Just reviewing some of his past attempts at destroying lives or winning lawsuits.

Without posting the accusations and rumors, can anyone remember anything that actually ever came out of his repeated posts to gather information on public or private people?

While scary, crude and tasteless, I can't recall one shred of info gathered that made a difference in any way.

Hailstone, Gatelli, Mazzoni, etc. - all victims, all attacked, all untouched when the dust settled.

Hell, I even remember him going after the mayor of Moscow as retribution for Mr. Edwards' letter to the editor bashing Joe. If I recall correctly, he got nothing on him.

So Joe keeps dragging the net, but the net comes up empty. He clouds the waters and stirs up mud and muck - attracting nothing but bottom feeders.

So other than giving the catfish and bullheads of the local political waters a place to feed, what has been accomplished? I've asked this question a thousand times, but never once received an answer. I asked it over there and only received questions as responses; do you think it's OK that Doherty did this, or Doherty did that? No claims of achieving any goals, just more accusations.

Joe likes to say we argue in circles over here, but I don't see it that way at all. I see us as the only place to post an honest retort to online anger, hostility and slander. If the arguement we present is circular, it's only because the topic keeps coming back to square one; nothing has been accomplished by DD.com.