Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Prove anything.

Please provide documents, sources, verifiable facts, etc.

Thanks,

Team Dobee

__________________

Make Jack pack!



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Could you narrow that down to a particular subject or issue? I'll tell you what I know.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


I think Art is more interested in what prove exists not what we may "know". I "know" lots of things but proving them is another thing altogether so I keep my mouth shut.I think his point is that there is much to much "well I heard from my brother who's friend's sister who babysits for the guy who works on the car of a connected person that .......blah blah blah. Once something is put out there it becomes the truth for that day. I have never seen anyone step up and help to clear the name of someone who has been unfairly or untruthfully talked about or gossiped about, therefore gossip should be avoided.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Proof of the criminal allegations that you make against the Mayor and other elected officials ... proof that the judge he speaks of is gay ... not that it matters because it's really none of our business ... proof of every allegation you have all been making ... you do know what proof is don't you?

It's what you know ... with the backup to prove what you are saying is true ... otherwise it is hearsay and slander ... Right?

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


That's a tough one Lus. I'm sure there's no pics of someone's penis in someones butt floating around. While I don't engage in those sort of threads, some of the "rumors" or "innuendo" supplied to DD may be just that. If they are not true, there's a vehicle to correct them. It's called a defamation lawsuit. As Joe has said numerous times, he's called Doherty a "corrupt thief" about a thousand times. Any lawsuits filed? Again, and in my opinion based on the silence, if the shoe fits.........

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Oh thats such a cope out! You think it's ok to say something even if it might just be a rumor, because the person can run to court everytime and file? Please..!

You need to feel what it's like to have this kind of abuse thrown at you day in and day out and then tell me..."it's no problem I'll just run to court to fix it". Some people actually have too much dignity to stoop down to that level and even acknowledge the filth that is being hurled. How about the collateral damage these rumors do to the children and family members? Do you think the kids should just run up to the court house and file a suit also? Maybe the eighty year old Mother can hobble over to the court house and "fix" the horrible things being said about her child. Geez you got to be kidding me! You think because no suit was filed it must be true? You can't be that naive.

Words have power and whether you want to take responsiblity for it or if you refuse to accknowldge your responsiblity, damage of that sort can't be "fixed" by a lawsuit. So hiding behind "I didn't say that stuff" doesn't cut it. If you allow it to be said or typed by others and you don't say "no this is wrong", you are just as responsible for the damage. Maybe no one will ever know who you are but you know and you have to live with it. I have to live with myself and I refuse to stand by while this wave of hatred and evil washes over this community. This isn't about whether you agree or do not agree with the current administration it's about whether this community will allow bullies and thugs to run the show.

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Oh thats such a cope out! You think it's ok to say something even if it might just be a rumorI don't do that and I cannot control what people post. To be critical of this site, your hate for Pilchesky is blinding you on why he does what he does. Most of you ignore what's going on in this city and choose to pound Pilchesky while sidestepping the cause., because the person can run to court everytime and file? Please..!

You need to feel what it's like to have this kind of abuse thrown at you day in and day out and then tell me..."it's no problem I'll just run to court to fix it"I know many who've had this abuse thrown at them. Things you cannot imagine. That's why I fight this regime. Some people actually have too much dignity to stoop down to that level and even acknowledge the filth that is being hurled.I personally hate this war, but I don't stand by and let it happen unanswered.How about the collateral damage these rumors do to the children and family members?Some of the people who chose their actions should have thought about that before they did them. I blame them.Do you think the kids should just run up to the court house and file a suit also? Yes I do if necessary. Maybe the eighty year old Mother can hobble over to the court house and "fix" the horrible things being said about her child. Geez you got to be kidding me! You think because no suit was filed it must be true? You can't be that naive.IfI was the brunt of those allegations, I'd respond. But that's just me. His silence is deafening. Makes you wonder.

Words have power and whether you want to take responsiblity for it or if you refuse to accknowldge your responsiblity, damage of that sort can't be "fixed" by a lawsuit. So hiding behind "I didn't say that stuff" doesn't cut it. If you allow it to be said or typed by others and you don't say "no this is wrong", many of you are wrong! That's why I'm here, to enlighten you.you are just as responsible for the damage. The ultimate responsibility is on the person who started it. To believe there will be no retribution is being naive.Maybe no one will ever know who you are but you know and you have to live with it. I have to live with myself and I refuse to stand by while this wave of hatred and evil washes over this community.Yeah me too, believe me, the other side is much worse. They hold the power and can domuch more damage to people.This isn't about whether you agree or do not agree with the current administration it's about whether this community will allow bullies and thugs to run the show. My friend, bullies and thugs are running the show. They're holding elective office and control our tax dollars. They're much more dangerous to you than posters on a web site.



