Oh My Good God ... you are a pisser!

Thursday wrote...

Sheri's posts were just an irritant. She just skirted around the issues SHE brought up, whereas Janet would have beaten that dead horse bloody, trying to get a point across. All sheri was good for was a few anti-doherty remarks and a 'screw you' to bring things to a close.

To that end, let me paraphrase all of the key points that Shari has ever made here (and a comment or two from me)...

"This site is just about bashing Joe" -- I wonder if she figured that out from the name of this site or from reading our actual postings?

"Everyone here supports the Mayor" -- Now I know that she hasn't really read the postings here, as many of us have been less than pleased with some of the Mayor's actions. But why let the truth stand in the say of a good accusation? Hey, I call them like I see them...the Mayor has done a GREAT JOB at Nay Aug park...it is becoming a great park; conversely, the Mayor has done a poor job in managing the city's human resources. I want the Police and Firefighter's contracts settled...these folks deserve a raise.

"I've stood up to some of the radical postings at DD." -- Yeah, and we are supposed to just take her word for that, right? Shari has skirted around this issue more times than I can count...yet she can prove me wrong right now by simply giving us her DD identity. Go ahead Shari...reply to this posting and tell us who you are at DD...or at least tell us why you won't provide the identity. Here's what I think...Shari will not provide her DD identity because we would then see that she is silent at best when it comes to things like Anti's racist rants. Prove me wrong Shari...go ahead...

"You have to admitt that Joe has done some good things for the city" -- I'd like to know one concrete thing that has improved for all of Scranton's residents as a result of Joe Pilchesky's serial lawsuits. In fact, I think he has done just the opposite...his serial lawsuits cost the city money and his encouragement of personal bashing has poisoned an already sick political atnosphere in Scranton.

And there you go...Shari in a nutshell.

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Janet will always suck ... And thank you Ag ... I think you summed up what Shari is all about quite nicely ...

Yeah I think that the name of the site could have been her first clue that none of us are really big fans of Pilhesky ... PILCHESKY DECEIT ... I wonder what part of that she didn't understand.

As for her not giving up her DD identity ... I believe she probably made her share of racist rants herself ... she is claiming that she defends ... I'm sure she does not ... my opinion ... she does not like it when I lump her in with the rest of the goons ... but she can prove me wrong and she won't ... so Shari Darling ... lumped in you will be until you prove to us that you are not as bad as the rest of them.

Shari came here to shake things up and try and get us to tell her who we are ... she is on a fishing trip when she comes here and she thinks that we are going to fall for it ... she was wrong ... the funniest thing was when she told me that the students at the high school think I'm hot ... I couldn't stop laughing ...

I think out of our three new posters ... Jimbu is the one who contributes the most ... when he's not angry that is ... but the other two are simply minor annoyances ... Shed rarely shows up ... And well Shari claims to know more than she actually knows ... but she's going to educate us all ... Let me ask ... who here feels they got any type of education from her ... I know that I don't.

She can defend Joe and Janet all she wants ... it does not change the fact that Joe sucks ... and his queen Janet ... sucks even more. That's the consensus here at PD ... and Shari just as you are entitled to feel as you do ... and have your opinions ... so are we ... the difference here is ... We WILL NOT Ban you for you Opinion!

Shari will not be happy with you ... your gonna get one of those

Wow .... postings from her.

Poor little lambchop!

