I love this post .... I guess "Hallowgate" will never die ... even though it was determined that it was not private property that was cleared and that was the admission of Mr. Dick Laske and you Mr. Moran ... I love your posts though!
Quote | ReplyRE: Where does Fanucci live and play?
Jo, these people are so corrupt that pictures don't even matter. The Hollowgate pics are very clear, yet Parker examined his actions and, amazingly enough, found he did nothing wrong. What next? Get rid of juries? Just ask the defendant to examine the facts and proclaim his guilt or innocence?
Apparently, there is no need for the independent examination of questionable activities because the person responsible for the investigation is the person accused.
The lack of ethics in government can be traced to the person in charge of ethics complaints, Mayor Doherty.
Say no more.
__________________ "Just remember, one sees no evil, one hears no evil and one says no evil and that's why the vote was three to two." -"Three monkeys and a budget", the current working title of the next movie to be financed in Scranton...
You took those pictures Nobody ... and you live to make the lives of your neighbors incredibly miserable ... but you fail to tell people that the real reason you backed Gary DiBileo was that you were going to be put on the police force ... but when Gary lost you lost all hope of being put on ... because now you are tooooooo old ... you have exceeded the age requirement and that alone makes you a hypocrite ... you go on and on about ethics ... but were you a DiBileo crony ... phony ... I think you were ... so what makes what you and Gary were doing any better than what went on in your neighborhood? Just wondering ... inquiring minds want to know ... hey say hello to Granma (she is your mommy isn't she?) Or so I have been told ... and if I am wrong I do apologize ... nah I take that back I don't apologize you people at DD never apologize when your wrong so why should I? ... get over the Hallow Ave incident ... because it was simply a right of way that was cleared not anyone's private property ... saw that on Channel 61
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
Just when you think there may be a good guy in the bunch ... or good gal ... who knows with a name like Chris ... but anyway I thought this one was going to be a reasonable person ... Boy was I wrong ... seemed like he/she was defending Sherry Fanucci a bit and then ... Wow did he turn on her in the typical DD fashion ... way to make them love you Chris ... become a ! Take a look!
Chris Posts: 4 Date: Sat Jan 6 2:39 PM, 2007 Views: 32 Quote | ReplyWhat is Fanucci's story?
OK, I am lost...Someone on here can probably get me up to speed. She is divorced? What does her husband do for a living? Must be good because she was a stay at home mom until she caught her big break with the job Doherty got her. Also, who is this "Danny" guy? And I am hearing now she lives in Clarks Green?
One thing I have to say about this "not so skinny lady"... If you are that big, don't wear clothes to try and flatter yourself, especially tops that show off your boobs. I am horrified when I see her where they slutty shirts to Council Meetings THAT ARE TELEVISED!!! Oh my!!
Chris P.
I don't think it is anyone's business what her ex-husband does for a living ... and I don't think it's any of our business who this Danny Guy is ... and if she is keeping time in Clarks Green ... well that does not mean she lives there ... have none of you ever spent the night at your girlfriends/boyfriends place ... think about it ... just because she spends the occasional night there does not mean she lives there ... I know you all aren't getting any so you live vicariously through Sherry ... what a sad situation for you all!
edited for typo's ... ooooops!
-- Edited by Voice of Reason at 06:07, 2007-01-07
-- Edited by Voice of Reason at 06:14, 2007-01-07
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
Well, I think that my little friend Chris P. was banned ... and I am ashamed of myself for even saying this ... but I hope he does not come here to post ... he was a bit tooooo much even for the at DD ... Can you all imagine that! I could hardly believe it when I went to DD to check out his thread and low and behold ... it was gone!
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
My Magical trip to me to the thread MORE MONEY WASTED FIGHTING THE UNIONS?Scranton "Political" TimesI would put up this thread but it is just toooo big ... but I find it funny ... because the don't seem to have a problem with any lawsuits filed by the Powerful Pill ... but they do seem to have a big problem with money being "wasted" on the Mayor appealing decisions where the Unions are concerned ... now my train of thought on this is this ... why is it OK for the Pill to sue the city every chance he gets ... does this not "waste" money ... I think it does ... so I guess this isn't so much for the Magical trip thread as it is the DD Hypocrites thread ...
I think that Doherty can't be just stomping on the rights of all of the unions because why the hell does he have no problems with the DPW ... why the hell are they not out there filing arbitration's against the City every chance they get ... makes me wonder ... Why was he able to settle the contract with the DPW? Traditionally they were always the department that got **** on at every turn. But they seem to be able to work with the administration ... I don't understand ... They don't go to every council meeting and whine ... and cry ... they do their jobs ... so what do we think can be learned from these DPW employees?
I surely would like some input on this because I think the Fire, Police and Clerical Unions could learn a thing or two from the Department of Public Works Employees!
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
In my opinion, the 'blame' (if it needs to be dished out) for the lack of contract progress goes about 60% to the unions, 40% to Mayor Doherty.