__________________


hey!! i resemble that remark!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


I think what bothers me most about the posters on DD is the fact that NO MATTER WHAT any politician does thats good for the city gets slammed. We all complained about Nay Aug going to hell, they added some nice attractions at it and BLAM!!! This city has been in bad shape for many many years, and no one person will be able to fix it in 4 or 8 years, not even their precious Janet. We might not have the best city, but it's not the worst. More people are going to see the little yankees than went to see the barons and still DD sees the bad. All politicians are crooks and always have been, that's never gonna change. Just vote for the best one and hope. And if you're so upset with the city....MOVE OUT!!!! There I feel better

__________________
..across the hall..where common sense is not so common..


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Flap,
It's never been what was done, it's how it is done. No one in the know has ever seen the shady deals, corruption and collusion at this level. It's disgusting. This clown can care less about Nay Aug. It's all about the photo ops so he can move to the next level. Doherty's fingerprints are all over the Kanjorski article in the Times. this is the beginning of the next movecooked upby the Times and his people. Why do you think all his cabinet members are all of a sudden leaving the city for the sewer authority, parking authority and Housing Authority?He's setting them up for the long run because he's leaving. The moment Doherty decided to run for council, he had his eye on the bigger picture. Why the no-bid contracts? Why would he pad so many friends and borrow us into oblivian in such a short period of time? Payback my friend to fund his next move. Why would he spend a million dollars to get re-elected?Because if he lost, his next step in his plan would be lost with it. Whywould he do a lease back agreement on the DPWcomplex? To free up more money to spend. Why would he not collect from the Ice Box? Because the owner contributes to him. Why would he sell the golf course that made a profit? because he needed the support of the person that bought it. Why would he sell the SS complex for a song? To free up more money to spend on Nay Aug. Why did he spend a million on an artificial bond rating? So he could borrow more money to spend. Why would he fight the unions for years? Because hegets tons of money from the lawyers hepays to fight them andit won't cost him any additional money while he ties them up in court and by time the court cases are over, he's gone and leaves the next mayor holding the bag. Why would he give Southern Union a million in relocation fees,knowing full well they weren't coming? Guess who gave him 10 thousand and we found out theday AFTER the election the deal went bust. We knew months before the election the deal was bust!Why did he push to become the president of the League of Cities? Networking to build his base. Why would he love to turn the lights off on 61? Because he's being exposed.He played everyone. It's never been about what's good for the people or the city, it's only been about HIM.I just happened torecognized it before most people did. And all in my humble opinion. If you can't see this, with all do respect, your blind.

__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Shari ... if you can enlighten me I would actually love it ... you say that we are Doobees ... well not all ... Sam who posts here ... well he's not a fan of the mayor ... but he makes his point in a dignified manner ... with class ... which in my opinion and it is only my opinion ... people are not allowed to do at DD ... here we agree to disagree ... I'm not trying to change SamIAm ... but I respect his opinion ...

I would like to respect you Shari but ... respect is earned and you lost my respect when you stated above in not your exact words but in a sense that children should be punished for the sins of their parents who had the notion to run and win ... or in some cases run and lose ... public office.

Let me ask you this ... When did Jerry Trently become a public official? I know you all posted about Jerry and his wife ... we have a thread over here that is dedicated to that ... Now tell me why was that ok to do ... and all the information contained in the post was wrong ... I know Jerry ... and his family. But yet that was left up on that site ... and I'm sure that you posters who work for the city know that Jerry does not work for the SSA.

But anything that Joe Pilchesky does is ok with you ... well we all have to standto bejudged in front of our maker one day ... I know for a fact that I have lived my life to the best of my ability and I have not intentionally hurt anyone ... I have treated others as I would like to be treated. Can you all say the same at DD ...

