How many IDs at DD share YOUR IP address, Joanne? You're so quick to blame Joe for this, but look in the mirror and be honest for a change. How many duplicate IDs do you have that you used to manipulate and misrepresent the discussion? Point blank question. You had the con just as much as Joe did. The responsibility for the whole circus that Doherty Deciet has been is not Joe's alone. Own up to contributing to the farce.
Valid question Joanne. And the answer is?
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Joanne the question has been asked, several times ... I do believe that I have asked it myself when your first joined PD ... how many of the user ID's at DD were yours ... we kind of figured out Joes because you could definetly see it in his writing style and the fact that often he forgot what name he was posting under.
I told you about mine here ... the ones that I used to have ... LusNewVoice - Voice of Reason - LusOnlyVoice ... and I kept changing them because you had posters posting on DD that were using the LusNewVoice ID .... so I came up with Voice of Reason ... didn't really care for that one so I just never used it here ... and then I had LusOnlyVoice ... I deleted the two that I didn't use ... and at the same time deleted members from this site that had duplicate IP addresses and also who had not been active in more than a year ...
When I did this I asked you how many user names that you use at DD? You never did answer me ... so now the membership here has asked again I see ... so if you could please answer that question it would be greatly appreciated.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
How does the assignment of a guardian around here hold up to the assignment of guardians in other counties. We aren't the ibggest county by a long shot, but we probably have the most cases assigned to a guardian.
My investment getting this thread started, keeping it going, suing Ross, exposing Family Court corruption and having to sue to get my own rights to admin and post back, as well as a fight to get this thread back up and keep it up speaks for itself.
In addition, Dr. Tarapchak is, as you know, my very significant other and she was the direct target of the imposter.
__________________
"Justice doesn't have to be fair, equitable or honorable - it just has to be justice"
I think it must be like mud-slinging during a political campaign: one person starts and before you know it everyone is doing it...but at some point someone looks back and says "ya know, this is seriously wrong $hit".
Anyway, thanks for the answer. I'm sure others may want to know the names, and they can certainly ask. Me? I just wanted to see you say it.
I give a ton of credit to Lus who, from day one, has insisted that posters here only use one name. While Joe & Co. were slamming us for low counts, at least those counts were achieved the honest way. This is one of the reasons why I've posted here all these years: we have rules that everyone abides by, even if those rules may not be popular.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Thursday 12th of April 2012 06:05:52 PM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
You know what joanne, I'm not going to bust your balls about which names you used. You fessed up and I respect that. Alright, now say something to make me laugh.
For someone who keeps such detailed records, as you apparently do, and especially as administrator and founder of that forum, your "about a dozen" answer comes off as dubious at best, flat out lie at worst.
Whatever. That litterbox is yours, go ahead and justify the stench as you see fit.
Riddle me this, joanne. Is it me or do the names of the threads change from one minute to the next? I could have sworn there was a title across the hall that doesn't seem to be there any more, but the same pages of posts are listed under another title. What the hell is that all about? Inquiring minds, and all that.
The topic titles have always changed when updated information or news became available. Also, topics can be merged, as your admin here can tell you. Some other titles have been changed back and forth between Joe and me. Specifically when he titled to The 2700 members who were wrongfully deleted, etc., etc., stuff. I would change it to something like To the 2700 members who Joe claimed to be real, etc., etc.
He claimed he sat for two hours one morning just editing, banning, deleting everything that I had allowed up on the board. I was glad that it took up so much of his time even though he has no worries about supporting anyone or paying any bills.
lol I just noticed since we outed baldy on his multiple screen names (by looking at the avatar host location) none of his multitude of screen names has an avatar anymore lol lol
Fay Franus is also the new poster "gaff". She posted earlier in the day, around 1030 or so, and used her name as a signature. Duh. The post was then deleted and re-posted hours later minus the signature.
Courtright's a tightwad. Still has his christening money. Wouldn't even buy a dollar ticket to benefit a WSHS sports fundraiser or donate 10 bucks to be a sponsor. He thinks he's Mr. popular and so important he's entitled to everything for free even though everybody knows you pay for that sign spot on Moosic St. And it's not the only one. This village idiot who stands on Main Ave. waving to passing cars for years wants to be mayor now? And is Mr. nice guy squeaky clean? Keep dreaming. Connors put him on the civil service board with Cardamone. Exam scam ring any bells? Then Billy boy ran for council and lost. Billy boy ran again and won courtesy of city unions. Meanwhile Billy was sucking arses of plenty of Doobies like McMullen, Owens, Kennedy, Kellys, etc. as soon as he got on council. To get further into Doherty camps now, Courtright's sidekick Barrett got former Doobie Hinton to support Courtright. Why? Nate Barrett & Co. gave him a made up job that he wasn't qualified for. Courtright held Nate's hand in West side when he ran for school director and now Barretts are returning the favor by pulling Hinton into the village idiots campaign. Even Bubser, Doherty civil service appointment and married to a Hinton jumped on the bandwagon. Another Hinton married Chick the guy who owns the cemetery Newcombe complains about. Will Courtright give Chick a free pass on the cemetery like doherty does? Billy boys been weaving a web of political corruption and deceit for years and it's getting stickier every day. Still think Tony Dibileo for tax collector is a big fat coincidence? Wait till all of Courtrights deals hit the light of day. Bend over folks.
-- Edited by Paul on Tuesday 12th of March 2013 07:50:06 PM
I am no fan of Courtright, but he brought Single Tax up from that quagmire McDowell created. I think for the sake of the Scrantonians, Courtright should stick with it, fix everything which needs to be fixed, and THEN move on.
I have to disagree with the opinions expressed here regarding Fay Franus. I like her as a speaker. I see her presentations as being incisive, well-based and persistent and insistent, as they should be, considering the subject matter. But I can understand how some may be put off by her "aggressiveness", especially if they hate her and her opinions in the first place.
For if we allow our spirits to waft down, down, down into the infernal, dingy dungeons of The Netherworld of The Scranton "Slimes" (thanx and a tip 'o the proverbial hat to Nelson Ancoroni {sp}) where Right Is Wrongand Wrong Is Right, opinions may vary hellishly.
But as we all know, even a little child can tell the difference between Fairy Tales and REALITY.