There were a lot of rumors when the Gilfooley story was first breaking. Among those stories was that he had a sweetie who happened to be a prisoner. Actually the story was that he picked sweeties from among the female population. If that is true and there was any type of intimate relationship between Gilfooley and any member of the female prison pupulation than he was guilty of rape or at least involuntary deviate sexual assault. Just who did that investigation? Anyone know who ran that farce, er I mean investigation?
*************
This is a classic example of why DD is a cesspool. Granted, Mr Gilhooley <sp?> broke the law and for that he should be punished. But my God, accusing him of RAPE? That's way the hell over the line. It would be nice if someone over there had the "huevos" to call this dude out. How would they react if Janet Evans were accused of some equally horrible crime?
Speaking of call out at DD, I actually registerred at DD, but I've decided not to post there. Actually, the thought of giving them another member, even one would take a stand for decency, was more than I could stand. So hats off to Art, Lus & all the others here who have posted at DD and tried to do the right thing (and gotten banned in the process).
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:13, 2007-01-26
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Had I never registered ... had I never posted ... at DD ... trying to get them to see what they were saying was wrong ... trying to make them see that a different point of view is a good thing ... giving them facts that were true ... but they didn't want to see the facts ... all they wanted was to see things in a way that their favorite Council woman saw them ... they worship her as though she has no flaws ... as though she herself had never had an affair while holding a political office (school director) ... as though she didn't use her political influences to gain a job ... and a job for her son ... it's OK for her to conduct city business when she is at work ... (always on that cell phone) ... all these things were OK for her ... but when others made a mistake .... they were there to crucify them ... and I will say this one more time ... I do not care who the politician is ... what they do (as long as it's not criminal) ... who they sleep with is none of our business ... it's between a married politician and his/her wife/husband ... not for the taxpayers to spread all over this town.
I began posting because they were hurting friends of mine ... and when I took a stand against what they had to say about these people ... well Joey P BANNED me ... that's OK ... I pleaded my case through e-mails ... as anyone who was at the old PD site knows as they were posted there for all to see ... but I could not go back to DD under the terms of Joe Pilchesky ... I told him that I felt my freedom of speech was being violated by him ... and he told me that if I changed the way I see things that he would allow me to post again ... of course being the strong minded woman that I am ... I refused ... I will not be another one of his sheep ... I will not be told how to think ... not by anyone ... especially the likes of Joey P.
So I have to actually thank Joey P. for the birth of this site ... for if it were not for him ... I would not have had the pleasure of posting and laughing and getting to know all of you ... so thank you Joey P. ...
LusNewVoice (the original)
-- Edited by Voice of Reason at 09:59, 2007-01-27
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!