How can one woman say so little after talking for such a long period of time? Man, you are one long-winded son of a bitch.

"Yes"
"No"
"Not to my knowledge"
"I'll look into it"
"Oh yes, a little more to the right"
"Mmm hmm, like that"

See ... short, sweet and to the point

OMG How enormous of an idiot do you have to be to put this list together?
Jesus, Joey and Janut compared as if they are equal??? Are you kidding me?? Naturally Dumbblo agrees with the poster how suprising!!

sarge115b Posts: 128 Date: Dec 5 5:31 AM, 2007 Views: 35	Quote | Reply RE: why does Janet bother? Why did Jesus bother Why did Washington bother Why did John Mitchell bother Why did Reagan bother Why did Gandi bother Why did MLK bother Why does J Pilchesky bother Why do We bother Why does Janet bother. Maybe because she is Janet
NotADumbBlonde Posts: 1172 Date: Dec 5 5:52 AM, 2007 Views: 28	Quote | Reply RE: why does Janet bother? sarge, I love it.

Written like a true teacher wouldn't you agree?? :))

NotADumbBlonde Posts: 1182 Date: Dec 5 1:28 PM, 2007 Views: 263

Quote | Reply And the password is...BULLY Your assignment for tonight's council meeting is tocorrectly use a form of the word bully in a sentence.. Mrs. Gatelli: ...So, I want the public to know the kinds of tactics and the kinds ofintimidations andbullying that Council members, reporters, etc., have to go through... Ms. Fanucci: ...I won't be bullied into someone else's decisions and someone else's agenda... Doug: ...You know, they're bullies... __________________ The person that loseshis conscience has nothing left worth keeping.

NotADumbBlonde Posts: 1191 Date: Dec 6 1:25 PM, 2007 Views: 454

Quote | Reply RE: Now That Politics Has Reached A New Low... Hardcore wrote: Your defense of the usage of the "N" word is a load of bullsh!t. That's your opinion, but it wasmy explanation, never a defense. ...but the real truth is the use of the N word is racist, is a racial slur, and it's usesmacks ofneanderthal thinking. Your opinion, again, and maybe your truth, but not mine. (By the way,your sentenceshould read "its" use (possessive)not it's use(contraction)-- sorry. (Now that's my forte.) (NotA) DumbBlonde, you need to cut and pasteyour results ofan online search of the meaning of the word Nig**r, (since that seems to be your forte). With pleasure:

Perhaps this little discourse will be considered the first debate of the next Scranton mayoral campaign. To think it's all about splitting hairs over something Joe Pilchesky wrote on his website boggles the mind.

Word of warning to the unions: Most of us here who take daily pleasure tearing apart the idiots who support the negativity of DD allready understand how much Janet Evans sucks, but for you to put any stock in her as your savior should think about this. The bitc* is showing her real colors here. If she talks down to you about the use of a racial epiteth, and defends the use of it on a forum like DD, can you imagine sitting across from her in a bargaining session?

Shari, or Chris, or whoever you are, the answer to your question is YES. Furthermore, I think the entire Evans family is consumed with what is posted on DD. Unlike the regular twelve people who actually follow fruitcake Pilchesky, it's gonna take more than a stick of gum and rubber bands to fool me.

Furthermore, I can prove Dave Evans posts on DD under a certain screen name, but it's not necessary. We all know what's going on.

I don't post on this site to get any kind of message across to those who might visit here. I'm simply hob-knobing with others who despise the Evans family for what they are... and it's actually a lot of fun.

Who cares if Janet really is NOtadumblonde or not. It's a lot of fun assuming it's her.

Shari ... I thought you didn't respond to posts that you consider nonsense? So if you think this is nonsense then why are you responding to it?

I am not saying that you shouldn't so please don't take this the wrong way ... I am just pointing out what you yourself has said.

So this is more important to respond to than the "N" word is ... I find that a very interesting part of your personality ...

Hmmmmmm ... the above was just a thought ... not meant to in any way put you down or insult you.

Lus

I am not having fun ... trust me Shari ... I am not having fun ... 5150 is having fun ... most of us believe that NotADumbBlonde is truly Janet ... I happen to be one of those people ... however you have stated that you feel this thread is nonsense ... and I was simply making an observation that's all ...

You won't engage in debate on racisim but you will engage in debate on our thinking that Jan is the DumbBlonde ... simply an observation ... but not a fun one for me.

There are very few things on this site that I feel are fun ... occassionaly Girl, Art, and Paul will give me a laugh or two ... but for the most part picking apart what the kids across the hall are saying about people ... well there is just no fun in that!

I also suspect that NotADumbBlonde is not Janet Evans. I believe he/she is Janet'sspeech writer. NotADumbBlonde considers themselvesto be a Toby Ziegler, Josh Lyman and Will Bailey all rolled into one. He/She truly believes that the end (getting Janet to the next level of political stardom) justify the means (hence the association with the LOaD and the Dolts at JOey LAnd).