Mind you, unlike Joe Pilchesky I'm not an expert at labor contracts (or in being a plaintiff either), but the Police, Fire and Clerical unions have gone way over-board in demonizing the Mayor. This is classic union strong-arm tactics at work...they can't win their desired contract provisions through negotiation, so they resort to making life as difficult as possible for management (the Mayor) through rants at council meetings, outrageous personal attacks at DD and 'news' in the union paid for newspaper. It's far from an original tactic, but it's still stinks to high hell.
As I've said before...Ms Krake, Ms Stulgis, Mr Gervasi should stop the public attacks and instead focus on any negotiations/abritration/legal avenues they are following. At this stage the only people they are harming are themselves and the reputations of the unions they represent. As union leaders, they should be a model for civil behavior and discourse, not the opposite.
They Mayor isn't completely blameless here...the leader of any organization sets the tone for labor relations, and I think in hindsight he should have done more to foster better relations with these three unions in general and with the above mentioned union presidents in particular. As the old mafia saying goes, "Keep your friends close, but keep you enemies closer". It's hard to aruge with working men and women who just want an annual raise. That's very reasonable, but unfortunately we've gone well beyond reasonable in this whole contract mess.
-- Edited by Agamemnon at 16:13, 2007-01-07
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I only wish the Chumster board was still accessible ... because let me tell you ... Bill Courtright was slammed at every turn on that board .... over the CRF issue ... they called him vile names ... changed his name to Courtwrong ... but now they want him to run again and they are backing him ... is this not hypocritical of them??? I think it is ...
Here is the link to the Thread:Courtright makes it official, he wants to keep his seat Scranton "Political" Times (just a link in the interest of saving space) ... tell me if you think they are hypocrites ... I know what I think!
Good luck Mr. Courtright because as we have seen in the past a political nod from them is like the kiss of death to a political career ... they endorse and the city goes against who they endorse ... I for one will not be voting for Mr. Courtright .... but that's just me! I have my reasons!
-- Edited by Voice of Reason at 05:48, 2007-01-08
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
This could be about any of the three posters at DD, including the Administrator:
Posted by MAW in the Bob McGoff thread:
...he is a stubborn man and you will never change his mind about anything or ever convince him that he is wrong. His speech about cooperation is good, the only problem is that if you do not agree with him, there is no cooperaton.
Hey, Mary Ann, I thought the thread was about Bob McGoff, not Joe Pilchesky? Stay on topic, please.
To your credit, though, your opening part of that post, namely "The manner in which this man handled actions against his daughter are immaterial..." was probably the single most sensible thing ever posted on that forum. Considering that 75% of what's posted over there is insane, nonsensical posturing with a 24% chance of idle threats, it took some real guts to momentarily go against the grain and post something that was reasonable and almost intelligent. Kudos to you!
Mary Ann ... how did you get this impression from Mr. McGoff ... I am just wondering? First of all aren't you always saying that it matters both how they are as people ... human beings and as politicians ... HYPOCRITE make up your mind ... which is it ... I firmly believe that it is none of your business what he does in his personal life ...
Isn't that great ... you want a marathon ... well isn't that nice ... did you ever stop to think that the marathon sessions are exactly what got you all in this situation ... I bet not ... it couldn't be your bad behavior and wild ranting ... you LoD'ers are perfectly well behaved right? NOT!
Your last paragraph is what puts you in this thread Mary Ann ... are you kidding me ... talk about the pot calling the kettle black ... How about the one you worship and bow down to ... Joe Pilchesky your honorless leader ... there is no bigger person violating that in which you accuse Mr. McGoff of ... Joe ... well if you don't agree ... he will banish you from the DD kingdom ... simply because you had the nerve to disagree ... you MAW just may be he biggest of all the DD Hypocrite's ... you want everyone to love you and you disguise your vile venom ... but you are just as bad if not worse than the rest ... get a life ... or if you think it's so damn easy ... hell run for office ... OH that's right you already tried that didn't you?
Quote | ReplyRE: Easy on Bob McGoff, after all........
The manner in which this man handled actions against his daughter are immaterial to how he is acting as councilman. He is arrogant and superior, and really believes he does not have to answer to us, the taxpayers. He believes this because Doherty told him so, I am sure. Be a good little man and just do what I tell you, try to cut out their free speech. It has been tried before but they believe they can do it this time because they are dividing up the time. I hope everyone goes to the meeting and speaks on the agenda, if enough people show up we could have another marathon session and Judy would not be too happy about it because she needs her rest. She always pushes to end meetings that are running too long.
As for McGoff, he reminds me so much of Gilhooley it is scary. No matter how bad we think Judy and Fannucci are, he is the one to watch out for, he is a stubborn man and you will never change his mind about anything or ever convince him that he is wrong. His speech about cooperation is good, the only problem is that if you do not agree with him, there is no cooperaton.
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
Quote | ReplyRE: Where does Fanucci live and play?
