Wow if Edith keeps this up I may have to stop calling her Edith. She may actually be turning over a new leaf and seeing the washing the vet and standing by her man really wasn't worth it!
DOWN goes the hammer on racial comments. It is still possible to extend an apology (late but better than never) to Stacy Brown for the racial slurs and to Jeremy Burton for the personal slurs in the past.
There's one in every movement, someone sneaking around trying to take all the credit for the sacrifices and sufferings of others. Any man who would take a small child to an adult protest on a freezing cold day to hold a sign on a corner is a child abuser to begin with.What kind of a dirtbag does that to a child?
If you recall, Joe himself suggested that protestors bring their children. Could you then include Joe in that 'dirtbag' group?
Why couldn't the child's father have held the sign himself?
I'm sure you're aware that participating could put any number of people at risk of retaliation. Maybe that's why.
What kind of a father leaves the child alone for other protestors to babysit.
Let's not go there. There are mothers who have done worse.
I hope this Levine guy is in some kind of therapy. If not he needs to be. CYS should investigate this creep.
And you are an authority.....how???
Levine? Jewish? Do none of the work and take all of the credit and suck out of others everything possible at no cost to you.
Don't ever make such a racial or ethnic statement again on this board. Ever.
What's "not acceptable" is your above comment. This is your last warning. Get back on point, get back to doing research and work on this subject, or leave.
I just know deep in my heart ... that Joe is the one who talked her right into taking that money ... No more Edith ... Joanne it is ....
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
One month of this, after how many years of participating and encouraging the exact behavior she's speaking out against (ONE time) does not mean anyone's turned over a new leaf. She may have, but I'd like to see this become the rule rather than the exception before declaring her undeserving of contempt.
I see what your saying Paul ... but I do think he is the one who more likely than not pushed her into taking that money ... it's just a feeling ... it does not make it right and it does not excuse her as she should have known better! But I will call her Joanne ... although and Edith here and there may slip! After years of calling her Edith ... it will take some getting used to.
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
LusOnlyVoice wrote:I do think he is the one who more likely than not pushed her into taking that money
The person pulling the trigger is just as guilty as the one who ordered the hit.
Show all the sympathy you'd like, it's your prerogative. Ain't getting any from me at this point in time. If the shoe were on the other foot, I'm sure none would be offered from her, and none would be expected.
One month of this, after how many years of participating and encouraging the exact behavior she's speaking out against (ONE time) does not mean anyone's turned over a new leaf. She may have, but I'd like to see this become the rule rather than the exception before declaring her undeserving of contempt.
I also have to agree with Paul on this. One good deed after so many years of allowing JOey BOy Land to run amock and unchecked does not make a person a symbol for social justice.
For the very next day after EDith spanked Not acceptable, JOey BOY LanD was back to the usual mix of unfounded innuendo and unsubstantiated rumors as Gospel fact just as Glenn envisions JOey BOy LanD to be "the efficient spread of information that would not easily be procured otherwise".
__________________
You can tell it's good if you light it and a blue flame comes up; that means it's good moonshine and it won't make you go blind.
RE: (Kids 4 Kash, Lack. Cty) Fourth Protest set for Friday, December 16 at 11:30 am at Family Court
Joe Pilchesky wrote:
Your support is appreciated, but in the world of being free to say what you want, where you want to say it, when you want to say it and to whom you want to say it as often as you please, it was, after all, a lot HARDER on the guy who did the following:
* Awoke one morning and gathered with his wife and children for two hours of embracing and reinforcement of love and care, knowing the chances were good it was the last time they'd see one another;
* Appeared for duty at his station and was forthwith wisked off in a troop carrier to a harbor where he boarded a battleship destined for Iwo Jima;
* Went to sleep for the last time at 14:00 hours, after having his last supper;
* Penned a Will and goodbye letter to his wife, at age 20.
