Take this weeks poll and let us know who you think may be the most dangerous DD Poster ... I am curious to know how you feel!
-- Edited by Voice of Reason at 15:19, 2007-01-03
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
I had a feeling that is the way it would turn out ... so I am not surprised at all either! Although I hope more than 6 people take the poll
__________________
This is just one person's opinion -- mine! ~~PD where True Freedom of Speech Rings ... DD ... where freedom of speech only applies if you agree with King Joe Pilchesky ... I prefer true Freedom of Speech!
The key word in the poll question is 'dangerous'. Milo and Granma, for example, can be ignorant in terms of what they say and how they say it, but I'd never call either dangerous. I think Pilchesky is the closest this list comes to dangerous, although I suspect he revels in the very idea of being considered 'dangerous' in the first place.
What I think makes Pilchesky dangerous is the fact that he seems to have an almost cultleader-like ability to get his sheep to swallow his spew hook, line & sinker. You need only read his explanation as to why 'Free Speech' doesn't apply at DD (and the 'Amens' that are posted after it by the sheep) to see an example of that in action.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I went with "Other", with kind of the same reasoning that Agamemnon used. Namely, I don't consider any of them to be "dangerous" per se.
Joe is dangerous in that he's the one most likely to have a stroke on his way to court and run over a pedestrian.
Milo's just an idiot. He's a danger to himself.
Antisystemicmovement's dangerous in that someday, he's going to find himself in a less than WASPy neighborhood, drop one of his many pearls of wisdom, and someone is likely to get caught with a riccochet.
Granma's dangerous in that if the educational system can fail her so miserably, it can surely fail someone else's kid. The functional literacy rate in the US is not quite 100%. I guess Granma's our exception.
I think each of them are dangerous in their own right and for different reasons - half the time when I read their posts, I laugh so hard I almost choke - I find a danger in that.
I feel anti is the most dangerous because not only does he follow the teachings of that asswipe Pilcheski, but he adds the race card to each and every post (whether he realizes it or not). He sees the world through Pilcheski's eyes and judges it with the mind of a Black Panther. Separate and apart, you've just got two guys pissing their agendas into the wind. But together? - that is a dangerous combination. Not everything is a ****ing conspiracy - not everyone is out to get you - race is not important - YOU are not that important. Do I associate anti's name with danger and do I think he is a threat? Absolutely, but not because he is Black or a Muslim or whatever he calls himself these days - it's because in my o-p-i-n-i-o-n, he's the psycho with the racial agenda and an asswipe for a mentor.