Joe Pilchesky says he stands for the little guys rights ... but yet he denied me the right to my opinion ... the right to have my say at DD ... and he actually sent me an e-mail that said when I changed my thinking that I would again be allowed to post ... (I still have it) come on ... he told me to pull my head out of the sand ... and the same has happened to most posters here ... not all I do believe that we have 2 posters here that never posted over across the hall ... he is what inspired and made the need for this place to exist ... so I guess this isour proverbial ramp.

-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 05:21, 2007-06-06

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


sharilewis wrote:

Flap,
It's never been what was done, it's how it is done. No one in the know has ever seen the shady deals, corruption and collusion at this level. Shari if you had proof of these allegations that you are making then Chris Dohety, Judy Gatelli and others would be sitting in Jail ... and you know it ... I think that you need to begin to back these statements up if you are going to continue to make them.It's disgusting.What is truly disgusting is the fact that you people never provide the proof ... show me proof ...once again that's whatwe are looking for.This clown can care less about Nay Aug. It's all about the photo ops so he can move to the next level. Well Shari ... you all keep saying that ... so what is the next level or him ... I am wondering ... because back in December of 06 you all said he was moving on ... well it's June and he's still here ... does not look like he's going anywhere. Doherty's fingerprints are all over the Kanjorski article in the Times. this is the beginning of the next movecooked upby the Times and his people. Why do you think all his cabinet members are all of a sudden leaving the city for the sewer authority, parking authority and Housing Authority?He's setting them up for the long run because he's leaving. The moment Doherty decided to run for council, he had his eye on the bigger picture. Why the no-bid contracts? Why would he pad so many friends and borrow us into oblivian in such a short period of time? Oh my god Share I think I have seen the light thank you so much ... becasue what you have just described would just further his political career so much ... it would gain him the trust of the taxpayers ... look how you look up to the Mayor ... see how that worked for him .... NOT! Payback my friend to fund his next move. Why would he spend a million dollars to get re-elected?Because if he lost, his next step in his plan would be lost with it. Whywould he do a lease back agreement on the DPWcomplex? To free up more money to spend. Why would he not collect from the Ice Box? Because the owner contributes to him. Why would he sell the golf course that made a profit? because he needed the support of the person that bought it. Why would he sell the SS complex for a song? To free up more money to spend on Nay Aug. Why did he spend a million on an artificial bond rating? So he could borrow more money to spend. Why would he fight the unions for years? I do think ... that he should sit down andget the union contracts settled ... I do beleive that thesefine men and women of the Fire and Police unions deserve a good contract. I do believethat and I know that they are doing a fine job and deserve more ... Because hegets tons of money from the lawyers hepays to fight them and it won't cost him any additional money while he ties them up in court and by time the court cases are over, he's gone and leaves the next mayor holding the bag. Why would he give Southern Union a million in relocation fees,knowing full well they weren't coming? Guess who gave him 10 thousand and we found out theday AFTER the election the deal went bust. We knew months before the election the deal was bust!Why did he push to become the president of the League of Cities? Networking to build his base. Why would he love to turn the lights off on 61? I have to say that I love the council meetings ... not because I learn what is going on in the city from them but because it is my favorite reality show ... I love the colorful characters ... they play to that camera like they are being paid a million dollars per episode ... They do not come to address city business they go to humiliate Judy Gatelli, Sherry Fanucci, and Bob McGoff ... and it does seem that they are turning on Bill Courtright again ... but the are fickle when it comes to him ...the abuse given out by Mr. Patilla is just one example of why they need to get the cameras out ... this needs to stop ... and what the hell did we do before channel 61? Some people (myself included) do not want to speak ...in front of the cameras of channel 61 so we don't go anymore ... and let me tell you ... go back in the minutes ... pre camera and see how many of the present speakers spoke at a meeting ... not many ... Mr. Bolus did ... and Ms Fraynus did ... but the rest are there for and because of the cameras. Because he's being exposed.He played everyone. It's never been about what's good for the people or the city, it's only been about HIM. Ok ... I see what you are saying ... but let me ask you this ... is Joe Pilchesky acting in the best interest of the city ... does he care that the surrounding communities are laughing at us ... between the meetings and his website ... we have become the joke of the region ... but that's ok ... that is in the best interest of the ciyt ... that will make people want to come to Scranton ... right???? I just happened torecognized it before most people did. And all in my humble opinion. If you can't see this, with all do respect, your blind. You recognized it???? I thought we were talking about the Mayor and Joe Pilchesky here ... now you are saying that it was you who recognized it ... so who are you shari ... Joe or Joanne Pilchesky???? (no don't tell me ... I truly do not care)






__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Any lawsuits filed? Again, and in my opinion based on the silence, if the shoe fits

Interesting logic - if someone accuses you of something and you choose to not dignify it with a response, then it must be true. You do realize that many people defended and supported the mayor on dd.com and he never respoded to them either. Your logic suggests that because he ignored those posts too that those claims must be true as well.

Here's the bottom line; you may have many reasons to hate the mayor and you may have facts to support your reasons for hating him. But you have no proof that he's a crook. You said it - no lawsuits have been filed. If lawsuits are the burden of proof then I suppose he's innocent of the charges dd.com makes, correct?

These arguements are all circular. They never end and when someone digs their heels in as much as Joe does he bans them for being a "Dobee." Yawn.


-- Edited by Art Gordon at 07:07, 2007-06-06

__________________

Make Jack pack!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


::: ... now you are saying that it was you who recognized it ... so who are you shari ... Joe or Joanne Pilchesky???? (no don't tell me ... I truly do not care) ... :::

I care AND I want to know

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Right hand up to God "thursday", because you seem to want to know. I am not Joe or JoAnn, or Krake or Stulgis. (sorry to disappoint youagain Paul or is it Pat?) I don't post as multiple names on the "other side". Feel better now? Glad to help.

__________________


Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


sharilewis
Veteran Member


Posts: 61
Date: Wed Jun 6 1:14 PM, 2007
Views: 29
Ban IP | Delete Post | Report Spam | Edit Post | Quote | Reply
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Right hand up to God "thursday", because you seem to want to know. I am not Joe or JoAnn, or Krake or Stulgis. (sorry to disappoint youagain Paul or is it Pat?) I don't post as multiple names on the "other side". Feel better now? Glad to help.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Oh Shari his name is Paul ... not Pat ... he is one who never hid his identity ... I on the otherhand have not and am not goint to reveal who I am ... but if you guess right I will confirm it! I think it's more fun to keep everyone guessing ...

__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Site Administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 5099
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


You know what Shari for the record it is I who think you may be Joe or Jo Pilchesky ... and it is I who does not care not Paul!



__________________

I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet.  Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


::: ...your hate for Pilchesky is blinding you on why he does what he does. ... :::
My hate as you call it, for Pilcheski would be directed toward ANYone who takes a stand against every person who disagrees with him.

Someone said 'no' to your request for a ramp?
The checkout guy at Price Chopper didn't double bag your ice cream?
Gas pump jockey charged you for the extra $.03 you free-pumped at the Exxon?
The 15 year old fry cook burnt your McDonalds extra value fries?

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Hey, Girl, I thought Paul was the resident smartass in this village.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


sharilewis wrote:

Hey, Girl, I thought Paul was the resident smartass in this village.



LOL oh no Girl, Paul and Art vie for first place everyday for their humor. I enjoy their posts on a daily basis. :))



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


No, not being a smartass, just wondering who will be Joe's next victim. Maybe the chick at his dry cleaners because she put too much starch in his drawers and now he has an itchy schmeckie. It could be anyone who looks at him sideways.

To me, his antics are not only stupid, but his ridiculous quests for information should be taken as a threat. He thinks he can put up an "all the dirt" topic on anyone he pleases, just because his ego won't allow for anything less. You and the rest of the dd zealots may not think so, but what about when you are on the receiving end of that nonsense? No one is perfect, Chris Doherty is not perfect, Judy Gatelli is not perfect. Yes, they are elected public figures and yes, we should put them under a microscope, but only from the day they have taken office - What Chris Doherty or Judy Gatelli did twenty-five years ago is none of my business and certainly none of Joe Pilcheski's and has nothing to do with today's city business.

Hell, I even have a skeleton or two in my closet - but they are MY business and NONE of yours, whether I am a public official or not.

__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2621
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Oh, and I have never claimed to be here for anything other than comic relief. I came here to voice an o-p-i-n-i-o-n and to point fingers and laugh at your buddies across the hall.





__________________

Stupid people piss me off !



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Come on Girl, you guys obviously enjoy the anticipation of awaiting the next big story that hits "over there". Admit it. It's like slowing down to see the carnage of the accident scene. Makes you sick and tears at your heart, but you can't help taking a peek. You being here is because of "there".



