish crap in order to keep a scumbag like Jeffrey Skilling out of jail.

Anyway, the facts will come out in the case, and no mater what, McDowell is going to come out of it smelling like the men's room in a Minooka bar after St Patrick's Day. He loses, no questions about it. The funny part will be when that crap really does hit the fan, how much credit Pilchesky will take for the whole caper? Of course his troops will hail him for "brining Kenny down", when in reality it will be McDowell's own arrogance that will be to blame (well that and the party leadership who "sold" this to the electorate*).

(
*) for the record, they didn't sell to me, as I actually did vote for Glenn Casuric...despite the crap I give him here from time to time.


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


IHave: I can't resist gloating. He really slimed me last year.

Puzzler: There is no medical problem. Enough with the "rumors" protest. Something is obviously wrong here.

Ag: I agree completely.

GC


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Glenn Cashuric wrote:

IHave: I can't resist gloating. He really slimed me last year.




Have fun just remember to play nice. :))

Also he may have slimed you last year, but hanging with Joey-boy slimes you all year. :/ Just my opinion.



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


It's a snarky May 20th, isn't it??

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


oops - hit the send button too quickly

As long as we are all being honest here (as honest as the internet will allow us to be) , I voted for Glenn as well.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Maybe we should have "Snarky Tuesdays"?


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Named Most Valuable Poster 4/5/09

Status: Offline
Posts: 204
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


If the guy is guilty, he will pay. The FBI is running this investigation, not the jacka$$ rodeo who ran the last Tax Office Investigation a few weeks back.

I have a tough time with the mob across the hall finding joy in if someone is undergoing rehab, those are the rumors I find shallow, Glen.



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


1. I think Snarky Tuesday is a great idea. Limiting, but great.

2. "Jackass Rodeo" is appropriate. I believe it is time to consider electing a new District Attorney.

3. It really is pathetic that Ken McDowell has done this to his life. He does have political skills, and he could very well have been commissioner at 40 and more soon thereafter. Because God knows, the clock is ticking on Corey.

4. The sliming was vicious. But now we're even (maybe even a little weighted toward me), so I'm content.

GC




__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Monday Monday
Snarky Tuesday
Humpday
Thirsty Thursday
and
Thank God it's Friday

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


The problem with the District Attorney, whether it's in Lackawanna County or anywhere else in the Commonwealth, is that it's as much a political as it is a prosecutorial position. Replace Jarbola and the next one could be even worse...which is what happens when you decide anything based on a popularity contest rather than actual qualifications.

I think the better solution is to wait for whatever comes out of whatever federal investigations are currently under way. The FBI has no skin in local politics, so I'm sure whatever they come out with will be as unbaised as you could get. If the picture they paint is one of glaring misconduct, then we can really start blamestorming, and yes, some of that should go the DA's way.



__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Consider...not commit. I like Andy personally, and appreciated the fact that he met with me for an hour last year (and was honest, unlike certain others), even though he and Kenny are "BFF"s.

I believe the Gilbride aspect of the tax office investigation may cause more damage than the Kenny part.

We'll see.

GC

P.S. And so ends the inaugural Snarky Tuesday.


__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Thank You for answering my question Glenn ....

I'm so sorry I missed Snarky Tuesday ... You all know how I love to be snarky ... God I love that word!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Today's idiot is resident racist, race-baiter, white-guilt feeler and proponent of planned economies, Anti,. who writes:

Antisystemicmovements

goebbels.Jpeg

Posts: 2259
Date: Jun 25 10:54 PM, 2008
Views: 41

a bitter pill wrote:

Would it be possible to elaborate on "addressing the underlying problem". Or would it take more space than we have available here?



Addressing the underlying problem means addressing the problems that include, but are in now way limited to, poverty, unemployment, abandonment and racism.

More precisely, it means fixing a capitalist system that functions best when broken.