People accuse Janet of writing material for the LOaD, it'snot her - it'sNotADumbBlonde. NotADumbBlonde'spurpose is to make Janet look good, everyone else is evil. What NotADumbBlonde forgets to realize is that every person has an inner voice (mannerisms, accents, quirks) that make them distinct. NotADumbBlonde is script writing for Janet and LOaD. Instead of just providing talking points to Janet and the LOD and letting them package the message in their own voice (similar to how the Republicans send talking points to Fox News) the entire message is written for them. Most likely because all of them put together couldn'tcome up with a complete non run on sentence if their lives depended on it. Meet Janet or a LOaD person outside of a council meeting or the spotlight and get into a discussion with them? Guarantee that in two minutes you'drealize that they didn'tcome up with the message/questions all by themselves. Better yet read the posts on JOey LAnd and you'll come to the same conclusion.

NotADumbBlonde is stuck between a rock and a hard place. He/She fails to realize that the DOlts at JOey LAndtolerates him/her because of Janet. The higher Janet attempts to climb the political ladder the more of a liability he/she becomes.

NotADumbBlonde does not have much of a life, instead spending lonely nights transcribing council meeting minutes, cutting and pasting articles and writing the next round of scripts for the upcoming council meeting. So NotADumbBlonde, take a night off you desire it. Break out some wine and white chocolates, light a few candles, put on some early Elton John, cuddle up with the lavender pillow and read a good Scott & Scott novel.

From on-line campaign finance reports (available here)

Interesting Contributors to Janet Evans' 2003 Campaign

Attorney John Minora/$100

Michael Donohue/$100

Attorney Harry McGrath/$100

Friends of Bill Courtright/$337.38

DiBileo Insurance Agency/$54.50 in in-kind services

Friends of Bob Mellow/$100

The Committee to Elect Ken McDowell Tax Collector/$100

Attorney Edwin Abrahamsom<sp?>/$250

Boots & Hanks Towing/$200

Jay Saunders/$100

Gene Barrett/$200

Attorney Thomas Munley/$100

Gene Peters/$100

Attorney Richard Fanucci/$100 (also listed on Sherry Nealon Fanucci's report as a contributor)

Quantum Labs (Dickson City)/$500

Friends of Bill Courtright/$580.22

John R. Williams/$100

Christopher Evans/$600 ($200+$400)

Friends of Judy Gatelli (Judy Gatelli Council Campaign)/$100 ... not on the Evans report, but it is on one of the Gatelli reports as an expenditure

2003 Payments Made to the "Fishwrap" (The Scranton Times)

$ 236.72

$2,275.56

$ 1,008.00


My point here? I don't really care who contributes to Janet Evans. However, to make her out to be something other than a typical politician is simply wrong. She is very typical, as it seems she will take money from just about anyone, even people Mr Pilchesky apparently despises.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

NotADumbBlonde Posts: 1214 Date: Dec 9 6:49 AM, 2007 Views: 11

Quote | Reply RE: JUDY DOES THE MAYOR MAKE YOU DO "TRICKS" FOR WARM GIBBONS BEER? Sorry, Bing, -- what a laugh! -- you certainly don't speak for me. Yet another poster today who's "lost." Sadly for Bing, they will be most seriously outnumbered on this one by the goons. I love Milo!!! I am sure you do given your close connection!! Tell me, though,at what agedo you believe a person's reputation becomes a significant part of his/her persona? Better hope it's not too youngit might effect Mrs. "I eloped" and "Mr. Youthful Indiscretions" very negatively I would assume.

To help kick off the new year and the council realignment, less we forget - Janet you suck. Wonder how long before this poster gets a a little PM smack down from JOey about this post. This Youtube video reminds me of QUeeN JaNuT's expalnation of HER CITY BUDGET. ENJOY!!!!

Harsh Times Posts: 187 Date: Jan 6 9:32 PM, 2008 Views: 206

Quote | Reply Does Janet really ramble??? watch video & decide 4 yourself __________________ The ends justify the means.

LOL You can always count on Joey to protect his friend, you know....the person who claims to not know him. LOL

Good points Agam. Just to add in my 2 cents worth. For someone who has such naked ambition for public office the clariol queen is strangly uninformed about how meetings are conducted within various governing bodies. I suggest she and her merry band of goons take a trip to Harrisburg or DC and watch how they conduct the State and the National business. Try acting like the goons do at our local meetings in those venues and see how far you get and while you are at it notice how many questions they answer from the "people" in attendance.

Sorry Agam on that point I have to disagree with you, not because I have anything against people getting answers but because people have a tendancy to think that if they ask a question and don't like the answer, their question hasn't been answered. That is when the game really starts. Rather I believe everyone has a right to attend meetings and address the governing body. If you have a question fine, ask it, but also submit it in writing to the secretary. You can then expect an answer... later. I would say 10 business days would be fair.
If you ask inapropriate questions you can expect no answer. For instance asking Mr. Mcgoff about his change of mind as it pertained to running for office, would receive no answer, that question is appropriate for a candidates forum not during city hall business. Fair enough??

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 08:12, 2008-01-08