Hey drugs get a clue, we dont believe you either since you are a dobee why would we believe her? She was telling people that she pays a mortgage in the City, that doesnt necessarily mean she lives there lots of people pay mortgages in Scranton that dont live here, most of them live in New York or New Jersey, since there is no crime here!!!! BAHABAHABAHABAHAAAA
__________________ Poison!! Danger this administration could he hazardous to our pocketbooks!!!
I hate to admit it but the Skeletor guy makes some sense ... but do they apply this same rule to their very Own Lee Morgan? Lee lives in the Summit but owns a home in Scranton ... I seem to recall he wanted a seat on the Council when McTiernan resigned ... and don't tell me the don't know this at DD ... they know everything ... so tell me why would things be so different for Sherry (who by the way is dating someone from ClarksGreen doesn't mean she lives there) than for Mr. Morgan ... You people are nothing but a bunch of Hypocrites!
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
And how about the posts of one of my very favortie DD posters that's right it's Granma's baby boy also talking about the smoking ban ... Your starting to sound like your Mamma nobody ... you better get a grip. Remember ... Parinoia will destroy!
I just can't get away from the psychology of this ban. It's really about what a few people can force thousands to do.
In my always humble opinion, a politician would get a representative group of people together, find a way to institute a ban that would be effective and inclusive, probably phased in and, to increase its effect, other municipalities might have been involved.
A real politician would recognize the cultural change this ordinance requires. A real politician would find a way to make the ordinance palitable to both sides of the issue. So much for a real politician who has the people's interest as her driving force.
On the other hand, in my opinion, a political rapist needs to feel the power. A political rapist needs to look into the eyes of the people and see the effects of the control they are exerting. A political rapist needs to feel powerful. Rape is about power and control. Political rape is about the power and control over the electorate.
In my opinion, to create a political rapist, take a plain jane who was not very smart, not very pretty, never anything special. Pump her up with delusions of grandeur and pay a little attention to her. Convince her she knows what is right for the people. Get her into office. She'll take it from there. The power of the office, people, for once, paying attention to what she says, to what she wears, to what she wants, the control, the feelings of superiority, they will overwelm plain jane and plain jane will be yours.
If you want to drive plain a jane politician crazy, show emotion. It's like a romantic dinner, and a night of amore. You might make plain jane leave the room, due to the excitement. What might appear as remorse and upset is actually an overload of pleasure. Hell, plain jane might need a cigarette herself, at that point!
Until plain jane realizes, at least in her mind, she's superior to her creator. That's when the fun begins.
And you thought this ordinance was about smoking. Smoking has nothing to do with this legislation being rammed up the electorate's.....
Makes you wonder what the next installment of "Plain Jane, Political Rapist," will be?
Cell phones? Trans Fat? Big dogs? Couches on porches?
While the plain jane is making her waves and feeling important, the creator of this political bombshell is free to do as he or she pleases because his creation is drawing the media attention and electorate concern that should rightly be focused on his activities.
What's being covered up in your town?
__________________ Defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and elected!
Hey nobody I think you are trying to make yourself look more intelligent than you really are ... The "Psychology" of the ban ... your kidding right? It's about enforcing the law ... it's a new law ... however it's a law ... and everyday a few force the many to obey the laws ... so where are you going with this statement? I know that I follow the Laws of Man everyday ... don't you ... hell you once wanted to be someone who forced people to follow these laws ... but then Gary DiBileo lost the election and there went your dreams up in smoke ... pardon the pun!
OK ... here we go ... Cell phones are about to be banned while driving ... not a bad idea and personally I think they should be banned in restaurants ... how annoying is it when you are having dinner and the person at the next table is taking a call ... and I do believe that they should be banned at CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ... and if you do not turn them off during a meeting ...well I guess a fine should be imposed ... Do you think $100 would get the people to turn the damn things off.
Trans Fats ... well you people are always saying we should be like the big cities ... in New York City ... I saw it on the "Nation News" they have banned the uses of Trans Fats for cooking in Fast Food and other Restaurants ... I would love it if we did that here ... would make me feel like a New Yorker!
As far as 's on porches ... well I guess Granma and Nobody like that look ... but doesn't the blight ordinance cover that ... I'm not sure but I think that these have already been banned ... but you do amuse me ... I guess if it didn't concern Hollow Avenue and the tree removal you people didn't care?
And again the DD'ers are proving just how paranoid they really are ... because do we all truly believe that Sherry and Chris Doherty conspired with some high school children to come up with this to cover up anything ... again ... Paranoia ... come on ... grow up ... could it be that a bunch of high school kids did a project ... the project went so well that their teacher decided to take them to a council meeting to present an idea ... the presented it ... the city said ... weren't those kids great ... (I guess they never thought this would pass) ... the kids asked for an ordinance ... council said they would look at the issue and possibly support it ... WOW ... they did what they said they would do ... isn't that amazing ... and why because someone presented an idea in a respectful manner ... Do you think the LoD would get further if they showed an ounce of respect for anyone ... I do ... but ... hell it was all just a conspiracy ... you know how those damn kids are ... put them with the mayor and a council woman ... well then the whole damn town better watch out ... Get a life DD and LoD'ers ....
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!