A few thoughts:
  • "Fixing" poverty isn't possible...as part of the root cause of poverty lies in human behavior, i.e., some people (not all, but some) are poor simply because on some level they simply find that having no money and being lazy is better than having money but working. Now efforts at providing opportunity for the poor is something that should always be done...but this notion that a big government hand is going to swoop in, give money to people, and "fix" poverty has been tried (Great Society for example) and has always failed. Why? It fails for the same underlying reason that Communism as a system always fails because it ignores basic human behavior. Government can regulate a lot of things, but it can't regulate ambition.
  • Anyone who has taken any class in Economics knows that an economy at "full employment" still has some measure of unemployment.
  • Racism isn't something that can be "fixed" by the government. The government can pass laws making discrimination illegal, but as we see by Pilchesky's use of the 'N' word, no government can ever outlaw, prevent, or even regulate racist thoughts and ideas.
  • The final sentence in that racist pig's post is the most telling: "fixing a capitalist system"...what do you suppose that means? Whenever I see things like that written, I immediately ask myself, "well who will do the fixing?", and the answer always comes up the same way: "why the government will". This is a fallacy of the highest order, because it assumes that the things that need fixing are things that the government can actually control. Personally, I want the government to do certain things, like protecting me (with laws, the military, etc.), but there are others...such as dictating what kinds of personal choices I can make in my life (choices that don't impact anyone but me)...where I think the government just needs to butt out.

So in addition to being a filthy racist pig, Anti is an idiot because he somehow believes that government can "fix" everything. Me? I'd be happy for starters if the government could "fix" some of the potholes on Stafford Avenue.


-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:30, 2008-06-26

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 319
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Today's IdiOt is none other than our good buddy Bo PEEP. He has to announce to everyone that he's back with his pwn thread and all the DOlts at JOey LAnD heap on praise and admiration that they're back. Talk about your posters who are narcissistic, why not just start posting again without the hype. Why didn't they post for a while, what the daughter's home from college and they can use her computer? Anyway, here's to you Bo PeeP, today's dd.com idiot.

bo peep



Posts: 1101
Go to fullsize image

Date: Jun 26 12:34 AM, 2008
Views: 87
She's baaaacccckkkk!!!!!

So DOherty and Co.want to play, huh? Getting a little bold lately, aren't you Chris?I'm back mutha fuka!!!!!! Out of the SHED Milo! Calling SABOD!We got work to DO!

__________________
I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell: Truman


__________________

You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


You know she's whipped into a frenzy when she starts spelling in ebonics.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


That post was strange. Not like Bo at all. I wondered if she was shearing the sheep for too long that morning.

GC


__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Or maybe ... a new password ... and someone posting under her name ... Joey can access all accounts ... remember when he was posting as Picillino ... just a thought ... I don't really know what bo's posts are like ... don't care ... but you Glenn would know better than I ... hey it wouldn't be the first time they pulled that little trick across the hall!!!

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Today's idiot is Katie, who writes...

Katie

avatar_10887.jpg

Posts: 464
Date: Jun 28 9:03 AM, 2008
Views: 46

Maybe the Ghost and possibly the others have proven themselves to be accurate and factual. Not everything is posted here remember. I know things are said to or handed to J or J that cannot be posted here lest someone be 'outed'.
Remember there are reasons for everything.

Back to top


"...accurate and factulal..."???? Milo's Ghost????????????????????????? What planet is this lady on?

-- Edited by Agamemnon at 09:48, 2008-06-28

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


Today's idiot is kristen (the DD crew doesn't believe in capitalizing proper nouns I guess), who writes...

kirsten
Posts: 8
Date: Jul 1 10:24 PM, 2008
Views: 6

doherty's a failure. walmart in dickson city; walmart in moosic; walmart in tayor. everywhere but scranton, and we're the ones with the most blighted land that should be developed. i personally don't like that walmart is spreading like mold, but we all know its a great retail draw. but there's no campaign money from walmart to doherty, and they're so successful on their own they don't need doherty.