__________________


Topless Robot

Status: Offline
Posts: 1134
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Our being here is because we got thrown out of there for dissenting opinions. Let's keep that straight. No one here threatened anyone, accused anyone, used violent or hateful language. We all got tossed because we disagreed. In one sense then you are correct, we are here because of there, but we wouldn't be here if Joe had a set and a thicker skin.

-- Edited by Art Gordon at 13:51, 2007-06-07

__________________

Make Jack pack!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Enjoy?? I wouldn't use that term. I see it as more of an obligation. I firmly believe if i remained silent while that vile website tore everyone they have an issue with to pieces and did nothing, I would be every bit as responsible as the ones who are doing the tearing. I wish I had never heard about that cesspool believe me, but I did and my obligation was clear. I know you feel as long as you can claim you dont spread the rumors or do the tearing; you are free of the responsibility. Not in my book. Your claim of "dont lump me in with all of them I dont do what some of them do" doesnt cut it with me either. Sorry, you're either with their scorched earth mentality and vile tactics or against it. No sitting on the fence with me.



-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 13:58, 2007-06-07

__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


I'm sorry too. I'm a believer in personal responsibility. I cannot stop someone from posting "vile" information. All I can do is try to stop it. I don't have the power to control that. He does and you do. Not to side step the issue, but I hear what your saying. I feel the same way about what Doherty is doing to this city. If you do not know about it you're excused. You all know everything about it, since you all read DD.com. Where's your obligation to yourself and the rest of the citizens of this city, knowing full well what's taking place. I don't knock you for dong what you do, just expand your protests further and help some of us out. That's why I'm here, to recruit.

__________________


Fvck you, clown. Sue me.

Status: Offline
Posts: 1694
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Where's your obligation to yourself and the rest of the citizens of this city, knowing full well what's taking place



At the voting booth, where it's always been. It's proven to be much more (one can almost use the word "infinitely") effective than anything Pilchesky believes he is doing has. Our responsibility is as a voter, not as a carpenter cum wannabe lawyer.

__________________



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 428
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Joe cannot ruin this city. Doherty can and is. Doherty has much more effect on this town and it's citizensthan Joe ever could. Joe's site is one vehicle to fight what's wrong. Again, if you devoted as much time to what ails us as you do towards Joe, maybe we'd be rid of Doherty. When that happens, maybe you'll be rid of Joe. He exists because of Doherty. Before Doherty he was just a carpenter and you probably never heard of him.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3414
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


sharilewis wrote:

Not to side step the issue, but I hear what your saying. I feel the same way about what Doherty is doing to this city. If you do not know about it you're excused. You all know everything about it, since you all read DD.com.



Oh please! The day I go read DD.com for news that I actually believe, I hope my family realizes I have gone senile and throws my sorry butt in a nursing home. That crew has ZERO credibility with me. Do they occasionally stumble over something accurate, probably, but even a stopped clock is right twice a day.Of courseI wouldn't know if it were accurate or not because as soon asI read it there I immediatly disregard it as untrue. So I guess they have less than ZERO credibilty with me. So at this point I have only their and your assestment that Mr. Doherty is the big bad evil emperor and frankly, I remain unconvinced. I shall remain unconvinced until someone with credibilty actually shows me some proof. In the famous words of Jerry McGuireand the funny old lady at the fast food restaurant

Show me the money! show me the beef!



__________________

Hey Joey?? Bite me! :))



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 102
Date:
RE: Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


sharilewis wrote:

When that happens, maybe you'll be rid of Joe. He exists because of Doherty. Before Doherty he was just a carpenter and you probably never heard of him.




False. Joe lives for this sort of thing and would just pick a new target once Doherty was gone. He also ran a similar website against a judge in Bradford County.



__________________

Remember, next Friday is Hawaiian shirt day. So, if you want to, go ahead and wear a Hawaiian shirt...and jeans.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 201
Date:
Dear Joe (and others of your ilk)
Permalink  
 


Joe should really get a JOB, like most people have and devote some time to picking up trash on the side of the highway, or volunteering at a homeless shelter.............i DON't know why he complains about taxes, he says he does not pay his property taxes, he does not work so I guess he does not pay the wage tax, so enlighten me as to what taxes he is worried about. and don't say the citizens of scranton, I AM a citizen of Scranton, and while THEY DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME

__________________
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard