Another thing, where was McGoff with the gavel when she started spewing all this out about a private citizen?
We're living in the most deplorable days of politics. I'd take that Doug Miller kid over Fanucci any day. Can't wait to hear what her campaign slogan is going to be. Maybe, "Vote for me or else". She could do this to anyone if she could get away with doing it to Joe. Wake up McGoff. Get that gavel going.
I do believe that unpaid taxes are city business ... damn it's how they pay the bills ... if nobody paid taxes there would be no money ... so yeah unpaid taxes would more likely than not be city business.
Now what is not anyone's business is someone's medical records ... if she brought that up ... well I would think Joe might have a case!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
What about someone's mental health records?? I think in this paricular case it maybe pertainent. LOL LOL
Oh I think that they can look into it ... but they can not make it any part of a public record. I could be wrong but I do believe it would be covered by the HIPPA Law
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
as usual Joey-little boy has to resort to filth to relay his messages. I have often found that the ones who obsessed the most about sex where the one who either never get any or who can't....<coughcough> shall we say cut the mustard anymore.
Status: Online Posts: 4311 Date: Feb 28 9:45 PM, 2009
Hitlers downfall wrote:
It's War Admiral vs. Seabiscut on a political track.
There's not always a Seabiscut for every War Admiral in an election, but if it'll make you feel better, there is in this one.
The fans want the race. The fans want the confrontation in a debate, maybe even from the podium.
Live. Doherty vs. Pilchesky
Works for me, but he doesn't have the balls. He doesn't have the brains, either. I'd crush him on an intellectual level. I'd crush him on his record. He'd never debate me. However, there is only one way to find out.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 11:27, 2009-03-01
PresidentMcgoof is a little goofy, Hardcore, but the over-reaction isn't necessary.
The Times AND Jeremy Burton have been $hitting down the necks of the union employees for how long now?
I guess that's not disgusting enough for you. I'm not defending McGoof, but free speech isn't always what we like to read. If you want a sample of that, read Burton's work. You're defending a reporter who'd be thrilled to be a part of shutting this site down. You're defending a reporter on the side of Sherry Fanucci who has voted against the unions since day one.
It's not disgusting when the Times goes on the attack but it's disgusting when their reporters do??
Burton brought this on himself. He took the first cheap shot. He exposed himself to a response. He looks like a full-grown adult to me. On the other hand, you don't sound like one in this circumstance. Stand up for what's right. Burton threw a cheap punch. Pilchesky punched back. People on this site were angered and threw a few of their own. That's life.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Not sure if this has come up before...and I'm not the usual "multiple personality" sleuth here...but just in case...
If you click on the attachment link, the pdf file launches from the actual DohertyDeceit URL...which means that the poster would have to be able to edit that site. Now how many people outside of the Pilchesky's would have that ability????
Posts: 52 Date: Mar 2 9:23 PM, 2009 This notice was attached to the employee's checks last friday. Here's a link if the copies on this page aren't readable for you.
Sam goes over the top more often than not, but responding to him doesn't help. We all know he's been the victim of quite a bit of racism and prejudice himself. Let's cut him some slack here and follow Joe's proposal. Joe does a good enough job of keeping this a controversy manufacturing plant. He really doesn't need help, at least where racism is concerned.
Burton was on a short leash tonight at council. My, oh my. So quickly. Where did that come from? A woman was with him doing all the writing and all of the interviewing. Back to second seat there Jeremy?
When did he realize he gave Pilchesky wayyyyyyyy too much to work with in a very short period of time? Before? Or after he got sued? Like the dog chasing the car, Burton ended up under the tires.
It's incredible to me that the paper would allow such a green reporter to cover any sensitive issue at city council. I'd like to know why he had a babysitter in the first place. Maybe because he has a big mouth and can't be left alone in case Mr. Pilchesky gets close to him?
At the end of the day, the Times is the embarassed party. Burton is a puppy. He writes like one. Few people, if any, are going to believe what he writes anymore.
I'd seriously like to know what her full education is. She talks like a tenth grader who struggled to get that far. She's the most shameful excuse for a public official ever. We actually have a GED grad or two on the school board, but they talk like her.
Question: What is your educational background and what documents can you produce to reflect upon how well you did in school?
I don't think Joe's question to her infers that. I think it infers her political ties to him, as in supporting what the admin is doing to the unions. Who the hell would admit to sleeping with Hayes in the first place? If she did, she'd be smart to deny that one. I wouldn't blame her one bit.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters at 17:02, 2009-03-04
It's incredible to me that the paper would allow such a green reporter [Green...because someone who has ZERO POINT ZERO knowledge of the media says he is? That's like me commenting on the technical capabilities of a aerospace engineer.] to cover any sensitive issue at city council. ["Senstive issue at City Council?" What a hoot!! That's like saying "feel good NAZI film of the year" or "engaging discussion about economic policy with Ray Lyman".] I'd like to know why he had a babysitter in the first place. Maybe because he has a big mouth and can't be left alone in case Mr. Pilchesky gets close to him? [Why, because Pilchesky will make a pass at him? You know that many of the militant anti-gay guys are really closeted homosexuals themselves...just like Pastor Ted Haggard. It's could get lonely if Edith gets sent away to the big house. Trial starts next week.]
At the end of the day, the Times is the embarassed party. [Why, because a man who once sued a Little League says it is? How about this for an embarassed party...the guy doesn't pay his taxes and then blames his wife?]Burton is a puppy. [I'd say that he's more of a man than Joe Pilchesky is...at least he doesn't doctor other people's emails.] He writes like one. Few people, if any, are going to believe what he writes anymore. [Let's take stock of this situation: Number of times Burton has been paid to write & has then been published: Many Times. Number of times Pilchesky has been paid to write & has then been published: Zero Point Zero Times. I think that pretty much sums it up. Pilchesky needs to go back to begging WILK to give him a radio show...so we can hear him stammer in stereo on 103.1FM.]
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 07:10, 2009-03-05
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Good riddance to him, that faggy-looking two face. Cop my ass. He's been a disgrace to law enforcement for decades. He makes a living on the back side of the law, as in backstabbing his own brothers and sisters. He won't be missed.
I take that back, it'll be great with him gone. Who would miss such a snake?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Hardcore wrote: Really, I'd be more excited at a yawning festival.
Joe Pilchesky wrote:
I was at a yawning festival once, I swiped 30 gold fillings and got a great blowjob. You're a funny prick Pilchesky, but a prick nonetheless. OK for us to starve for your political benefit. I suppose that means you'll starve too? Where's that coming from? The public you want us to protect from four more years of this mayor is a public we already protect with our lives. Think about that funny man.
I wonder if he has the same password for all these IDs? I don't know how he'd manage it otherwise.
Anyway, what's kind of funny is how other DD posters engage the alter-egos in conversation, acting as if it's somehow a different person. In the end, Pilchesky could lose all of his posters and still have two dozen posts a day...all from himself.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
More than two dozen Ag ... he must have 100+ user names over there ... I wouldn't be able to do that ... I wouldn't want to either ...
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Soon I predict this "poster" will post a favorable comment about Joey. He then can claim another "conversion" to the "cause" . Crazy scary at thsi point.
RE: Will FOP pres. Bob Martin's loyalty go to the members or Doherty's political agenda?
Good cop bad cop wrote:
I suppose that means you'll starve too?
Don't even go there.
Where's that coming from? The public you want us to protect from four more years of this mayor is a public we already protect with our lives.
What's your point? We already know cops put their lives on the line, so do firemen and many other service people. Your choice and I admire it. Does that mean you can't do the right thing here? Hundreds of thousands of men in uniform went to the deaths so we could be free men and women. Ahhh, for that price of human life, do you think you can be free and have a little balls at the same time for one little election? Not for nothing, but we do owe something to the people who died so we could live fat and free.
Think about that funny man.
Go fvck yourself. You think about it. It's not only the cops that have suffered with this heartless prick, everyone has. Carry your weight. Now's the time to send a message to every administration for the next 30 years. Show them all that you can't be fvcked with, becasue there will be more contracts to sign. Set it up. Make an impression.
Dear doherty deceit posters, IMHO do you find it at least interesting that a topic 10 solid reasons to vote for chris started by "Doherty for Mayor again" screen name (a name that had to be approved by the moderator) has yet to have a rebuttal posted by Joe or Joannce Pilchesky?
Funny when I mentioned a certain councilwoman by name before I was banned Joe Pilchesky was the first to respond.
"Funny when I mentioned a certain councilwoman by name before I was banned Joe Pilchesky was the first to respond."
As it says at the very bottom of the DohertyDeceit webiste,
M-7 PAC
"No Cuffs on Free Speech"
2005 Scranton, PA
Yes, "No Cuffs on Free Speech"...well unless Joe Pilchesky doesn't like the free speech in question. Maybe he should re-write that little line to read...
M-7 PAC
"No Cuffs on Free Speech that Joe Pilchesky Agrees with"
2005 Scranton, PA
or
M-7 PAC
"No Cuffs on Hyppcrisy"
2005 Scranton, PA
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 11:57, 2009-03-08
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I've verified with the DiBileo camp that the links above are "official".
The "Announcement Event" is accurate.
Everything you want to know about who, what, why, how, when and where will be answered at that event.
"It's Our Time for Change" speaks for itself. If you'd like to be a part of the excitment that comes with replacing corrupt with honest, you only need to appear. You won't be disappointed.
Status: Online Posts: 137 Date: Mar 9 5:26 PM, 2009
Hey, we can all be vilified for past conduct. But once you're in office, you are held to a higher standard from that point on.
Fanucci wanted $300 a pop (to use her words) for fines against people caught smoking where prohibited. I'd like to see the revenue there since she adamantly insisted that there was some 'good revenue' there.
I'd lay bets that if these parking tickets were paid as they should have been under fair fact finding, they would total hundreds more than smoking tickets.
I didn't know you didn't have free speech when it came to your OPINION. stupid old me. I'm glad that calling some one a NAME is more important that TERRORISTS and the ROTTEN economy. i mean, calling some one a blow job is not like saying that they take it up the ass right? what's to be upset about?
maybe I should change my name to some thing more colorful in the event that I ever feel like I would want to express my OPINION about some thing or some one on a PUBLIC board some thing that would be funny to see published in the paper and read over and over in court? what about ****licker69/ or mother****myass69? or pussyNpenis101?
OK, I've read through this thread, and have trundled over to DD for as long as I could stand it --can anyone give me an idea of just what POSITIVE things Joey P & his minions want for the City of Scranton?
Yes, I get it he wants Chris D. drawn & quartered & spun on a spit until golden brown & crusty. I also assume that fate would be wished for anyone who not only agreed w/CD, but even those who didn't harbor Joey P's pathological hatred for him.
It appears that he wants Jan the Man installed as Queen of the Realm (making Dastardly Dave her consort--well, he's good at consorting.. .[so is she] . . but that's another story).
But, from what I've seen, any progress is seen as evil, anything that does not keep Scranton mired in the dismal 50's mindset from which he seems to have been spawned, is a thing devoutly to be denied.
On a personal level he appears to want to be the power behind the throne, w/the ability to do as he pleases, laws, morals, etc, to be ignored.
But POSITIVE suggestions for the City????? Am I missing someting?
Status: Online Posts: 38 Date: Mar 24 2:51 PM, 2009
How about all those infamous parties at her house with all the contractors that have fleeced with with outragous no-bid contracts.
The most famous no-bidder was the $266,000.00 the mayor spent to fix the old Casey Garage so the new hotel could use it. A month after the alleged repairs were done and paid for it was demolished. Nobody saw the work. When confronted with it the mayor said an engineer inspected the work, but then the records came out here that showed only Sara Hailstone inspected the work. Won't forget that one on election day and neither will a lot of other people. Scartelli was the contractor, always at Gin's parties.
-- Edited by IHavehadenoughofhaters on Tuesday 24th of March 2009 02:04:19 PM
There is not one positive thing that will ever come out of DD ... you see they like ... no they love to complain ... they live for it ... without it they would not know how to exist.
So instead of going and enjoying the Dog Park that she asked for ... Fay slams the city for giving her what she wanted ... now she will tell you that the Dog Park cost $300,000 ... and yes that amount of money was spent at the Park ... but here is the thing ... it was not all spent on the DOG PARK ... it was spent throughout the park. But she won't ever tell you that because in their small minds it sounds better to say ..."Yeah I asked for the Dog Park ... but I never told them to spend money on it ... and why the hell did they fix up the rest of the Park ... all I wanted was a simple Dog Park".
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I've lived around the Doherty family all my life. The old man was simply the scum of the earth for how he treated people, his own kids included. Their mother was a very dedicated woman but she had her hands full with that pack. In his lifetime Chris never got to finish a lollipip because Virginia would take it off him. It happened every time and Chris would cry for an hour while she laughted away. They're sadistic people very capable of retaliating against anyone. No conscience.
Oh dear God here we have Joey and Joey having a converstion which is bad enough I grant you.....but he announces his "book" during this exchange. Please...Joey.... you need meds get them..... and for the love of God man seek help!! **highlighting mine.
It's a tremendous credit to their loyalty to all of us and free speech that they're still in the game. Maybe the machine thought going after Joe's wife would have been the knock out punch they were looking for. What did they get for their troubles? The same thing they always get, being exposed even more. My Dad knew Chris Cullen's Dad who worked at the Times his entire life. He wasn't the most popular writer in the shop. Worked for the machine. He wasn't happy with Chris' heavy drinking problems all those years. Chris Cullen closed many a bar in his day.
I hear he's clean up now and I wish him the best in that regard, but what he did to Joanne is so disturbing that if it were in my power to exile him to an island full of his own kind I'd do it in a heartbeat. Kevin Murphy should be ashamed of himself for walking into Gary's rally with him.
It's very invigorating for me that the game goes on with the Pilcheskys still on board. The site isn't down, but I'm sure that was part of the plan. Many of us do wonder if Joe was ever approached to take it down in exchange to being left alone. What say you, Joe?
It's a tremendous credit to their loyalty to all of us and free speech that they're still in the game.
This site will never be taken down as long as I'm alive. Never!
Many of us do wonder if Joe was ever approached to take it down in exchange to being left alone. What say you, Joe?
I've had repeated phone discussions regarding what it would take to get us to move on in exchange for taking this site down and pulling out of the SS Complex case. I can't reveal the caller's identity, as we spoke on conditions of confidence. The money was good, not of the 'retire for life' variety, but substantial.
My book, "Taking down politicians is so easy even a mouse can do it", will likely be electronically available by years end.
No Joey you weren't and no Joey this didn't happen and no Joey we don't believe this is anyone else but you......what a pathetic jerk. Joey Don't you get it we know who your alias are....*******.
I've been to parties where she's done nothing but work some of the people invited for favors in exchange for promises from everything from paved road to street lights. She makes more promises than the mayor for God's sake.