Now how many here think that if a Walmart did open in Scranton, the DD crew would be crying about how "the only jobs Doherty can attract are the low-paying Walmart kind"?

__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


You are so right Ag ... and since when is Doherty the one who tells Wal-Mart where to build?

I am sure that had they wanted to build one in Scranton ... well ... they would build one in Scranton.

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


LusOnlyVoice wrote:

You are so right Ag ... and since when is Doherty the one who tells Wal-Mart where to build?


I can see that the crew next door still holds fast to the old adage "never let the facts get in the way of a story"Hey loons... Connors was the Mayor during the possible Sam's Club venture.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


::: Now how many here think that if a Walmart did open in Scranton, the DD crew would be crying about how "the only jobs Doherty can attract are the low-paying Walmart kind"? :::

There are plenty of local jobs available in the Scranton area for bankers, stock brokers, lawyers, doctors and in many other professional fields. But the lazy asses across the hall couldn't (or I should say WON'T) find the time or inclination to educate themselves enough to find even mediocre employment.

I understand there are also numerous temp jobs for secretarial/clerical and light industrial work. They sure can type up a bitch-o-gram faster than Samboy can holler "hecky shecky", but put that talent to work to earn more than minimum wage? Hell, no! It's much easier to sit back in their barcolounger on their big fat internet and point to the educated bankers and lawyers and businessmen and call them fat-assed cronies and ugly doobies. Then they have the balls to stick their hands out palm-up waiting for a freebie -- and bitching when they are expected to EARN it.

Walmart is always hiring, as are Kmart and Big Lots. The posters across the hall have proven their point that they can pack the $hit better than anyone I know. Let them use that talent to stock some shelves or retrieve some carts from the parking lot -- again, maybe making more than minimim wage.

There are even jobs available for wait-staff and dishwashers at restaurants. But just by the little I know of these individuals, would I want them serving food or being responsible for the cleanliness of a food service venue? Ummm, no -- so I'll just leave that one alone.

(And just to clarify, I don't use capital letters when I refer to many of the posters across the hall [except for my Les :::smooch:::] because in my 'opion' they're not worthy of the distinction of a "proper" noun. I don't capitalize the words dustbunny, asswipe or jackass for the same reason.)

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


IHave,

I remember the Sam's Club deal ... and Jim Connors was Mayor and he bowed down to Al Boscov because Boscov did not want Sam's Club built in Scranton ... he thought it would draw shoppers away from his Mall.

I also remember that under the Connors administration we had the offer of a Saturn Manufacturer here in Scranton ... this was also turned down by that Administration and well those would have been great jobs for this area. But everything is Chris Doherty's fault ... I think not ...

Lus

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



DD: Where logic & proportion have fallen sloppy dead.

Status: Offline
Posts: 3768
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


DD poster 'Had It' is truly an idiot (comments in red by me).

Had It
Posts: 81
Date: Jul 5 2:21 PM, 2008
Views: 385

These issues of conflice ['conflice' is not a real word in the English language] are actually anti social in nature [WFT does that mean? This person sounds like an even dumber version of that filthy racist swine Anti.] in that it pits one segment of the population against the other [Maybe in extreme situations, but it's not the norm.]. And, we are educated at an early age that to get ahead we must disregard others [BULL$HIT!! I was raised in a housing project...you know how my single mother taught me about getting ahead? By working hard and getting an education...the same thing that countless other parents have told their children time and time again. In fact, two of the richest people on Earth...Bill Gates & Warren Buffet...didn't come from millionare families & didn't get ahead by disregarding others...they got ahead by, surprise, hard work. Crap like that statement really pi$$es me off, because it disregards and disrespects the hard work of so many people who succeed through hard work and education.]. Eventually as society declines from this dog eat dog philosophy there will be nothing left to rebuild [I am thinking that this poster has seen too many Mad Max and/or Resident Evil movies. Maybe the SciFi Channel should stop replaying the first Resident Evil movie over and over again.].