* Awoke for the last time at 04:00 hours and had his last breakfast and cup of coffee;
* Entered a nautical troop carrier at 06:00 hours with 75 comrads and listened as the amphibian's diesel motor roared them toward the shoreline;
* Listened bravely, grasping his rifle firmly, as the motor stopped and his commanding officer gave the order for the front hatch to drop into the freezing waters of the ocean and he then took the last five steps of his life as a series of 50 caliber bullets fired from a Japanese machine gun ripped through his chest killing him instantly.
Pay for that day's work: $18.00
He was one of many, many thousands of men who unselfishly painted the shores of Iwo Jima in arterial red so that we, the free people of the United States, six generations later, can somehow muster up the incredible balls and courage to hold up a sign for two hours at a protest at the great risk of being recognized, perhaps even being named in a courtroom as a dreaded PROTESTOR and participant on Dohertydeceit.com.
Yes, we are free peope, but you'd never know it by witnessing how few people appear in protest to support the exposure of the daily attacks upon disadvantaged adults and children alike in Family Court by backstabbing lawyers and incorrigible and corrupt lowlife judges, such as Judge Moyle and Judge Harhut, adding a team of bottom-feeding vultures we know to be Danielle Ross, Ann Marie Termini and Anthony LiBassi, among others.
Are we really free? I think not. We are captured by a socialistic attitude imposed by our own government to keep us fat and entertained, unmotivated to fight for what is right, while the government itself picks us clean of our inherited resources, our pride and at one time, something known as our dignity. We are hardly recognizable in other parts of the world as Americans. Other countries now laugh at us for our fat wastelines and lethargic backbones.
We are, indeed, prisoners of our capitalistic-thinking ambition, paid in slaughtered flesh and blood long forgotten, which evil-intended ambition went about the business of creating new Americans fat in the belly, soft in the backbone and deep in the pocket so that it will be nearly impossible to care about what goes on next door where a family is shattered by an experience in Family Court at the hands of a judicial conspiracy more practiced in greed than the Mafia and Catholic Church.
The new Americans are willingly deaf and blind to the horrors being imposed upon the victims of Family Court. The new Americans cannot be bothered with fighting for their neighbor, after all, it might miss The Price is Right in the morning and The Greatest Loser at night, perhaps even Survivor.
Worst above all, heaven forbid, the new American might lose a few hours pay, perhaps even a full day's pay, if he/she shows up at a protest for two hours in support of telling a thieving judiciary that we know what you do, and shame on you. Shame on you Judge Munley for doing nothing as an evil stalker of innocent and defenseless children, Danielle Ross, continues to author grossly prejudiced recommendations that serve her master's wishes and not that of the best interests of the children. And all suring this time, she's the target of a federal investigation?
Fvck Tom Munley and every unethical and immoral fiber in his body. At $175,000.00 a year, and the perks fit for a King, you'd think this man would rise to the occasion and replace Ross in every case where she still imposes the will of evil to the benefit of litigants who paid her like a $20 whore to do so.
Dear Leann, please, stay at work. The soldier who gave up the chance at making another $18.00 the next if only he ducked and cowered when the gate was lowered is who appears at the protest in his spirit. Some of us can still feel it, although we cannot share what it felt like for him to feel those bullets shred his body, and that is the spirit that is honored when these signs take their place on that corner.
You sit on your fat ass and make sure you make every penny you can to pay for your 850 channels of remote control.
in the world of being free to say what you want, where you want to say it, when you want to say it and to whom you want to say it as often as you please, it was, after all, a lot HARDER on the guy who did the following:
.............I want and need to thank "the guy" who did the following:
-Gave me hope when I felt hopeless
-Gave me strenght when I had none
-Held me up and gave me support when I felt weak
-Listened to me when all other ears went deaf
-encouraged me when I needed it the most
-helped me to learn how to empower myself by patiently spending hours educating me about the legal system
Thank you from the bottom of my heart Joseph Pilchesky. Without you in my life I would have never been able to even set foot again in Lackawanna County out of both fear and grief.
I proudly look forward to standing next to you and the other brave people that you have also helped to have the courage to stand up for themselves, what is right, and to hold those who are wrong, accountable.
Thank you for giving me back my "RIGHT OF LIFE, LOVE AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS."
I LOVE YOU
**************
Well just think, if the relationship with Joe doesn't work out, maybe Dr T can trade up if you will...you know, to maybe an ex-con, reformed pedophile or crystal meth addict.
Seriously, is this women that deluded, so desparate for attention, so very "needy" that she looks to Joe Pilchesky as her savior? My God, somewhere there is a cult leader reading this going "damn, I missed my chance to nab a doctor".
Oh and Edith/Joanne (I'm still on the fence on that one)...time again to show so self-respect. You are still married to this turd, correct? I don't especially care about "who screws who", but it is very sad when someone, in a very public way, disrespects someone else they supposedly cared about.
__________________
Free Speech does't require a multi-paragrah disclaimer Mr. Pilchesky.
I can't even imagine that this Dr. is so in love with Joe Pilchesky ... what do these two women see in this guy?
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
he preys on their weaknesses, just like any bully, pedofile, mysoginist, psychopath, sociopath.
they've got no choice but to show their appreciation in the only way someone with such low self-respect knows.
until their eyes are opened to his tyrany, they'll just keep opening their hearts (and their legs).
I have never heard anyone state so clearly, just exactly how hurting women/children volunteer to go from the frying pan into the fire! Throw in a natural born care taker who comes into contact with a bully, pedophile, misogynist, psychopath, sociopath, who is claiming to be helping the hurting, but is also one of the needing/lacking... BINGO! You have the makings of women/children who are being trained to have no self-respect as a matter of being nice and/or good. If they complain or ask questions, they are greedy/stupid/crazy. Call some *itch/slut? You have taught the women/children they deserve this treatment. I am not for or against either J.P.. I just wanted to see if the view from across the hall looked any different. Respectfully, MaMa Bear
Welcome MaMaBear .... I don't know if the view is what you are looking for if you are coming from across the hall ... respectfully Lus
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
No it was not because the kids for cash thread was loaded up with stuff that was very personal towards 2 particular people ... naming names ... of parents involved in a custody battle and so Girl would be right that would be an emphatic "NO" ... sorry but it violated everything that we stand for and we even ended up banning somone because of it ... and we generally do not do that here on this site ... but feel free to start one if you wish ... but please do not name the names of children and parents .... and make sure that everything is factual. Thank you!
__________________
I want everyone to stop and think about one thing ... Joe Pilchesky is not a lawyer ... he's just a guy playing a lawyer on the internet. Please don't trust your legal needs to this man.
No it was not because the kids for cash thread was loaded up with stuff that was very personal towards 2 particular people ... naming names ... of parents involved in a custody battle and so Girl would be right that would be an emphatic "NO" ... sorry but it violated everything that we stand for and we even ended up banning somone because of it ... and we generally do not do that here on this site ... but feel free to start one if you wish ... but please do not name the names of children and parents .... and make sure that everything is factual. Thank you!
I appreciate that offer, and I would never name names, (well... I guess I did bring up the condition of someone's children... and I'm sure I should not have done that... across the hall...)
I don't know if I am up to starting my own thing and I would have to get an OK from too many innocent people to tell the story. It's a good one but we all have children on both sides of the issue and I'm reluctant to hurt anyone's loved ones. I am fond of some of them, no matter which side of the table they sit on. It's hard to speak ill of those that one may have cared for like family at one time? Wish the players were as ethical... not having a soul gives one a distinct advantage in the "How far will one go to win" category? Pfft! :(
Thanks for letting me "Vent"... :)
BTW: "Edith" was a nice lady... replacing her with a female "Archie"?... Not a good plot line for a successful series... not even funny... in my opinion?
Mama Bear, I don't want to make you uncomfortable in participating on the other forum. Before Joe was legally ordered back on as admin, I thought there was good purpose for the site. Notice that once he got back on board (no pun intended) the insults, defamation, intimidation, threats and extortion erupted again. Notice it's all by him, and several 'new' members, not the regular posters. As he is delusional in thinking that he is the children's savior in family court, he continues to hurt other children, such as Judge Moyle's; and even his very own paramour's.
The kids for cash thread was littered with insults, lies and vulgarities that came from members that Joe created. About 10% of it was real. I took it down.
I just am trying to hold him accountable. People, like you, actually believe the things he posts up there either under his own name, or under his created names.
Hey that grand parent case had everything wrong with it! I've seen crazy custody situations and Outlaw was pretty good at making sense out of making a family cent-less! Besides copy your e-mail to me, you did what to help mothers and families? I'm confused but I'm no Geek... Are you and Joe putting the site back up or what? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Didn't you tell me that there for the grace of God we all could end up being Dr. T.? The family court system is bad for families and children! I was going to send you a message again while you were on line... Ka Fluey! Again! P.F.A.s cause family stress and endanger everyone anymore, IMO?
Some of the cartoons may have been funny, but they were degrading and humiliating?
Another Happy Holiday Weekend in the Happy Hours Valley of Pa.?
I have no clue what that link is never mind if it is a duplicate. sorry :(
I turns out that It's a recording of Dr.T, Joe, and a few other people, who were made half crazy and all but bankrupt by family court. One is a guy from another state. He said his kids were doing good and he and his wife were sharing custody and the same nanny, until the courts got involved are really messed them up. This is not word for word, but the jist is that as good parents, they went to court to dot the I's and cross the T's and their kids got so messed up that he's going public to warn other parents, something like that?
A 17 year old was not allowed to speak to the judge for way too long about how her gal was NOT representing her best interests? You might not like JP or Dr. T, but the stories are really that way far out there? Did anyone listen to the recording?
I don't like to look at the guy and I really don't like what the man puts out there for me to read. The last thing I am going to do is actually listen to the man's voice ranting and raving about bull$hit that has nothing to do with me.
Same goes for Dr. Candypants. She may have had a valid gripe, but since she's hooked up with that nightmare, she's got nothing to say that I want to hear.
I don't like to look at the guy and I really don't like what the man puts out there for me to read. The last thing I am going to do is actually listen to the man's voice ranting and raving about bull$hit that has nothing to do with me.
Same goes for Dr. Candypants. She may have had a valid gripe, but since she's hooked up with that nightmare, she's got nothing to say that I want to hear.
So, that would be a "no".
It was the other callers... really sad that there is no way to come up with excuses that explain away what court really does to children? Once a case is under a domestics, family court, etc. judge, the child loses the right to have a criminal charge filed. Scared mommies run to family judges, and even the judges who want to help them CAN'T, because of BAD administrative authority law, kinda' sorta'... imo. Can you edit my spelling and grammar please? I'm tired after more than fifteen years of trying to keep children sane and safe, after being "helped" by those fakers. Judges ought not jail children for almost nothing? I'll bet my bottom $ that Dr. T. was at one time a clean and sober mom, until the system pushed her over the edge, which it seems to do on purpose? Neither T. ought to be needing or asking for child support, any more the the wealthy deserve to cash in on poor moms. In my childhood days, grandparents who could, helped the moms provide for and protect the children, even if they hated the mom! Joanne doesn't belong in jail either, and Joe, he might be a *rick, but he opened the door for other moms to get noticed! A lot of them can't tell their stories now. Do you really want to hear about some "truths"? I will post them.
PS. The stupidity of buying a chopper is proof that someone is in big trouble and more than likely doesn't even know it? Corvettes are for young men cruising the "Audubon(?)", not old dudes who should be keeping in shape with a bike and saving gas by riding a Mo-Ped(?) Lol
No, Joe didn't open the door for other moms to get noticed, because where are they? How are they getting noticed? And, they certainly can tell their stories either by contacting the investigators on the grand jury case, or by posting on the site. I can identify over a dozen poster names that indicated that they were a mom who was in the system that were Joe.