What, serial-plaintiff Pilchesky is just now discovering that politicians use people like him for personal gain? Say it ain't so!
Actually, people like Janet Evans LOVE the likes of Joe Pilchesky. Think about it...
...Pilchesky relentlessly attacks the opponents of Janet Evans ...Evans gets to sit back and say "Hey, I barely know the guy and I certainly have nothing to do with this website"
He's the perfect low maintenance attack dog; all Janet has to do is throw him a dog bone every once in a while and he wags his tail like a obedient cur.
Pilchesky, begging for another Janet treat.
Yes, Pilchesky is a angry, bitter old bully...but he doesn't seem to claim to be anything other than what he is. Evans, on the other hand, is nothing more than an opportunist of the highest order.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 19:49, 2007-08-27
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 19:56, 2007-08-27
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
If Janet Evans LOVES teaching so much and is such a GREAT teacher (which she is not), then why is she so intent on leaving the teaching profession to gain a full time political office? Hell, she jumped on the open State Representative seat ballot like a crack whore on a $20, and now we have her posturing for a run at the Mayor's office.
Any thoughts?
Here's my theory: She doesn't love teaching and she is not a great teacher. She does, however, love the pension benefit, and I suspect since she is now 100% vested for that benefit, she's looking down the road to get something she really loves - political power.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
After this email fiasco with dave, many people will certainly look at her in a different light. I think any political aspirations for her are in the crapper over this one. Even if dd thinks they can divert the attention away from the situation (to their own paultry followers) the damage has still been done to her career.
I am sure joe feels the same way when HE spreads rumours and innuendo about other politicos. DD innuendo just runs amok with everyone adding their two cents. By the time they are finished weaving their little stories, any modicum of truth there might have been has been diluted with dd crap.
Thankfully, our PROVEN information has legs to stand on.
No, and (in a moment of seriousness) I strongly disagree with that insinuation Doomers. I think Janet Evans sucks in the sense that she is not a person who is worthy of trust. I do not think it's right to imply that she engages in any inappropriate sexual conduct. Besides, the visual with that one is really disgusting.
(Wait...did I just defend Janet Evans????)
Anyway, as for how she got here teaching position, I think it was through old fashioned back-room politics. You know, the kind of thing that people like Fay 'Foam @ the Mouth' Franus rail against. Something along the lines of "Hey, I want a teaching position. Put me at the top of the eligibility list and I'll support you in ____________________ (<= insert voting favor here)".
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 09:29, 2007-08-31
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I was at a function at whistles it was not a political function. Janet Evans got the microphone from the dj and tried to make a speach.The people who had the party were not to happy because she was on the mike.They were paying for a DJ to play music and not to hear her. She started out by saying do we have any Jan Fans and Joe Pulchesky came out of a cake.
I would proceed very carefully sweetheart! Mr. Hughes is not a public official or a public figure. He is, however, a businessman with a reputation to maintain.The threshhold for libel/slander is much lower for him than it is for the others you have trashed. I would imagine the wrong word mightcost the speaker a pretty penny, if it should be proven to be untrue. I know that mouth of yours is seldom shut, but this might bethe time to do so. Just a suggestion!
RE: Bouncing Ball # 20 - Form them - For County Dollars will Come
LIKEIWANNA wrote:
MID-VALLEY FLASG.... GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. THOMAS HUGHES SR. WAS THE SUBJECT OF "UNPROVEN" ACCUSATIONS CONCERNING MISSING ITEMS FROM DEAD PEOPLE. NO CHARGES WERE EVER BROUGHT AND NO EVIDENCE OF ANY WRONG DOING WAS EVER PROVEN. A GOOD MANS NAME WAS DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD FOR A LONG TIME. AND NEVER ANY CHARGES BROUGHT. HIS SON, AL HUGHES WAS NEVER ACCUSED OF ANY WRONG DOING.
Agood friend of mine is very much aware of the (ahem)"unproven" accusations and what wasseized from dead people -- it would take your breath away.
By the way, she was given the info from a friend -- a member ofsaid family --who had "tokens" of proof herself.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 15:11, 2007-09-08
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 02:12, 2007-09-09
::: Agood friend of mine is very much aware of the (ahem)"unproven" accusations and what wasseized from dead people -- it would take your breath away. By the way, she was given the info from a friend -- a member ofsaid family --who had "tokens" of proof herself. :::
It just figures that Miss Clairol would have such friends. Friends who would keep an item which they supposedly KNOW had been pilfered from a body. THAT JUST FIGURES. And the "friend of a friend" crap is probably just that.
I have a friend who has a friend who told me that NotADumbBlonde is ..........
That's right janut .... and oh Janut ... you suck!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Looks like this poster AKA Milo/Shed/either of the Evans boys has picked up a ghost writer. I think maybe a ghost writter with an "english" background! This poster has gone from a foam at the mouth illiterate to using this word "exemplifies" correctly in a sentence. I would sayafter readingmany and varied posts by those two, that they don't know the meaning of that word never mind how to spell it. So hey Jan now you suck at a behind the scenes ghost writer!
WHEN THE GOING GETS TOUGH WASHO RUNS AND HIDES... So Fed you have made the point exactly. I do have to make an assumption so forgive me if I am wrong but you seem like an ordinary regular everyday person. Your post exemplifies that type of reasoning of the every day hardworking person. One would think that Doherty and his band of theives don't have their paws in everything. That is where you are wrong not because you are not intelligent but because you don't see the behind the scenes moves of these scumbags and the paper keeps them behind the scenes. A vote for Washo/ObRien is a vote for Doherty to steal from your wallet at the county level. His sister is working so hard for those two not because she believes in making the area better but because she needs to save her husbands business and keep the kids in private school. Don't believe me? Ask around or better yet elect them and see where the steel contracts go for the new secret 200 million dollar project that will be announced in a few weeks.
Oh, I wonder what her opinion of the whole Giovanni Piccolino fiasco would be? Hmmmmm...that would take some serious pander-analysis on her part, plus you never know, Dave may really like the pizza.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Somebody, PLEASE tell this bitch to shut her piehole. Even the rest of council is rolling their collective eyes at her for all her incessant blathering.
I tune into council meetings each and every week to laugh like a schoolgirl and point my fingers at all the whackjobs in their doomer t-shirts, NOT to listen to all her "whah-whah-whah". God bless Sheri Fanucci - how can she not what to give a swift backhand upside the back of that bitch's head?
I think Ms Evans confuses her role as an Englsh Teacher...where she needs to speak slowly to instruct her students...with her role as a council member. The citizens of Scranton don't need to be spoken to as if they were high school students (well, maybe Ray Lyman does...and that dude from Parrot Avenue...and...oh hell, just scratch that thought!).
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.