NotADumbBlonde Posts: 714 Date: Wed Jul 11 2:32 PM, 2007 Views: 413	Quote | Reply RE: Agenda of 7/12/07 -- qualifications of prospective directors Nothing that Mayor Doherty does surprises me anymore. What surprises me is that he gets away with it all. Glenn, what I meant is that these resolutionsshould not even be introducedinto committee -- they should be tabled -- untilqualifications are made available to council and, of course, the citizens of Scranton to scrutinize; and speakers have a chance to question council before introduction. Janet herself should insist upon it. It has been done before, whereby items about to be introduced were tabled (and some, never heard from again) due to insufficient or inaccurateinformation. There should at least besome semblance of propriety. __________________ The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech. (Justice Anthony Kennedy)
NotADumbBlonde Posts: 714 Date: Wed Jul 11 4:08 PM, 2007 Views: 321	Quote | Reply RE: Agenda of 7/12/07 -- qualifications of prospective directors Just wondering because I really don't know him and will, of course,give him the benefit of the doubt... Does this sound like Jeff Brazil? POSITION VACANCY (for a TOWN in CT) PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: A 4-year degree from a recognized college or university in civil engineering or a closely-related field PLUS 10 years of progressively responsible public works administration experience, including at least 5 years in a responsible supervisory capacity or any combination of responsible experience and technical training which provides a demonstrated potential for performing the duties of this position. Must be a registered engineer in the state. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS KNOWLEDGE, SKILL, AND ABILITY: Thorough knowledge of the principles and practices of municipal public works functions, thorough knowledge of the principles and practices of civil engineering and land surveying as applied to municipal public works and related functions, thorough knowledge of the principles and practices of public works administration as applied to a municipal public works operation; thorough ability in oral and written communications, thorough ability to administer the activities of a municipal public works department and to supervise the work of others, thorough ability to develop short- and long- term development and operations plans and programs, thorough ability to make difficult decisions with deadlines, thorough ability to establish and main effective working relationships with supervisors, subordinates, associates, attorneys, contractors, officials of other agencies, and the general public. This job description is not, nor isit intended to be, a complete statement of all duties, functions, and responsibilities which comprise this position. __________________ The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech. (Justice Anthony Kennedy)
NotADumbBlonde Posts: 714 Date: Wed Jul 11 4:35 PM, 2007 Views: 299	Quote | Reply RE: Agenda of 7/12/07 -- qualifications of prospective directors DescriptionParks and Recreation DirectorCity in MarylandAre these (perhaps) the qualifications, more or less,of Mark Dougher?The Parks andRecreation Director develops and plans, organizes and directs the development, improvement, maintenance and daily activities of the Citywide park system, facilities, and recreation programsfor the Cityand serves as the highest authority in the division while exercising considerable independence in carrying out policy decisions and department goals.Tasks: Leads, plans, develops, organizes and directs the overall parks andrecreation programs for the City; develops and implements regulations, policies and procedures to advance the City's mission, goals, and objectives; serves as an advisor to theMayor and Council, citizens, employees, contractors, public officials and colleagues in the profession of Parks and Recreation; develops, administers and monitors the department's annual budget; forecasts future needs for staffing, equipment and supplies; develops reports, presentations and proposals for consideration by management and Council; serves as a member of the City's Management Team. Determines levels of staff, equipment, and other resources needed for division services and seasonal programs including directing and evaluating staff and providing leadership, supplies expert decision making and problem solving; maintains a thorough knowledge of State and local statutes, ordinances, standards, procedures and trends related to parks, recreation,and ensures compliance; assesses community and City needs and creates tactical and strategic plans to meet those needs. Meets with City Council to assist in policy determinations regarding department goals; analyzes trends, reviews statistics and communicates information to department leadership; represents the City in meetings with professional organizations, outside agencies, and the public; prepares and reviews special reports; monitors departmental operations and customer service to ensure quality control; identifies and resolves division deficiencies.RequirementsEducation and/or experience equivalent to a Bachelor's Degree, Master's preferred, in Recreation, Physical Education or closely related field in addition to a minimum of five (5) years full time managerial level parks/recreation work, or a qualifying combination of education and work experience needed to successfully and effectively carry out tasks and responsibilities. Previous experience as a Director desired. Must possess a validdriver's license and pass pre-employment drug test and background check. __________________ The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech. (Justice Anthony Kennedy)

Here is a thought ... quite a simple one ... for our friend DumbBlonde (Janut) ... How about getting the job description for the City of Scranton ... see what the requirements for the position are in the City of Scranton ... it's all well and good that you have done the research for other cities in other states ... but how about seeing what qualifications are needed in the City of Scranton ... isn't that simple.

I think that is the point I am trying to make Girl ... you know how I am ... I go around the issue and sometimes some understand what it is I'm trying to say ... I need to learn to use less words and make a quick point ... you usally understand what it is I'm trying to say and clarify it for others! Thank you!

why does sam post under his real name and cyberlion. Now Dumbblond is outing him. These few council/dd people are loosing their minds. They have turned this little hobby of being pretend political activists and have let it take over their world. They are in need of help at this point.

I don't know -- if I were dave, I would be a little worried right about now. Sounds to me as if our little princess is leaded toward ... well ... the dark side.

Sam's got a pretty prominent swagger these days, now that Janet is paying him so much attention. Don't get too used to it Sammy - she's just using you to get the "of color" vote. When you prove no further use to her, you'll be delegated to the seat next to Gary Dibileo - waaaaay in the back of the bus.

NotADumbBlonde Posts: 732 Date: Fri Jul 13 3:59 PM, 2007 Views: 33

Quote | Reply RE: Council Meeting 7/12/07 GATELLI DISGRACEFUL CONDUCT CONTINUES....... If the job is so bad, why fight tooth and nail to get reelected -- or even elected? One would think that once would be enough. Fanny spent over $34,000 (according to the Times) - the costliest campaign; Gatelli, over $10,000; Hazzouri, over $28,000; Pocius, almost $22,000. For a $12,000 job? Who do they think they're kidding? Especially with this mayor. They do next to nothing.

I wonder what Janet Evanspaid for her seat in front of the 64oz. iced lattes. What has she done to earn a single penny of that compensation?

And how is the Scranton Times is suddenly a reliable source to quote as verification for anything? I thought they were "evil" and "liars." Yet they can be called upon to cite as fact when it's beneficial.

You really think you have a shot in your next election, huh, Janet? Ignorance is truly bliss, isn't it?

Janet Evans, you suck.

(Just wanted to get that out there...)

Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.

Oh geez is Dick still saying he is goingto lose his house?? Holy Hell he has been saying that since before they build the new high school. Swore if the school was build he was moving out of scranton.... another promise broken. I hate when they tease us like that!!Does no one keep their word anymore?

NotADumbBlonde Posts: 781 Date: Tue Jul 17 1:17 PM, 2007 Views: 72

Quote | Reply RE: "This is your Life, Judy Gatelli", and it's open season on your character. 12 JULY 2007COUNCIL MEETINGDICK LASKE:I come today with a lot of things. One thing I want to compliment Ms. Evans onthe statement she made when she first took office, saying that she would workWITH the mayor but notFOR him. Now, I think there are some people up there that don't abide by that philosophy; and I question their integrity. It seems like 3 of you up there -- Ms. Fanucci, Ms. Gatelli, and Mr. McGoff -- go along with whatever the administration has. Now, I'm not crying poverty, but I'm gonna tell you something. You raised my taxes 25% -- I got a 3% raise in Social Security, and Medicare took 1/2 of that. So, I'm in a losing proposition. It's a matter of time until I lose my house that I worked very hard for, and I don't think it's right. I could see tax increases, but I can't see the $10,000,000 loan that Ms. Fanucci granted the administration. It was a sucker deal; she voted against the $44,000,000, and turns around and gives $10,000,000. This is the way things wheel-and-deal in the political things.

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 20:54, 2007-07-17

justducky wrote:

---

Betcha didn't know this tidbit, I dare someone to ask our Miss Jan, how come she rarely attends caucus at Council, then claims she is the ONLY one to not know ANYTHING, and she was also absent from the hearing before the meeting next week, i know she has missed others, but its ok for her....just a little something to ponder

---

-- Edited by LusOnlyVoice at 07:45, 2007-07-19

Nothing demonstrates the failure of our current council better than Evans being more than willing to throw her colleagues under the bus and charge them with racism and antagonizing the speakers.

No point taking the opportunity to maybe try and smooth things out and make an effort to work WITH everyone else for the betterment of the city. Nope, better to burn bridges and sell everyone else out and highlight the fact that she's been an obstacle for progress in the city for years, is NOT working for the people, and the least effective counciperson in recent memory.

Well played Janet! We couldn't destroy your career better if we tried.


-- Edited by Paul at 08:35, 2007-07-26

Another little slip?? I wonder why August is a month this poster "might" have time to get sunburned? Is this poster off for the month of August? Funny isn't council off for August too?? Hummmmmm....

NotADumbBlonde Posts: 892 Date: Thu Jul 26 12:10 PM, 2007 Views: 306

Quote | Reply RE: DA to Patilla: "Plea out or else" Sam, I am both proud and humbled to be considered a part of so distinguished a group.We are behind you 1000% and offer you our strength and courage.This is just the beginning.My personal thanks to Judy Gatelli. She has kept me focused and determined throughout all of this, andwillprevent me from getting too lazy and sunsoaked this August. I WILL be busy.

-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 23:47, 2007-07-26