The Lynetts, I think it can be presumed, are very highly educated and it wouldn't surprise me in the least to know that they took socio-economic classes/philosophy classes/political science/city planning/urban development/sociology, etc., and that they do understand the interaction and benefit of community cooperation [The idiot DD poster can't seem to grasp the concept that Lynett family runs a business, so they do things that promote and enhance their business. It astounds me that some people somehow believe that running a newspaper is some kind of charitable and/or public-good undertaking...it's a business. People start for-profit newspapers because they intend to make a profit. Reading into it any further than that is ridiculous. Now that's not to say that the owners of a newspaper can't act in the pubic good...because they can and do. But it's still a business.]. But by their actions (which always speak louder than words), they show that they disregard the opportunity to make this town a better place for everyone. [I have not and do not agree with everything that's written in The Scranton Times, however, the Good Lord gave me a brain with which I can evaluate what I read. Do I think owners of The Scranton Times have biases? Of course they do! It's a business, and it's run by human beings, so certain baises come with the territory. That's neither good nor evil, it simply 'is'. Everything written by everyone (including what I write) should be read with a critical eye, which therein lies one of the biggest problems I have with DD...Pilchesky's readers blindly accept everything he says and writes without question. In essence, Pilchesky's followers are guilty of what they accuse others of...blindly following.]




This post by 'Had It' is what you get when you allow pseudo-intellectual crap to be spewed more or less unchallenged (although I give DD poster Hardcore credit for trying). Proof yet again that Joe was right: they are bottom-feeders.


__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: dd.com poster: "Hi, I'm an idiot"
Permalink  
 


I thought that this post was very fitting for this thread .... Pappa you made it to the idiot thread ... you must be so very proud of yourself ...

Joe Pilchesky

leonidas.jpg

Posts: 2886
Date: Jul 6 11:34 PM, 2008
Views: 65
Gatelli wants this Confidentiality Agreement before she'll answer any questions

It must be nice to be one of the biggest political whores to hold a council seat and believe you can control the judicial system, too. I've been trying to get Gatelli to answer interrogatories for the last six months now. It's a no-go. (Poor Pappa .... did Judy burst your little bubble)We went before the Discovery Master last week to try to get this done and that's when Atty. Riehner hit me with this ridiculous "Confidentiality Agreement".(Why is it ridiculous? What because you wanted to post the entire thing up on DD for your little cult to read ... so they could all worship at your feet for bringing Judy to her knees ...)

I thought to myself, Wow, what an arrogant corrupt piece of Doherty $hit this worthless councilwoman is. (Nah ... she just wants to preserve her privacy .... you see most people don't post these things for the world to see ... most people don't come up with pages and pages of bull**** questions simply to embarass the other party ... most people ask questions that are relavant to the lawsuit) It just rattles my brain to the core that this woman is so damned full of herself.(Now you know how you make a great majority of the citizens of Scranton feel you Narcissasistic Bastard!)Here'sthe Agreement with the proper changes made to it. (And you think Judy is full of herself ... come on ... if you really believed what you are doing is the right thing.... you would make the agreement .... but you only want the answers so you can try and make an ass out of Judy on your website!)I believe it will take some time to hammer this agreement out, if it can, so if you have any recommendation, feel free to offer them.(There you go .. isn't that how you came up with most of your stupid questions that you really have no business asking? Now get them to tell you how to hammer out a confidentiality agreement ... well I'd like to say good luck ... but I can't) If that fat, crony, two-faced, corrupt, Hitler, blowjobbitch has nothing to hide, why this bizarre Confidentiality Agreement?(because she is dealing with you and the bottome feeders ... I wonder if she has asked pappa questions .... should I ask for a copy so that we can put them up here on PD? Wouldn't that be interesting?)


__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.

«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard