Funny, but according to Granma, the University doesn't contribute anything to our city. Where was 'Shed' when she was mouthing off? After all, the University apparently does help charity cases...the let 'Shed' use their computers.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I never realized that was a public service that was provided by the U of S .... I learn something new everyday!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I always laugh when the idiots over there bash the University for not giving back. The school has about ten differnt scholarships strickly for local residents. These are not 5k or 10 k either. These are close to full rides. They take kids from all over who have the grades but no money.
They give full and i repeat FULL use of the library facilites to the entire population of lackawanna county. If you have a libaray card you can get a U of S libaray card as well. CPU, BOOKS, TONS OF MATERIAL THERE. Plus amazing archives and just a great building. There are countless student Run organizations that contribute to the city as well. These people suffer from class envy worse than anyone I have ever seen. They just don't like anything nice. JAnet Evans is really bad about this. She is very critical of the U and has made many enemies over it. That is why they all jump on the "we hate the U" bandwagon.
Since 1888 it has been giving a world class education right in our back yard and these mental midgets want to see them gone.
Thank you Tim ... I never knew all that was available to me ... not a student of the U ... I never asked before so shame on me ... I'm sure that this information was available to me all this time ... and it took you and our little PD world to educate me on the things made available to me through the U of S.
thank you again!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I found this post on a jaunt across the hall. Everyone's got their suspicions about who is who - but this one is pretty obvious when you think about it. Remember how our good pal dave told us how the missus doesn't answer pm's and e-mails without a 'name'.
:::Hardcore wrote: To NotADumbBlonde: I sent you a PM. Did you get it? :::
and the reply from the DumbBlonde follows:
::: Hardcore, the first PM had absolutely nothing on it -- a blank white space. I was not sure if that were a message in and of itself. The second, as you know, simply referenced the first.
Inasmuch as I have to protect my identity -- as most of us do -- I am naturally wary of pm'ing anyone. I never underestimate the other side.
It is nothing personal and please do not take it that way. :::
Hardcore -- just stop up the house. She's got the pot on and a fresh jar of Sanka.
Hers is the most idiotic and paranoid excuse possible to give. Not suprising, though, given that she is the one of the most ignorant and misinformed posters on board.
I'll agree with the no responding to e-mails unless you can verify the sender policy. That's reasonable enough and I do the same thing. But blowing off PMs because you think they'll compromise your identity? Tin Foil, ailse 15, Mrs. Evans.
PM is a function that is can only be accessed by registered members. If Janet knows and trust Hardcore, then she really has nothing to fear from his e-mails. I doubt that her "identity" would be that much of a suprise, or even that important to him in the grand scheme of things. She can't PM me, I can't PM her; she's fairly safe in her little coccoon of support over there.
But if she enjoys playing her little espionage game, and believes she's so wily and clever, who am I to spoil her good time. Enjoy it while it lasts, though, Janet.
I think that this is proof positive that she is Janut ... oh I'm sorry ... I meant to say Janet ... ooooppppsss!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I laughed my ass off reading that thread ... but its interesting that they think Anti is also JB Davis ... unless they are humoring us here at PD ... that could be!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Yup!! Scripted it is! Dumbo has someone posting under her moniker doesn't even sound like the same poster. Then flower child comes in? ya ok!!
Anti is starting to annoy certain posters and don't forget Joey is under close watch now on that board. This was an attempt to give the appearance that all have a say on that board and that racist remarks are called out. Don't forget goon squad we have a few classic "anti" posts saved. :)) Try to find any negative comments from posters on the ones we saved. Good luck searching!! They will be few and far between, you misguided little goons. All in all though... the thread was a nice try but weak, and about a year and a half too late.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 10:57, 2007-07-14
I read the thread in question, and it did have a kind of "roadkill" appeal to it (meaning that you know it's disgusting to look at, but you still do). Regardless, serial-plaintiff Joe Pilchesky can get religion all he wants now about clamping down on the hate-speech (either directly or through his minions), but he can't re-write history. Nice try, but this effort is about as effective as having Bill Clinton do Public Service Announcements about the sanctity of marriage...too little, too late.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Well as she explained it ... she bought her own personal transcriber ... now that is one dedicated DumbBlonde!!!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I don't think it's Kay ... I know Kay personally and well I do believe she has more class than to participate in the damn board.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
If anyone needs anything from the last meeting, please let me know; and I will transcribe it here.
Got tired of waiting for council's court reporter to post the minutes. She is stuck at July 14, 2007 -- or was told not to post anything until the meetings are OVER until September.
__________________ The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech. (Justice Anthony Kennedy)
I wish I could find the post where she tells Sam that if he needs anything transcribed that she would be able to do that ... because she recently purchased a transcriber ... hmmmmm ... interesting! Damn I know it's there ...
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
$300 for a personal transcriber just to prove a weak point. I thought Granma was dumb....
If she was such a transcription goddess, she would know instinctively that 6 is shorthand for June, not 7. And if her proofreading is so suspect as to allow the word "July" to be substitued for "June" ("Got tired of waiting for council's court reporter to post the minutes. She is stuck at July 14, 2007"), and it takes her over an hour to catch the mistake, then it calls into question the very accuracy of her transcription of the meeting in the first place. Slow as it may be, I'll trust the "official" version of events, not some hack politician with an agenda's version, thank you very much.
*waves hello again to Janet, who's apparently a fan.*
RE: Council Meeting 7/12/07 GATELLI DISGRACEFUL CONDUCT CONTINUES....... FROM THE 7/12/07 MEETING RE $35MM LOAN
MRS. FANUCCI: I met with the Parking Authority twice this week on this issue.
MS. FRANUS: OK!
MRS. FANUCCI: I'm sorry that you feel that your PERCEPTION is not, of me, is not adequate, but I don't need excuses. I am telling you what I felt, and what I found out. Now, just because theymight notbe perfect for you, which they wouldn't be anyway, because it wasn't MRS. EVANS.
MS. FRANUS: That's not true.
MRS. FANUCCI: Oh, oh, please Fay,stop. We know...this has been going on since the school board.
Since Fanny met with the SPA TWICE, why didn't she share her wisdom (sorry, that's really pushing it) and answer questions.
Why is she making it oh-so-personal with Fay? And Janet? Isn't that what she and judas SCREAM AT COUNCIL SPEAKERS FOR DOING?
OK, one more: does Fanny really not know Jim Keisling, owner of Daron? Or does she suffer from selective memory, like her mentor?
GREAT QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL SPEAKERS.
__________________ The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech. (Justice Anthony Kennedy)
So tell me ... if you are not Janet ... why do you not attend the meeting yourself ... and ask these questions of Council ... what is so pressing (as it seems you are overly obbsessed with this) that keeps you from attending and asking these questions yourself ... could it be your commitment to COUNCIL? Hmmmmm inquiring minds would like to know!!!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
ewwwwwwww Fay is speaking about herself in the third person....how creepy!! She claims they "hugged" her... that's not just creepy it's down right scary! Oh I reposted the originalfrom DD were she admits to being Fay. I wouldn't want Sherri to accuse me of not having proof!! :)
RE: PROTECT THE U OF $ IMAGE...cut Fay off now!!! went over to channel 61 --they were wonderful--they said the only reason a disclaimer came up was another show was scheduled to come on at 4 and as soon as they saw the meeting was --still going on they quickly stopped the disclaimer and continued the meting--Fay only missed one sentence-and they will have it in the complete form tonight--they were super nice and even hugged me--they were great--almost every wordFay said about the university was said-not cut off--channel 61 is terrific we owe them a great deal
RE: Gatelli Countersues the Pilchesky's... I absolutely would love to see all of us file a counter suit against Judy Gatelli--I do not like being called a terrorist-- Just lead me to the nearest law office where this can get started--We really need to do this- anyone interested
by the way Judy, this is Fay Franus 327 Railroad Avenue
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 09:59, 2007-07-27
::: Got tired of waiting for council's court reporter to post the minutes. ... ::: Now they are dragging this poor thing into the frey?? Let the girl do her job and YOU DO YOURS --
::: ... Just lead me to the nearest law office where this can get started ... ::: I've heard tell that Lyman's guy Pulaski is taking new clients and is becoming especially adept at fielding LOaD lawsuits. Now, don't forget Fay - he's on the corner of Lackawanna and Luzerne. Walking distance from your place -- pick a direction - any direction.
What is an ICNer? can't figure it out. also, the only Pulaski i know is (or was) on Courthouse Square, but he'd be a little difficult to bring into council because he weighs several tons.
LOL LOL No one knows what a ICN is those fools just make things up as they go along.
As far as Pulaski goes are you calling Ray a liar?? He nose people and hez said da feral aturny is mad at dem dar konsil peoples. Soz don't be sasing hez a liar cause youz is wrong! Dat der aturny Pulaski is on da kerner of Lackawanna and Luzerne. So theres!
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 11:38, 2007-07-29
What is an ICNer? can't figure it out. also, the only Pulaski i know is (or was) on Courthouse Square, but he'd be a little difficult to bring into council because he weighs several tons.
Vince...I remember asking the same question about a year so ago. Don't feel bad...hell, we only just found out who "Gibby Joe" was. The DD crew does tend to speak in something of a code.
Anyway, ICN stands for Irish Catholic Network.
As for what it is, that depends. Personally, I think it's a cross between SPECTRE and something that you'd hear on late-nite radio (think Art Bell). Yupp, your basic paranoid fantasy. Most of the DD crew think that it's this secret society of Irish-Americans who clandestinely strive to oppress everyone who is not of Irish decent. Yes, I know, this is 2006 (not 1906), but hey, it's what they believe.
Oh, via extensive research, I was able to find a picture of the actual leader of the ICN...
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
RE: Council Meeting 7/12/07 GATELLI DISGRACEFUL CONDUCT CONTINUES....... We can't forget the night she showed pictures of her beautiful grandchildren. What would be said if we brought our children and granchildren's pictures? They are beautiful children, but don't we all consider our children beautiful? As Judy says, CITY BUSINESS. By the way she voted I guess her grandchildren don't count much either. Because if they stay in Scranton when they grow up, they will be paying DOHERTY DEBT also. Maybe Judy should have just held up a picture of DOHERTY. (YUCK, )"This is why I am voting". Judy life will be more pleasant if you could only forget what Doherty says and start thinking of the Tax payers. Believe me , your kids will get a job. Even if it is on their own. I have also been talked about for working for Gary to get my son a job. Truth is we never talked about it to Gary. My kids got their jobs by their education and proving themselves. I am very proud to know they can make it on their own. Try it Jude. You may feel better knowing your kids Can do things by themselves. You may even be proud of them and yourself.
I knew that was her ... and yes Gary was supposed to get her son a job ...I know this to be true because I herard them talking about it one day.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
RE: DA to Patilla: "Plea out or else" Newcomb's own words In the rag. You have the right to speak at council meetings but not to abuse anyone. When the meetings resume on Sept. 11, council should get aggressive and anyone who behaves abusively should be charged with harassment.
Does this apply to every one else but him? What does he think he did to Sam but, abuse him. What a piece of sh*t that guy is.