I have relieved Joe Pilchesky from his administrative responsibilities and privileges. It is my belief that the Doherty Deceit website, which operated by Joe and another Administrator, will have a link to a mirror message board that may look like and function like this one.
I have disabled this message board temporarily because I am attempting to prevent any defamatory, libelous or vulgar statements to be exported from this site and imported onto the new message forum.
It is my intent to clean up some of the posts on this board, removing ethnic, cultural, personal and all defamatory statements and then re-activate it. It should be up and running by tomorrow early a.m.
I thank you for your patience and understanding. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at scrantonpoliticaltimes@gmail.com and rest assured that your anonymity, as always, is guaranteed.
__________________
Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty. - Thomas Jefferson
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Now Joanne ... you should go through the members and clean out those that have multiple user names with the same IP address ... there wouldn't be much left. Holy Crap ... the new DD ... Joanne is taking out the trash and new postings will be with rules ... hard to believe.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
You know we've been harping on Joe & DD for years, so it is somewhat gratifying to see him really get kicked where it hurts the most...namely his EGO MACHINE.
-- Edited by Agamemnon on Thursday 22nd of December 2011 06:31:40 AM
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I never attacked Joe personally. I only tried to hold him to true transparency and material fact. The attack on me under his PFA topic was unwarranted to say the least. Bottom line.......he never should have touched me in anger.
His attacks on MANY PEOPLE over the years have been unwarranted. It just so happens now that someone decided to fight back. Kudos to you Joanne for doing what bullies hate the most...YOU DARED TO FIGHT BACK.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Hit the road Joanne. In other words, you stole something else by changing all the admin passwords behind Joe's back. That's what the truth is, right? You're going to change what free speech has been here for years?
We like it just the way it is. We do not want you editing our words to what you want our posts to sound like. Joe's carried the water here for years, and not you. You are the one who tried sabatoging this board when you snuck off in the night a long time ago leaving Joe all alone to handle everything. We all know that.
Joe could have cut your posting privileges completely, but he didn't. This is how you show your appreciation for that, too, just like you showed your appreciation to him for him not arresting you for stealing his computer a few weeks back. You are a snake in the grass.
Really Whore, are you really that simple, or just that stupid?!...What is it exactly that Joanne stole? And please explain to me how she could steal something that is legally hers?!...819 Sunset legally belongs to one Joanne Ricci/Pilchesky. Remember your gutless, bald, hero has stated many times right here in this forum that legally he has nothing in his name which included that residence for fear of being sued. Furthermore, until any kind of divorce settlement is made binding and legal, with the current PFA against your bald, gutless hero, EVERYTHING in that residence is legally hers, so again, explain to me how Joanne "stole" anything?!...As for leaving poor little "baldylox" all alone to handle everything, that's a crock of sh!t and you know it! Baldylox had his little hussie already moved in to a house that belongs to his wife, that is just sick and vile and you or anyone else here who still blindly wants to follow this man{and I use that term very loosely!} should be freakin' institutionalized!!!...Scranton's saviour my a$$!...Do what you gotta do Joanne, you don't deserve any of the sh!t this idiot has put you through!!!...JimBu15...
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I didn't realize that I didn't know the real Joe until after we were married. My mistake and I'll end up paying for that. When we got involved in the politics it gave me a value. After about 2 years I should have divorced but fooled myself into a sense of being honorable by remaining loyal.
I never suspected that he was a sociopath. When I put dozens of puzzle pieces together I did leave. I'll admit it ..... I am afraid of what he is capable of.
With good reason Joanne ... if I were walking in your shoes I would be afraid. I remember standing right next to him at a political debate between Gary DiBileo and Chris Doherty and wanting so badly to tell him who I was ... but then there was fear in me so I kept who I was to myself. I know what he did to people involved in the North Scranton Little League ... I know the man he beat while drunk and sleeping ... he is evil personified. It is unfortuante that you had to find this out the hard way.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I didn't realize that I didn't know the real Joe until after we were married. My mistake and I'll end up paying for that. When we got involved in the politics it gave me a value. After about 2 years I should have divorced but fooled myself into a sense of being honorable by remaining loyal.
I never suspected that he was a sociopath. When I put dozens of puzzle pieces together I did leave. I'll admit it ..... I am afraid of what he is capable of.
l
He is just a bad person, his lies, his " causes" wich are for.all the wrong reasons such as sex and money, just ask dr.kavorkian. she gave him 5,000 and sleeps w/him (that's pretty desperate and pathetic) says slot about her character. Joanne I know exactly where you are coming from, I've been in an extremely similar situation. God bless, keep your head up. Your a good person, just got tangled up w/ an extremely bad person.
I have a lot of faith that karma will catch up w/ that woman abuser Joe pilchelski. Just look at the way he treated corbett, and look how he beat that drunk man with a tire iron. He is a coward, a pig, scum of scum, a wanna be lawyer, grimmy manipulative pos. Bad things happen to.bad people
About time they figured that one out, as we have been saying this for a very, very long time!
hollywoodishname (Member)
2011-12-23 17:25:54
RE: IMPORTANT NOTICE! PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY
Lawman wrote:
Joanne Pilchesky wrote:
I'm not sure how anyone is going to react to remaining a member on this site.
What members? I can assure you that 95% of them will follow Mr. Pilchesky wherever he goes. Well over half of us have already contacted one another. Who do you believe would be loyal to you for what you've done to him over the last month and now to all of us?
I can assure you 50 percent of the posters were joes fake aliases. What a creep, that has to be some sort of mental illness for a 62 year old male, (cuz I don't consider Joe pilchesky a man, he uses women) to make fake posters up and praise himself.
:dunno:
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
Joanne I still wish you would go through and delete all of the user names that share Joe's IP address. I am curious to how that will bring down the membership.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
I'll figure it out and manage that issue. But suppose you let a visiting friend use your computer to post on the site? Then your IP is the same as your friend's (at that moment in time).
When and if I discover that he is one and the same with other user names, then one of the accounts will be deleted.
Well you can start with the list that we have up here ... they are definitley him ... but thank you for the consideration.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
Even though you stupidly stayed with that lame-ass for as long as you did, I can not imagine that you are a stupid person. Just agree with us about the usernames. You can not possibly think he's only using just the one. And you can not actually want to protect his treacherous ass. He manipulated the sheep at your board since it's inception and he manipulated you too (for HOW many years?) -- and just for $hit's and giggles -- let's just say he is manipulating dr. candypants as well.
The names joanne -- the names -- at least agree with the total we have of over seventy. Over SEVENTY for Pete's sake.
Even though you stupidly stayed with that lame-ass for as long as you did, I can not imagine that you are a stupid person. Just agree with us about the usernames. You can not possibly think he's only using just the one. And you can not actually want to protect his treacherous ass. He manipulated the sheep at your board since it's inception and he manipulated you too (for HOW many years?) -- and just for $hit's and giggles -- let's just say he is manipulating dr. candypants as well.
The names joanne -- the names -- at least agree with the total we have of over seventy. Over SEVENTY for Pete's sake.
I don't think he's using only one, and I don't want to protect him at all. What I don't want to do is cross the line so other people will feel that, if push comes to shove, I would expose them, too, regardless of how many usernames they might have. I really believe the message board is a valuable tool and I'd like to recapture and rebuild the integrity of its purpose.
Multiple user names are common on any message forum, the distinction comes with registering using the same email each time. Even when you enter an online sweepstakes, and it says one entry per customer, you can use a second, third, fourth, etc. email to enter.
As long as members, regardless of which username they choose to use, post valid information and exchange ideas in a respectful and educational way, I don't see mulitple names as a problem. It's only a problem when a member disseminates rumor and defamation and then uses another name to support it.
Probably the best way to protect the rest of the apples in the barrel, since one bad one spoiled, is to watch the information flow. If a member puts up statements he/she claims are facts, they would have a day to prove it. Otherwise it would come down. If they did it a second time, they would be banned.
Is that so inequitable for the majority that you don't concur?
But we're digressing here. I agree that there are dozens.
Gatelli/Charles/DeLeo/Doherty/Ginny meet at DeLeo's to hoodwink Tom Charles In the wind, brother of city cop Tim Charles, Tom Charles,Bulls Head resident, is in line to replace Fanucci. Not sure, but I believe he runs a gas station up in the Hill Section where the county fills up all day. Throws parties for the cronies and isn't bashful to donate.
Feel free to jump in.Good rep as family man and business man, but word on the street is heavy crony.
There's a difference between being screwed over by someone with some intelligence and someone as stupid, illiterate and ignorant as Fanucci. It might feel as bad in the end but at least it's not an insult at the front end. Anything is better than Fanucci. Anything!
As soon as the publicfinds out that Charles is a Doherty blowjob hump, everything will fall into place like ithas for other candidates poisoned by any association to Doherty. It won't help that he's a county crony, either.
Tom Charles could walk in Pilchesky's Lion Den with Pope and it'll get him nowhere. Piccolino and his sister Maria tried that in the last council run thinking they could play the electonic community out here and pull it over on as many voters as possible. Within aweekPiccolino and Maria were the laughing stock of anyone with a computer.
Tom, it ain't happening. Don't embarrass yourself. You're aDoherty hump through and through. The onlything needed to know about Jackie Evans is that he was at Stirna's showing his support. No futher words necessary. It's all bad for Charles if he thinks he's going bullsh!t anyone.
DeLeo thought about it last time and chickened out. That's how Popil got sucked into it. Jack is a little wierd looking with the handlebar muzzie and the ragtop. That "clean the fist" comment means what?
Tom Charles, another dem boy toy lined up to take a public beating so that for the next 20 years he's the laughing stock of the gas pumpers.
JP, if you knew Tom like I know Tom.....................
I'll wait until he announces. If he does. There is a side of him that's cautious, but there is definitely a side to him that makes him an easy victim to a persuasive voice. Like that of Mayor Doherty.
The borough solicitor is none other than spineless Brian Yeager.He fits right into the Lindner/Petroski/Beavers majority thinking of letting Yerke do what he pleases as long as everyone gets plowed in the winter. Brian is a sad excuse for a solicitor. He won't stand behind the right side. Never did and never will.
C'mon Scotty, the Inter"net" is big enough to catch them all grabbing a handful. Speaking of "handfuls", Tom likes to grab a handful now and then. Of course, he's handy to have around when it comes time to get something moved too. Good tipper to boot.
I don't know where Sam is. I don't even know if he's still in Scranton. I never caught Joe with Janet in that way. I did however, catch Joe with Stephanie Tarapchak.
" I did however, catch Joe with Stephanie Tarapchak. "
That statement. coming from a woman scorned makes me want to apolologize for being catty. Seeing your cheating husband with another woman is something no woman should ever experience.
Aside from all the dd crap, I hope you rake the cheating bastard over the coals.